Biomedical subjects

C R Joyce

Publications and source records attributed to C R Joyce.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Quality of life (QoL) assessment is becoming increasingly important for measuring the impact of illnesses, diseases, and their treatment and for deciding priorities when allocating resources. We developed a novel method to measure QoL from the perspective of the individual patient. The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQoL) was devised from the technique known as judgment analysis to measure patients' level of functioning in five self-nominated facets of life and the relative weight or importance attached to these areas. We applied this method, together with traditional measures of health status, in a prospective intervention study of 20 patients undergoing unilateral total hip-replacement surgery with six-month follow-up by comparison with matched, non-patient controls. Health status was significantly improved by hip replacement on the McMaster health index questionnaire (p less than 0.001) and the arthritis impact measurement scales (p less than 0.001). Individually measured QoL was significantly increased after surgery when measured by SEIQoL (p less than 0.02). The individual nature of QoL was reflected in the variety of life areas nominated as important by individual patients, the differences in relative weights attached to these areas, and the complex nature of the changes that occurred postoperatively. Our data not only highlight such individuality but also show that SEIQoL provides a means by which this can be assessed scientifically.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population.

Current methods of measuring quality of life (QoL) impose an external value system on individuals, rather than allowing them to describe their lives in terms of those factors which they consider important. The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) was developed to overcome such limitations. The QoL of 42 healthy attenders at an international immunization clinic was assessed using SEIQoL. Judgement reliability was high (r = 0.74) and individuals' judgement policies accounted for a large percentage of the variance in overall QoL (R2 = 0.75) demonstrating the construct validity of judgement analysis in this context. In a second study of QoL of out-patient suffering from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (N = 20) or peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (N = 20) was assessed using SEIQoL. Judgement reliability was lower (r = 0.54) although statistically highly significant (P less than 0.01), and the variance in overall QoL judgements explained was high (R2 = 0.74). SEIQoL is an acceptable, reliable and valid technique for measuring individual QoL that takes greater account of individual perspectives than traditional measurement approaches.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1990

Clinical judgment analysis.

Judgement is central to the practice of medicine and occurs between making clinical observations and taking clinical decisions. Clinical judgment analysis has developed as a method of making statistically firm models of doctors' judgments. Computed models reveal the differential importance attached to items of clinical, social, or other data which are determinants of clinical decisions. These models can both reveal the causes of conflicts of judgment and may help resolve them in a way that unaided discussion cannot. Revealing experts' models to students speeds learning of diagnostic skills. Clinical judgment analysis offers a method of probing the judgments not just of students and doctors but also of patients who have shown systematic differences in their perceptions of risk and benefit. The power and relevance of clinical trials can be improved by the consistent application of judgment policies generated from both the trialists and those who will use their results.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed1976

"Side" effects: a misnomer.

The tragic results for the babies of patients prescribed thalidomide, although they can indeed be termed "side" effects, hardly warrant so slight an epithet, and Dr Joyce in his paper would like the term to be dropped in favour of "additional" effects of drugs. Despite extensive clinical trials before drugs are put before the prescribing doctor, side effects cannot be entirely anticipated or eliminated, and indeed many are not harmful. However, it is important, Dr Joyce argues, for information to the doctor from the patient and from the doctor to the manufacturer to be collected and evaluated. Only in this way can effects of drugs other than those intended be drawn to the notice of the manufacturer. The commentary by two practising physicians emphasizes the ambiguities in the descriptive literature accompanying a new drug. Dr Herxheimer and Dr Higgs would like to see some sort of panel to be established to reassess drugs in the light of observations on their effects and "side" effects on patients, a task which the existing Committee on Safety of Medicines could not at the moment undertake. A medical need for a new drug should be established before it is manufactured, let alone offered to the general practitioner.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed1975

Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain.

A visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 4-point scale (FPS) have been compared in patients suffering from prolonged constant pain due to chronic inflammatory or degenerative arthropathy. Each patient was treated with a constant low or high dose of paracetamol or dihydrocodeine throughout a four week period. The VAS was accurate, as reliable and more sensitive than the FPS in registering the intensity of chronic pain. Separate records of each estimate, sealed immediately on completion by the patient, resulted in omission of significantly more pain recordings on the FPS, whereas retention by the patients of their previous records did not systematically influence subsequent judgments. In this study, the VAS appeared to be more satisfactory than the FPS for patient self-rating of pain intensity.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed1975

Cannabis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aggression↗