PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C T Baten

Publications and source records attributed to C T Baten.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

An EMG technique for measuring spinal loading during asymmetric lifting.

OBJECTIVES: To compare two methods of calibrating the erector spinae electromyographic signal against moment generation in order to predict extensor moments during asymmetric lifting tasks, and to compare the predicted moments with those obtained using a linked-segment model. METHODS: Eight men lifted loads of 6.7 and 15.7 kg at two speeds, in varying amounts of trunk rotation. For each lift, the following were recorded at 60 Hz; the rectified and averaged surface electromyographic signal, bilaterally at T10 and L3, lumbar curvature using the 3-Space Isotrak, movement of body segments using a 4-camera Vicon system, and ground reaction forces using a Kistler force-plate. Electromyographic (EMG) and Isotrak data were used to calculate lumbosacral extensor moments using the electromyographic model, whereas movement analysis data and ground reaction forces were used to estimate net moments using the linked-segment model. For the electromyographic technique, predictions of extensor moment were based on two different sets of EMG-extensor moment calibrations: one performed in pure sagittal flexion and the other in flexion combined with 45 degrees of trunk rotation. RESULTS: Extensor moments predicted by the electromyographic technique increased significantly with load and speed of lifting but were not influenced by the method of calibration. These moments were 7-40%greater than the net moments obtained with the linked-segment model, the difference increasing with load and speed. CONCLUSIONS: The calibration method does not influence extensor moments predicted by the electromyographic technique in asymmetric lifting, suggesting that simple, sagittal-plane calibrations are adequate for this purpose. Differences in predicted moments between the electromyographic technique and linked-segment model may be partly due to different anthropometric assumptions and different amounts of smoothing and filtering in the two models, and partly due to antagonistic muscle forces, the effects of which cannot be measured by linked-segment models. RelevanceAsymmetric lifting is a significant risk factor for occupationally-related low back pain. Improved techniques for measuring spinal loading during such complex lifting tasks may help to identify work practices which place the spine at risk of injury.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Lumbar loading during lifting: a comparative study of three measurement techniques.

Low back loading during occupational lifting is thought to be an important causative factor in the development of low back pain. In order to regulate spinal loading in the workplace, it is necessary to measure it accurately. Various methods have been developed to do this, but each has its own limitations, and none can be considered a "gold standard". The purpose of the current study was to compare the results of three contrasting techniques in order to gain insight into possible sources of error to which each is susceptible. The three techniques were a linked segment model (LSM), an electromyographic (EMG)-based model, and a neural network (NN) that used both EMG and inertial sensing techniques. All three techniques were applied simultaneously to calculate spinal loading when eight volunteers performed a total of eight lifts in a laboratory setting. Averaged results showed that, in comparison with the LSM, the EMG technique calculated a 25.5+/-33.4% higher peak torque and the NN technique a 17.3+/-10.5% lower peak torque. Differences between the techniques varied with lifting speed and method of lifting, and could be attributed to differences in anthropometric assumptions, antagonistic muscle activity, damping of transient force peaks by body tissues, and, specific to the NN, underestimation of trunk flexion. The results of the current study urge to reconsider the validity of other models by independent comparisons.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Cervical muscle dysfunction in the chronic whiplash associated disorder grade II (WAD-II).

STUDY DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study, surface electromyography measurements of the upper trapezius muscles were obtained during different functional tasks in patients with a chronic whiplash associated disorder Grade II and healthy control subjects. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether muscle dysfunction of the upper trapezius muscles, as assessed by surface electromyography, can be used to distinguish patients with whiplash associated disorder Grade II from healthy control subjects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In the whiplash associated disorder, there is need to improve the diagnostic tools. Whiplash associated disorder Grade II is characterized by the presence of "musculoskeletal signs." Surface electromyography to assess these musculoskeletal signs objectively may be a useful tool. METHODS: Normalized smoothed rectified electromyography levels of the upper trapezius muscles of patients with whiplash associated disorder Grade II (n = 18) and healthy control subjects (n = 19) were compared during three static postures, during a unilateral dynamic manual exercise, and during relaxation after the manual exercise. Coefficients of variation were computed to identify the measurement condition that discriminated best between the two groups. RESULTS: The most pronounced differences between patients with whiplash associated disorder Grade II and healthy control subjects were found particularly in situations in which the biomechanical load was low. Patients showed higher coactivation levels during physical exercise and a decreased ability to relax muscles after physical exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with whiplash associated disorder Grade II can be distinguished from healthy control subjects according to the presence of cervical muscle dysfunction, as assessed by surface electromyography of the upper trapezius muscles. Particularly the decreased ability to relax the trapezius muscles seems to be a promising feature to identify patients with whiplash associated disorder Grade II. Assessment of the muscle (dys)function by surface electromyography offers a refinement of the whiplash associated disorder classification and provides an indication to a suitable therapeutic approach.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Trunk muscle activation and low back loading in lifting in the absence of load knowledge.

People who know the actual mass of an object to be lifted normally prepare themselves before attempting a lift to control the movement and to minimize low back loading. In this study, the trunk muscular reactions and low back torque were investigated in the situation in which the individual did not know the actual mass but only had some idea of the range within which the mass lay. Nine males lifted boxes weighing 6.5 or 16.5 kg under the condition in which they knew the actual mass before attempting a lift (the 'known' condition) and the condition in which they only had the information that the mass would be within the range of 6.5-16.5 kg (the 'unknown' condition). The ground reaction forces and body movements were measured in the trials and, from these, the L5/S1 torques were calculated. The activation of back and abdominal muscles was also measured. For the 6.5 kg weight, a higher (16%) back muscle activation in grasping the box and a higher (10%) peak L5/S1 torque in actual lifting were observed in the 'unknown' compared with the 'known' weight condition. For the 16.5 kg weight, the back muscle activation was lower (10%) during grasping, and higher (10%) during lifting in the 'unknown' compared with the 'known' weight condition. Knowledge of the load had no effect on the activation of the abdominal muscles. It was concluded that in the so-called 'unknown' conditions, the risks of low back injury were increased in comparison with the conditions where the actual weight was known in advance.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed1999

Dynamic forces acting on the lumbar spine during manual handling. Can they be estimated using electromyographic techniques alone?

STUDY DESIGN: Compressive loading of the lumbar spine was analyzed using electromyographic, movement analysis, and force-plate techniques. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the inertial forces that cannot be detected by electromyographic techniques alone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Links between back pain and manual labor have stimulated attempts to measure spine compressive loading. However, direct measurements of intradiscal pressure are too invasive, and force plates too cumbersome for use in the workplace. Electromyographic techniques are noninvasive and portable, but ignore certain inertial forces. METHODS: Eight men lifted boxes weighing 6.7 and 15.7 kg from the ground, while joint moments acting about L5-S1 were quantified 1) by using a linked-segment model to analyze data from Kistler force plates and a Vicon movement-analysis system, and 2) by measuring the electromyographic activity of the erector spinae muscles, correcting it for contraction speed and comparing it to moment generation during static contractions. The linked-segment model was used to calculate the "axial thrust," defined as the component of the L5-S1 reaction force that acts along the axis of the spine and that is unrelated to trunk muscle activity or static body weight. RESULTS: Peak extensor moments predicted by the two techniques were similar and equivalent to spinal compressive forces of 2.9-4.8 kN. The axial thrust "hidden" from the electromyographic technique was negligible during slow lifts, and remained below 4% of peak spinal compression even during fast heavy lifts. Peak axial thrust was proportional to the peak vertical ground reaction (R2 = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Electromyographic techniques can measure dynamic spinal loading, but additional force-plate data would improve accuracy slightly during lifts requiring a vigorous upward thrust from the legs.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Usability of thenar eminence orthoses: report of a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference in the usability of three types of thenar eminence (TE) orthoses. DESIGN: Prospective comparative pre-experimental study with randomized cross-over design. SETTING: Rehabilitation centre. SUBJECTS: Ten patients with osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal I joint confirmed by X-ray. INTERVENTION: Three types of TE orthoses, made of either supple elastic material, elastic material with a semi-rigid thumb busk or a semi-rigid (polyethylene) material. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pain at the thenar eminence, pinch force, hand function, cosmesis, comfort and function of the TE orthosis. RESULTS: The supple elastic TE orthosis scores significantly better than the more rigid types on the subjects 'comfort', 'function' and the Green Test, while the semi-rigid orthosis scores best on 'cosmesis'. The score on the subject 'pain reduction' shows no significant difference between the three types of TE orthoses. The scores obtained correspond with the outcome of structured interviews about the usability of the TE orthoses. CONCLUSION: Eight out of 10 patients prefer the permanent use of a TE orthosis. Six patients chose the supple elastic orthosis and two chose the semi-rigid orthosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist.

Asymmetric lifting is associated with an increased risk of low back disorders. Especially in lifting movements, characterized by a small amount of asymmetry, it is still the question if asymmetric lumbosacral torques occur, or if subjects try to avoid asymmetric back loading by twisting their pelvis with respect to the feet. An increase of the lifting speed or the box weight might amplify the lumbar torques but might also result in an attempt to limit further increase of asymmetric torques by increasing pelvic twist. In the current study, asymmetrical lifting movements were analyzed with the aid of a 3D linked segment model, using cuffs mounted to the body segments. Eight subjects performed lifting movements with five different asymmetry conditions, ranging from 0 to 90 degrees lifting asymmetry with respect to the sagittal plane, using two lifting speeds and two box weights. A significant increase in lateral flexing and twisting low back torque was found for each increase in asymmetry of the lifting movement. Pelvic twist accounted more or less constantly for about 25% of the lifting asymmetry and was hardly influenced by lifting speed or box weight. Even for 10 or 30 degrees of lifting asymmetry, subjects did not twist their pelvis far enough to avoid asymmetric loading of the low back. Assuming that asymmetric loading of the low back is more strenuous to the spine than symmetric loading, the current results indicate that even small deviations of a lifting movement from the sagittal plane can explain an increased risk of low back disorders.

Back↗
PubMed1998

When is a lifting movement too asymmetric to identify low-back loading by 2-D analysis?

In ergonomics research, two-dimensional (2-D) biomechanical models are often used to study the mechanical loading of the low back in lifting movements. When lifting movements are asymmetric, errors of unknown size may be introduced in a 2-D analysis. In the current study, an estimation of these errors was made by comparing the outcome of a 2-D analysis to the results of a recently developed and validated 3-D model. Four subjects made two repetitions of five lifting movements, differing in the amount of asymmetry. The results showed a significant underestimation of the peak torque by 20, 36 and 61% when the initial position of a box was rotated 30, 60 and 90 degrees with respect to the sagittal plane of the subject. The main cause of this underestimation was a pelvic twist, resulting in an erroneous projection of a pelvic marker on to the sagittal plane due to pelvic twist. It is suggested that from 30 degrees box rotation a 2-D analysis may easily lead to wrong conclusions when it is used to study asymmetric lifting.

Adult↗