PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C M Salome

Publications and source records attributed to C M Salome.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Airway re-narrowing following deep inspiration in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects.

After bronchoconstriction, deep inspiration (DI) causes dilatation followed by airway re-narrowing. Re-narrowing may be faster in asthmatic than nonasthmatic subjects. This study investigated the relationship between re-narrowing and the magnitude of both DI-induced dilatation and the volume-dependence of respiratory system resistance (Rrs) during tidal breathing. In 25 asthmatic and 18 nonasthmatic subjects the forced oscillation technique was used to measure Rrs at baseline and after methacholine challenge, during 1 min of tidal breathing, followed by DI to total lung capacity (TLC) and passive return to functional residual capacity (FRC). Dilatation was measured as the decrease in Rrs between end tidal inspiration and TLC, re-narrowing as Rrs at FRC immediately after DI, as per cent Rrs at end-tidal expiration, and volume dependent tidal fluctuation as the difference between mean Rrs at end-expiration and end-inspiration. Asthmatic subjects had greater re-narrowing, less dilatation, and greater tidal fluctuations both at baseline and after challenge. Re-narrowing correlated with baseline tidal fluctuation and inversely with dilatation. Both baseline tidal fluctuation and dilatation were significant independent predictors of re-narrowing. Following deep inspiration-induced dilatation, faster airway re-narrowing in asthmatic than nonasthmatic subjects is associated not only with reduced deep inspiration-induced dilatation but also with some property of the airways that is detectable prior to challenge as an increased volume dependence of resistance.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Sahaja yoga in the management of moderate to severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sahaja Yoga is a traditional system of meditation based on yogic principles which may be used for therapeutic purposes. A study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of this therapy as an adjunctive tool in the management of asthma in adult patients who remained symptomatic on moderate to high doses of inhaled steroids. METHODS: A parallel group, double blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted. Subjects were randomly allocated to Sahaja yoga and control intervention groups. Both the yoga and the control interventions required the subjects to attend a 2 hour session once a week for 4 months. Asthma related quality of life (AQLQ, range 0-4), Profile of Mood States (POMS), level of airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (AHR), and a diary card based combined asthma score (CAS, range 0-12) reflecting symptoms, bronchodilator usage, and peak expiratory flow rates were measured at the end of the treatment period and again 2 months later. RESULTS: Twenty one of 30 subjects randomised to the yoga intervention and 26 of 29 subjects randomised to the control group were available for assessment at the end of treatment. The improvement in AHR at the end of treatment was 1.5 doubling doses (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0 to 2.9, p=0.047) greater in the yoga intervention group than in the control group. Differences in AQLQ score (0.41, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.86) and CAS (0.9, 95% CI -0.9 to 2.7) were not significant (p>0.05). The AQLQ mood subscale did improve more in the yoga group than in the control group (difference 0.63, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.20), as did the summary POMS score (difference 18.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 36.5, p=0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups at the 2 month follow up assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This randomised controlled trial has shown that the practice of Sahaja yoga does have limited beneficial effects on some objective and subjective measures of the impact of asthma. Further work is required to understand the mechanism underlying the observed effects and to establish whether elements of this intervention may be clinically valuable in patients with severe asthma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Exhaled nitric oxide levels in atopic children: relation to specific allergic sensitisation, AHR, and respiratory symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), which has been proposed as a measure of airway inflammation, is increased in atopic subjects. This raises the question of whether eNO provides any additional information about airway inflammation in asthmatic subjects, other than as a marker for atopy. A study was undertaken to determine whether eNO levels in a population of atopic children are associated with sensitisation or natural exposure to specific allergens, and to examine the relationship between eNO, airway responsiveness, and current respiratory symptoms. METHODS: Exhaled NO and airway responsiveness to histamine were measured in winter and in summer in 235 children aged 8-14 years who had been classified as atopic by skin prick testing. Current respiratory symptoms, defined as wheeze or cough during the month preceding the test, were measured by a parent completed questionnaire. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) was defined as a dose response ratio (DRR) of >8.1 (% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1))/micromol + 3). RESULTS: Sensitisation to house dust mite was associated with raised eNO levels in winter while sensitisation to Cladosporium was associated with raised eNO levels in both winter and summer. Grass pollen sensitisation was not associated with raised eNO levels in either season. Exhaled NO correlated significantly with DRR histamine (r=0.43, p<0.001) independently of whether the children had current symptoms or not. In children with current wheeze, those with AHR had eNO levels 1.53 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.66) times higher than those without AHR (p=0.006). Neither DRR (p=1.0) nor eNO levels (p=0.92) differed significantly between children with or without persistent dry cough in the absence of wheeze. CONCLUSIONS: In atopic children, raised eNO levels are associated with sensitisation to perennial allergens, but not to seasonal allergens such as grass pollen. In this population, an increase in eNO is associated with AHR and current wheezing, suggesting that eNO is more than just a marker for atopy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Eosinophilia, interleukin-5, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in asthmatic children.

BACKGROUND: There are few paediatric studies of the interrelationships between inflammatory markers and asthma severity. We therefore assessed the relationships between eosinophil-associated markers, cytokines, and asthma severity in asthmatic children aged 8-12 years. METHODS: Forty-five children were tested twice, 2 weeks apart. Asthma severity was measured in terms of symptoms, lung function, medication needs, and histamine responsiveness. Peripheral inflammatory markers measured included eosinophil numbers, serum ECP, IL-5, and TNF-alpha and mononuclear cell IL-5, and TNF-alpha production. RESULTS: Histamine responsiveness was correlated with circulating eosinophils (r = 0.56, P = 0.0001) and serum ECP (r = 0.54, P = 0.003). Eosinophilia was increased in children with severe as opposed to mild airway hyperresponsiveness (P = 0.02) and those who lost days at school as opposed to those who did not (P = 0.01). There were no other associations between markers of asthma severity and inflammation. Children taking inhaled corticosteroids had lower serum IL-5 levels than those on beta-agonists +/- cromolyn (mean and 95% CI: 20.5 [11.7-35.7] pg/ml vs 64.3 [26.6-155.4] pg/ml; P = 0.04). Cellular IL-5 production correlated with serum TNF-alpha (r = 0.63, P = 0.0062) and IL-5 (r = -0.59, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Serum levels of TNF-alpha and IL-5 were not related to peripheral eosinophilia and asthma severity in these children but were related to their own cellular production ex vivo. This study confirms that eosinophilia is the index of inflammation that is most closely related to the clinical severity of childhood asthma.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed2001

Obesity is a risk for asthma and wheeze but not airway hyperresponsiveness.

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to assess whether the recent increases in prevalence of both asthma and obesity are linked and to determine if obesity is a risk factor for diagnosed asthma, symptoms, use of asthma medication, or airway hyperresponsiveness. METHODS: Data from 1971 white adults aged 17-73 years from three large epidemiological studies performed in NSW were pooled. Doctor diagnosis of asthma ever, history of wheeze, and medication use in the previous 12 months were obtained by questionnaire. Body mass index (BMI) in kg/m(2) was used as a measure of obesity. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) was defined as dose of <3.9 micromol histamine required to provoke a fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) of 20% or more (PD(20)FEV(1)). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were obtained by logistic regression. RESULTS: After adjusting for atopy, age, sex, smoking history, and family history, severe obesity was a significant risk factor for recent asthma (OR 2. 04, p=0.048), wheeze in the previous 12 months (OR 2.6, p=0.001), and medication use in the previous 12 months (OR 2.83, p=0.005), but not for AHR (OR 0.87, p=0.78). FEV(1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were significantly reduced in the group with severe obesity, but FEV(1)/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and mid forced expiratory flow (FEF(25-75)) were not different from the group with normal BMI. The underweight group (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)) had increased symptoms of shortness of breath, increased airway responsiveness, and reduced FEV(1), FVC, PEF, and FEF(25-75) with similar use of asthma medication as subjects in the normal weight range. CONCLUSIONS: Although subjects with severe obesity reported more wheeze and shortness of breath which may suggest a diagnosis of asthma, their levels of atopy, airway hyperresponsiveness, and airway obstruction did not support the suggestion of a higher prevalence of asthma in this group. The underweight group appears to have more significant respiratory problems with a higher prevalence of symptoms, reduced lung function, and increased airway responsiveness without an increase in medication usage. This group needs further investigation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids.

To determine predictors for failed reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in 50 subjects with well-controlled asthma (age 43.7 [18-69]; 22 males) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg ICS/d (100-3,600 microg/d), ICS were halved every 8 wk. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to a bronchial provocation test (BPT) with histamine was measured at baseline. AHR to BPT with mannitol, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and, in 31 subjects, sputum inflammatory cells were measured at baseline and at monthly intervals. Thirty-nine subjects suffered an asthma exacerbation. Seven subjects were successfully weaned off ICS. Using a Kaplan- Meier survival analysis, the significant predictors of a failure of ICS reduction were being hyperresponsive to both histamine and mannitol at baseline (p = 0.039), and being hyperresponsive to mannitol during the dose-reduction phase of the study (p = 0.02). Subjects older than 40 yr of age tended to be at greater risk of ICS reduction failure (p = 0.059). Response to mannitol and percentage sputum eosinophils were significantly greater before a failed ICS reduction than before the last successful ICS reduction, whereas there were no significant differences in symptoms, spirometry, or eNO. These findings suggest that documentation of patient's AHR or sputum eosinophils may be useful in guiding the reduction of ICS doses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Markers of airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with well-controlled asthma.

In steroid-naive asthmatics, airway hyperresponsiveness correlates with noninvasive markers of airway inflammation. Whether this is also true in steroid-treated asthmatics, is unknown. In 31 stable asthmatics (mean age 45.4 yrs, range 22-69; 17 females) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) per day (range 100-3,600 microg x day(-1)), airway responsiveness to the "direct" agent histamine and to the "indirect" agent mannitol, lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF)), exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and number of inflammatory cells in induced sputum as a percentage of total cell count were measured. Of the 31 subjects, 16 were hyperresponsive to mannitol and 11 to histamine. The dose-response ratio (DRR: % fall in FEV1/cumulative dose) to both challenge tests was correlated (r=0.59, p=0.0004). However, DRR for histamine and DRR for mannitol were not related to basic lung function, eNO, per cent sputum eosinophils and ICS dose. In addition, NO was not related to basic lung function and per cent sputum eosinophils. In clinically well-controlled asthmatics taking inhaled corticosteroids, there is no relationship between markers of airway inflammation (such as exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophils) and airway responsiveness to either direct (histamine) or indirect (mannitol) challenge. Airway hyperresponsiveness in clinically well-controlled asthmatics appears to be independent of eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The effect of insecticide aerosols on lung function, airway responsiveness and symptoms in asthmatic subjects.

The object of this study was to compare the effect of standard and "low irritant" insecticide aerosols on lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and symptoms in asthmatic subjects. A double blind randomized, crossover study was conducted in 25 asthmatic subjects who reported sensitivity to insecticide aerosols. All subjects were exposed for 30 min, on separate occasions, to two standard insecticide formulations (A and B), one low irritant formulation (C) and a negative control aerosol. Spirometric function and chest, nose and eye symptoms were recorded during, and for 90 min after, the exposure. AHR to methacholine was measured 90 min after the exposure. Compared to the negative control, the maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was slightly greater after standard insecticides (mean differences from control +/-95% confidence interval: aerosol A, 3.3+/-3.6%, p=0.08; aerosol B, 5.1+/-4.7%, p=0.04), AHR was significantly more severe (mean difference from control: aerosol A, 0.35+/-0.29 doubling doses, p=0.028; aerosol B, 0.52+/-0.43 doubling doses, p=0.028), and symptoms were more severe. The low irritant test aerosol (C) did not differ significantly from the negative control with respect to FEV1, AHR or symptoms. It is concluded that some insecticide aerosols trigger symptoms and falls in lung function in some people with asthma. Furthermore, these aerosols may also increase airway hyperresponsiveness, although the mechanism of this effect has not been determined. The low irritant formulation did not appear to have the same effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Optimal asthma control, starting with high doses of inhaled budesonide.

The aim of this study was to determine whether outcomes in poorly controlled asthma can be further improved with a starting dose of inhaled budesonide higher than that recommended in international guidelines. The study had a parallel-group design and included 61 subjects with poorly controlled asthma, randomized to receive 3,200 microg or 1,600 microg budesonide daily by Turbuhaler for 8 weeks (double-blind), then 1,600 microg x day(-1) for 8 weeks (single-blind), followed by 14 months of open-label budesonide dose down-titration using a novel algorithm, with a written asthma crisis plan based on electronic peak expiratory flow monitoring. The primary outcome variable for weeks 1-16 was change in airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and, for the open-label phase, mean daily budesonide dose. By week 16, there were large changes from baseline in all outcomes, with no significant differences between the 3,200- and 1,600-microg x day(-1) starting dose groups (AHR increased by 3.2 versus 3.0 doubling doses, p=0.7; morning peak flow increased by 134 versus 127 L x min(-1), p=0.8). Subjects starting with 3,200 microg x day(-1) were 3.8 times more likely to achieve AHR within the normal range, as defined by a provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PD20) of > or = 3.92 micromol by week 16 (p=0.03) [corrected]. During dose titration, there was no significant difference in mean budesonide dose (1,327 versus 1,325 microg x day(-1), p>0.3). Optimal asthma control was achieved in the majority of subjects (at completion/withdrawal: median symptoms 0.0 days x week(-1), beta2-agonist use 0.2 occasions x day(-1), and PD20 2.4 micromol). In subjects with poorly controlled asthma, a starting dose of 1,600 microg x day(-1) budesonide was sufficient to lead to optimal control in most subjects. The high degree of control achieved, compared with previous studies, warrants further investigation.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

Perception of bronchodilation in subjects with asthma and smokers with airflow limitation.

Perception of the efficacy of bronchodilators in relieving airflow obstruction is a likely determinant of compliance with treatment in patients prescribed these drugs on an 'as needed' basis. This study aimed to determine whether bronchodilator-induced improvements in lung function are associated with improvements in breathing difficulty in subjects with asthma or smokers with airflow limitation. Twenty smokers with airflow limitation and 16 subjects with previously physician-diagnosed asthma received salbutamol (200 micrograms) and ipratropium bromide (80 micrograms). Spirometry and lung volumes were measured before and 40 min after bronchodilator. Subjects recorded changes in 'difficult breathing' on a visual analogue scale (VAS). After bronchodilator, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) increased by 23.0 +/- 6.4% of baseline (mean +/- 95% CI) in smokers, and by 25.2 +/- 8.5% in the asthmatics, while VAS improved by 31 +/- 23% in smokers and 45 +/- 25% in asthmatics. However, these changes were not significantly correlated in either smokers (r = -0.04) or asthmatics (r = 0.15). In the asthmatic subjects, good perceivers (> 25% improvement in VAS) had greater improvements in lung volumes, as percentage predicted, than did poor perceivers. In the smokers, changes in lung function did not differ significantly between good and poor perceivers. Improvement in FEV1, as percentage predicted, was significantly correlated with improvement in VAS in good perceivers (asthma: r = 0.78, P < 0.01; smokers: r = 0.68, P < 0.05), but not in poor perceivers. Asthmatic subjects had good perception of improvements in lung function. However, in smokers with airflow limitation there is little correlation between improvement in lung function and sensation of breathing difficulty. In these subjects symptoms appear to be an unreliable guide for 'as needed' use of bronchodilators.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Do subjects with asthma have greater perception of acute bronchoconstriction than smokers with airflow limitation?

OBJECTIVE: Smokers who develop chronic airflow limitation (CAL) do not usually present for medical attention until their lung disease is well advanced. In contrast, asthmatic subjects experience acute symptoms and present for care early in the course of their disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether subjects with asthma differ from smokers with CAL in their ability to perceive acute methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. METHODOLOGY: Thirteen subjects with diagnosed asthma and 10 current smokers with CAL, defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) < 75% predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity < 80%, with no previous diagnosis of asthma, were challenged with methacholine. Symptom severity was recorded on a Borg scale. Lung volumes were measured before challenge and after the FEV1 had fallen by 20%. RESULTS: After methacholine falls in FEV1 were similar in the asthmatic subjects and smokers. The regression lines relating change in FEV1 to symptom score were significantly steeper in asthmatic subjects than smokers (0.13 +/- 0.04, 0.03 +/- 0.04, respectively, P < 0.01). At 20% fall in FEV1 there were no significant differences between asthmatic subjects and smokers in the magnitude of change of lung volumes. CONCLUSIONS: In asthmatic subjects, symptoms are closely related to change in FEV1. In smokers with CAL, symptoms change little during bronchial challenge despite large changes in FEV1. The differences in perception between the two subject groups are not due to differences in acute hyperinflation during challenge. We propose that heavy smokers may adapt to poor lung function, or may have damaged sensory nerves as a result of prolonged cigarette smoking.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Exhaled nitric oxide measurements in a population sample of young adults.

In epidemiologic studies of asthma there is a group with recent wheeze, but with no airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), in whom it is unclear whether any significant airway abnormality exists. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) has been proposed as a measure of airway inflammation. We measured exhaled NO in a population sample of 306 young adults who also underwent bronchial challenge with histamine or a bronchodilator test. Subjects blew into a 3-L Tedlar bag against a 2-mm-diameter resistance to close the soft palate and exclude nasal air. The NO content of expired gas from a single breath was analyzed by chemiluminescent analyzer. Exhaled NO was log-normally distributed in the population sample and duplicate measurements were highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). Exhaled NO correlated significantly with airway responsiveness, measured as the dose-response ratio to histamine (r = 0.39, p < 0.001) and with peripheral blood eosinophils (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). Exhaled NO was significantly greater in asthmatic subjects (geometric mean, 22.2; 95% confidence intervals, 16.1 to 30. 7 ppb) than in normal subjects (7.8, 7.1 to 8.4, p < 0.001) or in subjects with wheeze but no AHR (8.8, 7.5 to 10.3, p < 0.001). We conclude that exhaled NO is log-normally distributed, is highly reproducible and discriminates well among subjects, suggesting that it is both a feasible and useful measurement for epidemiologic studies of asthma. The findings suggest that wheeze in the absence of AHR is unlikely to be associated with airway inflammation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Differences in airway closure between normal and asthmatic subjects measured with single-photon emission computed tomography and technegas.

The absence of a maximal dose-response plateau as well as gas trapping and increases in closing capacity (CC) suggest that increased airway closure is an important mechanical abnormality of asthmatic airways. We compared the extent and distribution of airway closure in 13 normal and in 23 asthmatic subjects. Airway closure (LVclosed) was measured with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and an inhaled Technegas bolus as the percentage of lung volume without Technegas (LVtrans), and with CC, using nitrogen washout. LVclosed was compared in the apical, middle and lower zones, each being of equal vertical height. Values of mean LVclosed +/- 95% confidence interval (CI) were similar in normal (30 +/- 6.0% LVtrans) and asthmatic subjects (30 +/- 7.8% LVtrans). In normal subjects, LVclosed correlated with both age (r = 0.89, p < 0. 01) and CC (r = 0.86, p < 0.01), was more extensive in the lower zone (58 +/- 18.8% LVtrans, p < 0.01) than in the middle and upper zones (17 +/- 8.7% and 26 +/- 8.2 LVtrans, respectively), and increased with age in both the middle and lower zones (r = 0.94 and r = 0.90, respectively, p < 0.01). In asthmatic subjects, LVclosed did not correlate with age; was greatest in the lower zone, intermediate in the middle zone, and lowest in the apical zone (59 +/- 13.2%, 22 +/- 5.8%, and 12 +/- 4.4% LVtrans, respectively, p < 0. 01); and correlated weakly with age in the middle zone only (r = 0. 46, p < 0.05). We conclude that there is a predictable pattern of airway closure in normal subjects and that it is primarily influenced by pulmonary elastic recoil. This pattern is lost in asthmatic subjects. This may be explained by an increased range of closing pressures and a patchy distribution of airway closure, probably secondary to allergic inflammation.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Effect of dietary intake of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids on severity of asthma in children.

We assessed the clinical and biochemical effects in asthmatic children of fish oil supplementation and a diet that increases omega-3 and reduces omega-6 fatty acids. Thirty nine asthmatic children aged 8-12 yrs participated in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial for 6 months during which they received fish oil capsules plus canola oil and margarine (omega-3 group) or safflower oil capsules plus sunflower oil and margarine (omega-6 group). Plasma fatty acids, stimulated tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) production, circulating eosinophil numbers and lung function were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of dietary modification. Day and night symptoms, peak flow rates and medication use were recorded for 1 week prior to laboratory visits. Plasma phospholipid omega-3 fatty acids were significantly greater in the omega-3 group at 3 and 6 months compared to the omega-6 group (p<0.001). In the omega-3 group TNFalpha production fell significantly compared with baseline (p=0.026), but the magnitude of change between groups did not reach significance (p=0.075). There were no significant changes in clinical outcome measures. Dietary enrichment of omega-3 fatty acids over 6 months increased plasma levels of these fatty acids, reduced stimulated tumour necrosis factor alpha production, but had no effect on the clinical severity of asthma in these children.

Asthma↗
PubMed1998

Standardization of ambulatory peak flow monitoring: the importance of recent beta2-agonist inhalation.

Standardization of conditions for peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring is much more difficult in practice than for laboratory spirometry. Patients are usually asked to record PEF before medication. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of prior bronchodilator use on PEF outcome measures in a clinical trial. Electronic PEF records from 43 subjects with poorly controlled asthma were examined to determine the frequency with which beta2-agonist was inhaled <4 h before PEF measurement, as such PEF are potentially "postbronchodilator". The effect of inclusion of such PEF values on improvement in PEF outcome measures after 8 weeks of inhaled budesonide was calculated. Subjects were asked to record PEF before medication. During run-in, the median frequency of postbronchodilator PEF was 29%, falling to 0% after 8 weeks of budesonide. Inclusion of postbronchodilator PEF led to an overestimation of average morning, evening and daily PEF during run-in (p<0.001). Improvement in these indices with treatment was, therefore, underestimated. Minimum morning PEF expressed as per cent personal best was unaffected. Subjects may not be able to withhold beta2-agonist for 4 h before every peak flow reading. This may change as the level of asthma control changes, leading to a systematic bias in clinical trial end-points or inaccuracy in individual treatment decisions. Simple changes to peak expiratory flow instructions and analysis are proposed.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Pitfalls in processing home electronic spirometric data in asthma.

Electronic spirometers offer the prospect of paperless home monitoring, but data quality is not automatically better than from conventional monitoring. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the quality and processing of self-recorded spirometric data from patients with asthma complied with international guidelines for spirometry. Data were from 33 subjects with poorly controlled asthma who had completed the first 9 weeks of a clinical budesonide trial. MicroMedical DiaryCard electronic spirometers were used to record three spirometric manoeuvres in twice-daily sessions. Confounding events were recorded in a paper diary. Within-session reproducibility was calculated for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the first week of run-in and week 9 of budesonide treatment. Geometric means of within-session reproducibility (mean difference between highest and second-highest value from each session over a one-week period) for FEV1, FVC and PEF were 76 mL, 116 mL and 18 L x min(-1), respectively, during run-in. Times of spirometric sessions varied widely, with some overlap between morning and evening session times. Manoeuvre-induced falls in PEF and FEV1 occurred only as often as expected by chance. Nonasthma events including equipment faults and painful conditions caused changes in spirometric results. Home spirometric monitoring can be carried out with excellent reproducibility in patients with asthma. However, quality-control issues are complex and an accompanying paper diary remains essential.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

'Normal' lung function in rural Australian aborigines.

BACKGROUND: Although lung diseases are a leading cause of premature mortality in Australian Aborigines, little is known about normal lung function in these people. AIM: To develop models for 'normal' spirometric function in rural Australian Aborigines. METHOD: A cross-sectional population-based study of four rural Aboriginal communities was performed in Queensland, Northern Territory and South Australia, Australia. We studied 261 children aged seven-19 years and 332 adults aged 20-80 years who were free of symptoms and had no clinical signs of chronic lung disease. The outcome measures were forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). Multiple linear regression was used to develop models for FEV1 and FVC and comparisons were made with Caucasians and indigenous people from other countries. RESULTS: The Aboriginal people studied had FEV1 and FVC values that were lower (20% and 30% respectively) than those found in Caucasians of the same height, age and gender. As a consequence, they had relatively high FEV1/FVC ratios. Those studied also had forced expiratory volumes that were lower than those found in African Americans and other indigenous peoples. CONCLUSIONS: Apparently healthy rural Aboriginal people have low forced expiratory volumes when contrasted with Caucasians and indigenous peoples such as African Americans. More research is required to determine if this is 'normal' or a product of the suboptimal environment into which many Aboriginal people are born.

Adolescent↗