Biomedical subjects

C T Noto

Publications and source records attributed to C T Noto.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Cerebellar influences on saccade plasticity.

Inaccurate saccades adapt to become more accurate. In this experiment the role of cerebellar output to the oculomotor system in adapting saccade size was investigated. We measured saccade adaptation after temporary inactivation of saccade-related neurons in the caudal part of the fastigial nucleus which projects to the oculomotor brain stem. We located caudal fastigial nucleus neurons with single unit recording and injected 0.1% muscimol among them. Two monkeys received bilateral injections and two monkeys unilateral injections. Unilateral injections made ipsiversive saccades hypermetric (gains >1.5) and contraversive saccades hypometric (gains approximately 0.6). Bilateral injections made both leftward and rightward saccades hypermetric (gains >1.5). During unilateral inactivation neither ipsiversive nor contraversive saccade size adapted after approximately 1,000 saccades. During bilateral inactivation, adaptation was either small or very slow. Most intact monkeys completely adapt after approximately 1,000 saccades to similar dysmetrias produced by intrasaccadic target displacement. After the monkeys receiving bilateral injections made >1,000 saccades in each horizontal direction, we placed them in the dark so that the muscimol dissipated without the monkeys receiving visual feedback about its saccade gain. After the dark period, 20-degree saccades were adapted to be 12% smaller, and 4-degree saccades to be 7% smaller. We expect this difference in adaptation because during caudal fastigial nucleus inactivation, monkeys made many large overshooting saccades and few small overshooting saccades. We conclude from these results that: (1) caudal fastigial nucleus activity is important in adapting dysmetric saccades; and (2) bilateral caudal fastigial nucleus inactivation impairs the relay of adapted signals to the oculomotor system, but it does not stop all adaptation from occurring.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Visual error is the stimulus for saccade gain adaptation.

Saccade accuracy is fundamental to clear vision. The brain maintains saccade accuracy by altering commands for saccades that are consistently inaccurate. For example, saccades that consistently overshoot their targets gradually become smaller. The signal that drives the adaptation of saccade size is not well understood. Previous reports propose that corrective movements and visual errors, both generated after inaccurate saccades, could be responsible for a change in saccade size. Here we show that we can elicit normal reductions in saccade size while eliciting few or no correction saccades. These normal reductions in saccade size indicate that visual errors, not correction saccades, drive the adaptation of saccades.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2000

Flexibility of saccade adaptation in the monkey: different gain states for saccades in the same direction.

Saccadic accuracy, measured as the ratio of the size of a saccade to the size of the target step that elicits it, i.e., saccade gain, can be altered by jumping the target surreptitiously during the targeting saccade. The gain change produced by this paradigm does not generalize or transfer to saccades of all sizes. Instead, the amount of transfer decreases the more the tested saccade differs in amplitude and direction from that adapted. Here, we tested the limits of this saccade-size specificity by attempting to impose quite different gain states on saccades in the same direction. We altered the saccadic gain by intrasaccadic target jumps of 30% of the initial target step, either forward to produce a gain increase or backward to produce a gain decrease. Three different conditions were studied: (1) saccades to target steps of 20 degrees or 7 degrees were adapted in individual sessions with backward and forward jumps, respectively; (2) saccades to target steps of 20 degrees caused backward target jumps during the same session in which saccades to 7 degrees target steps caused forward steps; (3) the target jumps accompanying 20 and 7 degrees saccades were the same as in (2), but in addition, there were intermediate-sized saccades to 13.5 degrees target steps with no intrasaccadic target jumps. Saccadic gain adaptation was quite flexible. In condition 2, we could simultaneously increase the gain of saccades to 7 degrees target steps while decreasing the gain of saccades to 20 degrees steps in the same direction. Intermediate horizontal saccades to 13.5 degrees target steps experienced gain reductions (average: 6.9%), which were not the sum of gain changes expected from separate 20 degrees gain decreases and 7 degrees gain increases alone, as predicted from condition 1. If adaptation at 20 degrees and 7 degrees occurred while an animal also tracked a non-adapting 13.5 degrees target step (paradigm 3), the gain reduction of saccades to the 13.5 degrees step was reduced considerably (3.4%). Thus, the mechanism that adapts saccade size can support a robust gain increase for saccades of one size while simultaneously supporting a robust gain decrease for saccades only 13 degrees larger. Furthermore, the presence during adaptation of a non-adapted target step with a size intermediate to the two adapting steps reestablishes a nearly normal gain within only 6.5 degrees of a robust gain increase and decrease. These data indicate that saccadic gain adaptation can set very different gain states for saccades with rather similar vectors.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed2000

Temporal characteristics of error signals driving saccadic gain adaptation in the macaque monkey.

Saccadic gain (saccade amplitude/target amplitude) can be reduced gradually by repeatedly stepping the target backward during the saccade. The gain reduction produced by this paradigm is thought to be driven by an error signal created by the backstep. We investigated the effects of varying the timing of this error signal relative to the end of the saccade by using two different paradigms in macaques. In the brief backstep paradigm, the target was stepped backward 30% during the saccade but extinguished after different durations. For very short backstep durations (32 ms), little gain reduction occurred. As backstep duration increased, the amount of gain reduction also increased. When backstep duration reached 80 ms, the amount of gain reduction was just under that achieved during the conventional adaptation paradigm in which the backstep remained visible for 1000-1200 ms. In the delayed backstep paradigm, as the saccade occurred, we extinguished the target and then, after a delay, illuminated it for 1 s at the backstep location. In most experiments with short delay times of 16-64 ms, the saccadic gain reduction reached that achieved during conventional adaptation. At delays of 112-208 ms, the amount of gain reduction decreased to approximately 75% of that reached during conventional adaptation. With still longer delays, the amount of gain reduction decreased more gradually. At delays of 750 ms, average gain reduction was 10%. By delays of 1.5 s, gain reduction had fallen essentially to zero. Taken together, these data suggest that the error signal must be present for a limited time ( approximately 80-100 ms) after the saccade to produce the most robust saccadic gain adaptation. However, errors present as long as 750 ms after the saccade still can produce a significant gain reduction.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed1999

Characteristics of simian adaptation fields produced by behavioral changes in saccade size and direction.

The gain of saccadic eye movements can be altered gradually by moving targets either forward or backward during targeting saccades. If the gain of saccades to targets of only one size is adapted, the gain change generalizes or transfers only to saccades with similar vectors. In this study, we examined the spatial extent of such saccadic size adaptation, i.e., the gain adaptation field. We also attempted to adapt saccade direction by moving the target orthogonally during the targeting saccade to document the extent of a direction or cross-axis adaptation field. After adaptive gain decreases of horizontal saccades to 15 degrees target steps, >82% of the gain reduction transferred to saccades to 25 degrees horizontal target steps but only approximately 30% transferred to saccades to 5 degrees steps. For the horizontal component of oblique saccades to target steps with 15 degrees horizontal components and 10 degrees upward or downward vertical components, the transfer was similar at 51 and 60%, respectively. Thus the gain decrease adaptation field was quite asymmetric in the horizontal dimension but symmetric in the vertical dimension. Although gain increase adaptation produced a smaller gain change (13% increase for a 30% forward adapting target step) than did gain decrease adaptation (20% decrease for a 30% backward adapting target step), the spatial extent of gain transfer was quite similar. In particular, the gain increase adaptation field displayed asymmetry in the horizontal dimension (58% transfer to 25 degrees saccades but only 32% transfer to 5 degrees saccades) and symmetry in the vertical direction (50% transfer to the horizontal component of 10 degrees upward and 40% transfer to 10 degrees downward oblique saccades). When a 5 degrees vertical target movement was made to occur during a saccade to a horizontal 10 degrees target step, a vertical component gradually appeared in saccades to horizontal targets. More than 88% of the cross-axis change in the vertical component produced in 10 degrees saccades transferred to 20 degrees saccades but only 12% transferred to 4 degrees saccades. The transfer was similar to the vertical component of oblique saccades to target steps with either 10 degrees upward (46%) or 10 degrees downward (46%) vertical components. Therefore both gain and cross-axis adaptation fields have similar spatial profiles. These profiles resemble those of movement fields of neurons in the frontal eye fields and superior colliculus. How those structures might participate in the adaptation process is considered in the DISCUSSION.

Adaptation, Physiological↗