PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C S BACHOFER

Publications and source records attributed to C S BACHOFER.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1962

Comparison of stimulus energies required to elicit the ERG in response to x-rays and to light.

The retina of Rana pipiens, the leopard frog or grass frog, is shown to be an extremely sensitive detector of x-rays. Its sensitivity to x-rays equals in some respects its sensitivity to visible light. The energy required for the response to visible light is so low that the reaction has long been known as one of the most sensitive in biological systems. An exact comparison is made of the amount of energy required in the stimulus to elicit an electroretinogram (ERG) in response to x-rays and in response to light. ERG's from threshold responses to maximal responses obtainable with x-rays and with light are reproduced. The rods of the retina are shown to be responsible for the production of the ERG. The actual amount of energy absorbed in the rhodopsin from x-ray and from light stimulation over a wide range of intensities and durations has been determined and has been related to the amplitude of the ERG. To the question whether light or x-rays are more efficient in eliciting an ERG, no simple or unequivocal answer can be given. The three dimensional relationship of amplitude of response, intensity of stimulus, and duration of stimulus shows rather unexpectedly that in certain regions light is more efficient while in other regions x-rays are more efficient.

Animals↗
PubMed1961

Electroretinogram in response to x-ray stimulation.

The retina of the grass frog, Rana pipiens, responds to flashes of highintensity x-rays and produces an electroretinogram indistinguishable in form from the electroretinogram produced in response to light stimulation at low and intermediate intensities. At higher intensities the form changes and, for maximal responses, the electroretinogram in response to x-rays shows a lower amplitude and a longer latent period than that in response to light. The prolonged latent period indicates additional intermediate reactions for the x-rays response.

Animals↗
PubMed1959

X-ray effects on single nerve fibers.

Electrophysiological responses of median and lateral giant nerve fibers of the earthworm were recorded during exposure, in vitro, to x-rays. In response to external stimulation, during x-irradiation, these nerve fibers showed initially an increase in conduction velocity, a rise in spike amplitude, a decrease in relative refractory period, and an increase in sensitivity. These responses represent an enhancement of activity, attributable to bombardment with x-rays, rarely found in other biological systems. They were followed by deterioration of activity and eventual block, representative of the lethal action of x-rays, commonly observed in other biological systems. Several properties of the enhancement of activity were noted: The time at which maximum activity of one factor occurred did not coincide with the time at which the maxima of other activities occurred; spike amplitude, for example, was observed to increase while conduction velocity had already reached its maximum and was rapidly declining. The energy supplied by bombardment with x-rays did not act synergistically during the time of the enhanced response; that is, concomitant irradiation was not necessary in order to produce the enhanced response, once the nerve had been altered by x-irradiation. Once the nerve was responding in an enhanced manner, cessation of irradiation for short periods of time had no effect on the response. The phenomenon was therefore due to an irreversible alteration of the nerve fiber itself.

Nerve Fibers↗
PubMed1956

Oxygen protection of bacteriophage T1 against ionizing radiations.

Bacteriophage T1 was suspended in distilled water and in phosphate buffer, saturated with oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon monoxide, and irradiated with gamma rays and x-rays. Under the same conditions phage was exposed to hydrogen peroxide. Oxygen acted as a protective agent against both irradiation and hydrogen peroxide inactivation. As a protective agent against irradiation, oxygen was more efficient in distilled water than in buffer. The phage was much more sensitive to irradiation in the presence of hydrogen or nitrogen than in the presence of oxygen. Survivals of phage irradiated in suspensions saturated with hydrogen and with nitrogen did not differ significantly. From this it was concluded that oxygen did not protect T1 by removing atomic hydrogen from the irradiated medium, since the hydrogen-saturated medium increased the yield of atomic hydrogen but did not increase the yield of inactivated phage. It was presumed, therefore, that phage is sensitive to OH radicals and this was confirmed by irradiating phage with UV in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and comparing this survival with the survivals obtained from hydrogen peroxide alone and from UV alone. The combined effect of hydrogen peroxide and UV acting simultaneously was greater than the effect attributable to hydrogen peroxide and UV acting separately. Evidence for sensitivity to HO(2) radicals was considered, and the effect was attributed chiefly to an oxidizing action since phage sensitivity is greater at higher hydrogen ion concentrations, which favor oxidation by HO(2) radicals. Since the OH radical is a more efficient oxidizing agent than O(-), the former being favored in an acid medium, the latter in an alkaline medium, and since the phage is more sensitive in the first situation than in the second, the present tests proved the importance of oxidation as the mechanism of inactivation. Since some inactivation was encountered when phage was exposed to reducing agents, independently of irradiation, it was concluded that phage is somewhat sensitive to reducing agents, but the inactivation attributable to ionizing radiations is due chiefly to oxidation, against which these reducing agents are very efficient protectors. Under no circumstances did hydrogen peroxide protect T1, whether produced by irradiation in the medium or added beforehand to the medium to be irradiated. The first point was investigated by irradiating T1 in the presence of hydrogen and oxygen combined; this produced a higher yield of hydrogen peroxide but a lower survival of T1. In all these tests phage survival under irradiation was directly correlated with oxygen content of the medium rather than with production of hydrogen peroxide. It is proposed that the protective effect of oxygen is due to a reaction between the phage and oxygen, and this complex confers stability upon the phage.

Bacteriophages↗