PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Settle

Publications and source records attributed to C Settle.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy sites.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion remains controversial. The bacteriology of peristomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion has been poorly studied, leading to uncertainty regarding the optimum choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis. AIM: To investigate the bacteriology of peristomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion and to determine the contribution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Nasal and pharyngeal swabs were taken from a consecutive series of patients prior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion over a 6-month period. Bacterial colonization and infection at the peristomal site were prospectively evaluated at days 2/3 and 7 post-insertion. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion (mean age, 68 years; cerebrovascular disease, 52%). Naso-pharyngeal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (35%) invariably led to peristomal colonization following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion. Peristomal infection occurred in eight (26%) cases (seven (88%) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus- positive). Peristomal infection was significantly more likely to occur in patients with naso-pharyngeal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization (odds ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-70.9). CONCLUSIONS: Naso-pharyngeal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization invariably predicts peristomal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion, and is associated with an increased peristomal infection rate. Currently recommended antibiotic prophylaxis regimens may be inappropriate in institutions with significant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization rates.

Aged↗

Program planning: the clinical utility of three activities of daily living assessment tools.

A jury of five occupational therapy experts was used to evaluate the clinical utility of three activities of daily living assessment tools that were originally designed for purposes other than individualized occupational therapy assessment or program planning. The three tools were the Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, PULSES Profile, and Physical Self-Maintenance Scale. Using the results from each tool, scored for a simulated patient with a right cerebrovascular accident, as well as medical information about the patient, the jury members were asked to plan a treatment program. The consensus of the jury was that the results from each tool did not provide enough information to help them identify the patient's specific performance problems or the causes of those problems. Therefore, the three tools were considered to have low clinical utility for planning individualized occupational therapy treatment. For use in planning an individualized treatment program, an activities of daily living assessment tool should provide specific information about which component of a task the patient found difficult or was unable to do and the type and level of assistance required.

Activities of Daily Living↗