Biomedical subjects

C W Howden

Publications and source records attributed to C W Howden.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) initiated prior to endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to systematically review evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied PPI treatment initiated before endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was undertaken according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model using CENTRAL, (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases and major conference proceedings up to September 2005. The literature search was re-run in February 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs). TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalised patients with unselected upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Types of interventions: Active treatment with a PPI (oral or intravenous) and control treatment with either placebo or an histamine-(2) receptor antagonist (H(2)RA). Types of outcome measures: Assessed at 30 days: mortality, rebleeding and surgery. Also assessed were stigmata of recent haemorrhage at index endoscopy, length of hospital stay and blood transfusion requirements. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two reviewers assessed the eligibility criteria of each study and extracted data regarding outcomes and factors affecting methodological quality. MAIN RESULTS: Five RCTs were included for review. No further RCTS were identified in an updated literature search. Four trials comprising a total of 1512 patients in total reported data for all randomised patients. There was no statistical heterogeneity among trials for the outcomes of mortality, rebleeding and surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of mortality, rebleeding or surgery between PPI and control treatment. Pooled mortality rates were 6.1% and 5.5% respectively (odds ratio (OR)1.12; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.73). Pooled rebleeding rates were 13.9% and 16.6% respectively (OR 0.81; 95%CI 0.61 to 1.09). Pooled rates for surgery were 9.9% and 10.2% respectively (OR 0.96 95% CI 0.68 to 1.35). PPI treatment compared to control significantly reduced the proportion of patients with stigmata of recent haemorrhage at index endoscopy; pooled rates were 37.2% and 46.5% respectively (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.84). For the continuous outcomes, namely length of hospital stay and blood transfusion requirements, quantitative analysis could not be performed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PPI treatment initiated prior to endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding significantly reduces the proportion of patients with stigmata of recent haemorrhage at index endoscopy. However, there is no evidence that PPI treatment affects clinically important outcomes, namely mortality, rebleeding or need for surgery.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

PubMed2006

Dose-response evaluation of the antisecretory effect of continuous infusion intravenous lansoprazole regimens over 48 h.

BACKGROUND: Attainment of intragastric pH < 6.0 may require high-dose continuously infused proton pump therapy. AIM: To assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose-responses of continuous infusion regimens of lansoprazole. METHODS: Healthy adult subjects were assigned to lansoprazole 60-mg intravenous bolus, followed by 6-mg/h continuous infusion; a 90-mg intravenous bolus followed by 6-, 7.5-, or 9-mg/h continuous infusion; or placebo. RESULTS: Mean intragastric pH values for lansoprazole regimens ranged from 4.8 to 5.2 (0-24 h), 5.5 to 6.0 (>24 to 48 h) and 5.2 to 5.6 (0-48 h). Within these three intervals, the percentages of time intragastric pH exceeded 4, 5 and 6 ranged from 65% to 96%, 54% to 88% and 30% to 61% respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters were dose-independent with steady-state plasma concentrations achieved within 6-12 h postdose and maintained over 48 h. The mean systemic clearance of lansoprazole was lower in CYP2C19 heterozygous metabolizers than in homozygous extensive metabolizers (9.2 vs. 16.5 L/h), with substantial variability resulting in overlapping ranges of clearance values for both subpopulations. All lansoprazole regimens were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Lansoprazole administered as a 60-mg intravenous bolus followed by 6-mg/h continuous infusion produced intragastric pH effects comparable with those of higher dosage regimens.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2006

Primary care physician perceptions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin-associated toxicity: results of a national survey.

AIM: To assess primary care physician perceptions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and aspirin-associated toxicity. METHODS: A group of gastroenterologists and internal medicine physicians created a survey, which was administered via the Internet to a large number of primary care physicians from across the US. RESULTS: One thousand primary care physicians participated. Almost one-third of primary care physicians recommended 325 mg rather than 81 mg of aspirin/day for cardioprotection. Fifty-nine percent thought enteric-coated or buffered aspirin reduced the risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Seventy-six percent believed that Helicobacter pylori infection increased the risk of NSAID ulcers but fewer than 25% tested NSAID users for this infection. More than two-thirds were aware that aspirin co-therapy decreased the GI safety benefits of the cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective NSAIDs. However, 84% felt that aspirin with a cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective NSAID was safer than aspirin with a non-selective NSAID. When presented a patient at high risk for NSAID-related GI toxicity, almost 50% of primary care physicians recommended a proton pump inhibitor and cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective NSAID. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has identified areas of misinformation regarding the risk-benefit of NSAIDs and aspirin and the utilization of gastroprotective strategies. Further education on NSAIDs for primary care physicians is warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding yield conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of PPIs in acute bleeding from PU using evidence from RCTs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2004), EMBASE (1980 to November 2004), proceedings of major meetings to November 2004, and reference lists of articles. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs of PPI treatment (oral or intravenous) compared with placebo or H(2)-receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) in acute bleeding from PU. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted data independently, assessed study validity, summarised studies and undertook meta-analysis. The influence of study characteristics on the outcomes was examined by subgroup analyses and meta-regression. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs comprising 4373 participants in total were included. Statistical heterogeneity was found among trials for rebleeding (P = 0.04), but not for all-cause mortality (P = 0.24) or surgery (P = 0.45). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality rates between PPI and control treatment; pooled rates were 3.9% on PPI versus 3.8% on control (odds ratio (OR) 1.01; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.40). PPIs significantly reduced rebleeding compared to control; pooled rates were 10.6% with PPI versus 17.3% with control treatment (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.65). PPI treatment significantly reduced surgery compared with control; pooled rates were 6.1% on PPI versus 9.3% on control (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78). There was no evidence to suggest that results on mortality and rebleeding were dependent on study quality, route of PPI administration, type of control treatment or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment. PPIs significantly reduced surgery compared with placebo but not when compared with H(2)RA. There was no evidence to suggest that study quality, route of PPI administration or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment influenced results on surgery. PPI treatment appeared more efficacious in studies conducted in Asia compared to studies conducted elsewhere. All-cause mortality was reduced only in Asian studies; reductions in rebleeding and surgery were quantitatively greater in Asian studies. Among patients with active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessel, PPI treatment reduced mortality (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.91), rebleeding and surgery. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PPI treatment in PU bleeding reduces rebleeding and surgery compared with placebo or H(2)RA, but there is no evidence of an overall effect on all-cause mortality.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2006

Review article: the clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors inhibit the gastric H+/K+-ATPase via covalent binding to cysteine residues of the proton pump. All proton pump inhibitors must undergo acid accumulation in the parietal cell through protonation, followed by activation mediated by a second protonation at the active secretory canaliculus of the parietal cell. The relative ease with which these steps occur with different proton pump inhibitors underlies differences in their rates of activation, which in turn influence the location of covalent binding and the stability of inhibition. Slow activation is associated with binding to a cysteine residue involved in proton transport that is located deep in the membrane. However, this is inaccessible to the endogenous reducing agents responsible for restoring H+/K+-ATPase activity, favouring a longer duration of gastric acid inhibition. Pantoprazole and tenatoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor which has an imidazopyridine ring in place of the benzimidazole moiety found in other proton pump inhibitors, are activated more slowly than other proton pump inhibitors but their inhibition is resistant to reversal. In addition, tenatoprazole has a greatly extended plasma half-life in comparison with all other proton pump inhibitors. The chemical and pharmacological characteristics of tenatoprazole give it theoretical advantages over benzimidazole-based proton pump inhibitors that should translate into improved acid control, particularly during the night.

Antacids↗

PubMed2005

Systematic review and meta-analysis: proton-pump inhibitor treatment for ulcer bleeding reduces transfusion requirements and hospital stay--results from the Cochrane Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors reduce re-bleeding and surgical intervention, but not mortality, after ulcer bleeding. AIM: To examine the effects of proton-pump inhibitor treatment on transfusion requirements and length of hospital stay in patients with ulcer bleeding. METHODS: For the Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials of proton-pump inhibitor therapy for ulcer bleeding, outcomes of transfusion requirements and hospital stay were summarized, respectively, as mean (+/-s.d.) units transfused and hospital days. We calculated weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval. We also performed subgroup analyses according to geographical origin of the randomized-controlled trials. RESULTS: There was significant heterogeneity among randomized-controlled trials for either outcome. Overall, proton-pump inhibitor treatment marginally reduced transfusion requirements (WMD = -0.6 units; 95% CI: -1.1 to 0; P = 0.05) and length of hospitalization (WMD = -1.1 days; 95% CI: -1.5 to -0.7; P < 0.0001). Most of the randomized-controlled trials did not state precise criteria for administering blood transfusion and discharging patients, thereby limiting the strength of conclusions on the pooled effects. CONCLUSIONS: Proton-pump inhibitor treatment for ulcer bleeding produces small, but potentially important, reductions in transfusion requirements and length of hospitalization.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

PubMed2005

Systematic review and meta-analysis: enhanced efficacy of proton-pump inhibitor therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding in Asia--a post hoc analysis from the Cochrane Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors reduce re-bleeding rates after ulcer bleeding. However, there is significant heterogeneity among different randomized-controlled trials. AIM: To see whether proton-pump inhibitors for ulcer bleeding produced different clinical outcomes in different geographical locations. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of our Cochrane Collaboration systematic review and meta-analysis of proton-pump inhibitor therapy for ulcer bleeding. Sixteen randomized-controlled trials conducted in Europe and North America were pooled and re-analysed separately from seven conducted in Asia. We calculated pooled rates for 30-day all-cause mortality, re-bleeding and surgical intervention and derived odds ratios and numbers needed to treat with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: There was no significant heterogeneity for any outcome. Reduced all-cause mortality was seen in the Asian randomized-controlled trials (odds ratios = 0.35; 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.74; number needed to treat = 33), but not in the others (odds ratios = 1.36; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.96; number needed to treat--incalculable). There were significant reductions in re-bleeding and surgery in both sets of randomized-controlled trials, but the effects were quantitatively greater in Asia. CONCLUSIONS: Proton-pump inhibitor therapy for ulcer bleeding has been more efficacious in Asia than elsewhere. This may be because of an enhanced pharmacodynamic effect of proton-pump inhibitors in Asian patients.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2005

Review article: immediate-release proton-pump inhibitor therapy--potential advantages.

The absorption of most oral proton-pump inhibitors is delayed by the enteric coating required to protect the acid-labile proton-pump inhibitor from degradation in the stomach and, as a result, antisecretory effect is also delayed. This article provides an overview of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new immediate-release omeprazole [(IR-OME) Zegerid power for oral suspension; Santarus Inc., San Diego, CA, USA] and its potential advantages over delayed-release proton-pump inhibitors. Immediate-release omeprazole has a higher mean peak plasma omeprazole concentration (C(max)) and a significantly shorter mean time to reach C(max) (t(max)) than delayed-release omeprazole. Immediate-release omeprazole 40 mg has a prolonged antisecretory effect with median intragastric pH above 4.0 for 18.6 h/day at steady-state, after 7 days of once daily dosing. The sodium bicarbonate in immediate-release omeprazole protects the uncoated omeprazole from degradation by gastric acid. The accelerated antisecretory action of immediate-release omeprazole compared with delayed-release omeprazole may be due to the activation of proton pumps by the rapid neutralization of intragastric acid by the sodium bicarbonate. The faster onset of action seen with immediate-release omeprazole is not achieved by using an antacid with a delayed-release proton-pump inhibitor, because administering antacids with conventional delayed-release proton-pump inhibitors does not significantly enhance absorption of the proton-pump inhibitor. In conclusion, immediate-release omeprazole is associated with rapid absorption of omeprazole and rapid onset of antisecretory effect, without compromising the duration of acid suppression.

Delayed-Action Preparations↗

PubMed2005

Review article: similarities and differences among delayed-release proton-pump inhibitor formulations.

Proton-pump inhibitors are acid-labile, and require an enteric coating to protect them from degradation in the stomach when given orally. However, this leads to delayed absorption and onset of action of the proton-pump inhibitor. This article aims to review the similarities and differences between the various formulations of delayed release proton-pump inhibitors. Delayed-release omeprazole and delayed-release lansoprazole have been suspended in sodium bicarbonate for tube administration; however, for omeprazole, absorption is further impaired and antisecretory effects are disappointing. Although such formulations may be more convenient for clinical use in certain patient groups, absorption of the proton-pump inhibitor is still influenced by residual enteric coating. There are few differences among the currently available delayed-release proton-pump inhibitors with respect to their pharmacodynamic effects during chronic administration. There are minor formulation-based pharmacokinetic differences among these agents, primarily reflected in their bioavailability following the first few doses. Differences in bioavailability may explain slight differences in the rate of onset of maximal antisecretory effect. However, minor pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences are not associated with meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2004

Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and healthcare cost. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in peptic ulcer bleeding have yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of PPIs in the management of acute bleeding from PU using evidence from RCTs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed a search of CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2003) and EMBASE (1980 to February 2003) and proceedings of recent major meetings through to February 2003. We searched the reference lists of articles and contacted pharmaceutical companies and experts in the field for additional published or unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs of PPI treatment (oral or intravenous) compared with either placebo or H(2)-receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) in patients with acute bleeding from PU were included if they met pre-defined criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted data independently on a purpose-designed data extraction form. Validity of included studies was assessed by adequacy of randomisation method and other pre-defined criteria. Studies were summarised and meta-analysis was undertaken. The influence of factors on the outcomes was assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs with a total of 2915 participants were included. Statistical heterogeneity was found among trials for rebleeding (P = 0.05), but not for mortality (P = 0.26) or surgery (P = 0.42). There was no significant difference in mortality rates between PPI and control treatment; pooled rates were 5.2% on PPI versus 4.6% on control (odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.57). PPI treatment significantly reduced rates of surgical intervention compared with control; pooled rates were 8.4% on PPI versus 13.0% on control (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.76). PPIs significantly reduced rebleeding compared to control; pooled rates were 10.6% with PPI (range: 0% to 24.4%) versus 18.7% with control treatment (range: 2.3% to 39.1%), the OR was 0.46 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.64). Results on mortality and rebleeding rates were independent of route of PPI administration, type of control treatment or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment. Surgical intervention rates varied with type of control (PPI significantly reduced surgical intervention rates compared with placebo and not when compared with H(2)RA) but not with route of PPI administration or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: PPI treatment in PU bleeding reduces rebleeding and surgical intervention rates in studies comparing treatment with placebo or H(2)RA, but there is no evidence of an effect on mortality.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2004

Review article: management of peptic ulcer bleeding-the roles of proton pump inhibitors and Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Peptic ulcer bleeding is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The goals of management are to control any active bleeding and prevent re-bleeding and then to heal the ulcer and prevent its recurrence. Initial management strategies are guided by the patient's clinical condition and endoscopic findings. Thus, treatment may consist of endoscopic and medical therapy and, sometimes, surgery. Control of acid secretion, preferably with proton pump inhibitor therapy in the initial management continues to evolve; it has also been used as both an adjunct to endoscopic therapy and as primary treatment. These agents have been found to be effective in some trials in the reduction of re-bleeding and the need for surgery, although there is no clear benefit demonstrated for overall mortality. Proton pump inhibitors have been administered either intravenously or orally in different trials. The long-term management of patients with peptic ulcer, after the initial bleeding episode, should include patient stratification based upon risk factors for ulcer recurrence (i.e. Helicobacter pylori infection, use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Elimination or modification of these risk factors reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence and, hence, of recurrent ulcer bleeding.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

PubMed2004

Review article: oesophageal complications and consequences of persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

The major oesophageal complications associated with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include erosive oesophagitis, ulceration, strictures and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Although the causes of these complications are uncertain, studies indicate that erosive oesophagitis may progress to the development of ulcers, strictures and GI bleeding. Pharmacological treatment with proton pump inhibitors is favoured over that with H(2)-receptor antagonists for the treatment of strictures. The treatment of strictures is accomplished with dilation and many favour the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors. Most gastroenterologists are seeing far fewer oesophageal strictures these days since the introduction of proton pump inhibitors. In addition, research has shown that oesophageal complications have a greater impact on patients suffering from night-time GERD than on those suffering from daytime GERD. Barrett's oesophagus is a significant complication associated with persistent GERD and those at risk generally experience a longer duration of symptoms, especially those with a high degree of severity. In addition, there is a strong relationship between Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. This is in part due to the association of obesity and the development of hiatal hernias. Furthermore, endoscopic screening is being used to detect Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma in persons suffering from chronic GERD, even though screening may not have an impact on outcomes (Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J, et al. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: The AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 310-30.).

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2004

Systematic review: Is there excessive use of proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease?

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors are often recommended for continuous use in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but this may not be necessary in all patients. AIM: To ascertain the level of evidence for alternative strategies for proton-pump inhibitor treatment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: We searched for observational or interventional studies examining alternatives to continuous proton-pump inhibitor treatment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. RESULTS: Non-randomized studies suggest that some patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, including some with erosive oesophagitis, may be adequately maintained on proton-pump inhibitor therapy given less frequently than once daily. However, the results may not be generalizable. Four high quality randomized-controlled trials compared 'on-demand' proton-pump inhibitor and placebo treatment in endoscopy-negative reflux disease; all found this effective for most patients. One high quality randomized-controlled trial found intermittent courses of a proton-pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist in erosive oesophagitis or endoscopy-negative reflux disease adequate for almost half of the patients studied. Up to 80% of patients on continuous high-dose proton-pump inhibitor treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can be 'stepped down' to less intensive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: On-demand proton-pump inhibitor treatment may be appropriate in endoscopy-negative reflux disease. In gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, patients taking more than once daily or high-dose proton-pump inhibitor treatment, a step down to once daily or standard dose therapy should be attempted.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding peptic ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Although a previous meta-analysis found that intravenous H2-receptor antagonists were only weakly beneficial in bleeding gastric ulcer and of no benefit in bleeding duodenal ulcer, patients with ulcer bleeding continue to receive such treatment. AIM: To re-evaluate the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in ulcer re-bleeding, surgery and mortality by updating the previous meta-analysis. METHODS: After two independent literature searches, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding ulcer published between 1984 and 2000 were added to those from the initial meta-analysis. Pooled rates of re-bleeding, surgery and death were re-calculated, together with the relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio. RESULTS: Intravenous H2-receptor antagonists did not significantly reduce re-bleeding, surgery or death in bleeding duodenal ulcer. There were small but significant reductions in re-bleeding, surgery and death in bleeding gastric ulcer; the absolute risk reductions were 7.2%, 6.7% and 3.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous H2-receptor antagonists are of no value in bleeding duodenal ulcer, although they may be mildly beneficial in bleeding gastric ulcer. Because proton pump inhibitors have a greater inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion than H2-receptor antagonists, they may be more effective in ulcer bleeding and should be further evaluated for that indication.

Histamine H2 Antagonists↗

PubMed2001

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing standard clinical doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole in erosive oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Omeprazole and lansoprazole are used to treat erosive oesophagitis in the respective daily doses of 20 and 30 mg. AIM: To investigate, by meta-analysis, whether treatment with lansoprazole 30 mg increases erosive oesophagitis healing rates over omeprazole 20 mg. METHODS: We searched for randomized, double-blind trials comparing omeprazole 20 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg in endoscopically diagnosed erosive oesophagitis. After assessing for homogeneity, non-heterogeneous trials were combined and pooled healing rates derived. We calculated the relative benefit increase, absolute benefit increase and number needed to treat. RESULTS: Six trials without significant heterogeneity met predetermined inclusion criteria. By per protocol analysis, pooled healing rates for omeprazole 20 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg were, respectively, 74.7% and 77.7% after 4 weeks and 87.0% and 88.7% after 8 weeks. The corresponding figures by intention-to-treat analysis were 70.8% and 72.7% after 4 weeks and 81.8% and 83.3% after 8 weeks. In each analysis the absolute benefit increase for lansoprazole was small and its 95% confidence interval encompassed zero. CONCLUSION: Lansoprazole 30 mg produces healing rates in erosive oesophagitis that are not statistically significantly different to those of omeprazole 20 mg.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2001

Helicobacter pylori eradication is superior to ulcer healing with or without maintenance therapy to prevent further ulcer haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication decreases ulcer recurrence and should prevent recurrent ulcer haemorrhage. AIM: By meta-analysis, to compare treatment of H. pylori infection with other approaches to prevent recurrent ulcer haemorrhage and, by cost minimization analysis, to determine the least costly strategy. METHODS: We searched for randomized, controlled trials comparing treatment of H. pylori infection with ulcer healing alone or with maintenance therapy in preventing recurrent ulcer haemorrhage. We calculated the relative and absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to treat. RESULTS: Treatment of H. pylori infection decreased recurrent bleeding by 17% (numbers needed to treat=6) compared with ulcer healing treatment alone. Compared with ulcer healing treatment followed by maintenance therapy, recurrent bleeding was decreased by 4% (numbers needed to treat=25). Decision model-based cost minimization analysis demonstrated that treatment of H. pylori infection was the least costly strategy unless the incidence of complicated recurrences after treatment was over 6%, or the cost of confirming eradication was over $741. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of H. pylori infection is superior to ulcer healing treatment with or without maintenance therapy in preventing recurrent ulcer haemorrhage. All patients with ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori infection and appropriately treated if positive.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2001

Current indications for acid suppressants in Helicobacter pylori -negative ulcer disease.

Although Helicobacter pylori infection remains the single most common cause of peptic ulcer, an increasing proportion of patients have H. pylori -negative ulcers. The proportion is higher in the USA--and possibly Australia--than elsewhere. Although the precise aetiology of these ulcers is often unknown, some are caused by the use of aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In areas with a high prevalence of H. pylori -negative ulcers, the empirical treatment of H. pylori infection for newly diagnosed peptic ulcer disease should be discouraged. All such patients should have documentation of their H. pylori status before treatment. Patients with H. pylori -negative ulcers may have the more serious ulcer diathesis and are likely to require long-term management with acid-suppressing drugs. Proton pump inhibitors are likely to be the drugs of choice; patients may be relatively refractory to H(2)-receptor antagonists. The optimal duration of treatment is undefined but might be lifelong. There are no prospective studies of the efficacy of surgery or mucosal-protective agents in the treatment of H. pylori -negative ulcers.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2001

The effect of stimulant laxatives and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation on serum electrolytes and hemodynamics.

We have previously shown that magnesium citrate or bisacodyl before polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) improves colonoscopy preparation. Patients prefer this to preparation with full-volume PEG-ELS alone. However, such combinations might cause undesirable changes in hemodynamics or serum electrolytes. This study examined the effects of these combinations on heart rate, blood pressure, and serum electrolytes. We randomized 68 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy to one of three preparations. Group 1 received 4 L of PEG-ELS, group 2 received 2 L of PEG-ELS with 20 mg bisacodyl, and group 3 received 2 L of PEG-ELS preceded by 296 mL of magnesium citrate. Heart rate, blood pressure, and serum electrolytes were measured before starting the preparation and immediately before colonoscopy. Mean serum magnesium fell by 0.01 mg/dL and 0.11 mg/dL in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and rose by 0.06 mg/dL in group 3 (p = 0.044). There were no other significant changes. Statistically significant changes in serum magnesium after preparation with PEG-ELS and a stimulant laxative are minor and probably of no clinical relevance. Two liters of PEG-ELS with a stimulant laxative is safe and effective for colonoscopy.

Cathartics↗