PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C M Haskell

Publications and source records attributed to C M Haskell.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1989

Supportive care versus supportive care and combination chemotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Does chemotherapy make a difference?

Current chemotherapy treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer has demonstrated some objective responses, but is still largely palliative. This report reviews the results of a randomized trial in patients with advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer which compared treatment with supportive care (treatment with palliative radiation, psychosocial support, analgesics, nutritional support) to supportive care plus combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine. Although the patients receiving combination chemotherapy had a slightly longer median survival (20.43 weeks versus 13.57 weeks), it was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). In addition, the patients receiving chemotherapy experienced serious toxicity, and showed no significant benefit in terms of quality of life as measured by Karnofsky performance status score. The authors conclude that contemporary combination chemotherapy provides only modest survival benefit to patients with advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and should not be considered standard therapy. Future investigations of chemotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer should continue to utilize control arms which provide high-quality supportive care.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Estimating the quality of life in a clinical trial of patients with metastatic lung cancer using the Karnofsky performance status and the Functional Living Index--Cancer.

Serial assessments of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and of the Functional Living Index--Cancer (FLIC) have been used to estimate the quality of life (QOL) of patients in a prospective, randomized trial of supportive care versus supportive care given with combination chemotherapy to patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. There was a good correlation between KPS and FLIC scores at study entry, thus confirming results originally reported using the FLIC. However, a number of unexpected problems were encountered in data collection and quality control with this QOL assessment instrument. This made it impossible to look for differences in treatment effect on QOL in this clinical trial. It is believed that QOL assessment should be an integral part of cancer clinical trials; however, investigators must acknowledge the difficulties in collecting this type of data. The development of new instruments and the refinement of old ones will facilitate the collection of data for this important aspect of clinical trials research.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer stands as the most important malignant neoplasm in the United States because of its high prevalence, increasing incidence, high rate of mortality, and great potential for prevention through the control of cigarette smoking. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lung cancer identifies four major types: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma. These tumors are commonly divided into two groups based on differences in their biology and treatment: small cell (SCLC) and non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLC). This review analyzes NSCLC with a strong emphasis on the practical aspects of treatment. We give recommendations about smoking cessation and early diagnosis through screening of high-risk individuals. We review contemporary diagnostic and staging techniques in the context of the new international TNM system of staging. Subsequent discussions of treatment are based on this new staging system. We stress the pivotal role of surgery for the management of local disease, and in addition present the potential contributions of newer radiation therapy techniques. We examine chemotherapy in detail, including a review of the comparative activity of the available cytotoxic agents against NSCLC, the relative contribution of combination chemotherapy, and the role of surgical adjuvant treatment with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy. We advise that patients with NSCLC be treated under the aegis of modern clinical trials of new therapy whenever possible. When this is not possible, we recommend an individualized approach based on such factors as the patient's age, general state of health, cardiopulmonary status, psychosocial status, and personal system of values.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1986

Carcinoembryonic antigen in breast cancer. Clinical review.

Carcinoembryonic antigen is widely used as a tumor marker for gastrointestinal neoplasms. Its role in the management of other tumors is poorly defined. This review considers the place of carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in the management of breast cancer and concludes that sufficient data exist to support its use in clinical practice. Of the many potential uses, the major role for carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in breast cancer is in following patients with advanced disease, especially patients with bone metastases.

Bone Neoplasms↗
PubMed1978

Chemo-immunotherapy for unresectable bronchogenic carcinoma.

Seventy-nine patients with metastatic or unresectable bronchogenic carcinoma were treated with a regimen of combination chemotherapy which included methotrexate, Oncovin (vincristine), cyclophosphamide, and adriamycin (MOCA), and were randomized to receive no additional therapy, immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin, or immunotherapy with Corynebacterium parvum (C. parvum). The response rate and estimated median survival time were 68% and 42 weeks in small cell carcinoma and 18% and 29 weeks in other histologic types. Improved survival correlated with high performance status and response to therapy. Immunotherapy did not improve response, time to progression, or hematopoietic tolerance of chemotherapy. C. parvum was associated with significant morbidity and was poorly tolerated. MOCA appears to be of modest value in the treatment of bronchogenic carcinoma, particularly of the small cell type. A role for immunotherapy remains unproven.

BCG Vaccine↗
PubMed1977

Systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

The data reviewed in this conference suggest that initial therapeutic decisions for patients with metastic breast cancer be based on the presence or absence of an estrogen receptor in the tumor. Patients with estrogen receptor in their original primary breast cancer or in a subsequent metastitic lesion are candidates for hormonal manipulation, whereas patients lacking estrogen receptor in their tumor are treated for their metastic disease with nonhormonal chemotherapy. Nonhormonal therapy usually consists of a combination of cytotoxic drugs including cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Other programs of combination chemotherapy are under active study, especially programs that include nonspecific immune stimulation with Corynebacterium parvum or bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Inasmuch as patients with Stage II primary breast cancer frequently have "micrometastatic" disease, combination chemotherapy is also under study as an adjuvant to surgery. Preliminary results strongly support the use of such therapy.

BCG Vaccine↗
PubMed1975

Metastatic carcinoid presenting as a spinal tumor.

A case of carcinoid tumor metastatic to the thoracic spine with associated myelopathy is described. Multiple posterior explorations were singularly unsuccessful in locating and indentifying the metastasis, but an anterior transthoracic exposure allowed identification of the tumor, removal of the osteoblastic epidural mass, and fusion of the spine with a rib graft. The patient's myelopathy improved steadily following surgery without evidence of tumor recurrence or regression of neurologic status. The reasons for the relative absence of central nervous system carcinoid metastases are not known.

Carcinoid Tumor↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical use of tumor markers in oncology.

The perfect tumor marker would be one that was produced solely by a tumor and secreted in measurable amounts into body fluids, it should be present only in the presence of cancer, it should identify cancer before it has spread beyond a localized site (i.e., be useful in screening), its quantitative amount in bodily fluids should reflect the bulk of tumor, and the level of the marker should reflect responses to treatment and progressive disease. Unfortunately, no such marker currently exists, although a number of useful but imperfect markers are available. The predominant contemporary markers are discussed here by chemical class, as follows: glycoprotein markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), and prostate specific antigen (PSA); mucinous glycoproteins, including CA 15-3, CA 19-9, mucinous-like cancer antigen and associated antigens, and CA 125; enzymes, including prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), neuron specific enolase (NSE), lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), and placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP); hormones and related endocrine molecules, including calcitonin, thyroglobulin, and catecholamines; and, molecules of the immune system, including immunoglobulins and beta-2-microglobulin. The biologic properties of each group of tumor markers are discussed, along with our assessment of their role in clinical medicine today.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer stands as the most important malignant neoplasm in the United States because of its high prevalence, increasing incidence, high rate of mortality, and great potential for prevention through the control of cigarette smoking. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lung cancer identifies four major types: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma. These tumors are commonly divided into two groups based on differences in their biology and treatment: small cell (SCLC) and non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLC). This review analyzes NSCLC with a strong emphasis on the practical aspects of treatment. We give recommendations about smoking cessation and early diagnosis through screening of high-risk individuals. We review contemporary diagnostic and staging techniques in the context of the new international TNM system of staging. Subsequent discussions of treatment are based on this new staging system. We stress the pivotal role of surgery for the management of local disease, and in addition present the potential contributions of newer radiation therapy techniques. We examine chemotherapy in detail, including a review of the comparative activity of the available cytotoxic agents against NSCLC, the relative contribution of combination chemotherapy, and the role of surgical adjuvant treatment with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy. We advise that patients with NSCLC be treated under the aegis of modern clinical trials of new therapy whenever possible. When this is not possible, we recommend an individualized approach based on such factors as the patient's age, general state of health, cardiopulmonary status, psychosocial status, and personal system of values.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Metastasis of unknown origin.

Metastasis of unknown origin (MUO) constitutes between 5% and 10% of all noncutaneous cancers. An MUO is defined as a metastatic tumor for which the site of origin is not suggested by thorough history, physical examination, chest x-ray studies, routine blood and urine studies, and histologic evaluation. Two major groups of MUO can be defined: MUO to lymph nodes only (N1-3), and MUO to visceral sites. The prognosis may be quite good for patients with MUO limited to lymph nodes in the mid to high cervical, axillary, and groin areas. However, MUO in other lymph node areas is far more serious, with the possible exception of that in patients with a new syndrome, i.e., "advanced poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary origin." There is some suggestion that these patients may respond to cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Patients with MUO to visceral sites have a poor prognosis. However, metastases from some primary tumors are sensitive to chemotherapy and a limited search for these tumors should be undertaken. These tumors include leukemia-lymphoma, germ cell tumors, small cell carcinoma of the lung, adenocarcinomas of the breast, ovary, endometrium, thyroid, or prostate, and possibly adrenal carcinoma. We start by reviewing the biochemical events of metastasis that may be targets for therapy. The importance of a correct tissue diagnosis is then considered, including the role of standard histochemistry, electron microscopy, enzyme histochemistry, and immunohistochemistry. The relatively limited value of radiologic tests in localizing the primary site of origin of the tumor is emphasized, as well as the limited role of currently available biomarkers. We conclude by discussing the treatment of each of the subtypes of MUO.

Adenocarcinoma↗