PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C T Plastaras

Publications and source records attributed to C T Plastaras.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

A simple institutional educational intervention to decrease use of selected expensive medications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a simple educational intervention can influence use of prescription medications at an institution. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis of prescribing behavior before and after an educational intervention. SETTING: A large, urban, free-standing academic rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, residents, and physician extenders. INTERVENTIONS: The hospital's pharmacy department provided simple written educational material about cost differences of various prescription medications to attending and resident physicians, nurse leaders, and case managers. Telephoned reminders were given when targeted medications were prescribed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total prescription medication use was recorded monthly for 12 months before and after the intervention. Pharmaceuticals monitored were subcutaneously administered anticoagulants, histamine type 2 (H2) blockers, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). RESULTS: A 32% decrease in use of the more costly anticoagulant and a 20% increase in use of the less costly anticoagulant (p <.0001), representing an estimated annual savings of nearly $66,000. Use of more costly H2 antagonist decreased 50% and use of less costly H2 antagonist increased 128% (p <.0001). With written intervention only, use of more costly NSAIDs declined 28%, whereas use of less costly NSAIDs increased 58% (p <.0020). CONCLUSION: Providing physicians with simple pharmaceutical cost information and telephone reminders decreased the use of targeted more costly medications.

Anticoagulants↗

Therapeutic zygapophyseal joint injections for headaches emanating from the C2-3 joint.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience using fluoroscopically guided therapeutic intra-articular C2-3 zygapophyseal joint injections in patients with chronic headaches after a whiplash event. DESIGN: Restrospective study (n = 18 patients) with independent clinical review. Each patient experienced persistent daily headache symptoms which failed to improve after at least 3 mo of physical therapy, activity restriction, and the use of oral analgesics. Each patient demonstrated initially a positive response to a diagnostic intra-articular C2-3 joint injection. Data collection and analysis were performed by an independent clinical reviewer. Outcome measures included headache frequency, medication usage, symptom response to medication, and employment status. RESULTS: Patients' symptom duration before diagnostic injection averaged 34 mo. Follow-up data collection transpired at an average of 19 mo after the final therapeutic injection. In 61% of patients, fewer than three headaches were experienced each week; these headaches were relieved with the use of oral analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Although the inherent limitations of this study preclude a definitive statement regarding the efficacy of C2-3 injections, these initial findings suggest that therapeutic intra-articular zygapophyseal joint injections are effective in the treatment of headaches emanating from the C2-3 joint after a whiplash event. Future controlled, prospective studies are necessary to clarify the role of such injections in this challenging patient population.

Adult↗

Fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections for sacroiliac joint syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes resulting from the use of fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections in patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome. DESIGN: A retrospective study design with independent clinical review was utilized. Thirty-one patients were included; each patient met specific physical examination criteria and failed to improve clinically after at least 4 wk of physical therapy. Each patient demonstrated a positive response to a fluoroscopically guided diagnostic sacroiliac joint injection. Therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections were administered in conjunction with physical therapy. Outcome measures included Oswestry scores, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, work status, and medication usage. RESULTS: Patients' symptom duration before diagnostic injection averaged 20.6 mo. An average of 2.1 therapeutic injections was administered. Follow-up data collection was obtained at an average of 94.4 wk. A significant reduction (P = 0.0014) in Oswestry disability score was observed at the time of follow-up. Visual Analog Scale pain scores were reduced (P < 0.0001) at the time of discharge and at follow-up. Work status was also significantly improved at the time of discharge (P = 0.0313) and at follow-up (P = 0.0010). A trend (P = 0.0645) toward less drug usage was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings suggest that fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections are a clinically effective intervention in the treatment of patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome. Controlled, prospective studies are necessary to further clarify the role of therapeutic injections in this patient population.

Adult↗

Symptom provocation of fluoroscopically guided cervical nerve root stimulation. Are dynatomal maps identical to dermatomal maps?

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study consisted of mechanical stimulation of cervical nerve roots C4 to C8 in patients with cervical radicular symptoms undergoing diagnostic selective nerve root block. OBJECTIVES: To document the distribution of pain and paresthesias that result from stimulation of specific cervical nerve roots and compare that distribution to documented sensory dermatomal maps. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical dermatomes were first studied in the late 19th century. The results of those studies underpin current clinical decision making for patients with neck and arm pain. However, it has been observed that patients with radicular symptoms may have cervical pathology by radiographic imaging that is not corroborative, or have imaging studies that suggest a lesion at a level other than the one suggested by the patient's dermatomal symptoms. These observations may suggest that cervical dermatomal mapping is inaccurate or the distribution of referred symptoms (dynatome) from cervical root irritation is different than the sensory deficit outlined by dermatomal maps. METHODS: Inclusion criteria consisted of consecutive patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided diagnostic cervical selective nerve root blocks from C4 to C8. Immediately preceding contrast injection, mechanical stimulation of the root was performed. An independent observer interviewed and recorded the location of provoked symptoms on a pain diagram. Visual data was subsequently compiled using a 793 body sector bit map. Forty-three clinically relevant body regions were defined on this bit map. Frequencies of symptom provocation and likelihood of symptom location from C4 to C8 stimulation of each nerve root were generated. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four cervical nerve root stimulations were performed on 87 subjects. There were 4 nerve root stimulations at C4, 14 at C5, 43 at C6, 52 at C7, and 21 at C8. Analyzing the frequency of involvement of the predetermined clinically relevant body regions either individually or in various combinations yielded more than 1,000 bits of data. Although the distribution of symptom provocation resembled the classic dermatomal maps for cervical nerve roots, symptoms were frequently provoked outside of the distribution of classic dermatomal maps. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates a distinct difference between dynatomal and dermatomal maps.

Cervical Vertebrae↗