A prospective comparison of scalpel versus bipolar scissors in the elevation of radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flaps.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap has become the workhorse for reconstruction of head and neck ablative defects. A location distal to the head and neck allows this flap to be elevated concurrent with the ablation. Most commonly, the flap is elevated under tourniquet control. This involves a primary ischemic insult with a certain amount of hemorrhage after the tourniquet is released. Bipolar scissors are a new method of dissection. They may allow for a speedier dissection with a concomitant decrease in ischemic time. Their hemostatic properties may control hemorrhage after use of the tourniquet. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of patients undergoing radial forearm free flaps over a 12-month period at a tertiary care referral center was undertaken. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered into the study, flaps were elevated with scalpel (20) and with bipolar scissors (20). Mean time under tourniquet was 39 minutes (range, 30-56 min) with scalpel compared with 27 minutes (range, 21-31 min) with bipolar scissors (P <.001). Total mean time of elevation (including control of hemostasis and pedicle dissection) for scalpel elevation was 50 minutes (range, 35-61 min) compared with 32 minutes (range, 20-41 min) for bipolar scissors elevation (P <.001). Mean blood loss was 46 mL (range, 15-110 mL) in the scalpel elevation group compared with 14 mL (range, 0-50 mL) in the bipolar scissors elevation group (P <.001). Complications at the donor site were equal between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar scissors are a safe, efficient method for elevating radial forearm free flaps.