PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Turpin

Publications and source records attributed to C Turpin.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Randomised controlled trial of brief psychological intervention after deliberate self poisoning.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of a brief psychological intervention (brief psychodynamic interpersonal therapy) for patients after deliberate self poisoning compared with usual treatment. To compare the impact of the active intervention and usual treatment on patients' satisfaction with care. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: 119 adults who had deliberately poisoned themselves and presented to the emergency department of a teaching hospital. SETTING: Community based study. INTERVENTION: Four sessions of therapy delivered in the patient's home. Control patients received "treatment as usual," which in most cases consisted of referral back to their general practitioner. OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity of suicidal ideation six months after treatment as assessed by the Beck scale for suicidal ideation. Secondary outcome measures at six month follow up included depressive symptoms as measured by the Beck depression inventory, patient satisfaction with treatment, and self reported subsequent attempts at self harm. RESULTS: Participants randomised to the intervention had a significantly greater reduction in suicidal ideation at six month follow up compared with those in the control group (reduction in the mean (SD) Beck scale 8.0 v 1.5). They were more satisfied with their treatment and were less likely to report repeated attempts to harm themselves at follow up (proportion repeating 9% v 28% in control group; difference 19%, 95% confidence interval 9% to 30 %, P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Brief psychodynamic interpersonal therapy may be a valuable treatment after people have deliberately tried to poison themselves.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

A writing workshop for the CANNT Journal.

Writing for publication requires special skills and understanding. The aim of this workshop held by the co-editors of the CANNT Journal was to help participants identify the first steps needed to initiate the process of writing for publication. During the workshop, the attendees were invited to join small groups with a facilitator for each group. The individual groups identified what they considered to be their first five steps to writing for publication. This information from each group was shared with all the attendees. At the end of the session, helpful tools to aid potential authors were identified and thoughts on future writing workshops were discussed.

Education, Nursing, Continuing↗
PubMed1989

Immunological and chemical characterization of hamster brain polyribosomes-cytomatrix complexes.

We have studied the cytoskeletal nature of a brain subcellular fraction previously shown to contain polyribosomes. We have identified the major proteins of this fraction by electrophoretic comparison to a standard cytoskeletal fraction and by immunodetection. These methods have shown the presence of actin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament triplet proteins. We have also studied the effect of various ions and nonionic detergents on the stability of this structure. It was stable in presence of Triton X-100 up to 2% but disrupted by 200 mM K+ acetate.

Actins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improving pain management in an acute care setting. The Crawford Long Hospital of Emory University experience.

PURPOSE: To identify which of three pain intensity measurement scales is most appropriate for use with patients admitted to the inpatient units of the study hospital. The following questions were addressed: Is one of the scales easier for most patients? Is the choice of scales influenced by nursing unit, age, education, race, SES, diagnosis, or type of pain experienced? Do patients perceive that a rating scale helps them describe their pain more effectively? SAMPLE: 267 patients admitted over a 3-week period completed a four-page questionnaire and demographic form distributed on admission. The primary admitting diagnosis for 39.5% of the sample reflected acute pain, 40.3% chronic pain, and 20.2 no pain. METHODS: Three pain rating scales were presented: two visual analogues (one contained a 100 mm line; the other contained six faces depicting graduated levels of distress); and a cognitive number rating scale. Each scale used a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible) rating format. Patients completed the questionnaire by rating the intensity of pain experienced using each of the three scales once over the next 24 hours. The last page contained questions related to which of the scales was easiest to use, whether the scale was helpful or needed further explanation, and work and education information. The demographic form was completed from information contained in the patient record. FINDINGS: The scale selected most frequently was the visual analogue containing faces (48.6%), followed by the number (35.3%) and line scales (16.1%). None of the demographic information was found to significantly influence choice of preferred scale. A majority (85.8%) indicated a rating scale as helpful; only 13.6% indicated a need for further explanation. The means for pain intensity ranged from 5.09 to 5.75. The interval between pain ratings for the majority (> 71%) was less than 2 hours. Patients tended to tell the nurse about their pain when the intensity exceeded the midpoint on the scales. A reliability coefficient for the three scales was computed at alpha = 0.88. CONCLUSION: The use of rating scales for pain assessment in adult inpatient units was viewed positively by patients. Recommendations for incorporating self-ratings of pain intensity are set forth. Involving both patients and providers in the process is essential to improving both our processes and the outcomes achieved.

Adult↗