Biomedical subjects

C Y Eto

Publications and source records attributed to C Y Eto.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1989

A comparison of the ocular hypotensive efficacy of once-daily and twice-daily levobunolol treatment.

The authors compared the ocular hypotensive efficacy of two different treatment regimens of levobunolol 0.5% in a double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Seventy-one patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension received levobunolol 0.5% as their sole glaucoma medication either on a once-daily or twice-daily treatment regimen for 3 months. Approximately 81% of the patients in the once-daily treatment group and 88% of subjects in the twice-daily treatment group successfully completed the 3-month study period. The overall mean decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) was 4.5 mmHg in the once-daily group and 5.6 mmHg in the twice-daily group. These differences were not statistically different. For both treatment groups, effects on mean heart rate and blood pressure were minimal. The authors' data from this population suggest that once-daily treatment with levobunolol is an effective glaucoma regimen.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1989

Effect of varying drop size on the efficacy and safety of a topical beta blocker.

We studied the effects on efficacy and safety of varying the drop size of a topical solution of levobunolol 0.5%. In a double-masked, crossover acute study, we administered a single drop of either 35 microL of vehicle, or 20, 35, or 50 microL of levobunolol one hour before the subjects began a ten-minute treadmill challenge electrocardiogram. After exercise the mean heart rate was 111 beats per minute (bpm) in the vehicle group and 102 to 103 bpm in the three levobunolol groups, which were significantly different from the control group but not from each other. In a randomized double-masked, parallel, chronic study, 117 patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) instilled one of the three drop sizes of levobunolol twice daily for three months. Mean decreases in IOP ranged from 5.1 to 6.0 mmHg in the three groups, not significantly different from each other in mean IOP, heart rate, or blood pressure. We conclude that drop size in the range tested had no clinically significant effect on either efficacy or safety of a beta blocker such as levobunolol.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed1988

Levobunolol and betaxolol. A double-masked controlled comparison of efficacy and safety in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.

In a double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial, the authors evaluated the ocular hypotensive efficacy of twice-daily treatment with levobunolol (0.25 and 0.5%) and betaxolol (0.5%) in 85 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. During the 3-month study, intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions in the two levobunolol groups were significantly greater than in the betaxolol group. From a mean baseline IOP of approximately 25 mmHg, overall mean reductions were 6.2 and 6.0 mmHg for the 0.25 and 0.5% levobunolol groups, respectively, and 3.7 mmHg for the betaxolol group. No clinically or statistically significant among-group differences were noted in the systemic safety variables evaluated. These data suggest that although all three treatments are effective, levobunolol provides a greater reduction in IOP than betaxolol.

Betaxolol↗

PubMed1988

Levobunolol compared with timolol: a four-year study.

Fifty-one patients with raised intraocular pressure (IOP) were treated for up to four years with one of three ophthalmic solutions: 0.5% levobunolol, 1% levobunolol, or 0.5% timolol. The study was conducted as a double-masked, randomised trial in which medications were administered twice daily to both eyes. Levobunolol and timolol were equally effective in reducing overall mean IOP; reductions were greater than 8.8 mmHg in all three treatment groups. The study showed levobunolol to be as safe and effective as timolol in the long-term control of raised IOP.

Aged↗