PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Nabhan

Publications and source records attributed to C Nabhan.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (MylotargTM) is infrequently associated with sinusoidal obstructive syndrome/veno-occlusive disease.

BACKGROUND: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is approved for the treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. Several reports have suggested an association between GO administration and hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), which has recently been termed sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS). However, the majority of these studies were done in patients who had undergone high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation or when GO was administered in combination with other cytotoxic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated at our institution with single-agent GO, either as initial therapy or in the relapsed and refractory setting. All patients were planned to receive GO 9 mg/m2 in two doses, 14 days apart. We reviewed liver function tests before and after administration and analyzed hepatic injuries in the context of patients' other comorbid conditions. Patients were classified as experiencing liver toxicity if their liver function(s) abnormality lasted for > 7 days, as documented by repeated serum studies. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were analyzed. Response rate (27.2%) and median duration of response (6 months) were comparable to other reports. All patients were assessable for liver toxicity, of which 23 (48%) had elevation of at least one of their liver function tests (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin or alkaline phosphatase). Elevations in liver function test(s) were noted at a median of 14 days (range 7-175 days). Eight patients had other comorbid conditions that could explain their liver abnormality, making the incidence of direct GO-induced liver injury 31%. However, only one patient had radiographic and clinical evidence suggesting SOSVOD. CONCLUSIONS: When administered using the recommended dose and schedule, GO has little association with VODSOS if given as a single agent. In this retrospective review, the incidence of GO-related SOSVOD is as low as 2%.

Acute Disease↗

Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia with MLL gene rearrangement following radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Targeted therapy with conjugated and unconjugated monoclonal antibodies for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has revolutionized the approach to this disease. The efficacy and low toxicity of these agents have allowed introduction of this strategy in the early stages of therapy. Longer follow-up is needed before validating the safety of these agents. Since monoclonal antibodies are being given as front-line therapy, it is important to identify all potential adverse events. We report a case of secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with 11q23 cytogenetic abnormality and mixed lymphoid leukemia (MLL) gene expression in a patient treated with Y90 labeled anti-CD20 antibody (Zevalin). The patient was not exposed to topoisomerase II inhibitors. Our observations suggest a relationship between 11q23 leukemia and radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) and further studies are needed.

Aged↗

The role of bone marrow transplantation in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a specific gene rearrangement and the generation of the PML-RARalpha fusion transcript which results from a translocation between chromosomes 15 and 17. Targeted therapy with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline-based chemotherapy results in an apparent cure in 70-80% of patients. Both allogeneic (ALLO) and autologous (AUTO) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are effective in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but their role in APL is not clear given the excellent outcome with ATRA and chemotherapy. Several retrospective studies have analyzed the outcome of patients undergoing AUTO or ALLO-HSCT in first (CR1) or second (CR2) complete remission. Most of these studies have shown significant transplant-related mortality (TRM) with ALLO-HSCT, but a reduction in relapse rate compared with AUTO-HSCT. The high TRM with ALLO-HSCT and the excellent outcome with ATRA and chemotherapy do not justify recommending this procedure for the majority of patients in CR1. The role of AUTO-HSCT in CR1 also is unclear. A small subset of patients at high risk of relapse, possibly identifiable by a high white blood cell count at presentation may benefit from HSCT. Most patients with relapsed disease achieve CR2 with ATRA, arsenic trioxide, or combination therapy. However, it is not known if these responses are sustained or if consolidation with HSCT has a place in this setting. The outcome of AUTO-HSCT in CR2 using stem cells that are negative for PML-RARalpha is excellent. It is unclear whether ALLO-HSCT from an HLA-identical sibling is superior to AUTO-HSCT with PML-RARalpha-negative cells in CR2 since the former would be associated with graft-versus-leukemia effects and the latter with lower TRM. Alternatively, arsenic trioxide or re-treatment with ATRA, followed by intensive chemotherapy may also be effective. A randomized prospective clinical trial, or a retrospective analysis of the available data would be useful in answering this critical question.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗

Gemcitabine in hematologic malignancies.

Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine analogue that showed significant activity in solid malignancies. Gemcitabine acts by inhibiting DNA synthesis through chain termination and ribonucleotide reductase inhibition. During initial phase I and II studies, gemcitabine had a low toxicity profile and was well tolerated as a single agent and in combination therapy. Recently, there has been more interest in studying the activity of gemcitabine in hematologic malignancies. Gemcitabine demonstrated good activity in refractory Hodgkin disease patients, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and acute leukemias. There is a preponderance of evidence on the activity of gemcitabine in vitro in myeloma and leukemic cell lines. The activity of gemcitabine in these disorders will pave the way for incorporating this agent into the early phases of therapy.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

The alternatively spliced type II corticotropin-releasing factor receptor, stably expressed in LLCPK-1 cells, is not well coupled to the G protein(s).

Two alternatively spliced corticotropin-releasing factor receptor (CRF-R) cDNAs, type I and type II, were recently isolated from a human cDNA library. The two cDNAs are identical except that the type II cDNA encodes an additional 29 amino acid inserted in the first putative cytoplasmic loop. Since the first cytoplasmic loop is highly conserved in all the members of the hCRF receptor family we have examined whether the presence of the 29 amino acid cassette in CRF-RII influences G protein coupling in LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing the type I and type II hCRF receptors. Whether measured in intact cells or in membrane preparations, LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing CRF-RII have a 4-5 fold lower binding affinity. Maximal CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing CRF-RI was 10-15-fold higher than that in LLCPK-1 cells expressing CRF-RII. The EC50 for CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in hCRF-RI-expressing cells was in the range of 0.5 +/- 0.2 nM. In contrast, the EC50 for CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in hCRF-RII expressing cells was 7.7 +/- 0.2 nM. hCRF increased phosphoinositide turnover in LLCPK-1 cells stably expressing CRF-RI but not in those expressing CRF-RII; this effect required hCRF concentrations of 100 nM and higher. In membrane preparations, GTP-gamma-S inhibited hCRF binding to CRF-RI and shifted the binding Kd from 4.5 nM to 16.7 nM. Conversely, GTP-gamma-S did not influence hCRF binding to CRF-RII in broken cell membranes. Additionally, CRF-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in cell membranes expressing CRF-RI was potentiated by GTP, whereas CRF-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in cell membranes expressing CRF-RII was insensitive to GTP. These data indicate that CRF-RII is not well coupled to the G protein. Since the only difference between the CRF-RII and CRF-RI is the insert in the first putative cytoplasmic loop, these data indicate that the first cytoplasmic loop plays a crucial role in hCRF receptor coupling to the G protein.

Alternative Splicing↗