PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C P Casteel

Publications and source records attributed to C P Casteel.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Lectures in physiology: a three-phase evaluation plan.

The initial phase of a voluntarily implemented multiphasic plan for improving faculty lectures was completed in 1988 and reported in 1989 [Am. J. Physiol. 256 (Adv. Physiol. Educ. 1): S3-S8, 1989]. That phase, conducted by a teaching consultant, included analysis of the teaching practices of each of seven faculty members. Following lecture observations, each faculty member received a written critique of his/her teaching, and individual as well as departmental strengths and weaknesses were identified. In the 1989 follow-up phase, faculty reviewed the feedback provided in their critiques and attended a seminar on developing effective lectures. Each faculty member was again observed during the presentation of a lecture; the same observation instrument was used in the follow-up phase as was used in the initial phase. A comparative analysis of the 1988 and 1989 teaching behaviors was completed for each faculty member and for the whole department. Results indicate that definitive changes had occurred in teaching methods employed since the initiation of the plan. Additional recommendations were made and specific target areas for ongoing improvement were identified.

Alabama↗

Teaching effectiveness analysis plan applied to lectures in medical physiology.

To improve and thus strengthen its teaching program, the Department of Physiology at the University of South Alabama voluntarily embarked on a multiphasic self-assessment of its medical teaching program. One phase of the greater assessment plan included an analysis of the teaching methods of each faculty member. To design and implement this phase, the services of a teaching consultant from the College of Education were obtained. The implementation of the objectives as established by the consultant resulted in 1) the development of a systematic and consistent method of evaluating the teaching practices of the faculty through the design of a standard observation instrument for use in analyzing the teaching of each individual; 2) the sampling of the teaching of each of the seven participating faculty members; 3) the collection and critical review of teaching materials used; 4) an analysis of the effectiveness of the faculty; and 5) the submission of a written report of evaluation results. The seven participating faculty members were observed during the delivery of two lectures each presented to the freshman medical class. Based on the analysis of both the lectures and materials used, a written critique of each faculty member was submitted. Lecture strengths and weaknesses, both of individual members and of the whole department were summarized. Finally, the results of a survey taken of the faculty in which the participants were asked to respond to a series of questions regarding the self-assessment program were most favorably accepted by all participating faculty.

Alabama↗