Biomedical subjects

Carlos J Camacho

Publications and source records attributed to Carlos J Camacho.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Genetic and physical interactions reveal overlapping and distinct contributions to meiotic double-strand break formation in C. elegans.

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious lesions experienced by our genome. Yet, DSBs are intentionally induced during gamete formation to promote the exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes. While the conserved topoisomerase-like enzyme Spo11 catalyzes DSBs, additional regulatory proteins-referred to as 'Spo11 accessory factors'-regulate the number, timing, and placement of DSBs during meiotic prophase, ensuring that SPO-11 does not wreak havoc on the genome. Despite the importance of the accessory factors, they are poorly conserved at the sequence level, suggesting that these factors may adopt unique functions in different species. In this work, we present a detailed analysis of the genetic and physical interactions between the DSB factors in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, providing new insights into conserved and novel functions of these proteins. This work shows that HIM-5 is the determinant of X-chromosome-specific crossovers and that its retention in the nucleus is dependent on DSB-1, the sole accessory factor that interacts with SPO-11. We further provide evidence that HIM-5 mediates interactions with the different accessory factors subgroups, providing insights into how components on the DNA loops may interact with the chromosome axis.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions.

We show that the mechanism for molecular recognition requires one of the interacting proteins, usually the smaller of the two, to anchor a specific side chain in a structurally constrained binding groove of the other protein, providing a steric constraint that helps to stabilize a native-like bound intermediate. We identify the anchor residues in 39 protein-protein complexes and verify that, even in the absence of their interacting partners, the anchor side chains are found in conformations similar to those observed in the bound complex. These ready-made recognition motifs correspond to surface side chains that bury the largest solvent-accessible surface area after forming the complex (> or =100 A2). The existence of such anchors implies that binding pathways can avoid kinetically costly structural rearrangements at the core of the binding interface, allowing for a relatively smooth recognition process. Once anchors are docked, an induced fit process further contributes to forming the final high-affinity complex. This later stage involves flexible (solvent-exposed) side chains that latch to the encounter complex in the periphery of the binding pocket. Our results suggest that the evolutionary conservation of anchor side chains applies to the actual structure that these residues assume before the encounter complex and not just to their loci. Implications for protein docking are also discussed.

Antigen-Antibody Complex↗

PubMed2004

ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking.

ClusPro (http://nrc.bu.edu/cluster) represents the first fully automated, web-based program for the computational docking of protein structures. Users may upload the coordinate files of two protein structures through ClusPro's web interface, or enter the PDB codes of the respective structures, which ClusPro will then download from the PDB server (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/). The docking algorithms evaluate billions of putative complexes, retaining a preset number with favorable surface complementarities. A filtering method is then applied to this set of structures, selecting those with good electrostatic and desolvation free energies for further clustering. The program output is a short list of putative complexes ranked according to their clustering properties, which is automatically sent back to the user via email.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Consensus alignment server for reliable comparative modeling with distant templates.

Consensus is a server developed to produce high-quality alignments for comparative modeling, and to identify the alignment regions reliable for copying from a given template. This is accomplished even when target-template sequence identity is as low as 5%. Combining the output from five different alignment methods, the server produces a consensus alignment, with a reliability measure indicated for each position and a prediction of the regions suitable for modeling. Models built using the server predictions are typically within 3 A rms deviations from the crystal structure. Users can upload a target protein sequence and specify a template (PDB code); if no template is given, the server will search for one. The method has been validated on a large set of homologous protein structure pairs. The Consensus server should prove useful for modelers for whom the structural reliability of the model is critical in their applications. It is currently available at http://structure.bu.edu/cgi-bin/consensus/consensus.cgi.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes.

MOTIVATION: Predicting protein interactions is one of the most challenging problems in functional genomics. Given two proteins known to interact, current docking methods evaluate billions of docked conformations by simple scoring functions, and in addition to near-native structures yield many false positives, i.e. structures with good surface complementarity but far from the native. RESULTS: We have developed a fast algorithm for filtering docked conformations with good surface complementarity, and ranking them based on their clustering properties. The free energy filters select complexes with lowest desolvation and electrostatic energies. Clustering is then used to smooth the local minima and to select the ones with the broadest energy wells-a property associated with the free energy at the binding site. The robustness of the method was tested on sets of 2000 docked conformations generated for 48 pairs of interacting proteins. In 31 of these cases, the top 10 predictions include at least one near-native complex, with an average RMSD of 5 A from the native structure. The docking and discrimination method also provides good results for a number of complexes that were used as targets in the Critical Assessment of PRedictions of Interactions experiment. AVAILABILITY: The fully automated docking and discrimination server ClusPro can be found at http://structure.bu.edu

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty?

Are current docking methods capable of building complexes from putative component protein structures? Results of recent computational studies, including those of the CAPRI (Critical Assessment of Protein Interactions) competition, were used to determine the key properties for successful docking and introduce a classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty. Enzyme-inhibitor complexes could be determined with reasonable accuracy - possibly to within a few alternative structures. Results for antigen-antibody pairs are less predictable, and data for small signaling complexes are generally poor. However, moderate amounts of experimental data can remove uncertainty and the methodology is rapidly improving. Transient complexes with large interface areas undergo substantial conformational change and are beyond the reach of current docking methods. The docking of such complexes might therefore require fundamentally new approaches.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Successful discrimination of protein interactions.

We present results from the prediction of protein complexes associated with the first Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI) experiment. Our algorithm, SmoothDock, comprises four steps: (1) we perform rigid body docking using the program DOT, keeping the top 20,000 structures as ranked by surface complementarity; (2) we rerank these structures according to a free energy estimate that includes both desolvation and electrostatics and retain the top 2000 complexes; (3) we cluster the filtered complexes using a pairwise root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) criterion; (4) the 25 largest clusters are subject to a smooth docking discrimination algorithm where van der Waals forces are taken into account. We predicted targets 1, 6, and 7 with RMSDs of 9.5, 2.4, and 2.6 A, respectively. More importantly, from the perspective of biological applications, our approach consistently ranked the correct model first (i.e., with highest confidence). For target 5 we identified the binding region but not the correct orientation. Although we were able to find reasonable clusters for all targets, low-affinity complexes (K(d) < nM) were harder to discriminate. For four of seven targets, the top models predicted by our automated procedure were among the best communitywide predictions.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking.

Rigid body protein docking methods frequently yield false positive structures that have good surface complementarity, but are far from the native complex. The main reason for this is the uncertainty of the protein structures to be docked, including the positions of solvent-exposed sidechains. Substantial efforts have been devoted to finding near-native structures by rescoring the docked conformations and employing various filters. An alternative approach emulates the process of protein-protein association, that is, first finding the region in which binding is likely to occur and then refining the complex while allowing for flexibility.

Binding Sites↗