PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Thilgen

Publications and source records attributed to C Thilgen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Selective electrolytic removal of bis(alkoxycarbonyl)methano addends from C60 bis-adducts and electrochemical stability of C70 derivatives

The novel mixed bis-adducts of C60, (+/-)-4-(+/-)-8 and 9, with a bis(ethoxycarbonyl)methano addend (Bingel addend) and a second addend ([1,2]benzeno, but[2]eno, methaniminomethano, or diarylmethano) bridging 6,6-closed bonds of the carbon sphere were synthesized in two-step reactions. Each bis-adduct was exhaustively electrolyzed at the potential of the second fullerene-centered reduction step, resulting in the selective removal of the Bingel addend (retro-Bingel reaction) to produce the corresponding mono-adducts, which were isolated in yields of over 60%. These results open up the possibility of using the Bingel addend as a temporary protecting and directing group in the construction of multiple adducts of C60 with unusual addition patterns. The Bingel-type mono-adduct of C70 10 and the constitutionally isomeric bis-adducts 11, (+/-)-12, and (+/-)-13 were also included in this investigation. A large difference in the electrochemical behavior between C70 bis-adducts and the corresponding C60 derivatives was observed. Thus, the intramolecular "walk-on-the-sphere" isomerization which occurs readily with Bingel-type bis-adducts of C60 under the conditions of two-electron controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) is only a minor reaction pathway in the series of C70 derivatives. The latter preferentially undergo retro-Bingel reaction.

Journal Article↗

Using risk assessment to evaluate adverse selection under capitated contracts.

Most provider organizations rely on health plan or market-based information about capitation rates, per member per month costs, and utilization trends to benchmark their performance. However, these statistics can be misleading because of differences in enrollee mix and contracting terms across provider organizations. This article describes the limitations of health plan contract provisions in protecting against adverse selection. It describes various actuarial and statistical data sources for evaluation of adverse selection. The article then presents various approaches to risk adjustment on population basis and their use in quantifying adverse selection for health plan contract negotiations.

Actuarial Analysis↗