PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C T Eliopoulos

Publications and source records attributed to C T Eliopoulos.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Characterization of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus durans.

During investigation of an outbreak of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium in a paediatric hospital, an isolate of Enterococcus durans resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin, ampicillin and highly resistant to gentamicin and streptomycin was found in the stools of a patient also colonized with a strain of E. faecium with the same resistance pattern. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin and teicoplanin were 512 and 64 mg/mL, respectively. Resistance to vancomycin as well as high-level resistance to gentamicin was transferable to an E. faecium recipient strain. Both multiresistant E. faecium and E. durans isolates as well as the transconjugant presented only one plasmid. The vanA gene was detected and localized to the high molecular weight plasmid by DNA hybridization with a vanA gene probe. Growth in vancomycin resulted in induction of an approximately 40 kDa protein visible in membrane preparations from these cells. Genetic linkage between vancomycin and gentamicin resistance genes in the same plasmid is suggested.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Comparative in vitro activities of L-695,256, a novel carbapenem, against gram-positive bacteria.

The in vitro activity of a prototype 2-aryl carbapenem, L-695,256, against gram-positive bacteria was examined. All streptococci and oxacillin-susceptible and -resistant staphylococci were inhibited at concentrations of < or = 0.125, < or = 0.125, and 4 micrograms/ml, respectively. The activity of L-695,256 was superior to that of imipenem against other organisms intrinsically resistant to beta-lactams.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

In vitro activity of CP-99,219, a new fluoroquinolone, against clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria.

The in vitro activity of the fluoroquinolone CP-99,219 against gram-positive bacteria was compared with those of five other antimicrobial agents. Against ciprofloxacin-susceptible staphylococci and against streptococci, MICs were < or = 0.12 and < or = 0.5 microgram/ml, respectively. CP-99,219 was also more active than ciprofloxacin against ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci, most enterococci, Leuconostoc spp., and lactobacilli.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

In vivo activity of the combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin compared with daptomycin alone against a strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level gentamicin resistance in the rat endocarditis model.

The in vivo activity of the combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin against a beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant strain of Enterococcus faecalis in a relapse model of rat endocarditis was studied. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (micrograms per milliliter) for these agents against this strain were 4 (daptomycin) and 16 (fosfomycin). Time-kill studies demonstrated synergistic bactericidal activity when daptomycin (0.5 micrograms/ml) and fosfomycin (32 micrograms/ml) were combined. There was no significant difference between the number of valves sterilized by daptomycin alone [six (35%) of 17 valves sterilized] and daptomycin+fosfomycin [ten (59%) of 17 valves sterilized] p = 0.3. These results suggest that the in vitro bactericidal synergism demonstrable between these two agents against strains of enterococci will not necessarily translate into greater therapeutic efficacy in clinical infections.

Animals↗

Therapy of enterococcal infections.

Because enterococci are typically tolerant of the bactericidal effects of cell wall-active antimicrobial agents, bactericidal therapy has required use of these agents in combination with aminoglycosides. For strains which do not demonstrate high-level aminoglycoside resistance, either streptomycin or gentamicin can be used in combination with penicillin, ampicillin or vancomycin. At some centers, as many as 50% of isolates display high-level gentamicin resistance. A minority of such isolates will not be highly streptomycin-resistant, and the latter drug can be used in combination with a cell wall-active drug. Optimal treatment of serious infections due to strains highly resistant to both streptomycin and gentamicin is unknown. While no agent is predictably bactericidal against such isolates, ampicillin, penicillin or vancomycin alone would be expected to cure some patients. Other drugs or drug combinations do not offer any predictable therapeutic advantages.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Ciprofloxacin in combination with other antimicrobials.

Combinations of ciprofloxacin with aminoglycosides or beta-lactams are infrequently synergistic and only rarely antagonistic against Enterobacteriaceae or gram-positive bacteria. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, combinations of ciprofloxacin with an aminoglycoside are synergistic for a minority of isolates, whereas rates of synergistic interactions between ciprofloxacin and beta-lactams against this group of organisms vary over a wide range.

Aminoglycosides↗

Treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin.

Several antimicrobial regimens were evaluated in the treatment of experimental enterococcal endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant strain of Enterococcus faecalis. Ampicillin alone cleared bacteremia in the majority of rats and reduced titers of bacteria within vegetations (6.84 versus 8.80 log10 CFU/g in controls) but did not sterilize valves. Ampicillin-sulbactam combinations, vancomycin, daptomycin, and imipenem each reduced residual bacterial titers within vegetations to 4.01 log10 CFU/g or less; in 26 to 43% of animals receiving 5 days of therapy, titers of bacteria were reduced to undetectable levels. In a separate experiment, rats received ampicillin-sulbactam, daptomycin, or vancomycin for 10 days and were then observed for 10 days after termination of therapy for evidence of relapse. In surviving rats, valves remained sterile in four of five rats treated with ampicillin-sulbactam, in five of seven treated with daptomycin, but in only one of eight receiving vancomycin.

Animals↗

Antibiotic combinations: should they be tested?

When antibiotic combinations are used to provide a broader spectrum of antimicrobial activity or in an attempt to prevent the emergence of resistant organisms, it is rarely necessary or practical to perform tests of drug interactions in vitro. In vitro testing of combinations may be useful when combinations are used in an attempt to attain synergistic interactions. In some cases, screening methods can be used as substitutes for formal synergy testing. This paper examines the mechanisms of antibiotic interaction leading to synergism or antagonism, surveys attempts to correlate in vitro observations with efficacy in animal models, and reviews clinical data providing evidence for or against a useful role of synergistic antibiotic interactions in the treatment of human infections.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗