PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C M Woodford

Publications and source records attributed to C M Woodford.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Screening measurements and procedures. Exemplified by an identification audiometry program.

To summarize, an effective procedure in audiometric screening may be using skilled testers to screen 1, 2, and 4 kHz at 20 dBHL (with oto immittance measures) on all students up to and including grade 3, 9th and 12th year high school students, and high-risk groups including those repeating a grade, having a history of recurrent middle ear disease, having speech and/or language problems, known to participate in high noise activities, for example, guns, dirt bikes, or model planes, and those failing previous screenings. Testing is done in a quiet, nondistracting environment, with each person tested individually, although instructions may be given to small groups. Any person not responding to one or more of the stimuli is rescreened. All failing the rescreening at any frequency in either ear are referred to an audiologist. Progress is monitored to ensure that the student is seen by an audiologist and that any audiological recommendations are followed. Screening procedures such as oto immittance measures and audiometric screening are effective identification procedures used in combination by skilled persons. When follow-up procedures are adequate, the program can work effectively in ensuring help for those with auditory problems. In addition, such programs can prevent many of these problems. The general principles of screening discussed earlier are applicable to identification of a wide variety of conditions including disordered speech, language, and hearing. Application of these principles will result in realization of identification objectives which are both pragmatic and quantifiable.

Audiometry↗

The prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the school-aged population: a school educational hearing conservation program.

A questionnaire assessing knowledge of hearing and hearing loss, and planned hearing conservation practices, was collected from 71 high school students before and after an educational hearing conservation program (HCP) consisting of a film, a lecture and a handout. An average increase of 16.7% correct responses from pre- to postexposure to the HCP was found. Moreover, substantial percentages of respondents stated that they now plan to use hearing protection devices and procedures, when appropriate, and about 80% stated they found the HCP helpful to them.

Adolescent↗

The effect of calibration tolerance values on obtained audiometric threshold: a hearing conservation perspective.

Auditory threshold was assessed at six commonly used audiometric test frequencies and for frequencies just within calibration tolerances for frequencies above and below these. Results indicate that differences of up to 23 dB in obtained auditory threshold values result from variation in frequency within tolerances. These findings are discussed in terms of their importance in industrial hearing conservation.

Audiometry↗

Effects of combinations of sodium salicylate and noise on the auditory threshold.

Thirty-nine monaural chinchillas were used to study the interaction between sodium salicylate and various TTS-producing noise paradigms. Five animals were included in each of the following three groups: 1) sodium salicylate (400 mg/kg) plus 2-4 kHz, 95 dB SPL noise band for one hour; 2) sodium salicylate (400 mg/kg) plus 4 kHz CF octave band noise at 80 dB SPL for 96 hours; and 3) sodium salicylate (400 mg/kg) plus 50 impulses having 50 musec A-duration and 158 dB peak SPL, presented at one per minute. The remaining 24 animals served as various controls in groups exposed to sodium salicylate or the noise paradigm alone. Thresholds were estimated before, during, and after exposure using the AER technique and cochleagrams were mapped for each cochlea 30 days after exposure. When sodium salicylate was combined with the various noise conditions, the maximum TTS values obtained from the combination studies were comparable to those obtained from the single agent producing the greatest TTS at a particular frequency. No consistent alteration in either magnitude or time course of posttreatment threshold shift was found following the combination treatments as compared to the individual agents alone. Hazard to the auditory system resulting from a combination of sodium salicylate and noise was concluded to be no greater than the hazard presented by either agent alone. This result is also substantiated in the histological results.

Animals↗

Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort level: relationships in children with profound hearing losses.

Acoustic reflex thresholds (ART) and loudness discomfort levels (LDL) were obtained from 51 ears of 34 deaf children using broad band noise and pure tones. Both thresholds and levels were recorded using the psychophysical method of tracking. Results indicate that the relationship between ART and LDL is at variance with similar data for normal hearing individuals. Specifically, in over 39% of these deaf children LDL was obtained at a lower intensity than ART. Implications for hearing aid fitting with deaf children are discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗