What is a neural network?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C M Shufflebarger.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Z statistic can be used to test whether the observed number of survivors in a specific trauma population is significantly different from what would be expected based on the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) norms. However, as with any statistic, inferences based on the Z statistic should be made with care. This is particularly true when a non-significant Z statistic is observed. The purpose of this paper, using data from a large, urban trauma registry, is to illustrate how the power of the Z statistic, or its ability to detect a difference between observed and expected survival, is influenced by the magnitude of the difference, the direction of the difference, the survival probability distribution of the study population, and the sample size. The implications for trauma research and quality assurance review are discussed.
It has been suggested that if triage criteria are to identify accurately patients with major trauma, not only physiologic status, but also anatomic site and injury mechanism must be assessed. This study examined the influence of physiologic, injury site, and injury mechanism criteria on the diagnosis of major trauma in 2,057 trauma patients. Because the Trauma Score was found to be a highly specific indicator of major trauma (98.7%), the strategy adopted for isolating the factors that minimize inappropriate triage was to determine which, alone or in combination, are the most effective in identifying patients with major trauma among those with high Trauma Scores (greater than 12). Based on this analysis, a set of triage guidelines was developed. The application of these guidelines to the study population indicated an undertriage rate of 4.1 to 6.3% and an overtriage rate of 16.8 to 21.3%, depending on the definition of major trauma.