PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Teal

Publications and source records attributed to C Teal.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Education improves colorectal cancer screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy in an inner city population.

OBJECTIVE: The District of Columbia General Hospital has a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) colorectal cancer screening program. We noted that this program was underused. The aim of this study was to determine whether education could improve use of a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening program in an inner city population. METHODS: Patients undergoing screening FS 5 months before our educational initiative were compared to patients undergoing screening FS 5 months after implementation. A 1-month period was allowed for implementation. Procedure logs and GI charts were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients underwent FS screening during our study period. Of the patients, 97% were African-American; 58% were female; and the average age was 61 yr. A total of 50 patients underwent FS in the pre-education group, and 71 patients underwent FS after implementation of our educational initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Education resulted in a 42% increase in FS screening in this inner city, predominantly African-American population. Larger scale educational initiatives should be conducted to determine whether these benefits can persist and can be improved upon.

Age Factors↗

Phacoemulsification devices: a consumer's report.

This report deals with our evaluation of six phacoemulsification devices tested at the Neumann Eye Institute (two additional devices have been evaluated since this paper was presented at the ASCRS meeting). The devices were compared for operating cost of the first 1,000 cases, dependability, ease of usage, and level of safety for the patient.

Cataract Extraction↗

Phacoemulsification devices: a consumer's update.

This report extends a previous paper on the various characteristics of the most popular phacoemulsification devices. An evaluation of 11 devices by ten different manufacturers was attempted. Only five manufacturers of six devices agreed to critical evaluation or reevaluation. As in the previous report, the devices were compared for level of patient safety, dependability, efficiency, ease of usage, and operating cost for the first 1,000 cases. At the completion of this study, we ranked the nine devices evaluated over the past 17 months as follows: (1) United Surgical (Optikon) Systems Plus, (2) Optical Micro Systems (OMS), (3) United Surgical (Optikon) Phacotron, (4) CooperVision 10,000, (5) Site XTR, (6) CooperVision KCP, (7) CooperVision 9001, (8) Phakosystems CES 4000 and (9) United Sonics. To enhance the usefulness of this consumer's guide, we asked 40 experienced cataract surgeons what they wanted in the "ideal" phacoemulsification device. The opinions of 27 who responded are included.

Cataract Extraction↗