PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Shostak

Publications and source records attributed to C Shostak.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Minimizing and measuring lens dose when giving cranial irradiation.

Three different techniques of administering cranial irradiation were used to determine the dose to the lens as measured in the Rando phantom. The techniques employed were as follows: (1) the central axis of the radiation beam was placed at the thickest portion of the cranium; (2) the central axis of the radiation beam was placed at the lateral orbital rim (bony canthus); (3) the central axis of the radiation beam was placed at the thickest portion of the cranium but with the beam angled 5 degrees posteriorly away from the eye. Thermal luminescent dosimeters (TLD) were placed in a phantom, at a point determined from a life-sized anatomical section of the plane through the midsection of the eye, to be at the location of the posterior capsule of the lens. In addition, TLDs were placed on the outer surface of the phantom head, directly lateral to the location determined to be where the lens would lie. With equally weighted lateral opposed beams, delivering a midplane dose of 200 cGy, the TLDs at the point of the lens measured 21, 9.9 and 10.6% of the midplane doses from the three techniques respectively. TLDs placed directly lateral to the lens on the surface of the phantom head gave an approximation of the lens dose, particularly when techniques 2 and 3 were used. Isodose curve generated by a General Electric treatment planning computer gave lens doses similar to those of the phantom data for each of the three different radiotherapy techniques. Cranial irradiation should be carried out by either technique 2 or technique 3 to minimize radiation dose to the lens.

Brain Neoplasms↗

An approach to abutting adjacent fields.

Problems arise in designing treatment techniques involving two pair of adjacent opposing fields where machine limitations require the patient to flip from supine to prone positions. Mantle and para-aortic treatments, in particular, can create challenging problems because of changes in patient position, different SSD's between adjacent fields, internal anatomical changes from supine to prone position, as well as field size and other treatment machine limitations. A simulator technique has been developed which takes cognizance of these limitations in specifying the gap between adjacent fields. It employs collinearity of the 50% decrement lines of adjacent-opposed field edges and the intersection of all four edges at an internal mid-plane match point. The technique maintains dose homogeneity and eliminates hot and cold triangles in the area of abutment. Simulation radiographs facilitate identification of collinearity with respect to a specific vertebra in the plane of abutment. In summary, this approach: Verifies abutment of coplanar fields by use of match film, improves isodose uniformity at mid-plane, evaluates dose distributions when abutment occurs at a point anterior or posterior to midline, prevents the possibility of spinal cord complications that might occur due to three field overlap.

Humans↗