PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Umiltà

Publications and source records attributed to C Umiltà.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Spatial representations of words and nonwords.

The first two experiments investigated whether the representations of words, besides being unitary, are also spatial in nature. Subjects were required to search for target letters in either five-letter words or five-letter nonwords. They were instructed to press the right-side key for one target and the left-side key for the other target. The center item of the letter string was always at fixation. Targets appeared one at a time, located at the second (left side) or the fourth (right side) position within the letter string. The results showed that: a) responses to targets within words were faster than responses to targets within nonwords (the word-superiority effect); b) responses to compatible stimulus-response pairings were faster than responses to incompatible stimulus-response pairings (the spatial compatibility, or, more precisely, the Simon effect); and c) in Experiment 2, left-side targets were responded to faster than right-side targets within nonwords (the left-right scanning effect). It was concluded that representations of both words and nonwords are spatial in nature. Experiment 3 was aimed at testing whether the spatial layout of the representations of words is always along the left-right horizontal dimension, regardless of the topographic transformation of the stimulus. The same words and nonwords used in the previous experiments were shown vertically and the subjects were required to make left-right discriminative responses to upper and lower target letters. The results showed the word-superiority effect but no spatial compatibility effects. It was concluded that the representation of a vertically presented word is vertically arranged.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Splitting focal attention.

The study was based on the inverse relationship between the effect of attention on reaction time (RT) and the size of the area over which focal attention is allocated. Independent occurrence of this in 2 locations in the opposite hemifields would be evidence of attention splitting. In Experiment 1, in which the 2 locations were denoted by empty boxes, there was an inverse relationship between size of the stimulated box and RT. Experiment 2 replicated the finding with different stimulation conditions. In Experiment 3, no relationship was found between RT and length of a cuing line. In Experiment 4, in which attention was manipulated by central cues, there was an effect of box size on valid and neutral trials but not invalid trials. Observers could split focal attention and manipulate simultaneously 2 independent attentional foci on objects located in the opposite hemifields.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Facilitating and inhibiting effects of the orientation of attention using peripheral cues].

The attentional field resulting from the presentation of peripheral cues; which were either informative or non informative about the position of the imperative stimulus, was studied. Different time intervals between cue and stimulus (120, 300, 600 ms) were used. The results showed facilitation of the response with the informative cue and inhibition with the non informative cue. This happened for the longest cue-stimulus intervals and when the position of the cue and the position of the stimulus were congruent. Also order of cue presentation (i.e., either informative followed by the non informative cue or vice versa) proved important in producing facilitatory and inhibitory effects.

Attention↗
PubMed1991

Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

The main aim of the present study was to clarify whether different types of grasping may affect the transport component of prehension movements. To this purpose two experiments were carried out. In the first experiment the kinematics of arm movements (transport and manipulation components) were studied in eight normal subjects instructed to reach and grasp different objects located either 20 or 30 cm from their hand. The objects employed required two different types of grip: prehension with the whole hand and prehension with the index finger and the thumb (precision grip). In the second experiment subjects were instructed to point to the same objects employed in the first experiment. This experiment served as a control for the precision requirements related to the object size. The results showed that, once the precision requirements were taken into account, the transport component remained unmodified with the different types of grip. The time course of the manipulation component and its temporal relations with the transport component changed with the type of grasping. The maximal hand aperture was reached earlier in the precision grip than in the whole hand prehension and the temporal coupling with the transport component was weaker in the former condition than in the latter. The data are interpreted as further evidence in favour of independence between the transport and the manipulation "channels".

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

[Orientation of attention in the visual space].

The display was composed of four boxes, horizontally aligned above the fixation point. In Experiment I, each box was cued by a digit shown at fixation. In Experiment II there were only two numeric cues, signalling the inner or the outer boxes, depending on the experimental condition. The subject was instructed to orient attention to the cued box, and to respond to the imperative stimulus as fast as possible, wherever it appeared. By using four time interval (SOAs), we tried to determine the route covered by attention movements. In Experiment I, with the shortest SOA (100 msec), it was shown that attention does not reach the cued box through a direct path. Rather it moves first on the inner boxes, thereafter focusing on the cued location. The same results were obtained in Experiment II, where the cue directed attention to the inner boxes. When the external boxes were cued, however, this trend was not observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

[Orientation strategy implicit in spatial attention].

In this experiment, two rows of four boxes, one above and the other below the fixation point, were displayed on a computer monitor. A cognitive numeric cue indicated one of the four external boxes, where the attention was to be directed. Stimuli, however, could occur in any of the eight boxes. The subject was instructed to respond to the imperative stimulus as fast as possible, regardless of its location. Four time intervals between cue and stimulus presentation (SOAs) were employed in order to disclose the route along which attention is moved. With the shortest SOA (100 msec) an indication that attention movements follow the cartesian/orthogonal axes was shown.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.

By following Eriksen and St. James (1986) the experiments reported in this study focused upon three questions: (a) Can the spatial extent of the attentional focus be made to vary in response to precues? (b) As the area of the attentional focus increases, is there a decrease in processing efficiency for stimuli within the focus? (c) Is the boundary of the focus sharply demarked from the residual field or does it show a gradual dropoff? The results seem to provide answers to these questions: (a) the size of the attentional focus can be adjusted so that it covers areas of the visual field of different size; (b) there is a decrease in processing efficiency when the area of the attentional focus increases; and (c) there is a gradual dropoff in processing efficiency around the attentional focus.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients.

Patients with left hemispatial neglect after right hemisphere lesions and control patients with right hemisphere lesions were presented in the ipsilesional (i.e., intact) visual field with stimuli that could occupy left-right relative positions. The patients were required to discriminate between target stimuli and distractors by emitting go/no-go responses. Reaction times (RTs) and measures of sensitivity (d') and response bias (beta) were obtained. The within-subjects comparisons showed that neglect patients were faster in the right than the left relative position, whereas control patients were faster in the left than the right relative position. The between-subjects comparisons showed that neglect patients were faster than control patients in the right relative position but slower in the left relative position. These effects were due to changes in processing efficiency, as attested by the fact that the differences in response speed were accompanied by congruent differences in sensitivity, whereas no differences in response bias were found. The results were interpreted by assuming that neglect patients focus attention on the right relative position and, therefore, have a small attentional focus concentrated on that position. By contrast, control patients, like normal subjects, would distribute attention between the two possible stimulus positions and, therefore, allocate attention to a larger portion of the visual field.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1990

Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.

In Experiment 1, four groups of 16 subjects performed ordered recall of six-syllable lists in both suffix and nonsuffix conditions. Sequential presentation of the lists varied for each group. In the auditory presentation, the syllables were delivered from one location only and were read aloud by the subjects. For the visual, spatially nondistributed presentation, the syllables appeared in one location only and were read silently. For visual, spatially distributed presentations, the syllables were spread out either vertically or horizontally and were read silently. Very robust recency and suffix effects were found in the auditory presentation, as well as in visual, spatially distributed presentations. In Experiment 2, 16 subjects performed ordered recall of visually presented lists with the items spread out vertically and conflicting spatial and temporal orders. A reliable recency effect was found for the final block of trials. In Experiment 3, 16 subjects performed ordered recall in the same conditions as in Experiment 2, except that they were instructed to recall the temporal order in which the spatial positions would be filled in. A bow-shaped curve and a strong recency effect were obtained.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Multiple mechanisms for recency with vowels and consonants.

Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that the difference in recency effect between vowel-contrasting and stop-contrasting lists of syllables in immediate ordered recall can be explained by item discriminability and regular short-term memory mechanisms, without any recourse to echoic memory or precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). In Experiment 1, the short-term memory mechanisms were manipulated by reducing amount of output interference and length of retention interval. The partial-report technique was used. The most important finding was the usual final-position recency effect (difference in recall between the fifth and sixth serial positions) for the vowel lists but not for the stop lists, regardless of the type of report. Thus the PAS theory could not be rejected. In Experiments 2 and 3, the last item was differentiated from the other items of the list, either by lengthening the interstimulus interval between the last and the next-to-last (Experiment 2) or by increasing the intensity of the last item (Experiment 3). In both cases, an increase of the final-position recency effect was found even for stop lists. Since a drop in recall errors was also obtained for the fourth item when its intensity was increased (von Restorff effect), this final-position recency effect for stop lists is likely to be due to item discriminability, and not to echoic memory for the last item. Item discriminability appeared to be the critical factor.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1989

[Kinematic study of reaching-grasping movements].

The experiment was conducted to investigate, by using kinematic parameters, the influence of the type of prehension on the transportation component in reaching-grasping movements. The main question was whether the transportation component is influenced by the type of prehension besides the distance of the object. The experiment was carried out on eight subjects who performed reaching-grasping movements toward objects located at different distances. Two types of prehension were examined: whole hand prehension and precision grip. The following kinematic parameters of the transportation component (wrist movement) were studied: movement times, profiles of velocity and accelerations. Our results have shown that the transportation component is affected by the two factors. However the kinematic parameters were influenced differently by the distance and the type of prehension. Our conclusion is that, although distance and type of prehension affect the transportation component, they are computed separately in programming this component.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

[Effects of age on orientation of attention].

The present experiment investigated the influence of age on the magnitude of attentional effects. Subjects were cued to attend to one of two possible stimulus locations horizontally arranged. The instructions were to respond as fast as possible to the occurrence of a visual stimulus, regardless of whether it occurred in a cued or in a non-cued location. When the stimulus occurred in a non-cued location, the subject had to reorient attention to the non-attended, but stimulated, location. Reorienting of attention was directed toward either the left or the right side. The results showed that for the elders, time for reorienting was longer than for younger subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

Evidence for a right hemisphere superiority and for a serial search strategy in a dot detection task.

In Experiment I the subjects manually signaled whether a solid dot was present or not in an array of empty dots presented either in the right or in the left visual field. The dots were either three or six and the target could appear in any of the possible locations. The results showed (a) a left visual field superiority; (b) a left hand superiority; (c) faster responses to three-dot than to six-dot displays, and (d) an effect of the location of the target in the display. Experiment II exactly replicated the previous experiment with the exception that the stimuli were centrally projected. The results showed: (a) a left hand superiority; (b) an effect of the number of dots in the display. These results can be interpreted to indicate: (a) a right hemisphere specialization in a simple feature detection task without any spatial component; (b) the compatibility of a right-hemisphere advantage with a serial search strategy.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

Hemisphere-dependent cognitive performances in epileptic patients.

Short-term memory (STM), long-term memory (LTM), and recency judgment were investigated in 75 right-handed nonaphasic patients without visual deficits who had epileptic foci localized in one of four different regions of the brain: right temporal lobe, left temporal lobe, right frontal lobe, and left frontal lobe. The results led to the following conclusions: (1) left temporal lesions yielded comparatively greater impairment for the verbal LTM task, whereas right temporal lesions were more disruptive for the spatial LTM task; (2) no significant differences between left- and right-brain-damaged patients in STM tasks were obtained; (3) left frontal lesions yielded deficits in a recency task in accordance with hemispheric specialization; (4) only prolonged epileptic syndromes impaired neuropsychological performance in those tests; (5) comparisons between male and female patients and between those with and without clear evidence of a structural lesion did not reach statistical significance.

Adolescent↗