Biomedical subjects

C Randon

Publications and source records attributed to C Randon.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Endovascular repair of aortic rupture.

OBJECTIVES: To report a single centre experience with endovascular repair of ruptures of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. DESIGN: Retrospective non-randomised study in a university hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February 1997 and October 2002, endovascular repair of the aorta was performed on 125 occasions. In 20 cases, this was done as an emergency (nine ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms and 11 descending thoracic aortic ruptures). All patients underwent spiral computed tomographic angiography to assess the feasibility of endovascular repair and the size of the endoprosthesis. RESULTS: Endovascular repair was successfully completed in all patients. Primary conversion to open repair was not necessary. Postoperative 30-day mortality was 5/20 (25%). There were major complications in 12/20 patients. No ruptures of the aneurysms occurred postoperatively. No primary endoleaks occurred, but in 4/20 (20%) secondary surgical interventions were required after a median follow-up of 12 months (range 1-42 months). CONCLUSION: Our early experience shows the feasibility of this technique with early results that compare favourably to those of emergency open repair. Further studies are required to assess the long-term efficacy.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

How to perform a below-knee amputation.

Even though modern techniques have improved patient survival and limb salvage rates in patients with critical limb ischaemia and end-stage vascular disease, amputation is sometimes the only possible treatment. In younger patients with traumatic avulsion of a foot, infected gangrene of the foot or a peripheral tumour, amputation is out of discussion and commonly accepted. In older vascular patients, amputation should rather be considered as the starting point for revalidation and rehabilitation than as failure of a revascularization technique. The evolution in prostheses permits a rapid revalidation in most patients. However, an accurate amputation technique is still required to produce a good quality stump allowing early fitting of prosthetics.

Amputation, Surgical↗

PubMed1999

Cost-benefit analysis of endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs and benefits of open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: A consecutive series of 29 elective patients (open treatment, N = 20 and endovascular treatment, N = 9) were compared retrospectively. RESULTS: Operating time was significantly shorter for endovascular treatment (mean 90 vs. 125 min, p = 0.026). No endovascular procedure was converted to open surgery; one early endoleak was seen which sealed spontaneously. Endovascular treatment resulted in a shorter ICU and hospital stay (0 days vs. 2 days, p. 0.001 and 5 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.01 respectively). Mean total cost did not differ 361,938 BEF (9,048 Euro) vs. 382,995 BEF (9,575 Euro), p = 0.46. Endovascular treatment generated significantly less hospitalization costs (73,162 BEF or 1,829 Euro vs. 18,2740 BEF or 4,568 Euro, p = 0.001) but required a more expensive implant (153,293 BEF or 3,832 Euro vs. 38,296 BEF or 957 Euro, p = 0.001). Mean total cost for the patient was significantly higher in the endovascular treatment group (66,309 BEF or 1,658 Euro vs. 24,969 BEF or 624 Euro, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our experience confirms the feasibility and safety of endovascular AAA treatment. It is associated with a shorter ICU and hospital stay and less morbidity. Overall cost for society does not differ significantly as the benefit, of lower hospitalization costs is undone by the high cost of the endovascular graft.

Aged↗

PubMed1988