PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C de Mey

Publications and source records attributed to C de Mey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Erythromycin increases plasma concentrations of alpha-dihydroergocryptine in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the potential for relevant pharmacotherapeutic interaction between cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4)-inhibiting agents such as erythromycin and the dopamine agonist alpha-dihydroergocryptine (DHEC). METHODS: The study was carried out as a single-center, controlled, nonblinded, 2-way crossover clinical trial with randomly allocated period-balanced sequences, investigating two treatments of a single oral dose of 10 mg DHEC (on the morning of day 1), once administered alone (reference), once along with a 4-day treatment (days -2 to 1) of 500 mg erythromycin 3 times daily. Periods were separated by a washout of at least 14 days. Nine healthy white male volunteers, 22 to 42 years old, with a body weight range of 58 to 90 kg (body mass index, 20.2-25.1 kg x m(-2)) began the study. One subject discontinued prematurely, and 8 concluded the study in accordance with the study protocol. RESULTS: The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of DHEC and its metabolites were characterized by a large variability. Concomitant treatment with erythromycin led to respective increases of 9.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 13.9) and 16.5 (95% CI, 8.7 to 31.5) times the maximum observed plasma drug concentration and the area under the time course of the plasma concentrations up to the last quantifiable concentration after dosing of unchanged DHEC (determined by radioimmunoassay). The 24-hour urinary excretion was on average 11 times larger (95% CI, 5.9 to 20.7). Qualitatively similar findings were recorded for the total of DHEC plus metabolites (as determined by enzyme immunoassay). CONCLUSIONS: The concomitant use of erythromycin or similarly CYP3A4-inhibiting agents along with direct dopaminergic agonists such as the ergoline DHEC may cause a clinically relevant increase in pharmacokinetic exposure, which may induce exaggerated dopaminergic effects.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of the dopamine agonist alpha-dihydroergocryptine in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic behavior of unchanged alpha-dihydroergocryptine (DHEC, Almirid, Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, under licence of Polichem S.A., Luxembourg) and total DHEC (unchanged DHEC and pooled metabolites) in plasma and urine in patients with impaired hepatic function, following administration of single oral doses. METHODS: The study was carried out according to an open, uncontrolled, parallel-group design, investigating two study groups: patients with hepatic dysfunction, i.e. with evidence of stable cirrhosis (n = 10) and age- and sex-matched healthy subjects (n = 8). Each subject received a single dose of 20 mg DHEC. Blood samples were taken at specified intervals up to 72 h after dosing and urine was collected fractionally for 24 h. Concentrations of unchanged DHEC were determined by RIA and concentrations of total DHEC (unchanged and pooled metabolites) by EIA. RESULTS: The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of DHEC and its metabolites were characterized by large variability. In patients with impaired hepatic function, the geometric mean Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) values for unchanged DHEC were 571.3 pg/ml (CV: 0.87) and 4038 pg x h/ml (CV: 1.04) and were approximately 2 times (2.04, 95% CI: 0.93 to 4.46 and 2.11, 95% CI: 0.58 to 7.73 for Cmax and AUC(0-infinity), respectively) larger than those measured in age-matched healthy controls. The 24-hour urinary excretion was approximately 3 times (3.41, 95% CI: 0.95 to 12.21) higher in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Similar results were obtained for total DHEC. CONCLUSIONS: The results reflect an increased systemic exposure in patients with impaired hepatic function which is not due to a reduced urinary excretion/elimination or reduced renal clearance. The most likely mechanism involved is a reduction in pre-systemic biotransformation. The observed range of effects on the pharmacokinetics of DHEC in patients with compromized hepatic function does not suggest the need to revise the dosage recommendations, since treatment with DHEC is generally started with low doses and is slowly up-titrated according to the individual response and the occurrence of adverse effects. Nevertheless, lower maintenance doses are likely to be achieved.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy of orally administered extract of red vine leaf AS 195 (folia vitis viniferae) in chronic venous insufficiency (stages I-II). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: Red vine leaf extract (RVLE) is a herbal medicine containing several flavonoids, with quercetin-3-O-beta-glucuronide and isoquercitrin (quercetin-3-O-beta-glycoside) as the main components. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily doses of 360 and 720 mg RVLE (pharmaceutical extract code AS 195; Antistax Venenkapseln) compared to placebo in patients with stage I and incipient stage II chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). DESIGN: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study. PATIENTS: Male and female outpatients aged 25 to 75 years with stage I to stage II CVI (i.e. without extensive trophic changes), not having any other significant medical conditions and not treated with compression stockings, diuretics or other drugs affecting fluid balance. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment with placebo, 360 mg AS 195 or 720 mg AS 195 once daily for 12 weeks, preceded and followed by a single-blind 2-week placebo treatment for baseline run-in and end-of-trial washout, respectively. Study criteria were evaluated at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks after discontinuation of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 260 patients enrolled and randomized, 219 completed the study in accordance with the protocol. In the intention-to-treat analysis (N = 257), the mean (+/- SD) lower leg volume (measured by water displacement plethysmography) of the patients treated with placebo (N = 87) increased by 15.2 +/- 90.1 g (displaced water mass) and by 33.7 +/- 96.1 g after 6 and 12 weeks compared to baseline. In contrast, for patients treated with AS 195, lower leg volume decreased, and after 12 weeks of treatment, the difference in mean lower leg volume between the active treatment groups and the placebo group was -75.9 g (95% CI: -106.1 to -45.8 g) and -99.9 g (95% CI: -130.3 to -69.6 g) for the group treated with 360-mg AS 195 (N = 86) and 720-mg AS 195 (N = 84), respectively. The changes in calf circumference showed a similar pattern: in patients treated with AS 195, both the higher dose (720 mg) and, albeit to a lesser extent, the lower dose (360 mg) resulted in a clear reduction in circumference over time, whereas, circumference remained largely unchanged in patients treated with the placebo (95% CI of the estimated treatment effects vs. placebo after 12 weeks: -1.40 to -0.56 cm and -1.73 to -0.88 cm for 360 and 720 mg AS 195, respectively). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The reductions in ankle circumference were qualitatively similar but quantitatively less marked. Subjectively, there was an improvement in key CVI symptoms (VAS) at 6 weeks with all treatments, but a further improvement at week 12 was seen only in the active treatment groups; at 12 weeks, the changes compared to baseline were significantly greater (p < 0.001) in both active treatment groups than in the placebo group. The treatments were well tolerated; Adverse events were rare and usually mild. Two adverse events (AEs) during treatment with the placebo led to hospitalization and were hence labeled as 'serious'. Three further patients were withdrawn because of AEs which occurred during treatment with the placebo. CONCLUSION: Once-daily doses of 360 and 720 mg AS 195 were confirmed to be safe and effective in the treatment of mild CVI, reducing significantly lower leg edema and circumference whilst improving key CVI-related symptoms to a clinically relevant extent. The edema reduction is at least equivalent to that reported for compression stockings and/or other edema-reducing agents. The higher dose was as well tolerated as the lower dose but resulted in a slightly greater and more sustained improvement.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Study on the interaction of the dopamine agonist alpha-dihydroergocryptine with the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

AIM: The study was carried out to explore the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction of a single oral dose of alpha-dihydroergocryptine (CAS 14271-05-7, DHEC, Almirid) with digoxin. METHODS: The serum pharmacokinetics of digoxin were analysed after the administration of single oral doses of 0.5 mg digoxin administered either alone or concomitantly with 20 mg DHEC according to a randomised, non-blinded, two-period cross-over design, with study periods 2 weeks apart. Twelve healthy male subjects, 23 to 39 years of age were enrolled and were investigated in accordance with the protocol. Venous blood was sampled up to 48 h after dosing. Concentrations of digoxin in serum were determined by a competitive radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The mean Cmax were 1.97 +/- 0.87 (after a median tmax of 1 h) and 2.05 +/- 0.95 ng/ml (after a median tmax of 0.83 h) after the administration of digoxin with (test) and without (reference) concomitant DHEC, respectively; the corresponding estimated treatment ratio for test: reference was 0.939, 95% CI: 0.781 to 1.129. The mean AUC(0-48) were 13.6 +/- 5.0 ng.h/ml and 13.3 +/- 4.7 ng.h/ml for the test and reference treatment, respectively; the corresponding estimated treatment ratio for test: reference was 1.011, 95% CI: 0.866 to 1.142. In addition, no clinically significant changes were observed by ECG monitoring. The tolerability of digoxin alone was good, significantly more adverse events occurred when co-administered with DHEC; these corresponded with the known adverse reaction profile and were of moderate intensity. No premature study termination was thus necessary. CONCLUSION: The present study did not demonstrate clinically relevant interaction of a single dose of DHEC on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin. On the basis of these observations there is no indication for an a priori adjustment of the dose of digoxin when concomitant treatment with DHEC is initiated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy and tolerability of myrtol standardized in acute bronchitis. A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group clinical trial vs. cefuroxime and ambroxol.

UNLABELLED: Myrtol standardized (Gelomyrtol forte) is a phytotherapeutic extract (distillate) consisting mainly of three monoterpenes: (+)alpha-pinene, d-limonene and 1,8-cineole. OBJECTIVE: This study describes and compares the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a 2-week treatment with myrtol stand. (4 x 300 mg, day 1-14), cefuroxime (CAS 55268-75-2) (2 x 250 mg daily for day 1-6), ambroxol (CAS 18683-91-5) (3 x 30 mg for day 1-3, 2 x 30 mg for days 4-14) and matched placebo in acute bronchitis. PATIENTS: 676 male and female outpatients, aged > or = 18 years, with acute bronchitis of recent onset (within last 5 days), with an FEV1 > 75% of the normal EGKS-value and without evidence or suspicion of chronic pulmonary disease or any further confounding illness were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to a 2-week treatment course with either myrtol stand. (N = 170), cefuroxime (N = 171), ambroxol (N = 163) or placebo (N = 172) in a double-blind, placebo-matched, parallel-group fashion. Evaluations were at baseline (visit 1), after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment (visits 2 and 3) and at 2 weeks after conclusion of the treatments (visit 4). CRITERIA: Responder- and non-responder rates (primary), signs (abnormal auscultation), symptoms (daily diary data on nightly cough, coughing fits during the day, sputum consistence and general well-being; visit data on bronchial hyperreactivity and absence/presence of associated symptoms), FEV1, overall efficacy, absence of relapse, safety and tolerability (adverse events, laboratory screens, vital signs and physical examination). Criteria were evaluated for the intention-to-treat data-set (ITT) and the 'efficacy evaluable' sample (EAP), i.e. excluding patients with missing values (incl. discontinued non-responders and drop-outs for other reasons) at the time of assessment. RESULTS: The signs and symptoms of acute bronchitis regressed readily in all treatment groups, but regression was slower and less complete in the patients treated with placebo. In patients treated with placebo, the acute bronchitis was considered to have deteriorated to such an extent that discontinuation was indicated ('non-responder') in 36 patients (ITT: 20.9%, 95% CI: 15.1 to 27.8% and EAP: 21.3%, CI: 15.4 to 28.3%) after 1 week (visit 2) and in 19 further patients (ITT: 11.0%, CI: 6.8 to 16.7%; EAP: 14.8%, CI: 9.2 to 22.2%) after 1 further week (visit 3). In contrast, in the group of patients treated with myrtol stand. the non-responder rates at visits 2 and 3 were only 5.3% (ITT, CI: 2.4 to 9.8%; EAP: 5.4%, CI: 2.5 to 10.0%) and 1.2% (ITT, CI: 0.1 to 4.2%; EAP: 1.3%, CI: 0.2 to 4.7%); the responder rates at visit 2 were statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001) for myrtol stand. (ITT: 92.9%, CI: 88.0 to 96.3) compared to placebo (ITT: 77.3%, CI: 70.3 to 83.4), and similar to those for cefuroxime (ITT: 92.4%, CI: 87.4 to 95.9) and ambroxol (ITT: 89.6%, CI: 83.8 to 93.8%). The superiority of the active treatments vs. placebo with little difference among the treatments was confirmed for all further criteria of evaluation. There was no evidence of bronchoconstriction or relapse in any treatment group for the patients continuing treatment (i.e. for those who were not discontinued because of non-response). The treatments were safe and comparably well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Compared to placebo, treatment with myrtol stand. was well tolerated but evidently superior in terms of efficacy, resulting in a more rapid and more complete recovery; although well comparable with the other active treatments, myrtol stand. tended to be superior to cefuroxime and ambroxol for several ancillary criteria. Myrtol stand. is a well-evidenced alternative to antibiotics for acute bronchitis without specified infective agent, without the risk to promote the development of bacterial resistance.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Respimat (a new soft mist inhaler) delivering fenoterol plus ipratropium bromide provides equivalent bronchodilation at half the cumulative dose compared with a conventional metered dose inhaler in asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Respimat, a possible alternative to the conventional metered dose inhaler (MDI), is a novel, reusable, propellant-free, multidose soft mist inhaler. Respimat slowly releases a metered dose of active substance as a soft mist with a high proportion of the dose in the fine particle fraction, leading to improved lung deposition following inhalation when compared with the conventional MDI. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The equipotent bronchodilating efficacy and safety of a combination of fenoterol hydrobromide and ipratropium bromide (F/I) in cumulative doses delivered by either Respimat or pressurised MDI was assessed in a randomised, controlled, double-blind (within device) 4-way crossover study. Forty-three patients with stable asthma (mean FEV(1) 62% predicted) responsive to F/I inhaled cumulatively 16 puffs on each of 4 test days (1 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 puffs at 50-min intervals) via Respimat delivering 50/20, 25/20 or 25/10 microg F/I per puff or via MDI delivering 50/20 microg F/I per puff. RESULTS: Cumulative doses of 400/160 and 400/320 microg F/I via Respimat produced bronchodilation (evaluated by average increase in FEV(1) 45-245 min after first inhalation) equivalent to that achieved with a cumulative 800/320 microg F/I via MDI (mean increase in FEV(1) above baseline 0.76, 0.73 and 0.71 litres, respectively). The tolerability of the F/I combination via Respimat was also comparable to that of twice the dose delivered via MDI. CONCLUSION: Therefore, a fenoterol hydrobromide/ipratropium bromide combination delivered by Respimat is as safe and effective as the MDI at half the cumulative dose, on acute administration to patients with asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2000

[Sense and nonsense in post-authorization surveillance].

Post-authorization surveillance studies analyze the intended use of medications in accordance with their authorized labeling. They are characterized by the principle of non-intervention, i.e. they do not take influence on the decision whether or how to treat and to survey treatment in the individual patient. These aspects define the difference between surveillance studies and phase-IV clinical trials. In consequence, surveillance studies--in contrast to phase-IV trials--are not subject to the regulations of sections 40, 41 of the German Drug Law and national and international Recommendations on Good Clinical Practice (GCP). In essence, they are pharmaco-epidemiological investigations that make use of personified patient data. Within the context of the European regulatory policies they are part of the overall pharmacovigilance effort. In Germany, surveillance studies may have an additional regulatory impact. Indeed, they may be accepted as a relevant extension to the documentation on both safety and efficacy and in some cases even as an alternative to the tedious experimental investigation thereof, provided they meet newly defined quality criteria (that are discussed here more extensively). Although not developed to this purpose and although these recommendations are mainly formal with some relevant shortcomings in defining content quality, they are an important source of reference for the individual physician to guide his decision about the value and acceptability of any surveillance study, including those not primarily intended to be used in a regulatory context.

Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic↗
PubMed1999

Differential vascular alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonism by tamsulosin and terazosin.

AIMS: In patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist terazosin lowers blood pressure whereas only very small if any alterations were reported with the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist tamsulosin. Therefore, we have compared the vascular alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonism of tamsulosin and terazosin directly. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects were investigated in a randomized, single-blind, three-way cross-over design and received a single dose of 0.4 mg tamsulosin, 5 mg terazosin or placebo on 3 study days at least 1 week apart. Before and 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 23.5 h after drug intake, alterations of diastolic blood pressure and other haemodynamic parameters in response to a graded infusion of the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine were determined non-invasively. RESULTS: At most time points tamsulosin inhibited phenylephrine-induced diastolic blood pressure elevations significantly less than terazosin (5 h time point: median difference in inhibition 35%, 95% CI: 18.7-50.3%). On the other hand, phenylephrine-induced changes of cardiac output, heart rate and stroke volume were similar during both active treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In doses equi-effective for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms tamsulosin causes less inhibition of vasoconstriction than terazosin.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy and tolerability of myrtol standardized in long-term treatment of chronic bronchitis. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Study Group Investigators.

This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized parallel-group trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of myrtol standardized (MYS, Gelomyrtol forte, 3 x 300 mg) in the long-term treatment of patients with chronic bronchitis during the winter. 246 patients received the investigational treatments (MYS: 122, placebo: 124) for at least 1 month; 215 subjects (110 under MYS and 105 under placebo) were evaluable in terms of efficacy (exacerbation rate, the need for antibiotics, symptom scores and general well-being) for the protocol-defined 6 months of treatment. Statistically significantly (p < 0.01) more patients remained without acute exacerbation in the myrtol standardized group (72%) compared to the placebo group (53%). In the placebo group, there was an evident peak in the incidence of exacerbations during the third month of treatment, which was not observed in the active treatment group. In the MYS group, 51.6% of the patients with an acute exacerbation required antibiotics vs. 61.2% under placebo. 62.5% of the patients treated with antibiotics in the MYS group required them for < or = 7 days, whereas 76.7% of the patients in the placebo group treated with antibiotics for exacerbation needed antibiotics for > 7 days. Well-being (assessed in terms of general health and health impairment by cough and expectoration) was significantly better under treatment with MYS. The overall therapeutic efficacy evaluation scored higher for MYS. Therefore, it is concluded that long-term treatment with MYS is equally well tolerated as placebo but is clearly superior in efficacy in terms of protecting against acute exacerbations in patients with chronic bronchitis: it reduces the frequency and intensity of acute exacerbations, the need of antibiotics for them and the health impairment by cough and expectoration.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

alpha(1)-blockers for BPH: are there differences?

alpha(1)-blockers are well established for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), previously referred to as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The various available alpha(1)-blockers do not differ in terms of their clinical efficacy, but there are several indications that alpha(1)-blockers differ qualitatively with regard to their cardiovascular safety and tolerability, albeit the quantification of these differences is subject to several constraints and pitfalls. Clinical selectivity, i.e. the capacity of separating between desired urological and undesired (actually redundant) cardiovascular alpha(1)-blockade is not unlikely to relate to pharmacological selectivity (the relative preference to block the alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor subtypes in vitro, whilst hardly blocking alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors). On the other hand, both clinical and pharmacological selectivity are not unequivocally reflected by experiments on so-called functional selectivity (in vivo experiments that differentiate urological and cardiovascular effects). Generally, alpha(1)-blockers that are efficacious in hypertension (doxazosin, terazosin, alfuzosin) are more likely to impair safety-relevant, physiological blood pressure control in normotensives with LUTS than tamsulosin, which does not reduce elevated blood pressure in comparison with placebo and has little effect on orthostatic blood pressure control. However, clinical selectivity and cardiovascular safety are also defined by the treatment regimen (dose, dosage interval, formulation, step-up dose-increments for treatment initiation, etc.) and by relevant patient-treatment interactions (co-morbidity and co-medication in particular). On the basis of the available information, tamsulosin administered once daily at a dose of 0.4 mg after breakfast (without step-up increments) can be accepted as a highly convenient and efficacious way to treat LUTS with a low cardiovascular safety risk, i.e. with a high level of clinically selectivity. Copyrightz1999S. KargerAG,Basel

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

A double-blind comparison of terazosin and tamsulosin on their differential effects on ambulatory blood pressure and nocturnal orthostatic stress testing.

OBJECTIVES: This single-centre, double-blind, randomized parallel-group study compared ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) and heart rate (HR) profiles and responses to orthostatic testing (OT) for recommended regimens of tamsulosin (TAM, modified release formulation) and terazosin (TER), two alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists that differ in their selectivity for alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes, pharmacokinetic properties and recommended posology for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: 50 elderly normotensive male volunteers (mean age 68 years, range 61-78; 27 had LUTS) entered a single-blind 24-hour placebo run-in followed by a 15-day double-blind treatment in which the TER group received a 1-week treatment with 1 mg, then 1 week with 2 mg and finally a last dose of 5 mg, each dose administered once daily in the evening, while TAM subjects received 0.4 mg once daily after breakfast throughout. Subjects had AMBPs and OT while hospitalized on four occasions: during the placebo run-in and subsequent to the first dose of 1, 2 and 5 mg TER or at corresponding times under TAM. Regular OT (blood pressure after 5 min supine and after 2 min standing) was carried out between 6:00 and 6:30 a.m.; 'nocturial' OT took place whenever the subject had to leave the bed at night to void. RESULTS: The baseline blood pressure values were slightly higher in the TAM group, but under treatment there was little difference between the treatments with regard to circadian changes in AMBP and HR. Under TER, there were 10 incidents of symptomatic hypotensive OT in 9 subjects (2 with syncope); furthermore, there were 24 events of asymptomatic exaggerated (> or = 20 mm Hg) decrease in systolic blood pressure in 12 subjects. With TAM in contrast, there was only 1 subject who experienced symptomatic hypotensive OT on 3 occasions (this subject had a previous history of vertigo and ought not to have been included); 7 subjects on TAM showed 16 incidents of asymptomatic hypotensive OT. The difference between TER and TAM was statistically significant for the number of subjects with positive symptomatic OT (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Once-daily dosing of TAM after breakfast at a fixed dose level (0.4 mg) offers a more efficient protection against undesired cardiovascular extension effects in the normotensive elderly treated for LUTS suggestive of BPO than the usually recommended treatment schedule of TER with step-up doses (1-5 mg) administered at night.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Opportunities for the treatment of erectile dysfunction by modulation of the NO axis--alternatives to sildenafil citrate.

Erectile function in man depends upon a complex interaction of psychogenic, neurologic, hormonal and vascular factors, and therefore the management of erectile dysfunction (ED) reflects this complexity of control. Therapeutic options include psychological and non-pharmacological approaches as well as drug treatments. The effectiveness of the type-5 cGMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil citrate (Viagra) confirms the pivotal role of the NO-cGMP axis in promoting and maintaining erection. Although widely acclaimed, sildenafil leaves many questions unanswered, especially regarding its susceptibility to pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and its safety in patients with ischaemic heart disease and those taking nitrates. In view of the epidemiological link between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease in the elderly, this limitation might have much broader implications. The presently available scientific documentation, although less extensive, indicates that NO donors, such as topically applied nitroglycerin (GTN; for example, 1-2 puffs of an ordinary GTN spray applied to the shaft of the penis), might be a reasonable alternative. Further larger-scale research on the efficacy and tolerability of topical GTN is needed to establish its full therapeutic potential in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Cyclic GMP↗
PubMed1998

Tolerability and in vivo performance of a novel freon-free metered dose inhaler for a fixed combinational product of reproterol and disodium cromoglycate.

The present study was conducted to describe and compare the in vivo performance (systemic exposure), clinical and laboratory safety of a fixed combinational product of inhaled reproterol (CAS 54063-54-6) plus disodium cromoglycate (DSCG; CAS 15826-37-6) using a novel freon (CFC)-free metered dose inhaler (MDI), which uses 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFA-227; CAS 431-89-0) as propellant and polyoxyethylene glyceryl trioleate (Tagat TO; CAS 68958-64-5) as surfactant relative to the conventional freon-driven MDI Allergospasmin in healthy male and female volunteers. Twenty-four young male and female healthy subjects were randomly allocated in gender-balanced fashion to 4 parallel treatment groups with single and repeated dosing of either reproterol + DSCG by HFA- or CFC-MDI (each time N = 8) or placebo by HFA- or CFC-MDI (each time N = 4) using matched placebo devices thus allowing a double-blind (with regard to placebo) approach. Treatments consisted of a single morning dose of 2 actuations followed 4 days later by a 1 week treatment course of 2 actuations four times daily. Subjects were investigated extensively in terms of blood pressure, pulse rate, electrocardiography, spirometry, respiratory rate, body temperature, laboratory safety (haematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis) and clinical well-being. There were no treatment, compound or device related effects for any of the tolerability and safety end points. The treatments were well tolerated. In particular, there was no irritative cough or any sign of broncho-irritation on application. Adverse events were reported in a total of 9 subjects: 3/8, 4/8, 0/4 and 2/4 subjects treated with reproterol + DSCG by HFA-MDI, reproterol + DSCG by CFC-MDI, placebo by HFA-MDI and placebo by CFC-MDI, respectively. Of these, 6 events in 6 subjects receiving the active treatments were considered probably or definitely related to the test drug administration (i.e. adverse drug reactions): after reproterol + DSCG one subject in each treatment group (HFA-MDI and CFC-MDI) complained of an unpleasant bitter taste immediately after application; one further subject in each group complained of headache. Under treatment with reproterol + DSCG by CFC-MDI one male subject complained of mild transient nausea with onset on day 5. Under treatment with reproterol + DSCG by HFA-MDI one female subject complained of mild dizziness and mildly disturbed (blurred) vision with onset on day 1. All adverse events occurred only transitory and required no treatment. Systemic exposure, evaluated by the plasma concentrations of DSCG at 1 h after application, was slightly higher with the HFA-MDI compared to the CFC-MDI. It is concluded that the safety, tolerability and in vivo performance of the newly developed freon-free MDI is at least as well tolerable as the already marketed freon-driven conventional formulation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Cardiovascular effects of alpha-blockers used for the treatment of symptomatic BPH: impact on safety and well-being.

Alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists (alpha-blockers) are efficacious in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), also termed symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), causing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). There is little difference among the various alpha-blockers in terms of efficacy in treating LUTS. However, conventional quinazoline derivatives such as terazosin, doxazosin and alfuzosin, originally developed for hypertension, have inherent cardiovascular extension effects, which influence the well being and safety of patients with LUTS by impairing physiological blood pressure (BP) control, even when their effect on unchallenged BP may be quite low. Preclinically, tamsulosin, a sulphonamide-substituted phenethylamine, has a relative selectivity for the alpha 1-adrenoceptors of the lower urinary tract. Clinically, this is associated with fewer cardiovascular extension effects with tamsulosin (modified release capsule) 0.4 mg once daily. This allows the use of convenient regimens of 0.4 mg tamsulosin administered once daily after breakfast from initiation of treatment without the need for 'step-up' increases of dose to avoid 'first-dose' hypotension. Extensive investigation, including multiple orthostatic stress testing (which otherwise is unusual in the characterization of alpha-blockers because of their inherent safety), confirms that tamsulosin 0.4 mg definitely carries a lower risk of impaired BP control.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗