Biomedical subjects

Cüneyt Kayaalp

Publications and source records attributed to Cüneyt Kayaalp.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Development of two cancers in the same patient after ileorectal and ileal pouch anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis. CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND INTERVENTION: A 36-year-old male patient who suffered from rectal bleeding was treated with colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in 1974. After 19 years, in situ adenocarcinoma was detected in the rectal stump. Completion proctectomy, mucosectomy, and hand-sewn ileal pouch anal anastomosis with protective ileostomy were performed. In 2002, a metachronous cancer was detected at the anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection of the pouch and end ileostomy were performed. Later on, the perineum was excised locally because of cancer recurrence. CONCLUSION: This case shows that lifetime surveillance of the FAP patients after surgery is crucial.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗

PubMed2005

Restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis coexisting with colorectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to assess whether restorative proctocolectomy was suitable as an initial procedure for selected familial adenomatous polyposis patients with coexisting colorectal cancer. Six malignancy patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis were reviewed. At the time of restorative proctocolectomy, cancer was not suspected in four patients. The two remaining familial adenomatous polyposis patients had a known associated colorectal cancer. Operative procedures, pathological findings, complications and long-term follow-up were evaluated. All patients were Stage I-II cancers. There was no mortality or pouch failure. No evidence of tumor recurrence was found and all the patients are still alive and disease-free in follow-up (mean 28 months). As an initial procedure, restorative proctocolectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis with coexisting Stage I-II colorectal cancer seems to be a dependable procedure.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed2004

Elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of the symptomatic pilonidal sinus is surgical with one of the most extensive being excision of the diseased tissue down to the sacral fascia. The closure of the defect is the matter of debate. An elliptical rotation flap has been used for pilonidal sinus treatment with no recurrence rate. METHODS: From April 1996 to June 2001, 20 patients were treated with this technique. The surgical procedure is a vertical elliptical excision of the diseased tissue and an elliptical cutaneous rotation flap to close the defect. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent with this technique, mean age 23.4 years (range 18 to 34). Mean follow-up was 42 months. All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Primary healing was achieved in all of the patients in 2 weeks. No recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elliptical rotation flap is recommended for patients selected for defect closure. It offers improved patient comfort, shorter hospital stay, and no recurrence rate.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

[Comparison of primary colonic anastomosis and colostomy in experimental localized fecal peritonitis].

BACKGROUND: To investigate the appropriate surgical method that should be selected in the localized fecal peritonitis due to colonic injuries with 24 hours delay. METHODS: Colonic injuries were performed in 35 rats and the repairs were carried out after 24 hours. Seven rats (%20) died of generalized peritonitis in this period. The remaining 28 rats in which fecal peritonitis were localized by surrounding organs, were randomized in two groups: colostomy (n=14) and primary anastomosis (n=14). Intraabdominal complications and 15 days mortality were assessed. RESULTS: The groups had similar results according to intraabdominal complications. The 15 days survival was 71.4 % for the colostomy group and 78.5 % for the anastomosis group (p=0.31) CONCLUSION: If the injured or perforated colon is surrounded by the organs and so the generalized peritonitis is avoided, primary anastomosis would have similar results with colostomy despite fecal contamination and prolonged intervention time.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗