PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

C Mahler

Publications and source records attributed to C Mahler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Management of relapsing disease in prostate cancer.

Almost all patients with prostatic cancer will eventually escape the control of the first-line endocrine therapy and relapse. This escape is attributed to selecting and/or cloning preexisting or de novo appearing hormone-independent or resistant cell lines and occurs in most patients after a median time of 12 to 18 months. Currently, there are no generally accepted rules for second-line management, either endocrine or by other means. It seems reasonable to consider length of survival as the only objective response criterion and not to rely on other response criteria. Available second-line therapeutic modalities in relapsed prostatic cancer are alternative endocrine manipulations, chemotherapy, combined endocrine and cytotoxic therapy, new drugs, radiation therapy, and general antitumoral and supportive care. Second-line therapy in relapsed disease makes sense if life can be prolonged while relieving symptoms and maintaining or improving the quality of survival. The capacity to prolong survival is limited. As a result, second-line therapy should aim more at improving the quality rather than the length of survival while considering the specific expectations and wishes of the patient.

Aminoglutethimide

Relapsing disease.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antigens, Neoplasm

Prolactin and pituitary gonadotropin values and responses to acute luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) challenge in patients having long-term treatment with a depot LHRH analogue.

Sixty patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma were treated with monthly subcutaneous injections of a depot formulation of goserelin, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue (Zoladex, ICI Pharma, Destelbergen, Belgium). All patients were regularly evaluated with measurements of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), and prolactin (PRL) levels. In 15 patients among them who could be treated for more than 42 months, an LHRH stimulation test was performed at the end of each 28-day period and before the next administration of the depot formulation. A complete and maintained suppression of both T and LH levels was seen. FSH levels also decreased, but to a lesser extent than LH levels, and showed a small escape after reaching a minimum value after 1 month of therapy. The LHRH challenge after 42 months of therapy elicited no significant responses of LH and FSH levels. The PRL values showed a small decrease.

Aged

Cushing's disease and hyperprolactinemia due to a mixed ACTH- and prolactin-secreting pituitary macroadenoma.

A 36-year-old man with depression, Cushingoid features and hypogonadism was found to have simultaneous pituitary-dependent Cushing's disease and marked elevation of serum prolactin (PRL). CT-scan revealed a macroadenoma with suprasellar extension. Transphenoidal surgery cured the patient's Cushing's disease, but failed to correct his hyperprolactinemia, which was controlled by subsequent bromocriptine therapy. Immunostaining of the pituitary tumor was positive for PRL as well as for ACTH, and ACTH-related peptides beta-lipotropin and beta-endorphin in two distinct tumor cell lines. This pituitary tumor is one of the few mixed PRL- and ACTH-secreting tumors documented by immunostaining. It is the second reported in a macroadenoma, in which PRL-secreting tumoral cells are much more abundant than ACTH-secreting cells.

Adenoma

Basal ganglia calcifications in postoperative hypoparathyroidism: a case with unusual characteristics.

A patient is described with post-thyroidectomy hypoparathyroidism and basal ganglia calcifications. The patient presented with a tonic-clonic seizure. The calcifications shown on CT scan were extensive in the basal ganglia, the bifrontal periventricular white matter and even in the brainstem. The white matter with calcifications displayed a high signal intensity on MRI, probably due to a different stage of the calcifying process in the white matter than in the basal ganglia. A severe dystonic reaction was observed after phenothiazine therapy and is discussed.

Basal Ganglia

Thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas: report of seven cases.

Seven patients with hyperthyroidism due to a TSH-secreting pituitary macroadenoma have been observed of a total of 800 patients with pituitary tumors over a period of 15 yr. Serum TSH levels varied between 1.1-36.3 mU/L. The serum alpha-subunit level was low in 1 case, while in 4 other cases the concentration was elevated and varied between 3.7-7.8 micrograms/L. Serum TSH beta levels were normal in the 4 cases in which it was determined. Serum GH or PRL levels were elevated in 5 cases. In 1 patient the cosecretion of TSH, GH, and PRL was confirmed by immunocytochemical examination. Serum TSH and alpha-subunit responses to TRH, GnRH, CRF, GRF, dexamethasone, methimazole, T3, and bromocriptine administration were variable when studied. Serum TSH and alpha-subunit circadian rhythms were absent in 1 case and inverted in another. A serum alpha-subunit pulsatility without TSH pulses was observed in 1 patient. Five patients underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Three of 4 patients operated on in our center were cured, but a recurrence of the adenoma was found in 1 of them after 5 yr. The fifth patient was not cured. Treatment with octreotide in 3 patients resulted in normalization of serum TSH, GH, and thyroid hormones levels. Cosecretion of PRL in 1 case and alpha-subunit in 2 cases was also inhibited. Partial tachyphylaxis occurred in 1 patient. In summary, heterogeneity in clinical presentation, hormonal expression, and therapeutic response appears to characterize these TSH-secreting adenomas.

Adenoma

Total androgen ablation: European experience. The EORTC GU Group.

Zoladex plus flutamide significantly delays the time to progression (subjective, objective, first progression) compared with orchiectomy, but no difference in survival (death from all causes or from malignant disease) could be detected. Thus, a delay in the appearance of progression has not improved survival. In fact, the duration of survival after progression tends to be shorter on Zoladex plus flutamide. There is thus no evidence to suggest any survival benefit with Zoladex plus flutamide. The quality control of our data revealed acknowledged problems in defining responses in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The review of the Bone Scan Committee provided the data for Tables 5 to 7. These data must provoke some reflections and emphasize once again the heterogeneity of the studied patient population. Table 4 on pain response after 4 weeks is just one of the many items to be analyzed by the committees for response criteria and quality of life. We expect that the other trials face similar problems. More work and patience are needed to obtain a firm answer to this clinical problem. These efforts will never be wasted, however, because the combined results of these trials will increase our knowledge of the treated history of prostate cancer and will, we hope, indicate a net treatment benefit in some subsets of patients. An individually tailored treatment for each patient selected from the anonymous mass of cases of advanced prostate cancer would be the highest reward of our continued collaboration with all the study groups.

Aged

Clinical profile of a new non-steroidal antiandrogen.

Recently a new non-steroidal antiandrogen (Casodex) has been shown in animal experiments to possess a potent peripheral antiandrogen effect. In patients with advanced prostatic cancer however, this drug is not peripherally selectively active and blocked central brain androgen-receptors results in a rise of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T). We treated 18 advanced prostatic cancer patients with 50 mg Casodex daily for a mean period of 42 weeks. There were no complete objective responses but partial responses were seen in a few patients. In 16 patients there was a greater than 50% reduction of pretreatment PSA levels. Endocrine evaluations showed a significant rise in LH, T and oestradiol (E), reaching peak values within the two first months with subsequent lowering of these levels afterwards but without returning to normal. The general tolerance of the drug was good, gynecomastia being the most frequent side-effect. Libido and potency, when present before start of therapy, were maintained in some patients. We conclude that this compound seems as effective as other antiandrogens, but with improved compliance, and shows less side effects in the management of advanced prostatic cancer.

Androgen Antagonists

Orchidectomy versus Zoladex plus Eulexin in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (EORTC 30853).

A total of 327 patients with metastatic prostate cancer have been randomized to either orchidectomy or treatment with goserelin (Zoladez) 3.6 mg depot preparation combined with flutamide (Eulexin) 250 mg t.i.d. in a phase III study (EORTC 30853). A small but statistically significant difference in time to subjective and objective progression of disease was found in favour of the combination treatment. However, time from objective progression to death was longer in the group initially allocated to orchidectomy. Thus no difference was found in overall survival between the two treatment groups. The clinical significance of these differences requires further follow up and analysis.

Aged

Lingual thyroid in two natural brothers.

Tc99m scanning because of hypothyroidism revealed a lingual thyroid in two natural brothers who had no family history of thyroid disease. No thyroid tissue was found in the neck. Further development under substitution therapy with levothyroxine was normal. The diagnosis of this rare disease in two natural brothers suggests that lingual thyroid may be inherited.

Humans

Long-term treatment of metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma with the somatostatin analogue octreotide.

Three patients with symptomatic metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), one with sporadic form and two with MEN IIa, were treated with the long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide (SMS 201-995, Sandoz) for 3 to 17 months. Octreotide was administered subcutaneously in a starting dose of 0.6 to 1.0 mg/day by automatic pump (Travax ASH6, Travenol). Symptoms of diarrhoea, weight loss and malaise improved in all patients. Maximal percentage decrease in mean serum calcitonin was 47, 52 and 81% of the basal values, and was observed 1-3 months from the beginning of treatment. Likewise, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels initially dropped to 45, 60 and 63% of the levels before therapy. A continuing effect was seen in the two patients with MEN IIa after 15 and 17 months of treatment. However, after the initial decrease, calcitonin (CT) levels went up again to 67 and 68% of the basal values and the dose of octreotide had to be increased to 1.5 mg and 2.0 mg/day. CEA also returned to 84 and 105% of the pretreatment titres. Response to 1.5 mg/day octreotide was lost in the patient with the sporadic form of disease after 3 months. Side-effects were minimal. Effects on tumour size could not be evaluated. These suggest that octreotide might be a valuable adjuvant in the long-term management of metastatic MTC. Tachyphylaxis may occur.

Adult

Orchidectomy vs. Zoladex plus flutamide in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The EORTC GU Group.

Treatment with bilateral orchidectomy was compared with Zoladex, 3.6 mg depot, plus flutamide, 250 mg t.i.d., in a randomized prospective study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Small but statistically significant differences in time to subjective and objective progression of disease were found in favor of Zoladex plus flutamide. However, time from objective progression to death was longer in the orchidectomy group. The clinical significance of these differences requires further follow-up and analysis. No difference was found in overall survival between the 2 treatment groups.

Aged

Prostatic cancer. An overview.

Reliable study results are scarce in prostate cancer for several reasons. The treated tumors represent a wide variety of natural history and therapeutic response. One assumes to select 'soft' or minimally toxic treatment for patients with good prognostic factors while aggressive treatment is reserved for infaust prognosis. Stage, grade and prognostic factors may influence the indication and choice of treatment. Better treatment selection will depend on the outcome of actual ongoing randomized trials, the development of new drugs or existing drugs in new indications and, above all, basic studies on the growth potential and invasiveness of the prostate cancer cell. Defining the correct treatment for the right cancer in the right patient is our clinical challenge for the next decade.

Humans