PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Zillinger

Publications and source records attributed to C Zillinger.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

[A 67-year-old patient with diarrhoea and constipation without any pathological findings in virtual colonoscopy].

Virtual colonoscopy provides a computer-simulated endoluminal perspective of the air-filled, distended colon using modern CT scanning (spiral CT). According to recent studies the sensitivity and specificity of this technique are high for adenomatous polyps > or = 10 mm. A 67-year-old patient was admitted to our hospital because of diarrhoea and constipation, associated with abdominal pain in the lower right abdomen. Prior to admission the patient had undergone virtual colonoscopy in a specialised radiological practice which had detected no abnormalities apart from colonic diverticulosis. However, conventional video-colonoscopy revealed a subtotal circular malignant stenosis in the region of the right colonic flexure. A poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was diagnosed histologically. Staging showed peritoneal carcinosis with infiltration of the right ureter and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa of the pectoral lobe of the left lung. After right hemicolectomy because of metastasised carcinoma of the ascending colon (pT4pN1pM1) we started palliative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. The risk of misdiagnosis by virtual colonoscopy is clearly increased in patients with subtotal tumour stenosis of the ascending colon. Conventional video-colonoscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

[Metal stents in gastroenterology].

Self-expanding metal stents have, when introduced in their constrained form through gastrointestinal and biliary strictures, a relatively small diameter. Once placed through the stricture and released, however, they expand to a much larger internal diameter, thus giving rise to sufficient palliative reopening of these strictures. Since metal stents are usually not removable, their primary use has been in malignant stenoses. Benign strictures should be treated with metal stents only in exceptional situations. For palliation of dysphagia in esophagocardial malignancies, metal stents have been shown to be associated with significantly fewer initial complications on placement than plastic tubes. The long-term fate of both stent types seems to be similar. In the palliation of malignant jaundice, metal stents were demonstrated to have a significantly longer patency rate, resulting in a favourable cost-benefit ratio despite the high price of metal stents. Continued developments are necessary to further reduce long-term complications and effectiveness.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

[Rational diagnosis of the bile ducts].

Since the introduction of MR cholangiography (MRC) diagnostic imaging of the biliary tract has been significantly improved. While percutaneous ultrasonography is still the primary examination, computed tomography (CT), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as the direct imaging modalities of the biliary tract--i.v. cholangiography, endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiography (ERC), and percutaneous-transhepatic-cholangiography (PTC) are in use. This article discusses the clinical value of the different diagnostic techniques for the various biliary pathologies with special attention to recent developments in MRC techniques. An algorithm is presented offering a rational approach to biliary disorders. With further technical improvement shifts from ERC(P) to MRC(P) for biliary imaging could be envisioned, ERCP further concentrating on its role as a minimal invasive treatment option.

Biliary Tract Diseases↗
PubMed1998

Randomized study of intracorporeal laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment modalities are well established for the removal of bile duct stones. For the small percentage of stones that are difficult or impossible to extract by conventional means, more sophisticated endoscopic techniques or associated modalities such as intracorporeal laser lithotripsy (ILL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) have to be applied. Little is known, however, about the relative value of these different techniques. We therefore compared endoscopic ILL with ESWL in patients with difficult bile duct stones in a prospective randomized study. METHODS: The study included 60 patients (35 women; mean age 70+/-15 years) with bile duct stones in whom standard extraction failed (n=33) or in whom the papilla was not accessible, thus requiring percutaneous access (n=27). They were randomized to receive ESWL under fluoroscopic targeting (maximum discharge number per session: 6000) or ILL using a pulsed dye laser with an automatic stone recognition system, which was mostly performed (28 of 30 cases) under cholangioscopic control. Endoscopic removal of fragments was attempted within the subsequent (ESWL) or the same (ILL) session. Failure was defined as failure to remove all ductal stones/fragments after a maximum of three lithotripsy sessions. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in background variables between the two groups. Bile duct clearance was achieved in 22 of 30 patients (73%) in the ESWL group and in 29 of 30 patients (97%) in the ILL group (p < 0.05). The number of treatment sessions (ESWL 3.0+/-1.3; ILL 1.2+/-0.4; p < 0.001) and the duration of treatment (ESWL 3.9+/-3.5 days; ILL 0.9+/-2.3 days; p < 0.001) were also significantly different in favor of ILL. Two minor complications occurred in each group; there was no 30-day mortality. Crossover therapy to ILL led to stone removal in seven of the eight cases in which ESWL failed, whereas ESWL fragmented the stone in the single patient in whom ILL failed. CONCLUSIONS: ILL is more effective in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones than ESWL in terms of stone clearance rate and treatment duration.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones under direct visual control.

Biliary laser lithotripsy was performed under direct visual control in 35 consecutive patients not amenable to routine endoscopy. The patients had 1-50 (median 1) bile duct stones with the greatest diameter of the largest stone being 9-42 mm (median 20 mm). Conventional endoscopic treatment had failed because of an inaccessible papilla (16 patients), biliary strictures (seven patients), and impaction or large size of calculi (12 patients). Twelve patients, depending on their anatomical condition, underwent peroral cholangioscopy by means of a mother-babyscope system. Percutaneous cholangioscopy was initially carried out in 23 patients, 7-20 days (median 10 days) after creation of a transhepatic fistula. Pulsed dye laser (32 patients) or alexandrite laser (three patients) lithotripsy was applied under an appropriate direct visual control in all cases. Complete stone disintegration succeeded in 33 of 35 patients. All resultant fragments passed the papilla within a mean number of 1.3 treatment sessions. Peroral cholangioscopic lithotripsy failed in two cases. One patient successfully underwent percutaneous laser treatment and the other patient was referred to surgery. Fever, temporary haemobilia, or a subcapsular liver haematoma were seen in a total of eight patients during establishment of the cutaneobiliary fistula. A 95 year old patient who had been admitted with septic cholangitis died because of cardiorespiratory failure 5 days after bile duct clearance. It is concluded that laser lithotripsy performed under a direct visual control is an effective and safe procedure for the non-surgical treatment of difficult bile duct stones. Ductal clearance can usually be achieved in a single treatment session when the papilla and the stones are accessible by the peroral route. Percutaneous cholangioscopic lithotripsy is more time consuming but highly effective even in patients with a difficult anatomy, bile duct strictures, or intrahepatic calculi. This approach should be limited, however, to cases not amenable to retrograde procedures because the creation of the cutaneobiliary fistula is not without risks.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystotomy in the treatment of gallbladder stones.

Laparoscopic cholecystotomy (LCT) was attempted in 34 patients with biliary type symptoms; 33 patients suffered from gallbladder stones and one patient from gallbladder polyps. In one patient the gallbladder was not accessible with the laparoscope due to extensive adhesions. In the other patients endoscopic removal of stones and polyps was possible in all cases. In the first five patients the gallbladder was drained with a Foley type catheter at the end of the procedure; in the other patients the incision of the gallbladder was closed primarily with clips and fibrin glue. At the beginning of the series two cases of complications were observed: balloon catheter deflation due to material defect and postoperative bleeding into the gallbladder; after conventional cholecystectomy the two patients made an uneventful recovery. LCT is a one-session procedure suitable for removal of symptomatic stones in well functioning gallbladders with no restrictions concerning the composition, number or size of the stones.

Adult↗