PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Carlos Dieguez

Publications and source records attributed to Carlos Dieguez.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Marked GH secretion after ghrelin alone or combined with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in obese patients.

OBJECTIVES: Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid peptide, predominantly produced by the stomach. It displays a strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamus-pituitary GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R). There are different studies that suggest the importance of ghrelin in feeding and weight homeostasis. In obesity there is a markedly decreased GH secretion. For both children and adults, the greater the body mass index (BMI), the lower the GH response to provocative stimuli, including the response to GHRH. However, the response to the natural GH secretaogogue ghrelin is unclear at the present time. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to ghrelin alone or combined with GHRH in a group of obese patients, in order to further understand the deranged GH secretory mechanisms in obesity and to clarify the mechanism of action of ghrelin. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Six obese female patients (31 +/- 3.4 years) with a BMI of 36.1 +/- 7.7 kg/m(2) were studied. As a control group, six normal nonobese female subjects of similar age and sex were studied. Four tests were performed: placebo, GHRH [1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, intravenous (i.v.)], ghrelin (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.) and GHRH (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.) plus ghrelin (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.). Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon and by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: After GHRH, the median peak GH secretion in obese patients was 2.4 micro g/l (range 0.9-8.9 micro g/l). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion showed in obese patients a median peak of 24.4 micro g/l (range 7.4-85.0 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05). After the combined administration of GHRH plus ghrelin in obese patients the median peak GH secretion was 39.9 micro g/l (range 19.2-120.0 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05) or ghrelin (P < 0.05). GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal control subjects showed a median peak of 25.0 micro g/l (range 16.5-33.4 micro g/l). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion in normal showed a median peak of 68.5 micro g/l (range 22.5-119.5 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05). After the combined administration of GHRH plus ghrelin, in normal subjects the median peak GH secretion was 117.8 micro g/l (range 77.5-280.1 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH or ghrelin alone (P < 0.05). When we compare the response of normal and obese patients, after GHRH alone, it was markedly decreased in obese people when compared with normal patients (P < 0.05) with a median GH peak of 25.0 micro g/l (range 16.5-33.4 micro g/l) and 2.4 micro g/l (range 0.9-8.9 micro g/l) for normal and obese patients, respectively. When we compare the response of normal and obese patients, after ghrelin alone or GHRH plus ghrelin, it was only blunted in obese subjects when compared with normal subjects with a median GH peak of 68.5 micro g/l (range 22.5-119.5 micro g/l) and 24.4 micro g/l (range 7.4-85 micro g/l) for normal and obese subjects, respectively, after ghrelin alone (P < 0.05) and a median GH peak of 117.8 micro g/l (range 77.5-280.1 micro g/l) and 39.9 micro g/l (range 19.2-120.0 micro g/l) for normal and obese patients, respectively, after GHRH plus ghrelin (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a massive GH response to ghrelin alone or combined with GHRH in obese patients, suggesting that altered ghrelin secretion could play a major role in the blunted GH secretion present in obese patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Circulating and cerebrospinal fluid ghrelin and leptin: potential role in altered body weight in Huntington's disease.

OBJECTIVE: In addition to neurological impairment, weight loss is a prominent characteristic of Huntington's disease (HD). Neuropathologically, the disease affects the caudate nucleus and the cerebral cortex, and also the hypothalamus. The recently discovered orexigenic hormone of gastric origin, ghrelin and the adipocyte hormone leptin, are two peripherally produced hormones exerting opposite effects on specific populations of hypothalamic neurons that play a key role in regulating energy intake and energy output. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible involvement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and circulating ghrelin and leptin in the regulation of energy balance in patients with HD. METHODS: Twenty healthy normal-weight subjects undergoing orthopedic surgery, and fifteen patients with genetically verified HD, were enrolled in this study. The unified Huntington's disease rating scale (UHDRS) was used to assess clinical course of the disease. Blood samples for hormonal measurements were obtained by venipuncture and in-parallel CSF samples for leptin/ghrelin determination were obtained by lumbar puncture. RESULTS: Patients with HD had increased concentrations of ghrelin in plasma compared with healthy subjects (4523.7+/-563.9 vs 2781.1+/-306.2 pg/ml, P<0.01). On the other hand, patients with HD had decreased concentrations of leptin in plasma compared with healthy subjects (4.8+/-1.6 vs 10.9+/-2.4 ng/ml, P<0.01). The concentrations of CSF ghrelin and CSF leptin were equivalent to values in healthy subjects. No correlation was found between disease duration--and other clinical features of HD--and plasma or CSF leptin/ghrelin levels. In patients with HD, baseline levels of GH, IGF-I, insulin and glucose did not differ from those in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: High circulating ghrelin and low leptin levels in patients with HD suggest a state of negative energy balance. Early nutritional support of patients with HD is advocated since patients with HD and higher body mass index at presentation have slower progression of the disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Regulation of growth hormone secretagogue receptor gene expression in the arcuate nuclei of the rat by leptin and ghrelin.

The anorexigenic and orexigenic hormones leptin and ghrelin act in opposition to one another. When leptin signaling is reduced, as in the Zucker fatty rat, or when circulating ghrelin is increased during fasting, the effect of ghrelin becomes more dominant, indicating an influence of both hormones on ghrelin action. This effect could be mediated via the level of expression of ghrelin receptor (growth hormone secretagogue receptor [GHS-R]). For testing this, GHS-R expression was measured using in situ hybridization in Zucker fatty versus lean rats; in fed versus fasted (48 h) rats, treated with either ghrelin or leptin; and in GH-deficient, dwarf versus control rats. In the arcuate nuclei of the Zucker fatty rat and in fasted rats, GHS-R expression is significantly increased. A single leptin intracerebroventricular injection attenuated the fasting-induced increase in GHS-R but had no effect in fed rats 2 h after injection, whereas leptin infusion for 24 h or longer significantly decreased GHS-R expression in fed rats. Ghrelin significantly increased GHS-R expression but not in dwarf rats. These results show that the level of GHS-R expression in the ARC is reduced by leptin and increased by ghrelin and that the effect of ghrelin may be GH dependent.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Ghrelin: from a GH-secretagogue to the regulation of food intake, sleep and anxiety.

Grhelin is an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor from the stomach. It is a 28-aminoacid peptide of which the serine 3 residue is n-octanoylated. Ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion in vivo as well as in vitro. This endogenous ligand promotes the production of orexigenic neuropeptides (NPY and AgRP) in the hypothalamic arcuate nuclei and activates the neurons that produce these orexigenic peptides, resulting in an increase in feeding and body weight. Ghrelin has other significant actions, including control of acid secretion, influences on sleep and on the regulation of anxiety.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Ghrelin, a widespread hormone: insights into molecular and cellular regulation of its expression and mechanism of action.

The recent discovery of ghrelin, the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, is the result of almost 25 years of research by many groups all around the world, and represents a milestone in our understanding of growth hormone secretion and energy homeostasis. This minireview is focused on recent studies on ghrelin, pointing out the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the gene expression of ghrelin since recent studies have unequivocally shown that ghrelin biological activity is dependent on a peculiar post-translational processing. Major interest in this peptide derived from the fact that, in addition to other effects, it is involved in the regulation of energy balance by inducing weight gain and reducing fat utilization. These activities are likely mediated by a CNS network of cells that is also modulated by other hormones such as leptin. Ghrelin has emerged as a premeal initiation factor that informs CNS about the status of the energy balance. The development of ghrelin analogs, agonists and antagonists, appears as a suitable approach for possible therapeutic intervention in a variety of disease states linked to alterations in body weight homeostasis.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Acetylcholine does not play a major role in mediating the endocrine responses to ghrelin, a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor, in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin is a 28 amino residue peptide produced predominantly by the stomach with substantially lower amounts deriving from other central and peripheral tissues. Ghrelin is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and possesses a potent GH-releasing activity for which the acylation in serine 3 is essential. Ghrelin also possesses other endocrine and non-endocrine activities reflecting central and peripheral GHS-R distribution and stimulates PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion, has been reported able to induce hyperglycaemia and to decrease insulin levels and has orexigenic activity. Moreover, ghrelin stimulates gastric motility and acid secretion and its action is mediated by acetylcholine which, in turn, is known to play a stimulatory influence on GH, ACTH and insulin secretion. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In order to clarify the influence, if any, of acetylcholine on the endocrine activities of ghrelin, we studied the effects of cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) and blockade by pirenzepine (PIR, 100 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) on GH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to human acylated ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) in seven normal young volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM): 28.3 +/- 3.1 years; BMI: 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effects of PD and PIR on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) have also been studied. RESULTS: The administration of ghrelin induced a prompt increase in circulating GH levels (hAUC: 5452.4 +/- 904.9 microg*min/L) which was markedly higher (P < 0.01) than that elicited by GHRH (966.9 +/- 20.50 microg*min/L). Ghrelin also induced a significant increase in PRL (1273.5 +/- 199.7 microg*min/L) and cortisol levels (15505.1 +/- 796.3 microg*min/L) and a decrease in insulin levels (Delta hAUC: -198.1 +/- 39.2 mU*min/L) which was preceded by an increase in plasma glucose levels (8743.8 +/- 593.0 mg*min/dL). The GH response to GHRH was markedly potentiated by PD (4363.3 +/- 917.3 microg*min/L; P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone). In turn, PD did not modify either the GH response to ghrelin (6564.2 +/- 1753.5 microg*min/L) or its stimulatory effect on PRL and cortisol as well as its effects on insulin and glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by PIR (171.5 +/- 34.7 microg*min/L, P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone) which, in turn, did not significantly modify the GH response to ghrelin (4044.0 +/- 948.8 microg*min/L). PIR also did not modify the effects of ghrelin on PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The endocrine activities of ghrelin are not affected significantly by cholinergic enhancement and muscarinic blockade. Thus, acetylcholine does not play a major role in the endocrine actions of ghrelin. Moreover, as the cholinergic system influences GH secretion via modulation of somatostatin release, the present data agree with the assumption that ghrelin is partially refractory to the influence of somatostatin.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2003

Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency after pituitary surgery: the combined acipimox/GH-releasing hormone test.

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of plasma free fatty acids leads to enhanced GH response after stimulation by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). We studied the clinical usefulness of combined administration of acipimox and GHRH for the diagnosis of GH deficiency. DESIGN: We evaluated 35 patients [mean age 53.0 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 26.7 kg/m2] after pituitary surgery. We compared GH responses after acipimox and GHRH with the GH response during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) and, in a subgroup of 12 patients, with the GHRH/arginine test. The acipimox/GHRH test was additionally performed in 21 control subjects (mean age 53.8 years; mean BMI 24.7 kg/m2). RESULTS: In the patients, the mean (+/- SEM) peak GH was almost four-fold higher after acipimox/GHRH (6.94 +/- 1.07 microg/l, range 0.46-23.1; P < 0.001) and after GHRH/arginine (8.32 +/- 1.23 microg/l, range 1.1-49.2; P < 0.001) than after ITT (1.84 +/- 0.46 microg/l, range 0.01-11.9). According to the ITT, 29 patients were severely GH deficient (peak GH < 3.0 microg/l). Peak GH levels after acipimox/GHRH in controls ranged from 7.5 to 78.4 microg/l (mean 29.3 +/- 3.5). GH peak values during the acipimox/GHRH test were significantly correlated with values from the ITT (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) and GHRH/arginine test (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). Areas under the curve were also correlated. According to generally accepted cut-off peak GH levels for the ITT and GHRH/arginine test, a GH peak exceeding 11.2 micro g/l excludes severe GH deficiency after acipimox/GHRH. Our control data indicate that the cut-off level is lower at older age. CONCLUSIONS: The acipimox/GHRH test leads to GH responses similar to those of the GHRH/arginine test, and to higher peak GH values if compared with the ITT. The acipimox/GHRH test is a potential additional tool to detect GH deficiency in patients with pituitary disease, in particular in patients with a perturbation of fatty acid metabolism.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2003

Effect of acute reduction of free fatty acids by acipimox on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), high GH basal levels and exaggerated responses to several stimuli have been described. Acipimox is an antilipolytic drug that produces an acute reduction of free fatty acids (FFA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the reduction of plasma FFA with acipimox, alone or in combination with GHRH, on GH secretion in DM1. METHODS: Six type 1 diabetic patients were studied (three women, three men), mean age of 30 +/- 2.1 years, body mass index (BMI) 23.1 +/- 1.5 kg/m2. As a control group, six normal healthy subjects of similar age, sex and weight were studied. Each patient and control received GHRH [1 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.) at min 180], acipimox (250 mg orally at min 0 and 120) and GHRH plus acipimox on three separated days. Subjects served as their own control. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH, FFA and glucose. RESULT: In control subjects, the GH area under the curve (AUC; microg/l x 120 min) was for acipimox-treated 1339 +/- 292 and 1528 +/- 330 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 3031 +/- 669, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). In diabetic patients, the GH AUC was for acipimox-treated 2516 +/- 606 and 1821 +/- 311 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 7311 +/- 1154, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). The GH response after acipimox was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 1339 +/- 292 and 2515 +/- 606 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The GH response after acipimox plus GHRH was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 3031 +/- 669 and 7311 +/- 1154 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The administration of acipimox induced a FFA reduction during the entire test. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of free fatty acids with acipimox is a stimulus for GH secretion in DM1. The combined administration of GHRH plus acipimox induces a markedly increased GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients when compared with normal subjects. These data suggest that patients with DM1 exhibit a greater GH secretory capacity than control subjects, despite the fact that endogenous FFA levels seems to exert a greater inhibitory effect on GH secretion in these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Differential effects of age and sex on the postnatal responsiveness of brown adipose tissue to prolactin administration in rats.

Previous studies have shown that prolactin administration to pregnant rats results in offspring with enhanced abundance of the brown adipose tissue-specific uncoupling protein (UCP) 1. The present study therefore aimed to determine whether a similar effect was observed after birth and if the sex of the animal further influenced the responsiveness of brown adipose tissue mitochondria to prolactin administration. Daily prolactin injections were therefore commenced at 15, 35 or 60 days of age and continued for 4 days. The abundance of UCP1 was unchanged with age in females but decreased between 15 and 35 days in males and was lower in males than females by 60 days of age. Cytochrome c abundance remained unchanged with postnatal age in both males and females and was consistently higher in males at each sampling age. Prolactin decreased the abundance of UCP1 and cytochrome c when administered to female rats at 35 and 60 days of age, but had no effect at 15 days. In contrast, prolactin had no effect on UCP1 in male rats at any age, but did stimulate the abundance of cytochrome c at 15 days of age. In conclusion, the administration of prolactin to postnatal rats over the period in which maturation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and brown adipose tissue function is occurring did not enhance UCP1 abundance. In females, prolactin actually caused a reduction in UCP1 suggesting that in rats it is only prior to birth that prolactin has a stimulatory role on brown adipose tissue development.

Adipose Tissue, Brown↗
PubMed2003

The inhibition of growth hormone secretion presented in obesity is not mediated by the high leptin levels: a study in human leptin deficiency patients.

GH secretion is regulated by hypothalamic and peripheral hormones under a very complex interplay. Superimposed on this regulation, signals of a metabolic nature connect GH secretion with the metabolic and energetic homeostasis of a given individual. GH secretion is enhanced in malnutrition and is severely impeded in obesity, but no information is available to explain why GH secretion is severely impeded or blocked in excess adiposity. Obesity is associated with high plasma levels of leptin, and leptin participates at the hypothalamic and pituitary levels in the regulation of GH secretion. Thus, it has been postulated that the inhibitory action of obesity on GH discharge may be mediated by excess leptin levels. The only situation in which obesity does not parallel leptin values is the rare case of morbid obesity due to leptin deficiency caused by missense mutation of the leptin gene. To understand the causes of GH blockade presented in obesity, patients with both homozygous and heterozygous mutations of the leptin gene and matched controls for both sex and body mass index (BMI) were studied. Three homozygous and 5 heterozygous patients with leptin gene mutations as well as 13 control subjects were studied. In all subjects basal levels of leptin and GH values stimulated by the combined administration of GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) were analyzed. To analyze the effects of obesity and leptin levels, 5 groups were designed, all them matched by sex and adiposity. The number of subjects (n), leptin levels in micrograms per liter, and adiposity in BMI were as follows: nonobese subjects: n = 5, BMI = 22.1 +/- 0.9 kg/m2, leptin = 5.4 +/- 0.9; heterozygous patients: n = 5, BMI = 27.0 +/- 1.0 kg/m2, leptin = 2.3 +/- 0.1; controls for the heterozygous group: n = 5, BMI = 24.7 +/- 1.1 kg/m2, leptin = 5.7 +/- 1.2; homozygous patients: n = 3, BMI = 54.4 +/- 0.2 kg/m2, leptin = 1.0 +/- 0.2; and controls for the homozygous group: n = 3, BMI = 50.3 +/- 2.0 kg/m2, leptin = 35.0 +/- 6.6. In these matched groups, the GHRH- and GHRP-6-stimulated GH secretion (mean peak +/- SE; micrograms per liter) was: nonobese, 86.8 +/- 8.9 [significantly higher than heterozygous (28.6 +/- 4.9) and control for heterozygous (39.9 +/- 10.4)]; homozygous group, 9.4 +/- 3.0; control for homozygous, 9.3 +/- 1.0 (significantly lower than the heterozygous, control for heterozygous, and nonobese groups). Hence, it appeared that GH discharge was negatively conditioned by adiposity and was not influenced by leptin levels. To further analyze this observation, a correlation analysis showed that GH peaks were negatively correlated with BMI in the 13 control subjects as well as in the 8 leptin-deficient patients. On the contrary, the GH peaks were negatively correlated with leptin levels in controls, but showed the opposite pattern in homo- and heterozygous patients. In conclusion, the GH secretion blockade, which is characteristic of obese states, is due to adiposity or some factor linked to adiposity, but not to elevated plasma leptin levels.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Regulation of ghrelin secretion and action.

The pulsatile release of growth hormone (GH) from anterior pituitary gland is regulated by the interplay of at least two hypothalamic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin, via their engagement with specific cell surface receptors on the anterior pituitary somatotroph. Furthermore, release of GH in vivo may also be controlled by a third type of receptor, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor, called GHS receptor type 1a (GHSR1a), which was identified in the pituitary and the hypothalamus in humans using a nonpeptidyl growth hormone secretagogue (MK-0677). Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand for the GHS-R1a, is a 28-amino-acid peptide isolated from human stomach that is modified by a straight chain octanoyl group covalently linked to Ser3, which is essential for its endocrine activity. This hormone, predominantly expressed and secreted by the stomach, has a dual action on GH secretion and food intake, showing interdependency between these actions. The finding that fasting and food intake, respectively, increase and decrease the secretion of ghrelin suggests that this hormone may be the bridge connecting somatic growth and body composition with energy metabolism, and appears to play a role in the alteration of energy homeostasis and body weight in pathophysiological states such as hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. Despite this, little is known about the intracellular signaling through which ghrelin exerts its regulatory actions. Activation of intracellular calcium mobilization is one of the earliest known cellular signals elicited by ghrelin. In HEK- 293 cells expressing the GHS-R1a, ghrelin induces a biphasic cytosolic calcium elevation characterized by a spike phase of the response, which reflects Ins(1,4,5)P3- dependent calcium mobilization of intracellular stores, and a sustained phase of the response, which is due to calcium influx across the plasma membrane triggered by aperture of capacitative calcium channels (store-operated calcium channels). Upon repeated administration, ghrelin showed a marked suppression of ghrelin-mediated elevations of intracellular calcium. This homologous desensitization represents an important physiological mechanism that modulates receptor responsiveness and acts as an information filter for intracellular signaling system. The discovery of ghrelin adds a new component to the complex machinery responsible for regulation of GH secretion in connection with the regulation of appetite and energy homeostasis.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Comparison between insulin tolerance test, growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRH plus acipimox and GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in normal subjects, obese and hypopituitary patients.

OBJECTIVE: It has been gradually realized that GH may have important physiological functions in adult humans. The biochemical diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin-tolerance test (ITT) is the best validated. The ITT has been challenged because of its low degree of reproducibility and lack of normal range, and is contra-indicated in common clinical situations. Furthermore, in severely obese subjects the response to the ITT frequently overlaps with those found in non-obese adult patients with GHD. DESIGN: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of four different stimuli of GH secretion: ITT, GHRH, GHRH plus acipimox (GHRH+Ac), and GHRH plus GHRP-6 (GHRH+GHRP-6), in two pathophysiological situations: hypopituitarism and obesity, and normal subjects. METHODS: Eight adults with hypopituitarism (four female, four male) aged 41-62 Years (48.8+/-1.4 Years), ten obese normal patients (five female, five male) aged 38-62 Years (48.1+/-2.5 Years), with a body mass index of 34.2+/-1.2 kg/m(2), and ten normal subjects (five female, five male) aged 33-62 Years (48.1+/-2.8 Years) were studied. Four tests were performed on each patient or normal subject: An ITT (0.1 U/kg, 0.15 U/kg for obese, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) preceded by acipimox (250 mg, orally, at -270 min and -60 min) (GHRH+Ac); and GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) plus GHRP-6 (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) (GHRH+GHRP-6). Serum GH was measured by radioimmunoassay. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon rank sum and by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: After the ITT the mean peak GH secretion was 1.5+/-0.3 microg/l for hypopituitary, 10.1+/-1.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 17.8+/-2.0 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH-induced GH secretion was 2+/-0.7 microg/l for hypopituitary, 3.9+/-1.2 microg/l (P=NS vs hypopituitary) for obese and 22.2+/-3.8 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. After GHRH+Ac, mean peak GH secretion was 3.3+/-1.4 microg/l for hypopituitary, 14.2+/-2.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 35.1+/-5.2 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH+GHRP-6 induced mean peak GH secretion of 4.1+/-0.9 microg/l for hypopituitary, 38.5+/-6.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 68.1+/-5.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal subjects. Individually considered, after ITT, GHRH or GHRH+Ac, the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal but higher than the minimal response in obese subjects. In contrast, after GHRH+GHRP-6 the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, in this group of patients, although both acipimox and GHRP-6 partially reverse the functional hyposomamotropism of obesity after GHRH, but are unable to reverse the organic hyposomatotropism of hypopituitarism, the combined test GHRH+GHRP-6 most accurately distinguishes both situations, without the side effects of ITT.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Physical activity or food intake prior to testing did not affect the reproducibility of GH secretion elicited by GH releasing hormone plus GH-releasing hexapeptide in normal adult subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults is a defined syndrome of which the adverse effects on different areas of body function are reversed under replacement therapy with GH. The diagnosis of GHD is controversial in adults, relying on the GH secretion elicited by the so-called provocative tests of GH reserve. Most of the tests in use, including the widely employed insulin tolerance test, have been shown to be blunted after daily activities, such as mild exercise, heat or food intake, which makes stringent testing conditions mandatory in order to assure reproducibility. The combined administration of GH releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) is a very effective test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. In the present study, the perturbatory action of mild physical activity and food intake on the reproducibility of this combined test was assessed. METHODS: Seventeen healthy volunteers of both sexes were tested twice on separate occasions with the sequential administration of GHRH (90 microg i.v.) plus GHRP-6 (90 microg i.v.) as bolus. Eleven subjects underwent the first combined test in the morning under basal conditions and the second test was performed in the afternoon of the same day after a morning of habitual working activity and after a standard lunch. Another group of six subjects underwent similar double testing in the morning and in the afternoon after morning activity followed by lunch; however, both tests were separated by a period of 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: GH levels were analysed by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay, with sampling every 15 minutes. RESULTS: The reproducibility of the GHRH + GHRP-6 test performed on the same day was high, with the mean GH peak being 65.4 +/- 8.0 microg/l in the basal state and 51.2 +/- 9.6 microg/l after lunch, while the area under the curve (AUC) was 2287 +/- 288 microg/l per 45 minutes in the morning and 1759 +/- 350 after lunch. When a period of 6 months had elapsed between the first and the second test, the reproducibility was well maintained with a mean GH peak of 42.7 +/- 6.2 microg/l in the basal state and 34.3 +/- 3.6 microg/l in the after lunch test, with the AUC 1463 +/- 209 and 1164 +/- 106 microg/l per 45 minutes in the morning and after lunch, respectively. When analysed individually, physical activity, lunch or time elapsed between the two tests did not significantly change the GH peak in the subjects tested. CONCLUSIONS: The GHRH + GHRP-6 test of GH reserve is a highly reproducible test in adult subjects over time, and is not perturbed by common daily activities, such as mild physical exercise or food intake. Considering that stringent testing conditions are not required and the whole test may be performed in 30 minutes, it may be useful in the clinical setting for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Effect of withdrawal of somatostatin plus GH-releasing hormone as a stimulus of GH secretion in obesity.

OBJECTIVES: Somatostatin (SS) may not merely be inhibitory to GH secretion but, under appropriate temporal conditions, may act in a paradoxically positive manner to sensitize somatotroph responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) produces a rebound GH rise in humans and increases GHRH-induced GH release. Theoretically, SSIW leaves the somatotroph cell in a situation of low endogenous SS. In obesity, there is markedly decreased GH secretion. In both children and adults, the greater the body mass index (BMI), the lower the GH response to provocative stimuli. It has been postulated that increased hypothalamic somatostatin secretion is the main mechanism responsible for the blunted GH secretion of obesity. There are no data evaluating GH responsiveness to SSIW plus GHRH in obese adults. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to SSIW plus GHRH in a group of control subjects and a group of obese patients. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Seven obese patients (six female, one male) with a BMI of 36.1 +/- 7.7 kg/m2 were studied. As a control group, seven normal subjects (six female, one male) with a BMI of 20.3 +/- 0.9 kg/m2 were also studied. Two tests were performed. On one day, somatostatin (SS) i.v. infusion (500 microg from 0-90 min) was performed followed by a placebo i.v. bolus 90 min after SS withdrawal (SSIW). On another day, SS i.v. infusion (500 microg from 0-90 min) was performed followed by a GHRH (100 microg) i.v. bolus 90 min after SS withdrawal. A second group of seven obese patients (six female, one male) with a BMI of 32.2 +/- 2.3 kg/m2 were studied. As a second control group, seven normal healthy subjects (six female, one male) with a BMI of 20.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m2 were also studied. On one day, saline infusion was performed followed by a placebo i.v. bolus at 90 min. On another day, saline infusion was performed followed by a GHRH (100 microg) i.v. bolus at 90 min. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. Serum GH was measured by chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal subjects showed a mean peak of 15.8 +/- 2.1 microg/l. Normal control subjects had a mean peak of 3.1 +/- 1.5 microg/l after SSIW-induced GH secretion. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was an increased GH secretion with a mean peak of 23.3 +/- 4.4 microg/l, significantly greater than the response after SSIW alone (P < 0.05) and GHRH alone (P < 0.05). GHRH-induced GH secretion in obese patients was decreased with a mean peak of 3.9 +/- 1.5 microg/l. In obese patients, GH secretion after SSIW was markedly decreased with a mean peak of 1.0 +/- 0.4 microg/l. When GHRH was administered after SSIW, an increase in GH secretion was observed with a mean peak of 4.3 +/- 0.9 microg/l, significantly greater than SSIW alone (P < 0.05) but not GHRH alone (P = NS), and significantly less than in normal subjects (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significantly blunted peak GH response to somatostatin infusion withdrawal plus GHRH in obese patients compared to normal subjects. In this theoretical situation of decreased somatostatinergic tone, there is persistence of GH hyposecretion in obesity, suggesting the existence of multiple defects responsible for decreased GH secretion in obesity. We also found that in obese patients, in contrast to normal subjects, SSIW did not increase GHRH-induced GH secretion.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The GH-releasing effect of ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue, is only blunted by the infusion of exogenous somatostatin in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28-amino-acid peptide purified from the stomach and showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at the serine 3 residue, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R). Ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion in both animals and humans, showing a synergistic effect with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) but no interaction with synthetic GHS. However, the activity of ghrelin as well as that of non-natural GHS is not fully specific for GH; ghrelin also induces a stimulatory effect on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion, at least in humans. DESIGN: To further clarify the mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing activity of this natural GHS, we studied the effects of somatostatin (SS, 2.0 microg/kg/h from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) in seven normal young male volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM) 28.6 +/- 2.9 years; body mass index (BMI) 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effect of SS on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microm/kg i.v. at 0 min) was also studied. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -30 up to +120 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels were assayed after ghrelin administration alone and during SS infusion. RESULTS: The GH response to ghrelin (hAUC0'-->120' 2695.0 +/- 492.6 microg min/l) was higher (P < 0.01) than that after GHRH (757.1 +/- 44.1 microg min/l). SS infusion almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (177.0 +/- 37.7 microg min/l, P < 0.01); the GH response to ghrelin was inhibited by SS (993.8 +/- 248.5 microg min/l, P < 0.01) but GH levels remained higher (P < 0.05) than with GHRH. Ghrelin induced significant increases in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels and these responses were not modified by SS. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin, a natural GHS-R ligand, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans and this effect is only blunted by an exogenous somatostatin dose which almost abolishes the GH response to GHRH. The stimulatory effect of ghrelin on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion is refractory to exogenous somatostatin, indicating that these effects occur through pathways independent of somatostatinergic influence.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2002

Effects of glucose, free fatty acids or arginine load on the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide purified from the stomach and showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester in serine-3 residue, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion. In humans, ghrelin is more potent than growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and non-natural GHS such as hexarelin. Moreover, ghrelin shows a true synergism with GHRH, has no interaction with hexarelin and, similarly to non-natural GHS, is partially refractory to the inhibitory effect of exogenous somatostatin (SS). Despite this evidence, the mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect of ghrelin in humans have not been fully clarified. SUBJECTS: To this aim we enrolled six normal young volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM) 28.9 +/- 3.1 year; body mass index 22.3 +/- 1.0 kg/m2). DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: In all subjects we studied the effects of glucose (OGTT, 100 g oral glucose at -45 min) or free fatty acids (FFA) load [lipid-heparin emulsion, Li-He, Intralipid 10% 250 ml + heparin 2500 U i.v. from -30 to +120 min] as well as of arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg infused from 0 to +30 min) on the GH response to human ghrelin (1.0 micro g/kg i.v. at 0 min) administration. These results were compared with those obtained by studying the effects of OGTT, Li-He and ARG on the GH response to GHRH-29 (1.0 micro g/kg i.v. at 0 min). RESULTS: The GH response to ghrelin (auc 5452.4 +/- 991.3 micro g/l/h) was higher (P < 0.05) than that after GHRH (1519.4 +/- 93.3 micro g/l/h). The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by OGTT (450.7 +/- 81.1 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) and almost abolished by Li-He (230.0 +/- 63.6 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) while was markedly potentiated by ARG (2520.4 +/- 425.8 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05). The GH response to GHRH + ARG, however, was lower (P < 0.05) than that to ghrelin alone. The GH response to ghrelin was blunted by OGTT (2153.1 +/- 781.9 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) as well as by Li-He (3158.8 +/- 426.7 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) but these responses remained higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH alone. On the other hand, ARG did not modify the GH response to ghrelin (6324.3 +/- 1275.5 micro g/l/h). For GH 1 micro g/l = 2 mU/l. CONCLUSIONS: In humans, ghrelin exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion which is partially refractory to the inhibitory effect of both glucose and FFA load and is not enhanced by ARG. These factors almost abolish and potentiate, respectively, the GH response to GHRH, at least partially, via modulation of hypothalamic SS release. Thus, our findings agree with the hypothesis that ghrelin as well as non-natural GHS acts, at least partially, by antagonizing SS activity.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Effect of withdrawal of somatostatin plus growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone as a stimulus of GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin (SS) may not merely be inhibitory to GH secretion but, under appropriate temporal conditions, may act in a paradoxically positive manner to sensitize somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH. SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) produces a rebound GH rise in humans and increases GHRH-induced GH release. Theoretically SSIW leaves the somatotroph cell in a situation of low endogenous SS. In Cushing's syndrome, GH secretion appears blunted to all stimuli. The mechanisms by which glucocorticoids impair GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome are unknown. There are no data evaluating GH responsiveness to SSIW plus GHRH in Cushing's syndrome patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to SSIW plus GHRH in a group of Cushing's syndrome patients, in order to further understand the deranged GH secretory mechanisms in Cushing's syndrome. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Eight female patients with Cushing's syndrome were studied. As a control group, eight normal subjects of similar age and sex were studied. Three tests were done. On one day, SS intravenous (i.v.) infusion (500 micro g for 0-90 min) was performed followed by placebo i.v. bolus at min 90 after SS withdrawal (SSIW). On another day, SS i.v. infusion (500 micro g for 0-90 min) was performed followed by GHRH (100 micro g) i.v. bolus at min 90 after SS withdrawal. On a third day, slow infusion of 150 mmol/l NaCl administration was performed followed by GHRH (100 micro g) i.v. bolus at min 90 after the start of the infusion. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. RESULTS: GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal subjects showed a mean peak of 15.4 +/- 2.1 micro g/l (conversion factor: 1 micro g/l = 1.2 mUI/l). Normal control subjects had a mean peak of 3.3 +/- 1.6 micro g/l after SSIW-induced GH secretion. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was increased GH secretion with a mean peak of 23.7 +/- 4.2 micro g/l significantly greater than the response after SSIW alone (P < 0.05) and GHRH alone (P < 0.05). The patients with Cushing's syndrome had a blunted GH response after GHRH administration with a mean peak of 1.4 +/- 0.4. After SSIW, Cushing's syndrome patients had a mean peak of 1.0 +/- 0.5 micro g/l. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was a similar GH response with a mean peak of 1.7 +/- 0.6 micro g/l, not statistically different than the response after SSIW alone (P = ns) and GHRH alone (P = ns). When we compare the response of normal subjects and Cushing's syndrome patients, after SSIW plus GHRH, it was decreased in Cushing's syndrome patients (P < 0.05), with a mean GH peak of 23.7 +/- 4.2 micro g/l and 1.7 +/- 0.6 micro g/l for normal subjects and Cushing's syndrome patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a significantly blunted peak GH response to somatostatin infusion withdrawal plus GHRH in Cushing's syndrome patients. In this theoretical situation of decreased somatostatinergic tone there is persistence of GH hyposecretion in Cushing's syndrome, suggesting the existence of a pituitary defect responsible for the decreased GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome.

Adult↗