PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Mizyrycki

Publications and source records attributed to C Mizyrycki.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Protein kinase A activity in permeabilized cells as an approximation to in vivo activity.

Permeabilized germlings from the dimorphic fungus Mucor rouxii were used for in situ measurement of protein kinase A (PKA) activation, to compare the results with those obtained in vitro at low or high (nonlinear) enzyme concentrations. The apparent total activity per cell when measured in situ is 5- to 10-fold lower than the in vitro measured activity in crude extracts from those cells. Polyamines and NaCl stimulate the activity in situ. The apparent relative specific activity of the in situ measured PKA toward four peptide substrates is similar to the results obtained in vitro at high holoenzyme concentration and not to those obtained with the free catalytic subunit. Saturation in the activation of PKA by cAMP in situ is attained at low concentrations (2 to 10 microM), while in vitro, at high holoenzyme concentration, no saturation was attained up to 1 mM cAMP (V. Zaremberg et al. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 381, 74-82, 2000). Activation of PKA by site-selective cAMP analogs is assayed in situ and in vitro at two enzyme concentrations. Site B-selective cAMP analogs are good activators of PKA at low enzyme concentration in vitro but poor activators either at high enzyme concentration in vitro or in permeabilized cells. A physiological correlation with the behavior of site-selective analogs in situ is demonstrated in vivo when assaying the effect of increasing concentrations of site-selective cAMP analogs on the impairment of polarized growth of M. rouxii spores.

Binding Sites↗

Human p8 is a HMG-I/Y-like protein with DNA binding activity enhanced by phosphorylation.

We have studied the biochemical features, the conformational preferences in solution, and the DNA binding properties of human p8 (hp8), a nucleoprotein whose expression is affected during acute pancreatitis. Biochemical studies show that hp8 has properties of the high mobility group proteins, HMG-I/Y. Structural studies have been carried out by using circular dichroism (near- and far-ultraviolet), Fourier transform infrared, and NMR spectroscopies. All the biophysical probes indicate that hp8 is monomeric (up to 1 mm concentration) and partially unfolded in solution. The protein seems to bind DNA weakly, as shown by electrophoretic gel shift studies. On the other hand, hp8 is a substrate for protein kinase A (PKA). The phosphorylated hp8 (PKAhp8) has a higher content of secondary structure than the nonphosphorylated protein, as concluded by Fourier transform infrared studies. PKAhp8 binds DNA strongly, as shown by the changes in circular dichroism spectra, and gel shift analysis. Thus, although there is not a high sequence homology with HMG-I/Y proteins, hp8 can be considered as a HMG-I/Y-like protein.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Pattern learning by honeybees: conditioning procedure and recognition strategy.

In recognizing a pattern, honeybees Apis mellifera, may focus either on its ventral frontal part, or on the whole frontal image. We asked whether the conditioning procedure used to train the bees to a pattern determines the recognition strategy employed. Bees were trained with the same patterns presented vertically on the back walls of a Y maze. Conditioning was either absolute, that is, bees should learn to choose a rewarded pattern when there is no alternative, or differential, that is, bees should learn to choose a rewarded pattern that is paired with a different, nonrewarded one. Bees used different pattern recognition strategies depending on the conditioning procedure: absolute conditioning restricted recognition to the lower half whilst differential conditioning extended it to the whole pattern. Bees trained with absolute conditioning saw and learned the features of the upper part of the trained patterns, but assigned more weight to the lower part. Bees trained with differential conditioning learned not only the features of the reinforced stimulus in an excitatory way, but also those of the nonreinforced one in an inhibitory way. Thus, conditioning tasks that involve not only excitatory acquisition of the conditioned stimulus per se, but also discrimination of nonreinforced stimuli, result in an increase in the visual field assigned to the recognition task. Conditioning tasks that involve only excitatory acquisition of the rewarded stimulus result in a higher weighting of the lower pattern half and thus in a more reduced field assigned to the recognition task. This difference may reflect that existing between a conditioned and an incidental behavioural modification. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Journal Article↗