[Cardio-embolic events also caused by thrombosis of the right heart atrial appendage?].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to C Mewis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: With the number of radio frequency ablations (RFA) for treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation increasing, the diagnostic evaluation for RFA associated pulmonary vein stenosis is getting more important. This study investigates the feasibility of the visualization of pulmonary vein stenosis using non-invasive multidetector computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were examined following RFA-treatment. A 4-slice (20 patients) and a 16-slice (8 patients) multidetector CT scanner (SOMATOM Volume Zoom and Sensation 16, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) with retrospective gating was used to assess the pulmonary veins. Lesion severity was determined on a semi-quantitative scale (< 30 %, 30 - 50 %, > 50 %). RESULTS: CT was performed without any complications in all patients. Diagnostic image quality could be obtained in all examinations. The pulmonary veins showed lesions < 30 % in four patients, lesions of 30 -, 50 % in five patients and a stenosis > 50 % in one patient. Eighteen patients showed no lesions. CONCLUSION: Multidetector CT of the pulmonary veins seems to be able to visualize high-grade and low-grade lesions, but larger catheter-controlled studies are needed for further assessment of the diagnostic accuracy and clinical reliability of this noninvasive method.
Biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization is a promising therapy for symptomatic improvement in selected patients with underlying severe congestive heart failure. ICD treatment has been shown to prolong life in patients with life threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but it does not improve quality of life. This review discusses current experience with ICD's incorporating biventricular pacing.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We describe the case of a 50-year-old woman with the clinical diagnosis of cardiomyopathy associated with supraventricular tachycardia refractory to pharmacological treatment. The totally irregular tachyarrhythmia was the result of different episodes of atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation that could be identified in the surface ECG. These findings and the patient's symptoms were all caused by a single focal tachycardia originating from the left upper pulmonary vein. Ablation of this focus represented a curative antiarrhythmic therapy also restoring a normalized ventricular function. Thus, an ablation of the AV node with consecutive pacemaker implantation could be prevented.
The patch electrode and the array electrode are the two types of subcutaneous leads available as an adjunct to a transvenous lead system in patients with high defibrillation thresholds. A prospective randomized study was conducted in 30 consecutive patients comparing the efficacy and the long-term performance of a patch electrode with an array electrode. After determination of the defibrillation threshold for the transvenous lead alone, a subcutaneous patch or an array electrode was implanted in random order. Adding a patch electrode decreased the defibrillation threshold in seven out of 15 patients (47%) from 13.2+/-6.6 to 10.5+/-5.1 J (P<0.05). In 13 out of 15 patients (87%), the implantation of an array electrode caused a significant lowering of the defibrillation threshold from 15.4+/-6.6 to 8.2+/-5.0 J (P<0.0001). The array electrode was significantly more effective in lowering the defibrillation threshold than the patch electrode (P<0.01). Complications during follow-up associated with the subcutaneous patch electrode were observed in four patients whereas no complications were associated with the array electrode (P<0.01). The additional implantation of an array electrode is more effective and associated with fewer complications compared to a patch electrode.
The lack of specificity in the detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias remains a major clinical problem in the therapy with ICDs. The stability criterion has been shown to be useful in discriminating ventricular tachyarrhythmias characterized by a small variation in cycle lengths from AF with rapid ventricular response presenting a higher degree of variability of RR intervals. But RR variability decreases with increasing heart rate during AF. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine if the sensitivity and specificity of the STABILITY algorithm for spontaneous tachyarrhythmias is related to ventricular rate. Forty-two patients who had received an ICD (CPI Ventak Mini I, II, III or Ventak AV) were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ninety-eight episodes of AF with rapid ventricular response and 817 episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity in the detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were calculated at different heart rates. When a stability value of 30 ms was programmed the result was a sensitivity of 82.7% and a specificity of 91.4% in the detection of slow ventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate < 150 beats/min). When faster ventricular tachyarrhythmias with rates between 150 and 169 beats/min (170-189 beats/min) were analyzed, a stability value of 30 ms provided a sensitivity of 94.5% (94.7%) and a specificity of 76.5% (54.0%). For arrhythmia episodes > or = 190 beats/min, the same stability value resulted in a sensitivity of 78.2% and a specificity of 41.0%. Even when other stability values were taken into consideration, no acceptable sensitivity/specificity values could be obtained in this subgroup. RR variability decreases with increasing heart rate during AF while RR variability remains almost constant at different cycle lengths during ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Thus, acceptable performance of the STABILITY algorithm appears to be limited to ventricular rate zones < 170 beats/min.
To answer whether atrial ischemia plays an important role in the genesis of atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease, we analyzed the electrocardiograms obtained at the time of coronary angiography and left ventriculography in 3220 consecutive patients. Atrial fibrillation was found in 74 (2.3%). Among those with significant coronary artery disease were 49 (66.2%) patients with atrial fibrillation and 88.5% with sinus rhythm (P<0.02). Angiograms of patients with atrial fibrillation and significant (>50%) coronary stenosis were re-evaluated and results compared to the control group which consisted of 108 consecutive patients who were in sinus rhythm at the time of coronary angiography. There were no differences between groups with respect to either frequency of injury to the right coronary artery and circumflex branch of left coronary artery or localization of the injury to this region (before or after atrial branch take-off). But patients with atrial fibrillation significantly more often had heart failure (55.1% versus 18.5%, P<0.001) and three vessel disease (30.5% versus 20.4%, P=0.05) as well as mitral valve insufficiency (20.4% versus 10.2%, P<0.05). In conclusion, in patients with coronary disease, systolic heart failure may be more important than atrial ischemia in causing atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Adenosine is widely used as a tool to assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of concealed accessory pathways. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine the reliability of this test by studying the retrograde fast pathway sensibility in a large patient population with typical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardias. We sought also to determine whether AV nodal properties were predictive of a retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. METHODS: In all, 124 patients with inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included in this study. All patients received a clinically used standard dose of 12 mg adenosine during ventricular pacing, with 500 ms and a constant ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction via the fast pathway. Electrophysiologic parameters of the AV node were determined in all patients in order to correlate them with the adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde pathway. RESULTS: In 74 patients, the injection of 12 mg adenosine resulted in a transient VA block, whereas no VA block occurred in the remaining 50 patients. In two patients, concealed accessory pathways were unmasked after the injection of adenosine. The adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde fast pathway was associated with longer retrograde conduction times and cycle lengths during AV nodal reentrant tachycardias. CONCLUSION: This study shows a high variability of retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. Thus, in 40% of patients the lack of VA block after adenosine injection is not specific for persistent accessory pathway function after radiofrequency ablation. Electrophysiologic properties of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardias were different in patients with and without adenosine-sensitive retrograde fast pathways, possibly indicating differential patterns of penetration of the retrograde fast pathway into the compact AV node.
Recently intra-atrial defibrillation has become an interesting alternative to external defibrillation and drug therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Low-energy intra-atrial defibrillation can be used to restore sinus rhythm f.ex. after a failed external cardioversion or during an electrophysiologic study when the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided. Additionally this new technique has led to the development of implantable atrial defibrillators for the treatment of selected patients suffering from chronic atrial fibrillation. Intra-atrial defibrillation seems to be a highly effective and safe method, but little experience exists concerning the outcome so far. Especially the potential risk of inducing ventricular pro-arrhythmia is subject of current controversy. We report the case of a 79-year-old patient suffering from WPW syndrome with a concealed bypass tract who was subject to an intra-atrial defibrillation during an electrophysiologic study. At the beginning of the study atrial fibrillation could be converted to sinus rhythm by a single low-energy atrial defibrillation (3 J.). After a short period of time a second intra-atrial defibrillation had to be performed in the same way because of recurrent atrial fibrillation. By this atrial shock ventricular fibrillation was induced, so that high energy external defibrillation became necessary. Analyzing the ECG a correct R-wave synchronization was found, but a rather short preceding RR interval (252 ms). In conclusion, low energy atrial defibrillation is gaining importance as a highly effective new technique to restore sinus rhythm in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation resistant to conventional therapies. Nevertheless potential risks have to be considered such as the induction of ventricular pro-arrhythmia. Therefore, a correct R-wave synchronization is obligatory and shock delivery should be withheld after short RR intervals. Future prospective randomized studies will have to show whether this new technique is really safe enough and superior to the conventional methods for restoring sinus rhythm in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
The antiarrhythmic properties of adenosine, its ultra-short half-life and the absence of frequent serious side effects make it a front-line agent in arrhythmia management, especially in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Due to a shortening of atrial refractoriness, adenosine can facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation. Life threatening tachycardias may result from a potential rapid conduction of atrial fibrillation over an accessory pathway especially if the latter one has a short antegrade refractory period. We report a case of a 59 year old female patient in which intravenous administration of adenosine during typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was followed by atrial fibrillation with rapid conduction over a hitherto unknown accessory pathway. After intravenous administration of adenosine the tachycardia was terminated successfully within 38 s. After a short period of asystole, spontaneous atrial fibrillation developed unmasking an antegrade preexcitation with subsequent rapid ventricular response (210 b/min). The three-lead ECG showed a narrow QRS complex tachycardia. Because of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm and the absence of hemodynamic compromise there was no need for external cardioversion. During electrophysiological study an antidromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia was recorded over a left posteroseptal accessory pathway including antegrade conduction properties only. Because of its ultrashort half-life, serious side effects after adenosine administration are rare. The possibility of life threatening proarrhythmias after intravenous adenosine administration should be taken into consideration if the etiology of a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia is not clear and a concomitant Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome cannot be excluded. As with application of all intravenous antiarrhythmic agents, the administration of adenosine should only be performed if continuous ECG monitoring and cardioversion facilities are available and possible.
AIM OF THE STUDY: It is generally accepted that chronic therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs might increase the defibrillation threshold at implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A recently published animal study showed a minor effect of the class 1 antiarrhythmic drug lidocaine on the defibrillation threshold if biphasic shocks were used. METHODS AND RESULTS: We therefore performed a retrospective analysis in 89 patients who received an ICD capable of monophasic (n=18) or biphasic (n=71) shocks with a transvenous lead system. In all patients the defibrillation threshold was determined according to the same step down protocol. In the 18 patients with a monophasic device the effects of chronic therapy with amiodarone (n=7) on the defibrillation threshold were evaluated in comparison to a group without antiarrhythmic treatment (n=11). In those patients receiving a biphasic device the effects of chronic therapy with amiodarone (n=29), sotalol (n=20) or no antiarrhythmic medication (n=22) on the defibrillation threshold were evaluated. The groups receiving a monophasic device did not differ in respect to age, sex, underlying cardiac disease, clinical arrhythmia (VT/VF), clinical functional status, left ventricular ejection fraction and the number of patients with additional subcutaneous electrodes. These parameters as well as the type of implanted device were not different between patient groups receiving a biphasic device. Patients on chronic amiodarone therapy receiving a monophasic device had a significantly higher defibrillation threshold (29.1 +/- 8.8 J) than patients without antiarrhythmic treatment (19.1 +/- 5.1 J, P = 0.021). The groups did not differ significantly in respect to the impedance measured at the shocking lead (P = 0.13). In three patients on chronic amiodarone an epicardiac lead system had to be implanted due to an inadequate monophasic defibrillation threshold compared to no patient without antiarrhythmic drug treatment (P = 0.043). In the patients with a biphasic device the intraoperative defibrillation threshold was not significantly different between the three study groups (P = 0.44). No patient received an epicardiac lead system. The defibrillation threshold in the amiodarone group was 15.3 +/- 7.3 J, in the sotalol group 14.4 +/- 7.2 J and in the patients without antiarrhythmic drug treatment 17 +/- 6.1 J. As well, no significant difference was seen between the groups in respect of the impedance of the high voltage electrode (P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: With the use of a biphasic device in combination with a transvenous lead system the intraoperative defibrillation threshold is not significantly different between patients on chronic amiodarone in comparison to patients without antiarrhythmic drug treatment or patients on chronic oral sotalol. This is in contrast to our findings with a monophasic device.
A 70-year-old woman with severely symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy was unresponsive to drug treatment. She had recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and syncope and was at high risk for sudden death; a dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator (DDD-ICD) was implanted. Her initial left ventricular outflow tract gradient was 80 mm Hg and fell to 40 mm Hg during dual-chamber pacing at an atrial ventricular delay of 140 ms. In the follow-up over six months she was asymptomatic with respect to angina pectoris; ventricular tachycardias could be successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing or by shocks. A dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator is an important therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a decrease in atrial ERP and ERP adaptation to rate as well as changes in atrial conduction velocity. The cellular changes in repolarization and the underlying ionic mechanisms in human AF are only poorly understood. METHODS: Action potentials (AP) and ionic currents were studied with the patch clamp technique in single atrial myocytes from patients in chronic AF and compared to those from patients in stable sinus rhythm (SR). RESULTS: The presence of AF was associated with a marked shortening of the AP duration and a decreased rate response of atrial repolarization. L-type calcium current (ICa,L) and the transient outward current (Ito) were both reduced about 70% in AF, whereas an increased steady-state outward current was detectable at test potentials between -30 and 0 mV. The inward rectifier potassium current (IKI) and the acetylcholine-activated potassium current (IKACh) were increased in AF at hyperpolarizing potentials. Voltage-dependent inactivation of the fast sodium current (INa) was shifted to more positive voltages in AF. CONCLUSIONS: AF in humans leads to important changes in atrial potassium and calcium currents that likely contribute to the decrease in APD and APD rate adaptation. These changes contribute to electrical remodeling in AF and are therefore important factors for the perpetuation of the arrhythmia.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of d,l-sotalol in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. BACKGROUND: D,l-sotalol is an important antiarrhythmic agent to prevent recurrences of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF). However, evidence is lacking that an antiarrhythmic agent like d,l-sotalol can reduce the incidence of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in comparison to no antiarrhythmic drug treatment. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 146 consecutive patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. In 53 patients, oral d,l-sotalol prevented induction of VT/VF during electrophysiological testing and patients were discharged on oral d,l-sotalol (sotalol group). In 93 patients, VT/VF remained inducible and a defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. After implantation of the device patients were randomly assigned to oral treatment with d,l-sotalol (ICD/sotalol group, n=46) or no antiarrhythmic medication (n=47, ICD-only group). RESULTS: During follow-up, 25 patients (53.2%) in the ICD-only group had a VT/VF recurrence in comparison to 15 patients (28.3%) in the sotalol group and 15 patients (32.6%) in the ICD/sotalol group (p=0.0013). Therapy with d,l-sotalol, amiodarone or metoprolol was instituted in 12 patients (25.5%) of the ICD-only group due to frequent VT/VF recurrences or symptomatic supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. In nine patients, 17% of the sotalol group, an ICD was implanted after VT/VF recurrence, three patients (5.7%) received amiodarone. Total mortality was not different between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: D,l-sotalol significantly reduces the incidence of recurrences of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in comparison to no antiarrhythmic drug treatment.
OBJECTIVES: Goal of this study was to assess the long-term reproducibility of electrophysiologic drug testing in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF). BACKGROUND: Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is still widely used to guide antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). Sotalol is considered as one of the most effective drugs for VT/VF. Because there is no proof of long-term reproducibility of a successful drug test with sotalol, we investigated the long-term reproducibility of drug testing with sotalol. METHODS: Thirty patients with VT/VF (age: 57+/-11 years, 20 patients with coronary heart disease, 7 patients with no structural heart disease, 3 with others) and reproducible induction of VT/VF (28 patients VT, two patients VF) in a baseline PVS, were suppressible with sotalol (mean dosage 395+/-137 mg) in a subsequent PVS. After a mean follow-up of 13+/-10 months a PVS was again performed in patients, who had no evidence of progressive cardiac disease, who did not experience any arrhythmia recurrences or who were drug compliant. Irrespective of the inducibility after long-term therapy with sotalol, all patients were kept on the initial sotalol regimen. All 30 patients had a stable cardiac condition, were free of VT/VF recurrences and were drug compliant. RESULTS: Despite the clinical efficacy of sotalol, in 12 patients (40%) VT/VF could again be induced after 13+/-10.2 months. Inducibility was independent of age, heart disease, ejection fraction and follow-up time. During a further follow-up of 22.1+/-10.9 months, five patients experienced nonfatal VT recurrences independently of the prior inducibility. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a lacking long-term reproducibility of an initial effective PVS with sotalol. Despite an uneventful clinical follow-up, late electrophysiologic testing showed a VT/VF inducibility in a high portion of patients. Hence, electrophysiologic testing performed late after the initial drug test may no longer be predictive of outcome.