PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C N Sternberg

Publications and source records attributed to C N Sternberg.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Seven year update of an EORTC phase III trial of high-dose intensity M-VAC chemotherapy and G-CSF versus classic M-VAC in advanced urothelial tract tumours.

EORTC protocol 30924 is an international randomized trial reporting a 7.3 year update of a 2 weekly regimen of high-dose intensity chemotherapy with M-VAC plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (HD-M-VAC) compared to classic M-VAC in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Two hundred and sixty three untreated patients with bidimensionally measurable TCC were included. In an intention to treat analysis, there were 28 complete responses (CR) (21%) and 55 partial responses (PR) (41%), for an overall response rate (RR) of 64% on the HD-M-VAC arm. On M-VAC, there were 12 CR (9%) and 53 PR (41%), for an overall RR of 50% . The P-value for the difference in CR was 0.009; and for RR, was 0.06. After a median follow-up of 7.3 years, 24.6% are alive on the HD-M-VAC arm vs. 13.2% on the M-VAC arm. Median progression-free survival was better with HD-MVAC (9.5 months) vs. M-VAC (8.1 months). The mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 0.76. The 2-year survival rate for HD-M-VAC was 36.7% vs. 26.2% for M-VAC. At 5 years, the survival rate was 21.8% in the HD-M-VAC vs. 13.5%. Median survival was 15.1 months on HD-MVAC and 14.9 months on M-VAC. There was one death from toxicity in each arm; and more patients died to malignant disease in the M-VAC arm (76%) than in the HD-M-VAC arm (64.9%). With longer follow-up initial results have been confirmed, and shows that HD-M-VAC produces a borderline statistically significant relative reduction in the risk of progression and death compared to M-VAC.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Phase III trial of satraplatin, an oral platinum plus prednisone vs. prednisone alone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Satraplatin is a novel oral platinum (IV) complex that shows activity against hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in cisplatin-resistant human tumor lines in phase I and phase II trials. A randomized multicenter phase III trial with a target sample size of 380 patients was initiated in men with HRPC. After 50 randomized patients, the trial was closed to further accrual by the sponsoring company. An ad hoc analysis of all available data is reported here. Eligibility criteria included pathological proof of prostate cancer, documented progression despite prior hormonal manipulation, WHO PS 0-2, and no daily intake of narcotic analgesics. Patients were randomized between satraplatin 100 mg/m(2) for 5 days plus prednisone 10 mg orally BID or prednisone alone. Compliance was excellent. 48/50 patients have progressed and 42 have died, mostly due to prostate cancer. Median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI: 13.7-28.4) on the satraplatin plus prednisone arm and 11.9 months (95% CI: 8.4-23.1) on prednisone alone (hazard ratio, HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.46-1.55). A >50% decrease in prostrate specific antigen (PSA) was seen in 9/27 (33.3%) in the satraplatin plus prednisone arm vs. 2/23 (8.7%) on the prednisone alone arm. Progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.8-13.7) on the satraplatin plus prednisone arm as compared to 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.1- 4.7) on the prednisone alone arm (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.92). This difference is statistically significant (p = 0.023). Toxicity was generally minimal in both arms. This randomized comparison of a combination of satraplatin and prednisone versus prednisone alone supports the antitumor activity of the combination. Its role in the treatment of HPRC remains to be elucidated in an appropriate phase III setting.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

What's new in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer?

Increased insight into the biology of prostate cancer and the emergence of new therapeutic strategies and chemotherapeutic agents has changed approaches in treating patients with advanced prostate cancer. After secondary hormonal manipulations, new approaches include: second-line hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy with granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) therapy, dendritic cell therapy, gene vaccination therapy, inhibition and/or blockade of growth factor receptors or growth factor receptor pathways, inhibition of neo-angiogenesis and inhibition of invasion and metastases.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗
PubMed2003

Metastatic renal cell cancer treatments.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has been considered to be resistant to chemotherapy, with responses observed in only limited numbers of patients. For this reason, therapeutic options have ranged from no treatment, to immunotherapy with cytokines such as IL-2 and interferon-alpha, chemotherapy alone or in combination with cytokines, and to a variety of new investigational approaches. Interferon and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have led to long-term survival in selected patients. Immunotherapy with cytokines, monoclonal antibodies, new agents, dendritic cell therapy, and allotransplantation offer promise. Novel therapeutic strategies include combining cytokines, and antiangiogenic approaches such as thalidomide and antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Pathologic, cytogenic and molecular studies have proven that renal cell carcinoma is not a single tumor entity. Efforts to improve results also include the identification of prognostic factors, which allow treatment to be better directed towards those patients most likely to benefit. Increasing understanding of cancer biology is beginning to allow for a more targeted approach to the therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Adequate positioning of known treatments is essential and many trials of new targeted therapies are underway.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2003

High grade superficial (G3t1) transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG).

OBJECTIVES: Immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) has been widely used recently as primary option for treatment of high grade superficial (G3T1) carcinoma of the bladder. We describe our long term experience of therapy of G3T1 bladder cancer. METHODS: From January 1982 to December 2000, 785 patients were diagnosed with superficial bladder cancer. All patients underwent preoperative CT scan and transurethral resection of the bladder. Eighty-six patients (11%) had histological high grade superficial bladder cancer infiltrating the lamina propria. This group was treated with the following schedule of BCG Pasteur strain plus maintenance. Four cycles BCG, 6 instillations per cycle, first cycle weekly x 6, second cycle every 2 weeks x 6, third cycle monthly x 6, fourth cycle (maintenance) every 3 months x 6 instillations. RESULTS: The median follow-up is 91 months (30-197 months). The overall recurrence rate was 35% (30/86). The median time to recurrence was 29 months (5-128 months). Of these patients, 12 (14%) had progression at a median follow-up of 16 months (range 8-58 months). Cystectomy was needed in 8 (9%) patients. Death due to disease occurred in 5/86 (6%) patients. One patient died due to adenocarcinoma at the ureterosigmoidostomy site. Sixty-four (74%) patients are alive at a median follow-up of 71 months (range 28-197 months). Sixty patients (70%) are alive with an intact bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BCG is a feasible conservative therapy for patients with primary G3T1 transitional bladder cancer. Long term results of BCG treatment are excellent. Cystectomy shouldn't be considered first line treatment for high grade superficial carcinoma of the bladder.

Administration, Intravesical↗
PubMed2002

Current perspectives in muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer should be dealt with in a multimodality approach with collaboration between the urologist, medical oncologist and radiotherapist. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy has not been proven to improve survival, but may be useful in programs of bladder preservation. Response to M-VAC neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is an important prognostic factor, but may represent patient selection factors. It is not known whether it is better to administer chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant or in the adjuvant setting, that may spare some patients unnecessary chemotherapy. The international adjuvant chemotherapy trial coordinated by the EORTC (protocol 30994) will hopefully clarify some of the unanswered questions concerning whether or not adjuvant chemotherapy immediately following cystectomy improves survival.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗
PubMed2001

Chemotherapy with an every-2-week regimen of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in patients with transitional cell carcinoma who have received prior cisplatin-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: An every-2-week regimen of gemcitabine and paclitaxel was adapted for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) who had received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-one patients with advanced or metastatic TCC who had received prior cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy were treated with an outpatient regimen of gemcitabine 2500-3000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Forty of 41 patients had measurable disease. Response was observed in 24 patients (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 45-75%). Eleven (28%) achieved complete response, and 13 (33%) obtained partial response. Twenty of 25 patients (80%; 95% CI, 64-96%) who had been previously treated in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting responded versus 4 of 15 (27%; 95% CI, 5-49%) in patients who received prior methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (M-VAC) for metastatic disease. The median duration of survival for patients given gemcitabine and paclitaxel after failing neoadjuvant or adjuvant M-VAC was 12 months (range, 2-43+), as compared with only 8 months (range, 2-28) for patients who had been treated after failure of prior therapy for metastatic disease. For all patients, the median duration of response was 6.4 months (range, 2-43.3+ months), and the median survival was 14.4 months (range, 2-43+). Thirteen patients (32%) developed World Health Organization Grade 3-4 neutropenia, with febrile neutropenia in 3 (7%) patients. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given to 10 (24%) patients. There was no Grade 3-4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and taxol in previously treated patients with recurrent TCC is highly effective and produces objective durable responses. This every-2-week schedule is a well tolerated outpatient regimen with minimal toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Randomized phase III trial of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus classic MVAC in advanced urothelial tract tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol no. 30924.

PURPOSE: This randomized trial evaluated antitumor activity of and survival asociated with high-dose-intensity chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (HD-MVAC) versus MVAC in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 263 patients with metastatic or advanced TCC who had no prior chemotherapy were randomized to HD-MVAC (2-week cycles) or MVAC (4-week cycles). RESULTS: Using an intent-to-treat analysis, at a median follow-up of 38 months, on the HD-MVAC arm there were 28 complete responses (CRs) (21%) and 55 partial responses (PRs) (41%), for an overall response of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54% to 70%). On the MVAC arm, there were 12 CRs (9%) and 53 PRs (41%), for an overall response of 50% (95% CI, 42% to 59%). The P value for the difference in CR rate was.009; and for the overall response, it was.06. There was no statistically significant difference in survival (P =.122) or time to progression (P =.114). Progression-free survival was significantly better with HD-MVAC (P=.037; hazard ratio.75; 95% CI.58 to.98). The median progression-free survival time was 9.1 months on the HD-MVAC arm versus 8.2 months on the MVAC arm. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 24.7% for HD-MVAC (95% CI, 17.1% to 32.3%) versus 11.6% for MVAC (95% CI, 5.9% to 17.4%). CONCLUSION: With HD-MVAC, it was possible to deliver twice the doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin in half the time, with fewer dose delays and less toxicity. Although a 50% difference in median overall survival was not detected, a benefit was observed in progression-free survival, CR rates, and overall response rates with HD-MVAC.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer.

In patients with locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was designed to treat micrometastatic disease present in up to 50% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Early chemotherapy has been combined with local therapy based on the reasoning that treatment of small volume disease would result in a better outcome. Another reason for giving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is in an attempt to save the bladder. In selected patients, bladder preservation can be achieved with the use of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, partial cystectomy, or transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and bladder preservation remain controversial topics, as radical cystectomy is still considered to be the gold standard of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The true success of bladder-preserving treatment by chemotherapy with or without RT will require validation in prospective randomized trials.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Second-line treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy such as methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin produces durable improvements in survival in only a minority of patients. Therefore, other therapeutic options and strategies are clearly needed. Strategies include increasing the dose of chemotherapy, modifying the sequencing of chemotherapy, and new therapeutic agents. This paper reviews recent work on high-dose chemotherapy, currently available chemotherapeutic agents and combinations, with an emphasis on gemcitabine and the taxanes. New strategies such as monoclonal antibody therapy and molecular targeted small molecule therapy are becoming a reality in the treatment of many diseases. The rationale for using epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapies is also reviewed.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Differences in gene expression in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comparison of Italian and American patients.

OBJECTIVE: To seek differences in gene expression in the primary muscle-invasive bladder cancers of two cohorts of patients having different survival rates. An Italian group treated by transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy using methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (M-VAC) followed by TURBT, partial cystectomy or radical cystectomy (75% 3-year survival) was compared to an American cohort treated by radical cystectomy (51% 3-year survival). METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the protein expression levels of three genes that act at the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint, p53, p21/waf-1/cip1 (a downstream effector gene in the p53 pathway) and Rb, plus a major inhibitor of apoptosis, Bcl-2. RESULTS: For the bladder cancers of the Italian patient cohort, there was a significantly higher rate of p53 immunopositivity (93 vs. 63%, p = 0.002) and a significantly lower rate of Rb loss (25 vs. 54%, p = 0.009). In bivariate analysis, 72% of Italian tumors were immunopositive for both p53 and p21 (p53+/p21+) vs. 49% for the American tumors. The subset of Italian patients with p53+/p21+ tumors were more frequently disease-free (stage pT0) following chemotherapy and were less likely to fail therapy than those with p53+/p21- tumors (p = 0.0357). Loss of Rb staining was associated with a decreased 5-year survival in the Italian, but not in the American patients. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Significant differences in the expression of the p53, p21 and Rb genes were found between the 2 groups of patients. (2) Italian patients with p53+/p21+ tumors had significantly lower recurrence rates after TURBT and chemotherapy than those having p53+/p21- tumors. (3) Absence of p21 immunopositivity in the Italian tumors may identify alterations in the p53 pathway that predict poor outcome.

Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic↗
PubMed2000

Phase II EORTC trial with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and interferon-alpha as second-line treatment of advanced transitional cell cancer of the urothelial tract.

BACKGROUND: Based on the favorable results of the combination 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin and interferon-alpha as second-line treatment in advanced metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract a confirmatory study was executed in a multicenter setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open label phase II study 43 patients failing adequate previous chemotherapy were treated with IFN-alpha2b 5 MU/m2 subcutaneously for 5 consecutive days starting on day 1 and 22 simultaneous with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 daily as a continuous infusion. In between the same dose of IFN-alpha2b was given 3 times weekly with CDDP 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. This cycle was repeated every six weeks. RESULTS: In 40 eligible patients 5 PR were seen (12.5%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 4.1%-26.8%). The major toxicity was hematological. Two toxic deaths were seen due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: In view of these results this combination can not be recommended as second line treatment for metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

Aged↗