Biomedical subjects

Carlos Coaguila

Publications and source records attributed to Carlos Coaguila.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

The value of a completely automatic ECG gated blood pool SPECT processing method for the estimation of global systolic left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: Electrocardiographically gated blood pool SPECT (GBPS) is an interesting method for measuring left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and volume. Recently, the availability of completely automatic GBPS processing software has been reported. We aimed to evaluate its reliability in measuring global LV systolic function. In addition, using the same population, we compared its reliability to that of three previously reported methods for processing GBPS. METHODS: We studied the performances of the new GBPS system for the evaluation of LVEFs and volumes in 29 patients. The LVEF provided by the planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography (planarLAO) and LV volumes provided by radiological LV contrast angiography (X-rays) were used as 'gold standards'. RESULTS: The new GBPS system failed in one patient. It shows good reproducibility for the measurement of both LVEF and volume. LVEF provided by this system is moderately correlated to planarLAO (r = 0.62; P < 0.001). The new GBPS constantly overestimates LVEF (P < 0.05). Results for LV volumes are moderately correlated to those obtained by X-ray investigation (r = 0.7; P < 0.001) but are significantly lower (P < 0.0001). There is a linear correlation between the average and the paired absolute difference for LV volumes (r = 0.52, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new, completely automatic, GBPS processing software is an interesting, moderately reliable method for measuring LVEF and volume. The performance of the method is lower than that previously reported for the same population for the other three GBPS processing methods.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Comparative value of ECG-gated blood pool SPET and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET in the assessment of global systolic left ventricular function.

Both electrocardiographically (ECG) gated blood pool SPET (GBPS) and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET (GSPET) are currently used for the measurement of global systolic left ventricular (LV) function. In this study, we aimed to compare the value of GSPET and GBPS for this purpose. The population included 65 patients who underwent rest thallium-201 GSPET imaging at 15 min after (201)Tl injection followed by planar (planar(RNA)) and GBPS equilibrium radionuclide angiography immediately after 4-h redistribution myocardial perfusion SPET imaging. Thirty-five patients also underwent LV conventional contrast angiography (X-rays). LV ejection fraction (EF) and LV volume [end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes] were calculated with GBPS and GSPET and compared with the gold standard methods (planar(RNA) LVEF and X-ray based calculation of LV volume). For both LVEF and LV volume, the inter-observer variability was lower with GBPS than with GSPET. GBPS LVEF was higher than planar(RNA) (P<0.01) and GSPET LVEF (P<0.01). Planar(RNA) LVEF showed a slightly better correlation with GBPS LVEF than with GSPET LVEF: r=0.87 and r=0.83 respectively. GSPET LV volume was lower than that obtained using X-rays and GBPS (P<0.01 for both). LV volume calculated using X-rays showed a slightly better correlation with GBPS LV volume than with GSPET LV volume: r=0.88 and r=0.83 respectively. On stepwise regression analysis, the accuracy of GSPET for the measurement of LVEF and LV volume was correlated with a number of factors, including planar(RNA) LVEF, signal to noise ratio, LV volume calculated using X-rays, summed rest score and acquisition scan distance (i.e. the radius of rotation). The accuracy of GBPS for the measurement of LVEF and LV volume was correlated only with the signal level, the signal to noise ratio and the acquisition scan distance. Both GSPET and GBPS provide reliable estimation of global systolic LV function. The better reliability of GBPS and in particular its lower sensitivity to different variables as compared with GSPET favours its use when precise assessment of global systolic LV function is clinically indicated.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Performance of OSEM and depth-dependent resolution recovery algorithms for the evaluation of global left ventricular function in 201Tl gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

UNLABELLED: It is unknown whether the use of ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) and depth-dependent resolution recovery (RR) will increase the accuracy of (201)Tl electrocardiogram-gated SPECT (GSPECT) for the measurement of global left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: Fifty-six patients having both rest (201)Tl GSPECT and planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography (planar(RNA)) on the same day were studied. Twenty-nine patients also had LV conventional contrast angiography (Rx). LV ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) were calculated with the quantitative gated SPECT software (QGS) using 4 different processing methods: filtered backprojection (FBP), OSEM, RR + FBP, and RR + OSEM. LVEF calculated with planar(RNA) and LV EDV and ESV calculated with Rx were considered gold standards. LVEF and volumes provided with the GSPECT methods were compared with the gold standard methods. RESULTS: LVEF calculated with GSPECT methods (FBP, OSEM, RR + FBP, and RR + OSEM) were similar (not statistically significant) and correlated well with planar(RNA). On Bland-Altman analysis, the mean +/- SD of absolute difference in LVEF with GSPECT FBP, OSEM, RR + FBP, and RR + OSEM methods versus planar(RNA) were similar, with relatively large limits of agreement. LV volumes calculated with the 4 GSPECT methods were significantly lower but correlated well with Rx LV volumes. LV volumes calculated with FBP and OSEM were lower than those calculated with RR + FBP and RR + OSEM (P < 0.01). On Bland-Altman analysis, the mean +/- SD of absolute difference in LV volumes with FBP, OSEM, RR + FBP, and RR + OSEM versus Rx was, respectively, 56 +/- 45 mL (P < 0.01 vs. the other 3 methods), 57 +/- 45 mL (P < 0.01 vs. the other 3 methods), 43 +/- 48 mL, and 46 +/- 47 mL, with correspondingly large limits of agreement. The variance of random error did not differ between FBP, OSEM, RR + FBP, and RR + OSEM for either LVEF or volumes. CONCLUSION: OSEM and FBP presented similar accuracy for LVEF and volume measured with the QGS software. Their combination with depth-dependent RR provided similar LVEF but more accurate LV volumes.

Algorithms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of equilibrium electrocardiography-gated SPECT radionuclide angiography versus planar radionuclide angiography for the quantification of global left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiography-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) radionuclide angiography (RNA) provides accurate measurement of both left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. In this study we studied the interstudy precision and reliability of SPECT RNA as compared with planar RNA for the measurement of global systolic LV function. METHODS AND RESULTS: The population included 10 patients with chronic coronary artery disease having 2 sets of acquisitions, each consisting of planar and SPECT RNA. SPECT RNA was processed with SPECT-QBS and SPECT-35%. (For SPECT-35%, a manual segmentation method based on the 35% threshold of the maximum LV cavity activity is used to provide estimates of the number of voxels and the activity included in the LV cavity. The calculated LV number of voxels is then used to calculate LV volume measurement. The LV EF is calculated as the ratio of LV end-diastolic and end-systolic activity.) For LV EF, end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume, the interstudy precision, as reflected by the correlation coefficient, coefficient of variability, coefficient of repeatability, and within-subject coefficient of variation, and the interstudy reliability, as reflected by the intraclass correlation coefficient, were best with SPECT-35%, followed by planar RNA and then SPECT-QBS, respectively. The sample size needed to objectify a change in a parameter of LV function is lowest with SPECT-35%, followed by planar RNA and then SPECT-QBS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SPECT-35% processing method provides excellent interstudy precision and reliability for LV function measurement. In this aspect it seems to be better than planar RNA and SPECT-QBS. These results need to be confirmed in a larger patient population.

Coronary Artery Disease↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Discordance between exercise SPECT lung Tl-201 uptake and left ventricular transient ischemic dilation in patients with CAD.

BACKGROUND: In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the characteristics of those with discordant exercise thallium 201 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) lung uptake (lung-to-heart [L/H] ratio) and left ventricular (LV) transient ischemic dilation (LVTID) are not well defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The population included 310 patients having exercise Tl-201 SPECT and coronary angiography. The population was subclassified into 4 subgroups: increased L/H ratio only, increased LVTID only, both, and neither. The L/H ratio was weakly correlated to LVTID (r = 0.18). The L/H ratio was correlated to the summed difference score (r = 0.26), summed rest score (r = 0.31), summed stress score (r = 0.5), and rest and stress LV volume (r = 0.5 and r = 0.54, respectively). LVTID was only correlated to the summed difference score (r = 0.32) and stress LV volume (r = 0.17). Increased LVTID only was associated with more frequent ischemia and patients with it tended to be more extensively ischemic, as compared with patients with increased L/H ratio only, but had a similar angiographic extent of CAD. These results were independent of prior myocardial infarction variable. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with patients with increased L/H ratio alone, patients with increased LVTID alone are more frequently ischemic but have a similar angiographic extent of CAD. Increased L/H ratio was correlated to both rest and postexercise LV volume, whereas increased LVTID was correlated only to postexercise LV volume.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Automatic quantification of right ventricular function with gated blood pool SPECT.

BACKGROUND: Quantification of right ventricular (RV) function is clinically relevant for the risk stratification and follow-up of patients with a wide spectrum of disease. This can be achieved with electrocardiography-gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (GBPS). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the completely automatic QBS GBPS processing software as compared with equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) and with a GBPS manual segmentation method (GBPS(35%)) for the measurement of global RV ejection fraction (EF), taking the first-pass RNA (FP-RNA) as the gold standard. In parallel, we compared the RVEF, RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), and RV end-systolic volume (ESV) provided by QBS and GBPS(35%). METHODS AND RESULTS: The population included 85 patients with chronic post-embolic pulmonary hypertension. Twenty-one patients were excluded because of unsuccessful FP-RNA. Intraobserver and interobserver RVEF, RVEDV, and RVESV reproducibilities encountered with planar RNA, QBS, and GBPS(35%) were similar and compared favorably with those calculated with FP-RNA for RVEF. Mean RVEF was different between all methods. RVEF calculated with FP-RNA was better correlated to QBS (r = 0.68) and GBPS(35%) (r = 0.70) than to planar RNA (r = 0.59). RVEDV and RVESV with QBS were lower than with GBPS(35%), by 29% +/- 14% and 36% +/- 13%, respectively. RVEDV and RVESV with QBS were highly correlated to corresponding GBPS(35%) values: r = 0.88 and r = 0.91, respectively. CONCLUSION: As opposed to FP-RNA, GBPS is highly successful for the quantification of RV function. Both QBS and GBPS(35%) provide RVEF values similarly well correlated to FP-RNA and performed better than planar RNA. RVEF, RVEDV, and RVESV provided by QBS and GBPS(35%) are highly correlated. All of these RV functional measurements require further validation versus a better gold standard before their accuracy can be established.

Algorithms↗