PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Palczynski

Publications and source records attributed to C Palczynski.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Glutaraldehyde inhalation exposure of rats: effects on lung morphology, Clara-cell protein, and hyaluronic acid levels in BAL.

Glutaraldehyde (GA) is a biocide widely used in hospital and laboratory practice. GA is a volatile substance and, under certain circumstances, significant airborne concentrations may be generated at room temperature. Occupational exposure to GA by inhalation is suspected of causing delayed irritating effects. In recent years, GA has emerged as the main cause of occupational asthma among health-care workers. The aim of the present study was to evaluate effects of GA inhalatory exposure (0.025 ppm or 0.1 ppm, for 28 days) in rats exposed corresponding to the occupational shift cycle, at time point 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days postexposure (PE). Numerous vacuoles and dilated spaces in epithelial cells in bronchioles showing a destructive effect of GA on the cellular membrane were observed at 24 h PE in 0.1 ppm exposed rats. Lipid vacuoles observed after 48 h PE in higher GA exposure, in the Clara cells of the bronchial epithelium, and in endothelial cells of the alveolar capillaries are probably attributable to disturbed lipid metabolism. Many foci of collagen fibers were observed already after 7 days postexposure. Monitoring of inflammatory response and repair was made possible by using two biomarkers: Clara-cell protein (CC16) and hyaluronic acid (HA). Our results show that the inflammatory repair response contributed to progenitor Clara cells and HA plays a role in the development of fibrotic changes in the lung of rats. Glutaraldehyde in rats causes fibrotic effects at the actual threshold limit value-time weighted average (TLV-TWA) level for GA as specified by current Polish and other national regulations.

Animals↗

Nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy.

BACKGROUND: Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy in workers using rubber gloves has been an occupational health problem for the last 10 years. In the case of the occupational agents, clinical history may be far from conclusive; hence, appropriate provocation should be carried out. The objective was to evaluate the usefulness of the nasal challenge test in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in subjects occupationally exposed to NRL. METHODS: A single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 16 nurses with respiratory symptoms (bronchial asthma and/or rhinitis) related to NRL exposure as well as positive skin prick test (SPT) response to NRL. The controls were nine nurses with asthma and/or perennial rhinitis unrelated to NRL exposure; six atopic patients not occupationally exposed to NRL, with asthma and/or perennial rhinitis; and six healthy subjects. All the controls had negative results of SPT with NRL. Patients with a history of anaphylaxis or positive results of RAST to NRL were not considered in the study. The "nasal pool" technique was used to evaluate the cellular response and changes in protein level and ECP concentration in nasal washings after topical provocation with allergen or placebo. RESULTS: A significant increase was noted in eosinophil and basophil number, albumin/total protein ratio, and ECP level only in NRL SPT-positive patients subjected to nasal challenge with NRL. Neither bronchial nor systemic reactions were found after the nasal provocation with NRL. CONCLUSIONS: The nasal challenge test appears to be useful for diagnosing occupational rhinitis in NRL-sensitized patients.

Adult↗

Nasal challenge test in the diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases in subjects occupationally exposed to a high molecular allergen (flour).

The objective of this study was the evaluation of the usefulness of the nasal challenge test in the diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases in subjects occupationally exposed to flour. A single-blind, placebo controlled study was conducted in 100 subjects with occupational atopic asthma with rhinitis. The control groups consisted of 20 atopic subjects not sensitized to investigated allergens and 20 healthy subjects. A 'nasal pool' technique was used to evaluate the changes of the cellular response and protein level in nasal washings after topical provocation with allergen or placebo. The concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein and mast cell-derived tryptase in nasal fluid were evaluated in 60 cases. There were significant increases in eosinophil and basophils number, albumin/total protein ratio, eosinophil cationic protein and tryptase levels in occupationally sensitized patients challenged with specific allergens. There were neither severe bronchial reactions or an increase of bronchial hyperreactivity in occupationally sensitized patients after the nasal provocation with flour. The nasal challenge test appears to be a very useful and safe tool for diagnosing occupational allergy.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Eosinophil and neutrophil chemiluminescence in patients with atopic asthma and in healthy subjects.

The 10 patients with atopic asthma and 6 healthy subjects were selected for the study. Each person underwent prick testing to common allergens (extracts of house dust, grass, trees, animal danders, feathers and mould). In addition blood was drawn for the specific IgE antibodies to D. pteronyssinus and total serum IgE levels. Neutrophil and eosinophil chemiluminescence induced by PMA and FMLP was measured in both groups. Eosinophils obtained from patients with atopic asthma stimulated with PMA and FMLP generated significantly greater free radicals than obtained from normal subjects. There was no observed significant difference of neutrophil chemiluminescence activated by PMA and FMLP and of the percentage of hypodense eosinophils in the peripheral blood between subjects with asthma and healthy ones.

Adult↗

Nasal response to allergen challenge in patients with immediate asthmatic reaction.

Ten patients with bronchial asthma and allergy to house-dust mite (HDM) and ten normal, nonatopic control subjects underwent a bronchial challenge with flour. Before and 24 h after the allergen provocation with flour, the levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were determined in the serum and nasal lavage fluid. All allergics showed an isolated immediate asthmatic reaction (IAR). After the flour challenge only in asthmatic patients the increase was detected in the mean values of: 1/eosinophils (mean value before 16.7 x 10(3)/mm3; mean after; 10 min 132.9 x 10(3)/ml; 3 hr 183.6 x 10(3)/mm3; 24 h 110.6 x 103/mm3, p < 0.05), 2/basophils (mean before 1.2 x 10(3)/mm3; mean after: 10 min 5.3 x 10(3)/ml; 3 h s 14.1 x 10(3)/mm3 24 h was 18.3/mm3, p < 0.05), 3/neutrophils (mean before 9.2 x 10(3)/mm3; mean after 24 h 18.2 x 10(3)/mm3, p < 0.05) in the nasal lavage fluid. In contrast to a group of normal subjects, asthmatics were found to have higher postchallenge levels of ECP and MPO in the nasal secretions as compared with the prechallenge levels (ECP-mean 3.85 ug/l compared with 32.17 ug/l p < 0.05; MPO-mean 120.02 ug/l compared with 1313.2 ug/l, p < 0.05). The authors did not find any significant difference between pre- and postchallenge levels of ECP and MPO in the serum of asthmatics and controls. The higher levels of MPO as well as higher count of neutrophils observed in asthmatic patients 24 h after allergen challenge support the neutrophil involvement in the allergic inflammation. Our results indicate that both neutrophils and eosinophils take part in allergic reaction in the mucosa.

Adult↗

Nasal response to allergen challenge in patients with immediate asthmatic reaction.

Ten patients with bronchial asthma and allergy to house-dust mite (HDM) and ten normal, nonatopic control subjects underwent a bronchial challenge with flour. Before and 24 hr after the allergen provocation with flour, the levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were determined in the serum and nasal lavage fluid. All allergics showed an isolated immediate asthmatic reaction (IAR). After the flour challenge only in asthmatic patients the increase was detected in the mean values of: 1) eosinophils (mean value before 16.7 x 103/mm3; mean after: 10 min 132.9 x 103/ml; 3 hr 183.6 x 103/mm3; 24 hr 110.6 x 103/mm3, p < 0.05), 2) basophils (mean before 1.2 x 103/mm3; mean after: 10 min 5.3 x 103/ml; 3 hr s 14.1 x 103/mm3 24 hr was 18.3 x 103/mm3, p < 0.05), 3) neutrophils (mean before 9.2 x 103/mm3; mean after 24 h 18.2 x 103/mm3, p < 0.05) in the nasal lavage fluid. In contrast to a group of normal subjects, asthmatics were found to have higher postchallenge levels of ECP and MPO in the nasal secretions as compared with the prechallenge levels (ECP-mean 3.85 ug/l compared with 32.17 ug/l, p < 0.05; MPO-mean 120-02 ug/l compared with 1313.2 ug/l, p < 0.05). The authors did not find any significant difference between pre- and postchallenge levels of ECP and MPO in the serum of asthmatics and controls. The higher levels of MPO as well as higher count of neutrophils observed in asthmatic patients 24 hr after allergen challenge support the neutrophil involvement in the allergic inflammation. Our results indicate that both neutrophils and eosinophils take part in allergic reaction in the mucosa.

Adult↗