PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Vesey

Publications and source records attributed to C Vesey.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Effect of transdermal nicotine patches on cigarette smoking: a double blind crossover study.

The effect of transdermal nicotine patches on ad libitum cigarette smoking was examined in 30 subjects by measuring behavioural, biochemical and subjective aspects of smoking during a week of smoking without patches, and then a week each of nicotine and placebo patches in a randomised double blind crossover design. While wearing nicotine patches the subjects did not reduce the number of cigarettes smoked, but their expired carbon monoxide was reduced by 14%, they obtained less satisfaction from their cigarettes, and reported fewer and weaker urges to smoke. Down-regulation of nicotine intake from cigarettes was imprecise, such that when subjects wore nicotine patches their post-cigarette plasma nicotine concentration increased to an average of 45 ng/ml compared with 37 ng/ml in both no patch and placebo patch conditions. As the nicotine patches produced a plasma nicotine concentration of 15.9 ng/ml in abstinent subjects, this suggests a 22% reduction in nicotine intake from cigarettes while wearing nicotine patches. No serious symptoms of nicotine overdose were reported. It is suggested that the continuous absorption of nicotine from the patch may cause a build-up of acute tolerance to both toxic and pleasant subjective effects from smoking.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1987

Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers.

Questionnaire and biochemical measures of smoking were studied in 211 hospital outpatients. Eleven different tests of smoke intake were compared for their ability to categorize smokers and nonsmokers correctly. The concentration of cotinine, whether measured in plasma, saliva, or urine, was the best indicator of smoking, with sensitivity of 96-97 per cent and specificity of 99-100 per cent. Thiocyanate provided the poorest discrimination. Carbon monoxide measured as blood carboxyhaemoglobin or in expired air gave sensitivity and specificity of about 90 per cent. Sensitivities of the tests were little affected by the presence among the claimed nonsmokers of a group of 21 "deceivers" who concealed their smoking. It is concluded that cotinine is the measure of choice, but for most clinical applications carbon monoxide provides an acceptable degree of discrimination and is considerably cheaper and simpler to apply.

Carbon Monoxide↗
PubMed1984

An evaluation of the intervention against smoking in the multiple risk factor intervention trial.

The results of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial showed no significant difference in mortality from coronary heart disease between intervention and control groups despite an apparent success of the intervention against cigarette smoking. A reanalysis of the published data indicates that the effectiveness of the smoking intervention may have been overestimated. The researchers counted those who smoked pipes or cigars at screen as nonsmokers and attempted to classify cigarette smokers who switched to pipes or cigars during the trial as successes whether or not they continued to inhale the smoke. It is unreasonable to assume a priori that inhaling pipe or cigar smoke is less dangerous than cigarette smoke. Moreover, attempting to include pipe and cigar smokers, who may have been inhaling smoke, among the successes makes biochemical validation of claims of abstinence overly lenient. When levels of serum thiocyanate are used to obtain an objective index of smoking reduction, it appears that the effect of intervention was considerably smaller than has been reported, and failed to reach design goals over the first 4 years. This could help to explain the disappointing mortality results.

Carbon Monoxide↗
PubMed1984

Biochemical markers of smoke absorption and self reported exposure to passive smoking.

One hundred non-smoking patients attending hospital outpatient clinics reported their degree of passive exposure to tobacco smoke over the preceding three days and provided samples of blood, expired air, saliva, and urine. Although the absolute levels were low, the concentration of cotinine in all body compartments surveyed was systematically related to self reported exposure. Salivary nicotine concentration also showed a linear increase with degree of reported exposure, although this measure was sensitive only to exposure on the day of testing. Measures of carbon monoxide, thiocyanate, and plasma nicotine concentrations were unrelated to exposure. The data indicate that cotinine provides a valid marker of the dose received from passive smoke exposure. The non-invasive samples of urine and saliva are particularly suited to epidemiological investigations. Detailed questionnaire items may also give valuable information.

Absorption↗