PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Troppmann

Publications and source records attributed to C Troppmann.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Incidence, complications, treatment, and outcome of ulcers of the upper gastrointestinal tract after renal transplantation during the cyclosporine era.

BACKGROUND: Ulcers of the upper gastrointestinal tract after renal transplantation have been reported as a frequent and often lethal complication. Considering the continuous expansion of renal recipient criteria, we reviewed our experience with post-transplant ulcers after 1,034 renal transplants performed during the cyclosporine era. STUDY DESIGN: Our retrospective study analyzed only endoscopy-proven ulcers of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum in 439 (42 percent) living related adult recipients and 595 (58 percent) cadaver or living unrelated adult recipients. For ulcer prophylaxis, only oral antacids were routinely given post-transplant. RESULTS: There were 41 ulcers in 33 patients (esophageal: n = 5, 12 percent; gastric: n = 17, 42 percent; duodenal: n = 19, 46 percent). Significant complications (n = 16) included 15 bleeding episodes and one perforation. The pathogenesis was viral in seven cases (gastric: n = 6, 15 percent; duodenal: n = 1, 2 percent). The ulcers occurred significantly earlier post-transplant in cadaver or living unrelated compared with living related recipients (median, 53 compared with 508 days, p = 0.02). Nonoperative treatment was successful for 96 percent of all ulcers. We found no ulcer-related mortality or graft loss. For living related recipients, the actuarial graft survival rate at three years was 69 percent for patients with ulcers compared with 86 percent for those without ulcers (p = 0.02); for cadaver or living unrelated recipients, it was 48 percent for patients with ulcers compared with 77 percent for those without ulcers (p = 0.9). For living related recipients, the actuarial patient survival rate at three years was 92 percent for patients with ulcers compared with 93 percent for those without ulcers (p = 0.8); for cadaver or living unrelated recipients, it was 59 percent for patients with ulcers compared with 88 percent for those without ulcers (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: With more specific immunosuppression and more effective antiviral therapy, the incidence of post-transplant ulcers is low. Considering the excellent results of nonoperative ulcer therapy and a zero percent ulcer-related mortality rate, renal transplantation is safe for patients with specific (e.g., ulcer history) as well as nonspecific (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) ulcer risk factors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Renal transplantation for infantile cystinosis: long-term follow-up.

Renal transplantation for infantile cystinosis corrects renal failure and prolongs survival. However, after transplantation, the disease may develop in the allograft and continue to progress in nonrenal organs. We studied seven children (6 boys, 1 girl) with infantile cystinosis who received 11 renal transplants (3 cadaver, 8 living-related) between May 1969 and December 1986. The age at transplant ranged from 6 to 12 years (mean, 9.1 years). Four children received second renal transplants at a mean age of 17 years (range, 16 to 22 years). The mean period of follow-up was 138 +/- 47 months. Three children received cysteamine therapy prior to transplantation. Nonrenal complications of infantile cystinosis present before transplantation were photophobia (n = 3), corneal crystals (n = 5), hypothyroidism (n = 1), rickets (n = 6), and short stature (n = 7). Graft and patient survival did not differ from controls matched for the time of transplantation. Two patients died (1 pneumococcal sepsis, 1 respiratory failure due to pulmonary fibrosis) with functioning grafts 5 and 14 years posttransplant. Complications that developed posttransplant included photophobia (n = 1), corneal crystals (n = 2), hypothyroidism (n = 4), polyneuropathy (n = 1), pulmonary fibrosis (n = 1), abnormal electroencephalogram without clinical seizures (n = 1), bladder stones (n = 1), and diabetes mellitus (n = 2). One patient received a corneal transplant. All seven children failed to show improvement in growth following transplantation. Cystine crystals are present in graft-infiltrating cells, but do not seem to affect kidney allograft function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Biopsy↗
PubMed1991

Risk factors for second renal allografts immunosuppressed with cyclosporine.

Second renal allograft survival rates are lower than those of primary allografts. For recipients immunosuppressed with azathioprine, prednisone, and Minnesota ALG (conventional immunosuppression), risk factors associated with decreased second graft survival have been identified: age greater than 40, cadaver donor, less than 6 months between primary graft loss and retransplantation, duration of primary graft function (6 months or 1 year, depending on the study), high peak panel-reactive antibody, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and delayed graft function. In this study, we used a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors associated with decreased second graft survival in patients who did or did not receive cyclosporine. Results were compared with primary graft survival rates. Risk factors for patients receiving conventional immunosuppression were: (a) primary graft loss caused by rejection greater than or equal to 6 months (P = 0.01 vs. either rejection less than 6 months or nonimmunologic loss); (b) cadaver donor (P = 0.005 vs. living related); and (c) interval between primary graft loss and retransplantation of greater than or equal to 6 months (P = 0.05 vs. less than 6 months). For CsA, risk factors that most decreased second graft survival were: (a) primary graft loss caused by rejection less than 6 months (P = 0.11 vs. nonimmunologic loss); (b) conventional immunosuppression for the primary graft (P = 0.08 vs. CsA immunosuppression); and (c) a peak PRA of greater than or equal to 21 (P = 0.14 vs. peak PRA of 1-20). For second graft recipients immunosuppressed with CsA, primary graft loss to either rejection greater than 6 months posttransplant or nonimmunologic causes was not a risk factor for second graft survival. These data extend the recent reports of other investigators by identifying risk factors for retransplant recipients treated with CsA and by demonstrating that subgroups of patients in the retransplant population can be retransplanted without additional risk (i.e., their second graft survival rates are similar to primary graft survival rates). This may become more important if, in the future, organ distribution is based on graft survival data. If so, our data would support retransplantation in patients who are immunosuppressed with CsA, especially those who lost their primary graft to either rejection greater than or equal to 6 months posttransplant or nonimmunologic causes; who receive living related grafts; and who have a peak PRA of 1-20.

Adult↗