PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Carl M Kjellstrand

Publications and source records attributed to Carl M Kjellstrand.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of survival between short-daily hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis using the standardized mortality ratio.

More frequent hemodialysis (5 or more times weekly, both short during the day and long overnight) has been shown to improve patient well-being, reduce symptoms during and between treatments, and have beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. Because of the relatively small patient sample sizes, there are little or no data on mortality from any single study at this time. This study compares survival in 117 U.S. patients treated by short-daily hemodialysis in 2003 and 2004, with patients reported in the 2003 data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Expected mortality was calculated from the USRDS and compared with observed actual mortality. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was used to adjust for differences in patient age, sex, race, and cause of renal failure. The SMR for the short-daily hemodialysis patients was 0.39, statistically significantly better (p < 0.005) than data from the overall U.S. population of hemodialysis patients and indicating that daily hemodialysis patients had a 61% better survival. Patients treated by short-daily hemodialysis have a better survival rate than comparable populations treated by conventional hemodialysis.

Adult↗

Daily dialyses decrease plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), a biomarker of left ventricular dysfunction.

Brain natriuretic peptide or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a sensitive marker of heart disease. Plasma levels of BNP increase in left ventricular failure and determination of plasma BNP has become a useful tool in the diagnosis of heart failure. Hemodialysis (HD) patients may have elevated plasma levels of BNP, particularly predialysis, that correlate with echocardiographic signs of left ventricular dysfunction. High BNP levels are also a strong predictor of mortality in both nonrenal and HD patients. We studied plasma BNP levels in patients who changed from conventional thrice-weekly dialysis to daily dialysis 6 times a week while maintaining a total weekly time on dialysis of 12 hr. Twelve HD patients, mean age 55 years, had 4 hr of conventional thrice-weekly treatment for 4 weeks. Predialysis and postdialysis blood samples were obtained at the last dialysis. Patients were then dialyzed for 2 hr, 6 times weekly, for 4 weeks (daily dialysis). Again, predialysis and postdialysis blood samples were collected at the last HD. Brain natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations were determined by immunoradiometric assay. Predialysis BNP levels decreased from 194+/-51 ng/L (68+/-19 pmol/L; mean+SE) during thrice-weekly HD to 113+/-45 ng/L (41+/-18 pmol/L; p = 0.001) after 4 weeks on daily dialysis. With thrice-weekly HD, predialysis BNP levels were higher than postdialysis levels: 120+/-26 ng/L (39+/-8 pmol/L; p = 0.059). With daily dialysis, predialysis BNP levels did not differ significantly from postdialysis levels. Elevated predialysis plasma levels of BNP, considered sensitive and early markers of left ventricular dysfunction, decreased when patients were changed from conventional thrice-weekly HD to daily dialysis maintaining total hours of dialysis per week constant. Given the accumulated evidence that BNP is a biomarker of left ventricular dysfunction and can be used for risk stratification and guidance in pharmacotherapy of heart failure, daily dialysis appears to lead to less cardiac distress.

Adult↗

Composition and clinical use of hemodialysates.

A thorough knowledge and understanding of the principles underlying the preparation and the clinical application of hemodialysates can help us provide exemplary patient care to individuals having end-stage renal disease. It is prudent to be conversant with the following: (a) how each ingredient in a dialysate works, (b) the clinical circumstances under which the concentration of an ingredient can be altered, and (c) the special situations in which unconventional ingredients can be introduced into a dialysate. The potential to enrich dialysates with appropriate ingredients (such as iron compounds) is limited only by the boundaries of our imagination.

Acetates↗

Early clinical, quality-of-life, and biochemical changes of "daily hemodialysis" (6 dialyses per week).

BACKGROUND: Advantages associated with an increased frequency of hemodialysis have been reported previously. However, previous studies were either small or not controlled and did not detail early clinical, biochemical, quality-of-life, urea kinetic, and dynamic changes when patients switched from a conventional (3 times/wk) dialysis regimen to "daily" (6 times/wk) dialysis therapy when total weekly dialysis time was unchanged. METHODS: A prospective sequential study with 21 patients as their own controls was performed. A 4-week period of conventional thrice-weekly dialysis (N = 240 treatments) was followed immediately by a 4-week period of daily (ie, 6 times/wk) dialysis (N = 480 treatments), in which each treatment was half the length of a conventional dialysis treatment session. Clinical parameters and symptoms during and between dialysis treatments were graded, and urea-related parameters, blood chemistry results, and nutritional data were determined. RESULTS: Within 4 weeks of switching to this daily dialysis regimen, there were improvements in blood pressure, dialysis "unphysiology," intradialytic and interdialytic symptoms, and urea kinetics and dynamics. There were fewer machine alarms and less need for nursing interventions during dialysis. Nutrition and quality of life began to improve. There was no increase in blood access complications and no significant changes in blood chemistry results, hematologic parameters, or use of medications. CONCLUSION: In this short-term study, daily dialysis appears to be a safe, better, and more physiological method to deliver dialysis care to patients with end-stage renal disease.

Adult↗

Neuropeptide-Y and atrial natriuretic peptide as prognostic markers in patients on hemodialysis.

We conducted a study of the influence of the vasoactive peptides atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) on survival of patients on hemodialysis and their association and relative importance with cardiac and clinical variables. Thirty-three hemodialysis patients were characterized by age, sex, diagnosis, blood pressure, serum (S)-albumin, serum (S)-urea, hemoglobin, dialysis dose, weight gain, duration of dialysis, cardiac hypertrophy, volume, failure, and ischemia and plasma levels of ANP and NPY. The outcomes were analyzed for early deaths (< 1 year) and for all deaths. The association of the variables to early deaths and all deaths, respectively, was studied in Cox proportional hazard analyses. The variables were also studied in three hierarchical steps: clinical variables only, clinical and cardiac variables, and all variables. For all deaths, the independent variables were plasma NPY (pmol/L) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.035, p = 0.004), heart volume (ml/m2) (HR = 1.009, p = 0.001), and S-albumin (g/L) (HR = 0.750, p = 0.034). For early deaths, the independent variables were predialysis ANP (pmol/L) (HR = 1.008, p = 0.034) and NPY (pmol/L) (HR = 1.031, p = 0.026). In the hierarchical study, excluding the vasoactive peptides, heart volume, heart failure and S-albumin were independently associated with all deaths, and mean arterial blood pressure was associated with early death. When also excluding the cardiac parameters, S-albumin was associated with all deaths and mean arterial blood pressure with early death. In conclusion, plasma levels of the vasoactive peptides ANP and NPY are the most important group in a hierarchy of variables that predict imminent death in hemodialysis patients, and NPY is associated with late death. ANP and NPY apparently sum up the detrimental influence of many factors in hemodialysis patients.

Adult↗

The Aksys personal hemodialysis system.

The Aksys personal hemodialysis system empowers patients to dialyze where, when, and how they want. It allows them to easily do the best dialysis--daily hemodialysis--in the safest place--at home--by simplifying operation (almost anyone can do it), doing the drudgery work of dialysis (the patient is the master, not the slave of the dialysis machine, giving patients their lives back), needing no bulky disposables (patients have their homes back), reducing emergencies during dialysis, and performing immediate fluid resuscitation on demand.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗