PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C W Acher

Publications and source records attributed to C W Acher.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Effect of MR angiography on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected renovascular disease.

PURPOSE: Although the diagnostic accuracy of renal magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is established, its effect on referring physicians is unknown. The authors prospectively measured the effect of MR angiography results on referring physicians' diagnosis and treatment (plans) of patients with suspected renovascular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Referring physicians prospectively completed questionnaires before and after MR angiography was performed during evaluation of their patients with suspected renovascular disease. The questionnaires asked them to estimate the probability (0%-100%) of their most likely diagnosis before and after receiving the imaging information. They were also asked for their anticipated and final treatment plans. The authors calculated the mean gain in diagnostic percentage confidence and the proportion of patients with changed initial diagnoses or anticipated management. A paired t-test was used to assess significance of the gains in diagnostic percentage confidence. RESULTS: Physicians prospectively completed pre- and post-MR-angiography questionnaires for 30 patients. MR angiography improved mean diagnostic certainty by 35% (P < .0001). MR angiography changed physicians' initial diagnoses in 12 patients (40%). Anticipated treatment plans were changed in 20 patients (67%). Invasive procedures were avoided in eight patients (27%). CONCLUSION: MR angiography has a substantial effect on the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making of physicians managing patients with suspected renovascular disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Minimal incision aortic surgery.

PURPOSE: In this study we evaluated the clinical and economic impact of minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS) for treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). METHOD: Fifty patients with either AAA (34) or AIOD (16), prospectively treated with the MIAS technique, were compared with 50 patients (40 AAA and 10 AIOD) treated in the same time period with long midline incision and extracavitary small bowel retraction. MIAS was also compared with a cohort of 32 patients with AAA treated by means of endoaortic stent-grafts. Outcomes and cost (based on metric mean length of stay) were compared for the open and endoaortic techniques. RESULTS: Patients who experienced no perioperative complications after the MIAS or endovascular repair technique had shorter hospital stays than patients with uncomplicated aortic repairs performed with a traditional long midline abdominal incision (3 days vs 3 days vs. 7.2 days). Hospital stay was also significantly shorter for the less invasive procedures when perioperative complications were included (4.8 days vs. 4.3 days vs 9.3 days). The MIAS and endovascular aortic repair groups had a shorter intensive care unit stay (< or = 1.0 day) and a quicker return to general dietary feeding (2.5 days) than patients treated with standard open repair (1.8 days, 4.7 days). The overall morbidity for the MIAS technique (14%) and endovascular technique (21%) was not significantly different from standard open repair (24%). The mortality rate for the different treatment groups was equivalent (MIAS, 2%; endovascular repair, 3%; standard repair, 2%). The MIAS was more cost-efficient than standard open repair ($12,585 vs $18,445) because of shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay and was more cost-efficient than endoaortic repair ($12,585 vs $32,040) because of reduced, direct intraoperative costs. CONCLUSIONS: MIAS is as safe as standard open or endovascular repair in the treatment of AAA and AIOD. MIAS is more cost-efficient than standard open or endoaortic repair.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Yield of repeated screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm after a 4-year interval. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rate at which new abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) develop or whether screening older men for AAA, if undertaken, should be limited to once in a lifetime or repeated at intervals. METHODS: A large population of veterans, aged 50 through 79 years, completed a questionnaire and underwent ultrasound screening for AAA. Of these, 5151 without AAA on the initial ultrasound (defined as infrarenal aortic diameter of 3.0 cm or larger) were selected randomly to be invited for a second ultrasound screening after an interval of 4 years. Local records and national databases were searched to identify deaths and AAA diagnoses made during the study interval in subjects who did not attend the rescreening. RESULTS: Of the 5151 subjects selected for a second screening, 598 (11.6%) had died (none due to AAA), and 20 (0.4%) had an interim diagnosis of AAA. A second screening was performed on 2622 (50.9%), of whom 58 (2.2%; 95% confidence interval, 1.6%-2.8%) had new AAA. Three new AAAs were 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 10 were 3.5 to 3.9 cm, and 45 were 3.0 to 3.4 cm. Independent predictors of new AAA at the second screening included current smoker (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence, 1.74-5.50), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.07), and, in a separate model using a composite variable, any atherosclerosis (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.35). Adding the interim and rescreening diagnosis rates suggests a 4-year incidence rate of 2.6%. Rescreening only in subjects with infrarenal aortic diameter of 2.5 cm or greater on the initial ultrasound would have missed more than two thirds of the new AAAs. CONCLUSIONS: A second screening is of little practical value after 4 years, mainly because the AAAs detected are small. However, the incidence that we observed suggests that a second screening after longer intervals (ie, more than 8 years) may provide yields similar to those seen in initial screening and therefore warrants further study.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Preliminary experience with minilaparotomy aortic surgery.

This prospective nonrandomized study assessed clinical outcomes of a minilaparotomy technique (MLT) used for elective graft repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and/or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Twenty-three patients requiring infrarenal AAA or aortofemoral bypass underwent a small periumbilical midline incision, nondisplacement of the small bowel, and a traditional vascular anastomosis. Results from these procedures were compared with those from contemporaneous procedures performed in the standard transabdominal (STA) fashion (n = 21). Age, weight, and comorbid conditions were comparable between groups. Patients requiring concomitant renal, mesenteric, or infrainguinal revascularization were excluded. Operating time, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), number of oral feeding times, and length of hospital stay were recorded. There were no significant differences in age, operative time, or aneurysm size between the MLT and STA groups. With the MLT then were significant decreases in ICU stay (1 vs. 1.8 days), length of time to return to a general diet (3 vs. 4.7 days), and length of stay (4.9 vs. 7.3 days.) Morbidity and mortality were not statistically different between groups. Patients undergoing the MLT have reduced ICU and hospital stay, and decreased post operative ileus. The MLT does not increase operating room costs or require expensive laparoscopic equipment or the extended postoperative radiographic surveillance needed after endovascular repair.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Magnetic resonance angiography of aorto-iliac disease.

BACKGROUND: Four different techniques for aorto-iliac magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were assessed for accuracy using a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) gold standard. Surgeons' confidence in their ability to generate treatment plans with MRA and DSA was assessed, in consultation with a radiologist. METHODS: Two different two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) sequences, a phase-contrast sequence, and a contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA sequence were used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and areas (A(z)) calculated from radiologists' readings. Surgeons' confidence in their ability to utilize the images for treatment planning was assessed with a 5-point Likert scale. Thirty-six patients were evaluated. RESULTS: CE MRA had a sensitivity, specificity, and A(z) of.92,.93, and.96, respectively, for stenoses 50% or greater. CE MRA performed better than other sequences, but the improvement compared with gated 2D TOF was not statistically significant. Interobserver agreement for CE MRA and DSA yielded identical Kappa values. Surgeons were most confident in DSA, followed by CE MRA, which was significantly preferred to other techniques. CONCLUSIONS: CE MRA closely approximates DSA in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Surgeons considering treatment plans are confident in the CE MRA technique, relative to other MRA methods.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Less invasive aortic surgery: the minilaparotomy technique.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated a less invasive technique for exposure of the infrarenal aorta and its impact on the treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), or both. METHODS: Forty patients with AAA (26), aneurysmal extension into the iliac arteries (6), or AIOD (8) were prospectively selected for minilaparotomy aortic exposure and repair using a small periumbilical midline incision (< or =10 cm); intra-abdominal, nondisplaced retraction of the small bowel; and conventional hand-sewn vascular anastomoses. Perioperative comparisons with a contemporary group of AAA patients treated with long, open midline incision and extracavitary small bowel retraction were made. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the minilaparotomy and open surgical control groups for operating room time; intraoperative, perioperative morbidity; or mortality. Significant differences were documented between the minilaparotomy and the control group with regard to stay in the intensive care unit (days; 1.0+/-1.2 versus 1.8+/-1.5); return to general diet (days; 3+/-1.3 versus 4.7+/-2.8); and length of stay (days; 4.9+/-1.8 versus 7.3+/- 3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Minilaparotomy exposure is safe and effective for treatment of infrarenal AAA and AIOD. This technique maintains quality outcome while reducing postoperative ileus, hospital stay, and resource utilization.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Clamp and sew techniques in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery using naloxone and CSF drainage.

Surgical repair of thoracoabdominal (TAA) and thoracic aneurysm is challenging, with the potentials for high morbidity and mortality. There is no standardized operative approach. Operative management of TAA consists of simple clamp-and-sew techniques with adjuncts, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, naloxone administration, and intraoperative hypothermia, to protect the spinal cord. The use of CSF drainage and naloxone administration has reduced paraplegia to 3.4%, compared with 21% when none of these adjunctive spinal cord measures were used. The authors discuss their operative strategy, surgical technique, and results at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics.

Aorta, Abdominal↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiography-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to determine whether preoperative treatment plans for patients with lower extremity ischemia can be made with electrocardiography (EKG)-triggered two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as accurately as digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: Forty patients were prospectively evaluated with the combination of EKG-triggered 2D TOF MRA, DSA, and pulse volume recordings. Blinded reviewers graded arterial segments for disease severity. Accuracy of separate MRA- and DSA-based treatment plans was compared with the procedures performed based on all available information. RESULTS: There was an 86% exact match between MRA- and DSA-based plans (92% MRA and 94% DSA accuracy). The MRA-based plan accurately predicted 90% of suprainguinal and 95% of infrainguinal procedures, whereas the DSA-based plan accurately predicted 100% of suprainguinal and 85% of infrainguinal procedures. Two-year primary patency was 83% for all procedures. Radiologists' review of disease severity resulted in a mean exact correlation between studies of 81% (kappa = 0.64). The agreement between radiologists interpreting the MRA was 84% (kappa = 0.7) compared with 82% (kappa = 0.66) for the DSA. CONCLUSIONS: MRA- and DSA-based preoperative management plans were of comparable efficacy. Significant interobserver variability was seen with the interpretations of both preoperative studies. EKG-triggered 2D TOF MRA can be used to plan arterial reconstructions; however, all patients require arterial pressure measurements prior to suprainguinal repair and confirmatory intraoperative angiography during infrainguinal revascularization.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. How we do it.

A systematic approach to paraplegia risk in the surgical treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms based on effective strategies identified from the experimental literature is discussed. With this approach, collateral blood flow, rather than direct intercostal reimplantation, moderate hypothermia and endorphin receptor, is emphasized blockade. The result has been a 10-fold reduction in paraplegia risk in elective patients and a 5-fold reduction in acute patients. This reduction in paralysis risk has resulted in improved short- and long-term survival.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal↗
PubMed1998

Cardiac function is a risk factor for paralysis in thoracoabdominal aortic replacement.

PURPOSE: We studied factors that influence paralysis risk, renal function, and mortality in thoracoabdominal aortic replacement. METHODS: We prospectively collected preoperative demographic and intraoperative physiologic data and used univariate and multivariate analyses to correlate this data with risk factors for paralysis. A mathematical model of paraplegia risk was used to study the efficacy of paraplegia reduction strategies. We analyzed preoperative and operative factors for paralysis risk, renal function, and mortality for 217 consecutive patients surgically treated from 1984 through 1996 for 176 thoracoabdominal and 41 thoracic aneurysms at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. No patient had intercostal reimplantation or assisted circulation. One hundred fifty patients (group A) received cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) and low-dose naloxone (1 microg/kg/hour) as adjuncts to reduce the risk of paralysis. Sixty-seven patients (group B) did not receive CSFD and naloxone. RESULTS: Seventeen deficits occurred in 205 surviving patients: 5 of the 147 in group A (expected deficits = 31) and 12 of the 58 in group B (expected deficits = 13) (p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression model, acute presentation, Crawford type 2 aneurysm, group B membership, and a decrease in cardiac index with aortic occlusion remained significant risk factors for deficit (p < 0.0001). By odds ratio analysis, group A patients had 1/40th the risk of paralysis of group B. The only significant predictor of postoperative renal function was the preoperative creatinine level (p < 0.0001); renal revascularization significantly improved renal function. The mortality rate was 1.6% (2) for patients undergoing elective treatment and 21% (19) for patients who had acute presentations. Acute presentation, age, and the preoperative creatinine level were found to be significant factors for operative mortality in a logistic regression model (p < 0.001) and defined a group at high risk for death. CONCLUSIONS: CSFD and low-dose naloxone significantly reduce the paralysis risk associated with thoracoabdominal aortic replacement. A decrease in the cardiac index with aortic occlusion is a previously unreported variable that defines a subset of patients at higher risk for paralysis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Independent risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have not been clearly defined in multivariable analyses of large patient populations. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that are independently associated with AAA and to determine the prevalence of previously unrecognized AAA in defined demographic and risk groups. DESIGN: Cross-sectional screening study. SETTING: 15 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: 73451 veterans who were 50 to 79 years of age and had no history of AAA. MEASUREMENTS: The results of ultrasonographic screening for AAA and a prescreening questionnaire were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: An AAA of 4.0 cm or larger was detected in 1031 participants (1.4%). Smoking was the risk factor most strongly associated with AAA; the odds ratio (OR) for AAAs of 4.0 cm or larger compared with normal aortas (infrarenal aortic diameter < 3.0 cm) was 5.57 (95% CI, 4.24 to 7.31). The association between smoking and AAA increased significantly with the number of years of smoking and decreased significantly with the number of years after quitting smoking. The excess prevalence associated with smoking accounted for 78% of all AAAs that were 4.0 cm or larger in the study sample. Female sex (OR, 0.22 [CI, 0.07 to 0.68]), black race (OR, 0.49 [CI, 0.35 to 0.69]), and presence of diabetes (OR, 0.54 [CI, 0.44 to 0.65]) were negatively associated with AAA. A family history of AAA was positively associated with AAA (OR, 1.95 [CI, 1.56 to 2.43]) but was reported by only 5.1% of participants. Other independently associated factors included age, height, coronary artery disease, any atherosclerosis, high cholesterol levels, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with multiple factors. Smoking was the risk factor most strongly associated with AAA and may be responsible for most clinically important cases of previously undiagnosed AAA.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Late renal function in patients undergoing renal revascularization for control of hypertension and/or renal preservation.

Long-term outcome was studied in 233 patients who had undergone renal artery revascularization (51 with balloon angioplasty, 182 with surgery) between 1976 and 1992. Patients (excluding renal transplants) were treated for renal vascular hypertension without or with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 1.6 mg/dl. All patients still alive (n = 188) were contacted to determine current blood pressure, medications, serum creatinine, and subsequent significant medical events. In patients who had died the cause of death was determined and renal function status at the time of death noted from medical records. Some follow-up information was obtained on all 233 patients; follow-up serum creatinine data were obtained in 193 (82.8%) patients. Some 24 patients (10.3%) became dialysis-dependent. Using a multiple logistic regression analysis only, preoperative creatinine maintained significance (P < 0.001) for increased dialysis risk. There was no statistically significant association of dialysis for type of revascularization (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, autogenous artery, saphenous vein, endarterectomy or synthetic material), simultaneous or previous aortic or other vascular surgery (carotid endarterectomy, femoropopliteal bypass, etc.), pathology (atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia), number of renal arteries stenosed or treated, length of follow-up, age, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, chronic lung disease or type II diabetes. It is concluded that, in patients with renal artery stenosis, the timing of renal artery revascularization relative to the level of renal function is the most important determinant for long-term renal salvage.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) will allow preoperative management decisions without the need for contrast arteriography in patients with lower extremity ischemia caused by infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. METHODS: Forty-five patients with lower extremity ischemia in 50 limbs were evaluated by both two-dimensional time-of-flight MRA and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) between February 1992 and June 1995. Independent management plans were based on clinical presentation, pulse volume recordings, and separate reviews of the MRA and DSA. RESULTS: Of 50 limbs, 23 required arterial bypass, 19 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, 5 patch angioplasty, and 3 amputation. MRA and DSA correlated exactly in 89.5% of infrainguinal arterial segments, whereas interpretations disagreed in 10.5% of arterial segments. Mismatches that had an influence on patient treatment decisions occurred in only 8 (2.3%) of 352 arterial segments. Independent MRA- and DSA-based revascularization plans agreed in 45 (90%) extremities. MRA predicted the level of arterial reconstruction in all 23 limbs that required arterial bypass. MRA identified focal stenoses amenable to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 18 (94.7%) of the 19 limbs that ultimately underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A strategy of preoperative planning by MRA with confirmatory intraoperative arteriography would represent a 31% cost savings per patient at our institution while eliminating the morbidity of preoperative DSA. CONCLUSIONS: When used in combination with the patient's physical examination and segmental limb pressures with plethysmography, MRA is sufficient for planning infrainguinal arterial bypass procedures and selecting patients for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report interobserver and intraobserver variability of computed tomography (CT) measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter and agreement between CT and ultrasonography observed in the course of a large, multicenter, randomized trial on the management of small AAAs. METHODS: CT measurements of AAA diameter from participating centers were compared with measurements made from the same scan by a central laboratory. Blinded central remeasurement of a randomly selected subset of these CT scans was used to assess intraobserver variability. Agreement between AAA measurements by CT and ultrasonography done within 30 days of each other was also assessed. RESULTS: For interobserver pairs of local and central CT measurements of AAA diameter (n = 806), the difference was 0.2 cm or less in 65% of pairs, but 17% differed by at least 0.5 cm. For intraobserver pairs of central CT remeasurements (n = 70), 90% differed by 0.2 cm or less, 70% were within 0.1 cm, and only one differed by 0.5 cm. Of 258 ultrasound-measured and central CT pairs, the difference was 0.2 cm or less in 44% and at least 0.5 cm in 33%. Ultrasound measurements were smaller than central CT measurements by an average of 0.27 cm (p < 0.0001). Local CT and ultrasound measurements showed a marked preference for recording by half centimeter. CONCLUSIONS: A high degree of precision is possible in CT measurement of AAA diameter, but this precision may not be obtained in practice because of differences in measurement techniques. Differences between imaging modalities increase variability further. Variations in AAA measurement of 0.5 cm or more are not uncommon, and this should be taken into account in management decisions. Efforts to reduce variation in measurement are warranted and might include (1) seeking agreement between surgeons and radiologists on a precise definition of AAA diameter, (2) limiting the number of radiologists who measure AAAs, and (3) use of calipers and magnifying glass for CT measurements.

Aged↗