PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Carlos Badiola

Publications and source records attributed to Carlos Badiola.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol therapy on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with pollen-induced asthma.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern that in allergic asthmatic patients there might be an interactive effect on inflammation between regular salmeterol use and exposure to allergens, resulting in increased airway responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels in allergic asthmatic patients concomitantly taking inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Forty-two asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to treatment with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (n=21) or fluticasone propionate alone (n=21). Spirometry, the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20), the adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) PC20, and ENO levels were measured before and at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Changes in the methacholine PC20, the AMP PC20, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. No significant changes in the AMP PC20 were observed among the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and fluticasone propionate groups during natural pollen exposure. However, a significant increase in the methacholine PC20 was observed in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group (P = .03) and in the fluticasone propionate group (P = .04); ENO concentrations decreased significantly in both groups during natural allergen exposure (P = .009 and .005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced asthma, treatment with either fluticasone propionate or fluticasone propionate-salmeterol is associated with significant reductions in methacholine responsiveness and ENO concentrations, even during natural pollen exposure. Furthermore, at least in patients with mild asthma, natural allergen exposure and the regular use of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO levels and airway responsiveness than natural allergen exposure and fluticasone propionate use alone.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Phenol-containing saline solution as a diluent for adenosine 5'-monophosphate in bronchial challenge testing.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of dissolving adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) with phenol-containing saline solution on the stability and the bronchoconstrictive properties of this indirect agonist. METHODS: Eleven subjects with asthma well controlled with short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists as required or with inhaled corticosteroids were studied. Bronchial challenge tests with AMP dissolved with either normal saline solution or saline solution containing 0.4% phenol were performed on separate days. Furthermore, to assess the potential influence of the phenol-containing saline solution on the stability of the bronchoconstrictor agent, AMP solutions in concentrations of 40 microg/mL and 400 microg/mL were prepared in saline solution and phenol-containing saline solution and, after 30 min, the AMP levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. RESULTS: The geometric mean AMP provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was 13.49 mg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.76 to 26.91) for the saline solution method, and AMP PC20 for the saline solution with phenol method was 8.91 mg/mL (95% CI, 3.39 to 23.44) [p = 0.18]. No significant differences were found between the concentrations of AMP made in saline solution compared to those made in phenol-containing saline solution measured by HPLC. CONCLUSION: These observations indicate that normal saline solution with or without phenol can be used as the diluent for AMP. However, since a potential risk with AMP of industrial sources is the bacterial contamination, adding a preservative such as phenol to a saline solution diluent might be recommended.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Differences in asthma clinical outcomes according to initial severity.

UNLABELLED: Information on asthma morbidity outcomes in relation to the initial degree of severity is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences in asthma morbidity, quality of life (QOL), and lung function outcomes according to the initial severity of the illness. METHOD: A cohort of 235 (102 mild, 69 moderate, and 64 severe) asthma patients was followed up for 3 years. The following parameters were collected for all patients: asthma morbidity, clinical data, spirometry, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: A significant reduction in asthma morbidity and an improvement in pulmonary function and QOL were observed in the total group 3 years later. However, when the sample was stratified according to the initial severity, differences were observed between means in the third year compared with the first year in the following: number of primary care visits (patient/year) due to asthma: mild -1 (95% CI: -1.42 to -0.56); moderate -0.9 (-.92 to 0.18); and severe 1 (-0.23 to 2.27) (p = 0.020); FEV, (%): mild 8.5 (-5.3 to 11.6), moderate -0.3 (-3.2 to 2.6), and severe -1.5 (-5 to 2) (p < 0.001); and total score of the SGRQ: mild -9.8 (-12.2 to -7.3), moderate -9.1 (-12.9 to -5.2), and severe -7.9 (-11.9 to -3.9) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that asthma prognosis varies according to the initial severity. Clinical, QOL, and pulmonary function outcomes in the mild asthma group are better than in the moderate and severe groups.

Adult↗

Patient perception and acceptability of multidose dry powder inhalers: a randomized crossover comparison of Diskus/Accuhaler with Turbuhaler.

This study was designed to provide information on correct use and preference to features and device handling of two multidose dry powder inhalers, the Diskus/Accuhaler and the Turbuhaler. A total of 169 powder-naive patients (mean age 40 years) with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were enrolled in a randomized crossover comparison of both inhalers. An effective use of either inhaler was assessed before (leaflet only) and after inhaler education. Ease of use especially during an attack and the presence of a dose counter were regarded as the most important features for an ideal inhaler. The percentage of correct handling maneuvers and the percentage of patients achieving 100% of correct maneuvers increased significantly (p < 0.001) after inhaler education in both devices, but percentage of correct use after the intervention was significantly higher for the Diskus/Accuhaler (92.6%) than for the Turbuhaler (89.8%; p = 0.036). Overall 60% of patients thought the Diskus/Accuhaler was preferable to the Turbuhaler (p < 0.001). The main reasons given were presence of a dose counter, perceived ease of use including ease of learning to use, design, and attached cover. Among those who preferred the Turbuhaler device, the main reason cited was small size, discreetness, and ease of holding. In the multivariate analysis, inhaler education (p = 0.005) and education level (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with the percentage of correct maneuvers. Age, sex, or tested inhaler showed no effect on appropriateness of the inhalation technique.

Administration, Inhalation↗