PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Nice

Publications and source records attributed to C Nice.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

A prospective audit of wound infection rates after caesarean section in five West Yorkshire hospitals.

A three month prospective audit of wound infection following emergency and elective caesarean section was carried out in five West Yorkshire hospitals. Among 4076 women undergoing delivery in the five obstetric departments, the caesarean rate was 15.4%. The overall infection rate was 45/628 (7.2%) with a range of 2.5-17.2% between the five centres. The infection rate was 14/226 (6.2%) when antibiotics were used compared with 31/402 (7.7%) without antibiotics. The use of prophylactic antibiotics made no significant difference to the infection rate, which did not correlate with duration of labour or of ruptured membranes. The number of vaginal examinations correlated with the infection rate. In conclusion, the caesarean section rate observed was higher than that estimated for the UK as a whole, but was distorted by one centre with a high rate. For the other four hospitals the caesarean rate was unexceptional. The ratio of emergency to elective operations was comparable with recently reported values in the UK and the wound infection rate was within the widely varying limits found in previous studies. In view of the relatively low infection rate recorded without antibiotics, in the interests of cost effectiveness, prophylaxis may be limited in future to selected women at high risk. Because this was an audit rather than a randomized study we cannot exclude that this is already happening on an empirical basis.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Retrograde vs. antegrade puncture for infra-inguinal angioplasty.

This study was done to compare antegrade punctures with a retrograde puncture technique for infrainguinal angioplasty. A group of 100 consecutive patients (71 men, 29 women) were randomized for antegrade puncture or retrograde puncture of the common femoral artery. Following retrograde puncture the guidewire was 'turned' and placed into the superficial femoral artery. The time for gaining access, screening time, radiation dose, patient height, weight and complications were recorded. All patients were reviewed the day after the procedure and within 3 months. Data from 46 patients (34 males and 12 females) in the retrograde group and 44 (28 males and 16 females) in the antegrade group were available for analysis. Mean procedure time, screening time, radiation dose, height and weight were 8.3 minutes (range 3-22), 2.1 minutes (0.3-6.5), 7950 mGy cm(-2) (820-71250), 169 cm (149-204) and 79 kg (32-108) for retrograde puncture and 8 min (2-60), 0.7 min (0.0-3.2), 1069 mGy cm(-2) (0-15400), 169 cm (152-186) and 75 kg (39-125) for antegrade punctures, respectively. An average of 1.2 (1-2) punctures was required for retrograde and 1.75 (1-8) for antegrade. Seven small hematomas occurred with antegrade and three for retrograde puncture. Retrograde puncture is technically easier with a tendency to fewer complications but results in a higher radiation dose. This technique should be used in difficult patients at high risk of haematoma formation.

Aged↗