PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Q Doe

Publications and source records attributed to C Q Doe.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Neural stem cells: from fly to vertebrates.

Our goal in this review is to explore the relationship between Drosophila and vertebrate neural stem cell development by comparing progress in each system with the aim of answering several central questions in stem cell biology: (a) How are stem cells formed? (b) Do stem cells divide symmetrically or asymmetrically? (c) How is stem cell fate maintained? (d) How is stem cell differentiation initiated? (e) How are different stem cell fates determined? (f) How "plastic" are different neural stem cell fates? (g) How do neural stem cells produce different progeny? and (h) What regulates stem cell proliferation versus quiescence? Not surprisingly, research in Drosophila and vertebrate systems each have their own biases, strengths, and weaknesses; we hope that by directly comparing progress in each field, new experiments and interpretations in both vertebrate and Drosophila research will become apparent. It has become increasingly clear that vertebrates and Drosophila share many fundamental mechanisms of neurogenesis, validating a comparative approach.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Miranda directs Prospero to a daughter cell during Drosophila asymmetric divisions.

Asymmetric cell division is a general process used in many developmental contexts to create two differently fated cells from a single progenitor cell. Intrinsic mechanisms like the asymmetric transmission of cell-fate determinants during cell division, and extrinsic cell-interaction mechanisms, can mediate asymmetric divisions. During embryonic development of the Drosophila central nervous system, neural stem cells called neuroblasts divide asymmetrically to produce another multipotent neuroblast and a ganglion mother cell (GMC) of more restricted developmental potential. Intrinsic mechanisms promote asymmetric division of neuroblasts: for example, the transcription factor Prospero localizes to the basal cell cortex of mitotic neuroblasts and then segregates exclusively into the GMC, which buds off from the basal side of the neuroblast. In the GMC, Prospero translocates to the nucleus, where it establishes differential gene expression between sibling cells. Here we report the identification of a gene, miranda, which encodes a new protein that co-localizes with Prospero in mitotic neuroblasts, tethers Prospero to the basal cortex of mitotic neuroblasts, directing Prospero into the GMC, and releases Prospero from the cell cortex within GMCs. miranda thus creates intrinsic differences between sibling cells by mediating the asymmetric segregation of a transcription factor into only one daughter cell during neural stem-cell division.

Alleles↗
PubMed1997

Extrinsic cues, intrinsic cues and microfilaments regulate asymmetric protein localization in Drosophila neuroblasts.

BACKGROUND: The Drosophila central nervous system develops from stem cell like precursors called neuroblasts, which divide unequally to bud off a series of smaller daughter cells called ganglion mother cells. Neuroblasts show cell-cycle-specific asymmetric localization of both RNA and proteins: at late interphase, prospero RNA and Inscuteable, Prospero and Staufen proteins are all apically localized; at mitosis, Inscuteable remains apical whereas prospero RNA, Prospero protein and Staufen protein form basal cortical crescents. Here we use in vitro culture of neuroblasts to investigate the role of intrinsic and extrinsic cues and the cytoskeleton in asymmetric localization of Inscuteable, Prospero and Staufen proteins. RESULTS: Neuroblast cytokinesis is normal in vitro, producing a larger neuroblast and a smaller ganglion mother cell. Apical localization of Inscuteable, Prospero and Staufen in interphase neuroblasts is reduced or eliminated in vitro, but all three proteins are localized normally during mitosis (apical Inscuteable, basal Prospero and Staufen). Microfilament inhibitors result in delocalization of all three proteins. Inscuteable becomes uniform at the cortex, whereas Prospero and Staufen become cytoplasmic; inhibitor washout leads to recovery of microfilaments and asymmetric localization of all three proteins. Microtubule disruption has no effect on protein localization, but disruption of both microtubules and microfilaments results in cytoplasmic localization of Inscuteable. CONCLUSIONS: Both extrinsic and intrinsic cues regulate protein localization in neuroblasts. Microfilaments, but not microtubules, are essential for asymmetric protein anchoring (and possibly localization) in mitotic neuroblasts. Our results highlight the similarity between Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, vertebrates, plants and yeast: in all organisms, asymmetric protein or RNA localization and/or anchoring requires microfilaments.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed1997

Establishing neuroblast-specific gene expression in the Drosophila CNS: huckebein is activated by Wingless and Hedgehog and repressed by Engrailed and Gooseberry.

The Drosophila ventral neuroectoderm produces a stereotyped array of central nervous system precursors, called neuroblasts. Each neuroblast has a unique identity based on its position, pattern of gene expression and cell lineage. To understand how neuronal diversity is generated, we need to learn how neuroblast-specific gene expression is established, and how these genes control cell fate within neuroblast lineages. Here we address the first question: how is neuroblast-specific gene expression established? We focus on the huckebein gene, because it is expressed in a subset of neuroblasts and is required for aspects of neuronal and glial determination. We show that Huckebein is a nuclear protein first detected in small clusters of neuroectodermal cells and then in a subset of neuroblasts. The secreted Wingless and Hedgehog proteins activate huckebein expression in distinct but overlapping clusters of neuroectodermal cells and neuroblasts, whereas the nuclear Engrailed and Gooseberry proteins repress huckebein expression in specific regions of neuroectoderm or neuroblasts. Integration of these activation and repression inputs is required to establish the precise neuroectodermal pattern of huckebein, which is subsequently required for the development of specific neuroblast cell lineages.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

heartless encodes a fibroblast growth factor receptor (DFR1/DFGF-R2) involved in the directional migration of early mesodermal cells in the Drosophila embryo.

After invagination of the mesodermal primordium in the gastrulating Drosophila embryo, the internalized cells migrate in a dorsolateral direction along the overlying ectoderm. This movement generates a stereotyped arrangement of mesodermal cells that is essential for their correct patterning by later position-specific inductive signals. We now report that proper mesodermal cell migration is dependent on the function of a fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor encoded by heartless (htl). In htl mutant embryos, the mesoderm forms normally but fails to undergo its usual dorsolateral migration. As a result, cardiac, visceral, and dorsal somatic muscle fates are not induced by Decapentaplegic (Dpp), a transforming growth factor beta family member that is derived from the dorsal ectoderm. Visceral mesoderm can nevertheless be induced by Dpp in the absence of htl function. Ras1 is an important downstream effector of Htl signaling because an activated form of Ras1 partially rescues the htl mutant phenotype. The evolutionary conservation of htl function is suggested by the strikingly similar mesodermal migration and patterning phenotypes associated with FGF receptor mutations in species as diverse as nematode and mouse. These studies establish that Htl signaling provides a vital connection between initial formation of the embryonic mesoderm in Drosophila and subsequent cell-fate specification within this germ layer.

Alleles↗
PubMed1996

The embryonic central nervous system lineages of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Neuroblast lineages derived from the ventral half of the neuroectoderm.

Central nervous system development in Drosophila starts with the delamination from the neuroectoderm of about 30 neuroblasts (NBs) per hemisegment. Understanding the mechanisms leading to the specification of the individual NBs and their progeny requires the identification of their lineages. Here we describe 17 embryonic NB lineages derived from the ventral half of the neuroectoderm and we assign these lineages to identified medial and intermediate NBs. The lineages are composed of interneurons (NB 1-2, NB 2-1, MP2, NB 4-1, NB 5-1, NB 5-3, NB 6-1, NB 6-2, and NB 7-2), interneurons and motoneurons (NB 3-1, NB 3-2, NB 4-2, NB 5-2, NB 7-1, and NB 7-3), or interneurons, motoneurons, and glial cells (NB 1-1 and NB 2-2). NB 1-1, NB 2-2, and NB 3-1 form segment-specific lineages. Neuroectodermal progenitors forming NB 2-1, NB 5-1, and NB 7-3 divide while still in the ectoderm to give rise to an additional epidermoblast. Expression of segmentation genes is not lineal in the clones of NB 1-2 and NB 7-3 (engrailed), NB 1-1, NB 4-2, and NB 7-1 (even-skipped), and NB 7-1 (gooseberry-proximal). The timing of delamination for individual NBs as well as the number of their progeny is not strictly invariant. The 17 NBs produce about 200 neurons and only three glial cells, corresponding to about 70% of the estimated total number of neurons and 10% of the glial cells per thoracic and abdominal hemisegment. Previously identified neural cell types were linked to particular lineages and we introduce a systematic terminology for the ventral nerve cord neurons. The wild-type clones provide a foundation for the analysis of mutants, expression patterns, and experimental manipulations.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

The achaete-scute complex proneural genes contribute to neural precursor specification in the Drosophila CNS.

BACKGROUND: The Drosophila central nervous system (CNS) develops from a segmentally reiterated array of 30 neural precursors. Each precursor acquires a unique identity and goes through a stereotyped cell lineage to produce an invariant family of neurons and/or glia. The proneural genes achaete, scute and lethal of scute are required for neural precursor formation in the Drosophila CNS, and are expressed in overlapping subsets of 'proneural cell clusters' from which a single neural precursor later develops. Vertebrate achaete-scute homologues are expressed early during neurogenesis, and promote neurogenesis, neuronal development and/or differentiation. The Drosophila proneural achaete-scute genes govern neural precursor formation, but their role in specifying neural precursor identity has not been tested. RESULTS: Here, we test the role of the Drosophila achaete-scute genes in specifying neural precursor identity, focusing on the well characterized CNS MP2 precursor. MP2 delaminates from a cluster of achaete-scute-expressing ectodermal cells. In an achaete-scute double mutant, MP2 formation was reduced (to 11-14 %) as expected because of the function of proneural genes in promoting neural precursor formation. Surprisingly, we also observed that the developing MP2 precursors were incorrectly specified and acquired traits characteristic of adjacent neural precursors. In rescue experiments, achaete or scute, but not lethal of scute, completely restored the normal MP2 identity. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the achaete-scute complex genes specify aspects of neural precursor identity in the Drosophila CNS. Given the phylogenetically conserved function of these genes, our results raise the possibility that achaete-scute homologues may help specify neural precursor identity in other organisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

The engrailed and huckebein genes are essential for development of serotonin neurons in the Drosophila CNS.

A number of the pattern formation genes expressed in the Drosophila epidermis are also expressed in the developing CNS. It is uncertain how these genes contribute to neuronal differentiation. Here we show that the normal differentiation of the serotonin neurons of the Drosophila nerve cord is dependent on the expression of two pattern formation genes, huckebein (hkb) and engrailed (en). hkb and en gene products coexpress uniquely in the serotonin neurons and in neuroblast 7-3 (NB 7-3), indicating that as in the grasshopper, NB 7-3 is the progenitor for these neurons. Both genes are important for differentiation of this lineage, since loss-of-function alleles for hkb or en eliminate expression of several markers that characterize these cells. hkb appears to act at a step subsequent to NB delamination, since NB 7-3 is detectable in a strain containing a severe hkb allele.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

huckebein is required for glial development and axon pathfinding in the neuroblast 1-1 and neuroblast 2-2 lineages in the Drosophila central nervous system.

huckebein encodes a predicted zinc finger transcription factor which is transiently expressed in a subset of Drosophila central nervous system precursors (neuroblasts (NBs)). We used DiI cell lineage tracing and cell fate markers to investigate the role of huckebein in the NB 1-1 and NB 2-2 cell lineages. Loss of huckebein does not switch these NBs into different NB fates, nor does it change the number of cells in their lineages; rather, it is required for glial development in the NB 1-1 lineage, and for axon pathfinding of a subset of interneurons and motoneurons in both lineages.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Numb antagonizes Notch signaling to specify sibling neuron cell fates.

Asymmetric cell divisions play a key role in establishing neuronal diversity in the mammalian and Drosophila CNS, but the mechanisms involved are mostly unknown. The Drosophila MP2 precursor divides asymmetrically to generate the dMP2/vMP2 interneurons. Delta-Notch signaling is required to specify vMP2 fate, whereas the localized determinant Numb is segregated into dMP2 and is required to specify dMP2 fate. Notch; numb double mutants have two dMP2 neurons; hence, Numb is not required for dMP2 fate, but antagonizes the Delta-Notch "vMP2" signal. In vivo Delta expression and in vitro culture experiments show that vMP2 fate is specified by an "inductive" signal from outside the MP2 lineage. Thus, intrinsic and extrinsic cues converge to specify binary cell fates in the MP2 cell lineage.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Asymmetric cell division and neurogenesis.

Several proteins have been identified that are asymmetrically localized in dividing Drosophila and vertebrate neural precursors. Some are involved in establishing cell polarity, whereas others are determinants of cell fate. New insights into how cell diversity is generated during neurogenesis have been obtained and the means for rapid progress in this field now exist.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Neurogenesis in the insect central nervous system.

Recent advances provide an increasingly sophisticated understanding of Drosophila CNS development. First, genes have been identified that specify unique neuroblast cell fates. Second, neuroblasts have been found to use a novel mechanism for asymmetric localization of proteins into one daughter cell at mitosis. Third, a gene controlling the choice between glial/neuronal determination has been discovered. And finally, new cell-lineage methods are being used to determine the entire lineage of identified neuroblasts, including axon projections and synaptic contacts.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Specification of neuroblast identity in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system by gooseberry-distal.

The Drosophila central nervous system develops from a segmentally reiterated array of 30 unique neural precursors, called neuroblasts. Each neuroblast goes through a stereotyped cell lineage to produce an invariant clone of neural progeny. It is critical to identify the genes that specify neuroblast identity as these genes control the time of formation, gene expression profile, and cell lineage characteristics of each neuroblast. Here we show that the Pax-type gooseberry-distal gene specifies row 5 neuroblast identity. Initially, four rows of neuroblasts form per segment (1, 3, 5, 7) and gooseberry-distal is expressed in row 5 neuroblasts. By using 10 molecular markers, and by following the number and orientation of neuroblast divisions, we show that lack of gooseberry-distal transforms row 5 neuroblasts into row 3 neuroblasts, whereas ubiquitous gooseberry-distal generates the reciprocal transformation. Thus, gooseberry-distal is necessary and sufficient to specify row 5 neuroblast identity autonomously. The 10 genes coordinately regulated by gooseberry-distal are prime candidates for controlling specific aspects of neuroblast identity.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

huckebein specifies aspects of CNS precursor identity required for motoneuron axon pathfinding.

huckebein encodes a putative zinc finger protein expressed in a subset of Drosophila CNS precursors, including the NB 4-2/GMC 4-2a/RP2 cell lineage. In huckebein mutant embryos, GMC 4-2a does not express the cell fate marker EVEN-SKIPPED; conversely, huckebein overexpression produces a duplicate EVEN-SKIPPED-positive GMC 4-2a. We use Dil to trace the entire NB 4-2 lineage in wild-type and huckebein mutant embryos. Loss of huckebein does not affect the number, position, or type of neurons in the NB 4-2 lineage; however, all motoneurons show axon pathfinding defects and never terminate at the correct muscle. Thus, huckebein regulates aspects of GMC and neuronal identity required for proper motoneuron axon pathfinding in the NB 4-2 lineage.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

New neuroblast markers and the origin of the aCC/pCC neurons in the Drosophila central nervous system.

Drosophila is an ideal system for identifying genes that control central nervous system (CNS) development. Particularly useful tools include molecular markers for subsets of neural precursors (neuroblasts) and the simple expression pattern of the even-skipped (eve) gene in a subset of neurons. Here we provide additional molecular markers for identified neuroblasts, including several with near single cell specificity. In addition, we use these new markers to trace the development of several eve+ neurons. Our results shows that the eve+ aCC/pCC neurons develop from a different neuroblast than previously thought, and have led us to assign new names for several neuroblasts. These results are supported by DiI cell lineage analysis of neuroblasts identified in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

The prospero transcription factor is asymmetrically localized to the cell cortex during neuroblast mitosis in Drosophila.

Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors are known to regulate sibling cell fate. Here we describe a novel mechanism for the asymmetric localization of a transcription factor to one daughter cell at mitosis. The Drosophila CNS develops from asymmetrically dividing neuroblasts, which give rise to a large neuroblast and a smaller ganglion mother cell (GMC). The prospero gene encodes a transcription factor necessary for proper GMC gene expression. We show that the prospero protein is synthesized in the neuroblast where it is localized to the F-actin cell cortex. At mitosis, prospero is asymmetrically localized to the budding GMC and excluded from the neuroblast. After cytokinesis, prospero is translocated from the GMC cortex into the nucleus. Asymmetric cortical localization of prospero in neuroblasts requires entry into mitosis; it does not depend on numb function. prospero is also observed in cortical crescents in dividing precursors of the peripheral nervous system and adult midgut. The asymmetric cortical localization of prospero at mitosis is a mechanism for rapidly establishing distinct sibling cell fates in the CNS and possibly other tissues.

Animals↗