[The relationships between the general practitioner and the oncological radiotherapist. A preliminary study by telephone interviews].
PURPOSE: We addressed the issue of the relationship between the general practitioner (GP) and the radiotherapist to improve the quality of care of cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consisted in evaluating medical requests and phone interviews, with a questionnaire with yes/no and multiple choice answers to the following 5 questions: 1) Do you think a cancer diagnosis is always a hopeless death sentence? 2) Is it professionally rewarding to cure a cancer patient? 3) Are you satisfied with your relationship, as a general practitioner, with oncologic reference centers? 4) Is it more wearing for a general practitioner to manage a cancer than a noncancer patient? 5) Would you answer a questionnaire about the relationship between the general practitioner, the cancer patient and the oncologist? We evaluated 1590 medical requests and made 401 phone interviews; 255 colleagues (70%) answered the questionnaire. RESULTS: Medical requests were correctly and completely formulated by GPs in 45% of cases. A cancer diagnosis was not considered a hopeless death sentence in 90.9% of cases and 76% of GPs considered it professionally rewarding to cure a cancer patient. 75.6% of GPs considered it more wearing to manage a cancer than a noncancer patient, and female GPs felt this more strongly than their male counterparts. Irrespective of gender, GPs over 50 years of age tend to consider cancer a hopeless and fatal disease. The relationship with oncologic centers was considered satisfactory in 86.2% of cases. However, since cancer patients need greater medical care, GPs would like a closer cooperation with oncologists. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The great interest GPs took in this study encourages further investigation through a more in depth questionnaire designed with the help of GPs themselves and interested statisticians.