PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Raffaitin

Publications and source records attributed to C Raffaitin.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Bone loss in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether loss of bone is detectable during follow-up of diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 40 initially non-dialysed diabetic patients with CKD (isotopic glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) or albumin excretion rate > 30 mg/24 h), body composition (DEXA scan) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR determined from (51)Cr-EDTA clearance) were measured at a 2-year interval, and compared by paired t-tests. RESULTS: The 40 patients, mainly with Type 2 diabetes (n = 28), were men (n = 28), aged 65 +/- 11 years, with diabetes duration 18 +/- 11 years. GFR was initially 38.0 (range 8-89) ml/min/1.73 m(2). CKD progressed during follow-up: eight started haemodialysis and GFR declined in the 32 others (P < 0.05 vs. initial). T-scores for total body (initial -0.61 +/- 1.11, final -1.11 +/- 1.40; P < 0.001) and femoral neck (initial -1.88 +/- 0.15, final -2.07 +/- 0.15; P < 0.05) declined. Ten patients were osteopaenic at baseline (no osteoporosis), whereas most were osteopaenic (n = 21, P < 0.05) and five were osteoporotic at final assessment. The 16 patients who became osteopaenic or osteoporotic during follow-up did not differ from the others for the type of diabetes, age, GFR, albumin excretion rate, HbA(1c), GFR reduction and the requirement for dialysis during follow-up. They were all men (P < 0.01 by chi-squared test), with reduced initial total body T-score (-1.20 +/- 0.82, others -0.32 +/- 1.13; P < 0.05) and a lower body mass index (24.6 +/- 4.3; others 27.7 +/- 4.3; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bone loss, especially in the femoral neck, is progressive in diabetic patients with CKD.

Adult↗

A simplified Cockcroft-Gault formula to improve the prediction of the glomerular filtration rate in diabetic patients.

AIM: The National Kidney Foundation recommends stratification of renal failure into moderate (Glomerular Filtration Rate: GFR = 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2), severe (15-30) or terminal (<15) using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) or the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations. We studied the biases in these methods in an attempt to improve the standard CG (MCG) and devise a strategy for stratification. METHODS: GFR was measured by 51Cr-EDTA clearance in 200 diabetic patients: 100 (Group 1: study of concordance) before 2003 and 100 thereafter (Group 2: validation of MCG). The CG was modified by replacing body weight by its mean value: 76. RESULTS: In group 1, the recommended equations only correctly stratified 50 patients. The CG, not the MDRD, underestimated GFR if BMI was normal, and overestimated it in obese patients. In group 2, the MCG was well correlated with GFR and not biased by weight. Over the whole population, the MCG and MDRD were more accurate for the diagnosis of moderate and severe renal failure. The MDRD showed the lowest differences with GFR, except if GFR > 60, where the MCG performed better. All formulae overestimated low GFR, the MDRD also underestimated high GFR. The best stratification (147/200) was obtained using the MCG if creatininemia < 120 micromol/l and the MDRD if creatininemia > or =120 micromol/l. CONCLUSION: The CG is biased by weight, the MCG corrects this. The more accurate MDRD cannot be used in all patients as it underestimates high GFR. The best stratification was obtained using the MCG at low and the MDRD at high creatininemia.

Adult↗

Body composition in diabetic subjects with chronic kidney disease: interest of bio-impedance analysis, and anthropometry.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lean body mass (LBM) is reduced in uremia, but this has not been reported in diabetic nephropathy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We compared predicted % LBM to DEXA measurements in 10 non-diabetic uremic, 10 non-uremic diabetic and 10 uremic diabetic subjects matched for age, gender and BMI. We also measured % LBM by anthropometry, bio-impedance analysis (BIA) and compared them with DEXA in 49 diabetic subjects with a wide range of renal failure. The results were compared and a Bland & Altman procedure was performed. Associations between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and % LBM were tested. RESULTS: In matched groups, predicted % LBM values were overestimated in non-diabetic uremic subjects, and underestimated in non-uremic diabetic subjects. In uremic diabetic subjects, the error was intermediary. As compared to DEXA (% LBM: 69.0 +/- 7.1%), measurement of % LBM by anthropometry (71.4 +/- 8.0%, p < 0.05) and BIA (67.2 +/- 7.6%, p < 0.05) were biased in the 49 diabetic subjects. The mean of anthropometric and BIA (Ant+BIA) were similar to DEXA results (69.3 +/- 6.8%, p = 0.64), with best correlation coefficients and Bland & Altman plots. GFR was correlated to % LBM assessed by DEXA, BIA and Ant+BIA. CONCLUSION: In diabetic subjects with chronic kidney disease, LBM should be measured, rather than predicted. A good evaluation is possible, even without DEXA.

Anthropometry↗

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in diabetic subjects: Cockcroft formula or modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation?

OBJECTIVE: The Cockcroft-Gault formula is recommended for the evaluation of renal function in diabetic patients. The more recent Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation seems more accurate, but it has not been validated in diabetic patients. This study compares the two methods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 160 diabetic patients, we compared the Cockcroft-Gault formula and MDRD equation estimations to glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) measured by an isotopic method ((51)Cr-EDTA) by correlation studies and a Bland-Altman procedure. Their accuracy for the diagnosis of moderately (GFR <60 ml . min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2)) or severely (GFR <30 ml . min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2)) impaired renal function were compared with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Both the Cockcroft-Gault formula (r = 0.74; P < 0.0001) and MDRD equation (r = 0.81; P < 0.0001) were well correlated with isotopic GFR. The Bland-Altman procedure revealed a bias for the MDRD equation, which was not the case for the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Analysis of ROC curves showed that the MDRD equation had a better maximal accuracy for the diagnosis of moderate (areas under the curve [AUCs] 0.868 for the Cockcroft-Gault formula and 0.927 for the MDRD equation; P = 0.012) and severe renal failure (AUC 0.883 for the Cockcroft-Gault formula and 0.962 for the MDRD equation; P = 0.0001). In the 87 patients with renal insufficiency, the MDRD equation estimation was better correlated with isotopic GFR (Cockcroft-Gault formula r = 0.57; the MDRD equation r = 0.78; P < 0.01), and it was not biased as evaluated by the Bland-Altman procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although both equations have imperfections, the MDRD equation is more accurate for the diagnosis and stratification of renal failure in diabetic patients.

Adult↗

[Ac-SDKP, a marker of the angiotensin-converting enzyme activity?].

The tetra-peptide Acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (Ac-SDKP) generated by the cleavage of thymosine beta4 inhibits the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells and the proliferation and secretion of fibroblasts in the myocardium and the glomeruli. The clinical administration of Ac-SDKP has been proposed and partially investigated. The peptide could protect hematopoietic stem cells during anti-neoplastic treatments leaving cancerous cells unprotected. As it opposes the effects of TGFbeta it could prevent fibrosis after myocardial infarcts and glomeruli fibrosis during the natural course of diabetic nephropathy. However, until now the expected benefits of such a treatment are based on an indirect consideration. Indeed, the degradation of Ac-SDKP is due to the action of the angiotensin-converting enzyme. Interestingly, the blocking of this enzyme both improves the above-mentioned fibrosis and increases the plasma levels of Ac-SDKP. Should the therapeutic effects prove solid, and therapeutic levels be established assaying Ac-SDKP could be an interesting marker of therapeutic efficiency.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

[Primary hyperaldosteronism].

Diagnosing primary aldosteronism, a hypertensive endocrine disease, is difficult because of an ill-defined frequency, various clinical forms and multiple diagnostic criteria. Current recommendations rest upon aldosterone and renin or renin activity determinations, the main point being to investigate aldosterone secretion with regards to of its main stimulus, renin. Proponents of the renin assay argue that it is easy and reliable. Proponents of the renin activity assay favour this method because of multiple epidemiological studies. Whatever the method used, each laboratory has to establish its critical thresholds in relation to the kits used. Extensive comparative studies would be useful to appreciate their relative benefits.

Aldosterone↗