PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C M Wilcox

Publications and source records attributed to C M Wilcox.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly used for postoperative evaluation of an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). Although a normal IOC is very suggestive of a disease-free common bile duct (CBD), abnormal studies are associated with high false-positive rates. This study aimed to identify a subset of patients with abnormal IOC who would benefit from a postoperative ERCP. METHODS: This prospective study investigated 51 patients with abnormal IOC at laparoscopic cholecystectomy who underwent postoperative ERCP at two tertiary referral centers over a 3-year period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of CBD stones at postoperative ERCP. RESULTS: For all 51 patients, ERCP was successful. The ERCP showed CBD stones in 33 cases (64.7%), and normal results in 18 cases (35.2%). On univariate analysis, abnormal liver function tests (p < 0.0001) as well as IOC findings of a large CBD stone (p = 0.03), multiple stones (p = 0.01), and a dilated CBD (p = 0.07) predicted the presence of retained stones at postoperative ERCP. However, on multivariable analysis, only abnormal liver function tests correlated with the presence of CBD stones (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with an abnormal IOC have a normal postoperative ERCP. Elevated liver function tests can help to identify patients who merit further evaluation by ERCP. The use of less invasive methods such as endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography should be considered for patients with normal liver function tests to minimize unnecessary ERCPs.

Adult↗

Prospective endoscopic evaluation for gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: determination of the best diagnostic approach.

The best endoscopic diagnostic strategy for gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is unknown. Over a 48-month period, all patients with unexplained diarrhea at risk for acute gastrointestinal GVHD were prospectively identified. Acute GVHD was defined as symptoms and histologic evidence of GVHD occurring within 100 days of transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Colonoscopy was performed with multiple biopsies of the ileum, right colon and rectosigmoid colon. Next, upper endoscopy with duodenal and random gastric biopsies of both antrum and body were performed. All biopsies were evaluated for GVHD by an experienced GI pathologist. Over the study period, 24 patients (mean age 37 years; 62.5% male) were evaluated. The median time from transplantation or DLI was 30.5 days. The biopsy site with the highest yield was the distal colon (82%). A combination of upper endoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy with ileal biopsies were equivalent ( approximately 94%). In patients with diarrhea at risk for GVHD, biopsies of the distal colon had the highest diagnostic yield suggesting the importance of sigmoidoscopy and biopsy. Colonoscopy and ileoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy plus upper endoscopy had the highest diagnostic yields.

Adolescent↗

Suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction type II: empirical biliary sphincterotomy or manometry-guided therapy?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Sphincter of Oddi manometry is considered to be the gold standard for diagnosing sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). Elevated basal sphincter pressures are found in about half of the patients with findings consistent with biliary type II SOD, and most of these patients will symptomatically improve after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Since manometric sphincter evaluation is not widely available, a decision analysis was used to compare the overall costs and outcomes of manometry-directed therapy with "empirical" sphincterotomy in patients with suspected biliary type II SOD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A decision analysis model was constructed using a software program. In a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients with suspected type II SOD, the following strategies were evaluated: a). endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry followed by biliary sphincterotomy only if an elevated sphincter of Oddi basal pressure was found; and b). "empirical" biliary sphincterotomy without manometry. Data on the probability of an elevated sphincter of Oddi basal pressure at the time of ERCP in patients with suspected biliary SOD type II, the proportion of patients who improved after biliary sphincterotomy (with and without elevated basal pressures), the proportion of patients who improved without biliary sphincterotomy, complications, and death were obtained from the literature and from our center. The procedural and hospitalization costs represented the average Medicare reimbursement at our institution. The expected overall costs and numbers of patients improving with each strategy were compared.[nl] RESULTS: The strategy of ERCP with manometry resulted in total costs of US dollars 2790 per patient, whereas a strategy of "empirical" biliary sphincterotomy resulted in total costs of US dollars 2244. In a cohort of 100 patients with suspected SOD, 55 % of patients would be expected to improve if manometry were performed, compared to 60 % of patients improving with "empirical" biliary sphincterotomy. Univariate sensitivity analyses demonstrated that "empirical" biliary sphincterotomy continued to be a cost-saving strategy in comparison with ERCP with manometry as long as the probability of spontaneous improvement in patients with "normal" manometry was less than 41 %, the probability of complications associated with manometry was greater than 6 %, and the probability of complications due to biliary sphincterotomy was less than 19 %. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with suspected biliary SOD type II, empirical biliary sphincterotomy performed by experienced endoscopists appears to be cost-saving in comparison with a strategy based on the results of manometry.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

Prevalence and significance of periduodenal venous collaterals in patients evaluated for pancreaticobiliary disorders by endosonography.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The prevalence of periduodenal venous collaterals detected by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in patients undergoing evaluation for pancreaticobiliary disorders, and their influence on the success of transduodenal fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of solid pancreatic masses is not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records for all consecutive patients who underwent EUS for pancreaticobiliary disorders over a 14-month period were reviewed. EUS was carried out by a single endosonographer using a radial echo endoscope. When FNA was attempted, a curvilinear-array echo endoscope was used in conjunction with color flow Doppler. Periduodenal and perigastric collaterals were defined as multiple anechoic serpiginous structures imaged from the duodenal bulb, the second portion of duodenum, or the stomach. Established criteria were used to assess the presence of chronic pancreatitis. RESULTS: Over the study period, 338 patients (mean age 58.9 +/- 14.5 years; 52 % women) underwent EUS for pancreaticobiliary disorders. Periduodenal collaterals were detected in 22 patients (6.5 %), 21 of whom (19 %) had pancreatic cancer. Patients with pancreatic cancer were significantly more likely to have periduodenal collaterals in comparison with those without pancreatic cancer (OR 25; 95 %CI, 5.75 - 109; P = 0.001). Computed tomography detected collaterals in only two of the 22 patients (9.1 %). Periduodenal collaterals made transduodenal FNA impossible in nine of the 22 patients (41 %). However, in these patients a cancer diagnosis was obtained using EUS-FNA from liver lesions in two cases; using a transgastric approach in two (pancreatic neck lesions); and atypical cells were obtained in two. A safe window could not be achieved in three patients (13.6 %). Transduodenal FNA was performed by avoiding the collaterals and was successful in 13 of the 22 patients, with no bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS: Periduodenal collateral vessels are infrequent in patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease, but are relatively common in patients with pancreatic cancer. Transduodenal EUS-FNA can be carried out safely in the majority of cases in the presence of periduodenal collaterals, but collaterals may occasionally hamper successful transduodenal pancreatic FNA.

Aged↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with obstructive jaundice: is it worth the cost?

BACKGROUND: There are few published data concerning the economic impact of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the setting of biliary obstruction. AIM: To perform decision analysis to determine the costs of prophylaxis in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for obstructive jaundice. METHODS: A decision analysis model was constructed. The probability of biliary sepsis, death and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications was obtained from the medical literature and from a retrospective analysis of our own experience. Costs were obtained from Medicare reimbursement at our institution. The strategies evaluated were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with and without single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. We compared the total costs, number of episodes of cholangitis and deaths associated with each strategy. RESULTS: Based on published data and the results of our retrospective analysis, the strategy of administering single-dose prophylactic antibiotics prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with obstructive jaundice resulted in lower total costs, fewer episodes of cholangitis and fewer deaths compared to a strategy of not administering antibiotics. The results were sensitive to the rates of cholangitis, cost of antibiotics and the cost of treating an episode of cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography results in fewer cases of cholangitis and is cost saving when compared to a strategy of no prophylaxis in patients with obstructive jaundice.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

Comparison of the efficacy of pantoprazole vs. nizatidine in the treatment of erosive oesophagitis: a randomized, active-controlled, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor approved for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole vs. nizatidine for the treatment of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and endoscopically documented erosive oesophagitis (grade > or = 2). METHODS: A multicentre, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study (221 patients) was performed to compare 20 and 40 mg pantoprazole daily with nizatidine 150 mg b.d. (maximum, 8 weeks). The primary end-point was endoscopic healing of erosive oesophagitis (grade 1 or 0). The secondary end-point was symptomatic improvement. RESULTS: Healing averaged 61%, 64% and 22% for pantoprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and nizatidine 150 mg, respectively, at 4 weeks, and 79%, 83% and 41% at 8 weeks (P < 0.05, differences between groups at both points). Starting on day 1 of symptom assessment, significantly fewer pantoprazole-treated patients reported night-time heartburn and regurgitation compared with nizatidine-treated patients. Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were completely eliminated in 68% and 65% of patients in the pantoprazole 20-mg and 40-mg groups and in 28% of patients in the nizatidine group at study completion. The difference between each pantoprazole group and the nizatidine group was significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole, at single daily doses of 20 mg and 40 mg for up to 8 weeks, provides more rapid relief of symptoms and superior healing of erosive oesophagitis than nizatidine 150 mg b.d., and is well tolerated.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

Acid peptic disease in the elderly.

GERD and peptic ulcer disease are important diseases in the elderly. GERD presents similarly in the elderly and the young, although elderly patients may have less severe symptoms yet more severe mucosal disease and a higher prevalence of BE. Although the prevalence of H. pylori is falling, the elderly remain at risk for peptic ulcer because of the widespread use of NSAIDS. The presentation of peptic ulcer disease in the elderly can be subtle and atypical when compared with younger patients, leading to a delay in diagnosis. Because of comorbidity in the aged, peptic ulcer disease and its complications result in increased morbidity and mortality rates.

Aged↗

Surveillance colonoscopy or chemoprevention with COX-2 inhibitors in average-risk post-polypectomy patients: a decision analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials are currently underway evaluating the efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in decreasing the incidence of adenomas and colorectal carcinoma in 'average' risk individuals. AIM: To use decision analysis to compare the cost-effectiveness of celecoxib to surveillance colonoscopy in 'average' risk patients who had undergone prior adenoma resection. METHODS: A model of the natural history of adenomas after endoscopic polypectomy was constructed using probabilities from the literature. Cost estimates were obtained from available Medicare reimbursement rates and supplemented by the literature. Three strategies were evaluated: (i) no surveillance; (ii) colonoscopic surveillance; and (iii) celecoxib chemoprevention. We compared total costs and performed cost-effectiveness analysis between these strategies. The outcome measures were years of life saved and 'high-grade' adenoma prevented. Sensitivity analyses were performed on selected variables. RESULTS: Our base-case analysis assumed a 50% risk reduction in the incidence of adenomas among patients using celecoxib. No surveillance was associated with a cost of $1014 per patient, and colonoscopic surveillance with a cost of $1572 per patient, whereas celecoxib use was associated with a total cost of $11,503. Ten years after the index colonoscopy, 15% of patients in the no surveillance strategy developed 'high-grade' lesions compared to 13% of patients in the colonoscopic surveillance group and 6% in the celecoxib group. There was a small gain in years of life saved (0.006) favouring celecoxib over colonoscopic surveillance. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of celecoxib vs. colonoscopy was $141 871 per 'high-grade' adenoma prevented and $1,715,199 per year of life saved. The most important variables in determining the cost-effectiveness of celecoxib were its cost and its efficacy. CONCLUSION: Chemoprevention with COX-2 inhibitors in 'average-risk' postpolypectomy patients is a more expensive strategy compared to colonoscopic surveillance.

Adenoma↗

Wire-assisted minor papilla precut papillotomy.

BACKGROUND: Deep cannulation of the dorsal duct in patients with pancreas divisum may not be possible, even for the experienced endoscopist. This is a description of a technique to facilitate access to the dorsal duct. METHODS: Patients undergoing dorsal ductography in whom endoscopic therapy was indicated and in whom a 4.5F tapered-tip catheter could not be passed into the dorsal duct over a guidewire were prospectively identified. After ductal opacification, either a 0.035- or 0.021-inch guidewire was passed into the dorsal duct; a needle-knife was then passed to the minor papilla alongside the guidewire, and with appropriate orientation, a precut papillotomy was made. RESULTS: Eleven patients undergoing dorsal ductography for recurrent pancreatitis (10 patients) or ductal leak (1 patient) were prospectively treated with the above technique. Secretin was used in 1 patient. In all patients, after precut papillotomy the diagnostic catheter was passed without difficulty into the dorsal duct allowing for guidewire exchange and/or stent placement. Extension of the papillotomy could then be performed with the needle-knife over a pancreatic stent. Complications included pancreatitis in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: This technique, which uses widely available accessories, facilitates access to the dorsal pancreatic duct for endoscopic therapy.

Adolescent↗

Survey of primary care physicians' approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition, little is known regarding physicians' approach to the diagnosis and management of GERD in elderly patients. METHODS: We surveyed by facsimile a random sample of 14,000 practicing primary care physicians throughout the United States. Physicians were questioned using a case-based format about the approach to a symptomatic patient with GERD including the use of empiric therapy, the role of diagnostic testing, and the drugs of choice to treat GERD. RESULTS: A total of 2241 surveys (16%) was returned and tabulated. Most respondents were either internists (37%) or family practice physicians (56%) in solo or group practice, and 74% had been in practice for 11 or more years. There were 1980 (90%) respondents who evaluated more than 6 patients per week with GERD. Empiric therapy was commonly recommended for the symptomatic patient, most often in a step-up approach beginning with H(2)-receptor blockers. Diagnostic testing, usually endoscopy, was recommended appropriately in patients with alarm symptoms. Proton-pump inhibitors were most often recommended for patients failing to respond to over-the-counter H(2)-receptor blockers and for those with endoscopic esophagitis; the use of cisapride in combination with H(2)-receptor blockers was also commonly recommended in these scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The management of symptomatic GERD in elderly patients appears similar to the management of GERD in other patients. Empiric therapy was frequently recommended in a step-up approach, and diagnostic testing was appropriate. Combination therapy with cisapride and an acid-reducing agent was commonly recommended.

Adult↗

Gastrointestinal infections in children.

Gastrointestinal infections in children are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Children living in developing countries are particularly susceptible to infectious diarrhea because of poor standards of hygiene and sanitation. Although the magnitude of diarrheal illnesses in developed countries is less, costly hospital admissions are still frequent. The causal agent of infectious diarrhea is most frequently related to age, geographical location, lifestyle habits, use of antibiotics, associated medical conditions, social circumstances, and degree of immune competence. In this article we present some of the most important articles published in the field during the last year. The role of Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of gastritis and peptic ulcer disease has been shown in adults and children. Information about the natural history of H. pylori, symptomatology, and diagnostic therapeutic approaches for children are being generated constantly; we discuss some of the most relevant information in this review.

Journal Article↗

Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.

OBJECTIVES: The role of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is controversial. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are modalities for bile duct visualization that could lower costs and prevent ERCP-related complications. We analyzed costs and examined the cost-effectiveness of these modalities to define their role in ABP. METHODS: A decision analysis model of ABP was constructed. The strategies evaluated were 1) ERCP, 2) MRCP followed by ERCP if positive for common bile duct stones (CBDS) or if biliary sepsis ensued, 3) EUS followed by ERCP if positive or if biliary sepsis ensued, and 4) observation with intraoperative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy with ERCP only if biliary sepsis ensued. We compared costs and performed cost-effectiveness analysis between strategies at probabilities of CBDS ranging from 0% to 100%. The outcome measures were total costs and costs per ABP death prevented. RESULTS: At probabilities of CBDS < 15%, observation with intraoperative cholangiography is the least expensive strategy, whereas EUS and ERCP are the least expensive strategies at probabilities of 15-58% and >58%, respectively. In terms of cost-effectiveness, at probabilities of CBDS of 7-45%, EUS is the most cost-effective alternative, and at a probability of >45% ERCP is the most cost-effective option. CONCLUSIONS: Total costs and cost-effectiveness ratios of these strategies in patients with ABP are highly dependent on the probability of CBDS.

Acute Disease↗

Congenital vascular lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: blue rubber bleb nevus and Klippel-Trenaunay syndromes.

We present two cases of hemangiomatosis of the gastrointestinal tract. The first case describes a 59-year-old patient with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to the blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome. The second case illustrates a 26-year-old patient with recurrent rectal bleeding due to Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. These two syndromes are distinct disorders characterized by cavernous hemangiomas of the skin, soft-tissue, bones, and viscera. In addition, we review the available literature on the epidemiology, transmission, clinical features, associated conditions, diagnosis, and treatment of these two disorders.

Adult↗

Diagnosis and treatment of esophagitis in AIDS.

At least 30% of patients with AIDS experience esophageal symptoms at some point during the course of HIV infection. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach to the evaluation and therapy of esophagitis in AIDS.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

What is heartburn worth? A cost-utility analysis of management strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best treatment strategy for the management of patients presenting with symptoms consistent with uncomplicated heartburn. METHODS: We performed a cost-utility analysis of 4 alternatives: empirical proton pump inhibitor, empirical histamine2-receptor antagonist, and diagnostic strategies consisting of either esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or an upper gastrointestinal series before treatment. The time horizon of the model was 1 year. The base case analysis assumed a cohort of otherwise healthy 45-year-old individuals in a primary care practice. MAIN RESULTS: Empirical treatment with a proton pump inhibitor was projected to provide the greatest quality-adjusted survival for the cohort. Empirical treatment with a histamine2 receptor antagonist was projected to be the least costly of the alternatives. The marginal cost-effectiveness of using a proton pump inhibitor over a histamine2-receptor antagonist was approximately $10,400 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in the base case analysis and was less than $50,000 per QALY as long as the utility for heartburn was less than 0.95. Both diagnostic strategies were dominated by proton pump inhibitor alternative. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical treatment seems to be the optimal initial management strategy for patients with heartburn, but the choice between a proton pump inhibitor or histamine2-receptor antagonist depends on the impact of heartburn on quality of life.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

Special histologic stains are rarely beneficial for the evaluation of HIV-related gastrointestinal infections.

During a 28-month period, endoscopic mucosal biopsy specimens from all HIV-infected patients were submitted for routine histologic evaluation. Immunoperoxidase staining for cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus antigens (esophagus), mycobacterial and fungal staining, and Gram staining of mucosal biopsy specimens were done. Special fungal and acid-fast stains were selectively performed in patients with absolute CD4 cell counts of less than 200 cells per microliter (200 x 10(6)/L) and/or with diarrhea and or wasting syndrome. Treatment was based on the endoscopic and histologic findings, and long-term follow-up was performed. The 121 symptomatic HIV-infected patients underwent 221 upper and/or lower endoscopies with 285 biopsy sites. The sensitivity and specificity of H&E staining for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus were 97% and 100%, respectively. The results of fungal and mycobacterial stains neither altered therapy nor identified previously undiagnosed infections in any patient. Long-term follow-up revealed no patient in whom an infection was missed on routine H&E, which affected outcome. Routine H&E staining is accurate for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients. Special histologic stains for fungal, mycobacterial, and viral infections did not increase the diagnostic yield or alter medical therapy but doubled the costs.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗