PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Myser

Publications and source records attributed to C Myser.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Ethical reasoning and decision-making in the clinical setting: assessing the process.

Clinical ethical reasoning and analysis are skills as central to good patient care as the efficient application of biomedical knowledge to diagnosis and prognosis. However, experience in teaching clinical ethics to senior medical students has indicated that simply trying to 'apply' the knowledge learnt about ethical theories, principles, concepts and rules in the clinical setting does not ensure ethical competence in clinical decision-making. In 1992, we developed and piloted a three-session programme that focused on a more systematic approach to the way students identified and attempted to manage ethical issues in their clinical practice. This programme was modified and improved in 1993 and further expanded in 1994. Our experience suggests that many students are now better able to bridge what has been called the 'gap' between the possession of ethical knowledge and its actual use in clinical decision-making. The remaining problem was assessment. How do you assess clinical ethical reasoning and decision-making? In the preclinical years of medical education, knowledge-based assessment tools, like the modified essay question (MEQ), provide a means for assessing the sensitivity of students to ethical issues. However, such tools permit neither an appraisal of how students actually make clinical ethical decisions, nor which factors students perceive as important in making an actual clinical decision. In order to make this type of appraisal, we developed a format for a written case report that facilitated our assessing the process as well as the end-product, the decision.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Australia↗
PubMed1995

Teaching clinical ethics as a professional skill: bridging the gap between knowledge about ethics and its use in clinical practice.

Ethical reasoning and decision-making may be thought of as 'professional skills', and in this sense are as relevant to efficient clinical practice as the biomedical and clinical sciences are to the diagnosis of a patient's problem. Despite this, however, undergraduate medical programmes in ethics tend to focus on the teaching of bioethical theories, concepts and/or prominent ethical issues such as IVF and euthanasia, rather than the use of such ethics knowledge (theories, principles, concepts, rules) to clinical practice. Not surprisingly, many students and clinicians experience considerable difficulty in using what they know about ethics to help them make competent ethical decisions in their day-to-day clinical practice. This paper describes the development of a seminar programme for teaching senior medical students a more systematic approach to ethical reasoning and analysis and clinical decision-making.

Curriculum↗
PubMed1994

Guidelines for no-CPR orders.

A no-CPR decision is not synonymous with abandonment and does not, of itself, rescind the obligations of the health care team to provide the highest quality care. Rather, a no-CPR order is best seen as one element of a comprehensive and dynamic management plan which should be reviewed and changed as the patient's medical condition warrants. A no-CPR order, therefore, offers an opportunity to rethink the goals of therapy in the light of discussions with the critically ill patient and his or her family.

Australia↗
PubMed1993

"Is she fit to sign, doctor?"--practical ethical issues in assessing the competence of elderly patients.

The competence of elderly people to participate in medical decision-making is often called into question. This article explores the concept of competence as it relates to elderly people, and outlines the guiding ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence. Practical guidelines are offered on how competence can be assessed and some avoidable pitfalls are highlighted.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1993

Assessing the clinical ethical competence of undergraduate medical students.

At the University of Newcastle, health law and ethics is taught and assessed in each year of the five-year curriculum. However, the critical question for assessment remains: 'Does teaching ethics have a measurable effect on the clinical activity of medical students who have had such courses?' Those responsible for teaching confront this question each year they sit down to construct their assessment tools. Should they assess what the student knows? Should they assess the student's moral reasoning, that is, what decisions the student makes, and, how these decisions are justified, or should they assess what the student actually does when dealing with patients in the clinical setting, and how he or she does it? From 1982 to 1991, assessment at Newcastle was primarily aimed at determining the quality of the students' ethics knowledge base. This paper describes the strengths and limitations of a purely knowledge-based method of evaluation and why in 1992, we are now attempting to redefine and assess, what we call 'clinical ethical competence' in terms of how students actually apply this knowledge base in a controlled clinical context.

Australia↗