Biomedical subjects

Carlos M G Aragon

Publications and source records attributed to Carlos M G Aragon.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Acute administration of 3-nitropropionic acid, a reactive oxygen species generator, boosts ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. New support for the role of brain catalase in the behavioural effects of ethanol.

The antioxidant enzyme catalase by reacting with H(2)O(2), forms the compound known as compound I (catalase-H(2)O(2)). This compound is able to oxidise ethanol to acetaldehyde in the CNS. It has been demonstrated that 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NPA) induces the activity of the brain catalase-H(2)O(2) system. In this study, we tested the effect of 3-NPA on both the brain catalase-H(2)O(2) system and on the acute locomotor effect of ethanol. To find the optimal interval for the 3-NPA-ethanol interaction mice were treated with 3-NPA 0, 45, 90 and 135min before an ethanol injection (2.4mg/kg). In a second study, 3-NPA (0, 15, 30 or 45mg/kg) was administered SC to animals 90min before saline or several doses of ethanol (1.6 or 2.4g/kg), and the open-field behaviour was registered. The specificity of the effect of 3-NPA (45mg/kg) was evaluated on caffeine (10mg/kg IP) and cocaine (4mg/kg)-induced locomotion. The prevention of 3-NPA effects on both ethanol-induced locomotion and brain catalase activity by L-carnitine, a potent antioxidant, was also studied. Nitropropionic acid boosted ethanol-induced locomotion and brain catalase activity after 90min. The effect of 3-NPA was prevented by l-carnitine administration. These results indicate that 3-NPA enhanced ethanol-induced locomotion by increasing the activity of the brain catalase system.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2006

Voluntary ethanol consumption decreases after the inactivation of central acetaldehyde by d-penicillamine.

Acetaldehyde, the first metabolite of ethanol, may mediate some ethanol-induced effects. Previous research in our laboratory has shown that D-penicillamine, an inactivation agent for acetaldehyde, is effective in decreasing locomotor stimulation and conditioned place preference induced by ethanol in mice. In the present study, the effects of D-penicillamine on the voluntary consumption of ethanol were assessed. Male rats were offered ethanol under restricted access, without food or water deprivation. Daily availability of ethanol was limited to a 15-min period in the home cages. When the response for 10% ethanol was stable, rats received an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of D-penicillamine (0, 25, 50 or 75 mg/kg) over a 5-day period, given 30 min before exposure to ethanol. In a second study we determined the specificity of D-penicillamine effects (50 mg/kg) on voluntary sucrose consumption (3%). Another study was conducted to evaluate whether IP D-penicillamine (50 mg/kg) alters taste reactivity responses. In the final experiment, rats were treated with intracerobroventricular (ICV) infusions of D-penicillamine (75 microg) for 5 days before drinking ethanol or sucrose. D-Penicillamine was found to reduce ethanol intake in a dose-dependent manner. Sucrose consumption was also affected by this thiol amino acid. We also demonstrated that D-penicillamine produced changes in the ingestive and flavor properties of sucrose and ethanol, measured by means of a taste reactivity test. When D-penicillamine was administered ICV, only voluntary ethanol consumption was modified. These findings indicate that the central inactivation of acetaldehyde blocks ethanol intake in rats, and suggest that acetaldehyde plays a key role in the motivational properties of ethanol.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2006

Motor stimulant effects of ethanol injected into the substantia nigra pars reticulata: importance of catalase-mediated metabolism and the role of acetaldehyde.

A series of experiments was conducted to investigate the locomotor effects of local injections of ethanol and the ethanol metabolite, acetaldehyde, into substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). Infusions of ethanol into SNr resulted in a dose-related increase in locomotor activity, with maximal effects at a dose of 1.4 micromol. Ethanol injected into a control site dorsal to substantia nigra failed to stimulate locomotion, and another inactive site was identified in brainstem areas posterior to substantia nigra. The locomotor effects of intranigral ethanol (1.4 micromol) were reduced by coadministration of 10 mg/kg sodium azide, a catalase inhibitor that acts to reduce the metabolism of ethanol into acetaldehyde in the brain. SNr infusions of acetaldehyde, which is the first metabolite of ethanol, also increased locomotion. Taken together, these results indicate that SNr is one of the sites at which ethanol and acetaldehyde may be acting to induce locomotor activity. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that acetaldehyde is a centrally active metabolite of ethanol, and provide further support for the idea that catalase activity is a critical step in the regulation of ethanol-induced motor activity. These studies have implications for understanding the brain mechanisms involved in mediating the ascending limb of the biphasic dose-response curve for the effect of ethanol on locomotor activity.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2005

Ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, but not aversion, is blocked by treatment with D -penicillamine, an inactivation agent for acetaldehyde.

RATIONALE: There is evidence to suggest that acetaldehyde is involved in the control of ethanol-seeking behavior and reward. D -penicillamine, a thiol amino acid, is a highly selective agent for the inactivation of acetaldehyde. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that D -penicillamine prevents both behavioral stimulation induced by ethanol and acetaldehyde-produced locomotor depression in mice. OBJECTIVES: The contribution of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde to the affective effects of ethanol (preference and aversion) was assessed using an unbiased place conditioning design. METHODS: Male mice received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+: GRID+ or HOLE+) with injections of saline and ethanol (2 g/kg) given before (preference) or after (aversion) the 5-min exposure to the place conditioning apparatus. A different floor stimulus (CS-: GRID- or HOLE-), associated with saline-saline injections on alternate days, was presented. For a different group of animals, the pairings with the CS+ were associated with saline and ethanol injections, but on alternate days, they received D -penicillamine (50 or 75 mg/kg) and ethanol injections paired with the CS-floor stimulus. A 60-min preference test was carried out 24 h after the last conditioning trial. A similar procedure was followed to test the effect of D -penicillamine on morphine (16 mg/kg) and cocaine-induced (20 mg/kg) conditioned place preference (CPP). RESULTS: CPP and conditioned place aversion (CPA) were observed for ethanol, but D -penicillamine only blocked CPP. D -penicillamine, by itself, did not produce either rewarding or aversive effects. CPP observed for morphine and cocaine was unaffected by D -penicillamine pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that the selective inactivation of acetaldehyde blocked the rewarding, but not aversive, effects of ethanol and support the role of this ethanol metabolite in the affective properties of ethanol.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2005

Habituation to test procedure modulates the involvement of dopamine D2- but not D1-receptors in ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in mice.

RATIONALE: Novelty associated with behavioral testing has been shown to enhance psychostimulant- and morphine-induced locomotor stimulation. Evidence has demonstrated that novelty increases dopamine (DA) activity, and habituation to a novel environment reduces such activation. However, it is not clear whether novelty modulates ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation and whether DA plays a role in this effect. OBJECTIVES: The present work sought to demonstrate a role of habituation to test procedure as a factor that could modulate the involvement of DA in ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. METHODS: Non-habituated (NH) and habituated (H) Swiss mice pretreated with DA D1- (SCH23390; 0-0.045 mg/kg) or D2-receptor (sulpiride; 0-50 mg/kg) antagonists were tested for ethanol (0-2.5 g/kg)-induced locomotor stimulation. Experiments with amphetamine (0-4 mg/kg), morphine (0-5 mg/kg) and caffeine (0-15 mg/kg)were designed to compare their results to those obtained with ethanol. The effect of the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone (0-1.5 mg/kg) was also tested on ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. RESULTS: NH and H animals did not differ in their locomotor response to ethanol or caffeine; however, amphetamine- and morphine-induced stimulation was greater in NH than in H mice. SCH23390 only reduced ethanol-induced stimulation at doses that also reduced spontaneous activity in both NH and H mice. Sulpiride decreased ethanol-stimulated behavior only in the NH condition. Habituation did not modify the effect of sulpiride on amphetamine-, morphine- or caffeine-induced activation. Naltrexone (0-1.5 mg/kg) reduced ethanol-induced stimulation regardless of habituation. CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that the participation of DA D2-receptors in ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation requires the presence of novelty. Results also support the involvement of neurotransmitter systems other than DA (i.e., endogenous opioid system) as important substrates mediating ethanol-induced locomotor activation.

Amphetamine↗

PubMed2005

The role of opioid receptor subtypes in the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol.

Nonspecific blockade of opioid receptors has been found to prevent development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol. Whether this effect is achieved through a specific opioid receptor subtype, however, is not clear. The present study investigated, for the first time, the role of specific opioid receptor subtypes in the development of ethanol-(2.5 g/kg/day; six sessions) induced locomotor sensitization in mice. We confirmed previous results showing that the nonspecific antagonism of opioid receptors (naltrexone; 0-2 mg/kg) prevented the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol, an effect attained at doses presumed to occupy only mu opioid receptors. This was confirmed by using the selective mu opioid receptor antagonist CTOP (0-1.5 mg/kg), which also blocked sensitization to ethanol. The selective delta receptor antagonist, naltrindole (0-10 mg/kg), however, did not alter sensitization. We further assessed the role of mu opioid receptors in sensitization to ethanol by exploring the involvement of mu(1), mu(1+2), and mu(3) opioid receptor subtypes. Results of these experiments revealed that the blockade of mu(1) (naloxonazine; 0-30 mg/kg) or mu(3) opioid receptors (3-methoxynaltrexone; 0-6 mg/kg) did not prevent locomotor sensitization to ethanol. Using naloxonazine under treatment conditions that block mu(1+2) opioid receptor subtypes we observed a retarded sensitization. The present data suggest that the concurrent inactivation of all mu opioid receptor subtypes may be required to prevent the neural adaptations underlying the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol. In addition, these results support previous data suggesting a putative role for the mu opioid receptor endogenous ligand, beta-endorphin, and the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in ethanol sensitization.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2005

Effect of selective antagonism of mu(1)-, mu(1/2)-, mu(3)-, and delta-opioid receptors on the locomotor-stimulating actions of ethanol.

Previous studies have demonstrated that administration of nonspecific opioid antagonists such as naltrexone or naloxone reduces ethanol-induced locomotor activity in mice. However, because of their broad pharmacological profile, it remains unclear through which opioid receptor this antagonism is achieved. Therefore, the present study was aimed at further investigating the role of the different opioid receptors in ethanol-induced (2.5 g/kg) locomotion in mice. First, we compared the effect of naltrexone (0-2 mg/kg) on ethanol-induced locomotion with that of the selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist, naltrindole (0-10 mg/kg). Results of this first set of data revealed that naltrexone completely blocked this effect of ethanol at doses suggested to occupy only mu-opioid receptors, and naltrindole did not modify ethanol-induced locomotion. In a second set of experiments, we further investigated the involvement of mu-opioid receptors in ethanol-stimulated motor activity by assessing the implication of mu(1)-, mu(1/2)-, and mu(3)-opioid receptor subtypes. Results revealed that mu(1/2)-, and to a lesser extent mu(3)-, but not mu(1)-opioid receptor subtypes are involved in the psychomotor actions of ethanol. Data are discussed together with previous results which have emphasized the critical dependence of ethanol-induced motor behaviors on opioid receptors, as well as, of the integrity of beta-endorphin synthesizing neurons from the hypothalamic Arcuate Nucleus.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Brain catalase mediates potentiation of social recognition memory produced by ethanol in mice.

The involvement of catalase in ethanol-induced locomotion has been clearly proven. However, studies addressing the role of this enzyme in the effects that ethanol exerts on memory are lacking. In the present study, the social recognition test (SRT) was used to evaluate ethanol effects on memory. In this test, the reduction in investigation time of a juvenile conspecific, when this social stimulus is presented for the second time, is considered a reliable index of memory. Exploration ratios (ER) were calculated to evaluate the recognition capacity of mice. Ethanol (0.0, 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5g/kg, i.p.) was administered immediately after the first juvenile presentation, and 2h later the juvenile was re-exposed to the adult. Additionally, adult mice received aminotriazole (AT) or sodium azide (two catalase inhibitors) 5h or 30 min before juvenile presentation, respectively. Ethanol (1.0 and 1.5g/kg) was able to reduce ER, indicating an improving effect on memory. This improvement was prevented by either AT or sodium azide pre-treatment. However, neither AT nor sodium azide attenuated the memory-enhancing capacity of NMDA or nicotine, suggesting a specific interaction between catalase inhibitors and ethanol in their effects on memory. The present results suggest that brain catalase activity could mediate the memory-enhancing capacity of ethanol and add further support to the idea that this enzyme mediates some of the psychopharmacological effects produced by ethanol.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2005

The role of acetaldehyde in the central effects of ethanol.

This article represents the proceedings of a symposium at the 2004 annual meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism in Vancouver, Canada. The symposium was organized by Etienne Quertemont and chaired by Kathleen A. Grant. The presentations were (1) Behavioral stimulant effects of intracranial injections of ethanol and acetaldehyde in rats, by Mercè Correa, Maria N. Arizzi and John D. Salamone; (2) Behavioral characterization of acetaldehyde in mice, by Etienne Quertemont and Sophie Tambour; (3) Role of brain catalase and central formed acetaldehyde in ethanol's behavioral effects, by Carlos M.G. Aragon; (4) Contrasting the reinforcing actions of acetaldehyde and ethanol within the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of alcohol-preferring (P) rats, by William J. McBride, Zachary A. Rodd, Avram Goldstein, Alejandro Zaffaroni and Ting-Kai Li; and (5) Acetaldehyde increases dopaminergic transmission in the limbic system, by Milena Pisano and Marco Diana.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2005

Prevention of ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation by D-penicillamine: a sequestration agent for acetaldehyde.

BACKGROUND: D-Penicillamine, a sulfhydryl amino acid derived from penicillin, is a highly selective agent for sequestering in vivo acetaldehyde, the first metabolic product of ethanol. A substantial amount of research supports the idea that brain acetaldehyde, produced by central ethanol metabolism, plays a key role in determining some of the behavioral effects of ethanol administration. This study addressed two questions. First, we tested if D-penicillamine was able to modify the depressant effects of acetaldehyde on behavior. Second, we studied the effect of D-penicillamine on ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation. METHODS: Mice were pretreated with 75.00 mg/kg of D-penicillamine, and 30 min later, they received acetaldehyde at 0, 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Different groups of animals were treated with 0.0, 37.5, 75, 150, or 300 mg/kg of D-penicillamine simultaneously 30, 90, 150, or 210 min before the intraperitoneal administration of saline or 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, or 3.6 g/kg of ethanol, respectively. The specificity of D-penicillamine effects was addressed using two drugs: cocaine (4 mg/kg) and caffeine (15 mg/kg). RESULTS: Our results revealed that behavioral depression caused by acetaldehyde (200 and 300 mg/kg) could be attenuated by D-penicillamine treatment. In addition, D-penicillamine was also effective in lowering behavioral locomotion induced by ethanol (1.8 and 2.4 g/kg), without altering spontaneous locomotor activity. This sulfhydryl amino acid specifically modified the effect of ethanol on locomotion because cocaine- or caffeine-induced locomotion was unaffected. In addition, blood ethanol levels were not different between D-penicillamine- and saline-pretreated mice. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral effects produced by acetaldehyde and ethanol are blocked when animals are treated with D-penicillamine, an effective sequestration agent for acetaldehyde. These results suggest that some of the psychopharmacological effects, classically attributed to ethanol, could be mediated by its first metabolite, acetaldehyde.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2004

Catalase inhibition in the Arcuate nucleus blocks ethanol effects on the locomotor activity of rats.

Previous studies have demonstrated that there is a bidirectional modulation of ethanol-induced locomotion produced by drugs that regulate brain catalase activity. In the present study we have assessed the effect in rats of intraperitoneal, intraventricular or intracraneal administration of the catalase inhibitor sodium azide in the locomotor changes observed after ethanol (1 g/kg) administration. Our results show that sodium azide prevents the effects of ethanol in rats locomotion not only when sodium azide was systemically administered but also when it was intraventricularly injected, then confirming that the interaction between catalase and ethanol takes place in Central Nervous System (CNS). Even more interestingly, the same results were observed when sodium azide administration was restricted to the hypothalamic Arcuate nucleus (ARC), a brain region which has one of the highest levels of expression of catalase. Therefore, the results of the present study not only confirm a role for brain catalase in the mediation of ethanol-induced locomotor changes in rodents but also point to the ARC as a major neuroanatomical location for this interaction. These results are in agreement with our reports showing that ethanol-induced locomotor changes are clearly dependent of the ARC integrity and, especially of the POMc-synthesising neurons of this nucleus. According to these data we propose a model in which ethanol oxidation via catalase could produce acetaldehyde into the ARC and to promote a release of beta-endorphins that would activate opioid receptors to produce locomotion and other ethanol-induced neurobehavioural changes.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Opposite effects of acute versus chronic naltrexone administration on ethanol-induced locomotion.

Several studies have pointed out that the mu opioid receptor (MOR) can play a key role in some of the behavioural effects of ethanol. In the present study, the implication of the MOR in ethanol-induced locomotion in mice was assessed. First, the effects of the administration of different naltrexone doses (0.001-1.000 mg/kg) on the locomotor changes produced by ethanol (2.5 g/kg) were evaluated. In a second set of experiments, the ability of repeated naltrexone (6 mg/kg) administrations to modify the effects of ethanol was also assessed on mice locomotion. The results of the present study revealed that an acute naltrexone administration reduced dose-dependently ethanol-induced locomotion. Conversely, after repeated naltrexone injections, a transient boost of ethanol induced locomotor activity was observed. Thus, the results of the present study revealed that the effects of these naltrexone pretreatments on ethanol-induced locomotion are similar to the previously described changes on MOR activity. Moreover, the same (acute and chronic) naltrexone pretreatments produced similar changes on the locomotion of mice after a challenge with morphine (a MOR agonist), but not after tert-butanol (an alcohol which does not release beta-endorphins) administration. Therefore, our results are discussed in terms of the proved ability of ethanol to promote the release of beta-endorphins and, consequently, to activate the MOR.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Motor behavior and brain enzymatic changes after acute lead intoxication on different strains of mice.

Lead is a nonphysiological metal that has been implicated in toxic processes that affect several organ systems in humans and other animals. Although the brain generally has stronger protective mechanisms against toxic substances than other organs have, exposure to lead results in several neurophysiological and behavioral symptoms. The administration of a single injection (i.p.) of lead acetate in mice is a model of acute Pb2 + toxicity. In the present study, this model was used to explore the magnitude of the effect of different doses, time intervals and mice strains on several biobehavioral parameters. We investigated the effects of acute lead acetate administration on body and brain weight, brain lead acetate accumulation and specially, spontaneous locomotion and brain catalase activity. Lead acetate was injected i.p. in outbred (Swiss or CD1) and inbred (BALB/c, C57BL/J6 or DBA/2) mice at doses of 0, 50, 100, 150 or 200 mg/kg. At different time intervals following this acute treatment, several biochemical, physiological and behavioral responses were recorded. Results indicated that acute lead acetate has deleterious dose-dependent effects on brain and body weight. The effect on body weight in the present study was transient, although lead acetate was detected in neural tissues for several days after administration. Spontaneous locomotor activity only was reduced up until 24 hours. The effect of lead on body weight was strain-dependent, with Swiss mice showing greater resistance compared to the other strains. Total brain catalase activity in lead-pretreated Swiss mice showed a significant induction. This enzymatic upregulation could provide a protective mechanism for oxidative stress in these mice.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Brain catalase activity inhibition as well as opioid receptor antagonism increases ethanol-induced HPA axis activation.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that brain catalase activity is involved in the psychopharmacological actions of ethanol. Recent data suggest that participation of this enzymatic system in some ethanol effects could be mediated by the endogenous opioid system. The present study assessed whether brain catalase has a role in ethanol-induced activation of the HPA axis, a neuroendocrine system modulated by the endogenous opioid neurotransmission. METHODS: Swiss male mice received an intraperitoneal injection of the catalase inhibitor 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (AT; 0-1 g/kg), and 0 to 20 hr after this administration, animals received an ethanol (0-4 g/kg; intraperitoneally) challenge. Thirty, 60, or 120 min after ethanol administration, plasma corticosterone levels were determined immunoenzymatically. In addition, we tested the effects of 45 mg/kg of cyanamide (another catalase inhibitor) and 0 to 2 mg/kg of naltrexone (nonselective opioid receptor antagonist) on ethanol-induced enhancement in plasma corticosterone values. RESULTS: The present study revealed that AT boosts ethanol-induced increase in plasma corticosterone levels in a dose- and time-dependent manner. However, it did not affect corticosterone values when measured after administration of saline, cocaine (4 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), or morphine (30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). The catalase inhibitor cyanamide (45 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) also increased ethanol-related plasma corticosterone levels. These effects of AT and cyanamide on ethanol-induced corticosterone values were observed under treatment conditions that decreased significantly brain catalase activity. Indeed, a significant correlation between effects of catalase manipulations on both variables was found. Finally, we found that the administration of naltrexone enhanced the levels of plasma corticosterone after the administration of saline or ethanol. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the inhibition of brain catalase increases ethanol-induced plasma corticosterone levels. Results are discussed together with previous findings suggesting a putative linkage between brain ethanol metabolism and the endogenous opioid system to explain some of the neuroendocrine effects of ethanol.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Neonatal administration of monosodium glutamate prevents the development of ethanol- but not psychostimulant-induced sensitization: a putative role of the arcuate nucleus.

Lesions of the arcuate nucleus by monosodium glutamate, goldthioglucose and oestradiol valerate treatments are known to prevent the acute stimulating effect of ethanol in mice. On the basis of these results, the current study analysed whether a lesion of the arcuate nucleus by monosodium glutamate was able to block ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization. To produce the arcuate nucleus lesions, pups were injected with saline or monosodium glutamate (4 mg/g body weight) subcutaneously on 5 alternate days, starting on postnatal day one. Sensitization treatments began 10 weeks after the initial lesions. Sensitization training consisted of six trials on alternate days, in which groups of mice were treated with ethanol (2 g/kg) or saline, and then tested in an open-field for the induction of locomotor activity. The present study demonstrated that animals with monosodium glutamate-induced lesions did not develop locomotor sensitization to ethanol. Different groups of mice were used to assay blood ethanol levels and to evaluate the effect of arcuate nucleus lesions on psychostimulant-induced locomotor sensitization. Sensitization to cocaine or amphetamine was spared in monosodium glutamate-pre-treated animals, although the lesion of arcuate nucleus reduced the sensitivity of mice to cocaine. Our findings therefore suggest that the arcuate nucleus may be critical for the neuroadaptations that underlie the behavioural sensitization to ethanol, in contrast to those mediating psychostimulant-induced sensitization.

Alcoholism↗

PubMed2003

DDTC, a metabolite of disulfiram, reduces the stimulating effect on ethanol's locomotor activity in mice.

To investigate how diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) affects the stimulating effect of ethanol on open-field locomotion, mice were pretreated with different doses of DDTC 8 hours prior to ethanol. The effect of DDTC and saline on different ethanol doses was analyzed. DDTC reduces ethanol-induced locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner, not the spontaneous locomotor activity. Aldehyde dehydrogenase might influence psychopharmacological effects of ethanol.

Alcohol Deterrents↗

PubMed2002

Ethanol-stimulated behaviour in mice is modulated by brain catalase activity and H2O2 rate of production.

RATIONALE: Over the last few years, a role for the brain catalase-H(2)O(2) enzymatic system has been suggested in the behavioural effects observed in rodents after ethanol administration. This role seems to be related to the ability of cerebral catalase to metabolise ethanol to acetaldehyde using H(2)O(2)as a co-substrate. On the other hand, it has been shown that normobaric hyperoxia increases the rate of cerebral H(2)O(2) production in rodents in vivo. Thus, substrate-level changes could regulate brain catalase activity, thereby modulating the behavioural effects of ethanol. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess if the enhancement of cerebral H(2)O(2) production after hyperoxia exposure results in a boost of ethanol-induced locomotion in mice. METHODS: CD-1 mice were exposed to air or 99.5% O(2) inhalation (for 15, 30, or 45 min) and 0, 30, 60 or 120 min after this treatment, ethanol-induced locomotion was measured. The H(2)O(2)-mediated inactivation of endogenous brain catalase activity following an injection of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole was used as a measure of the rate of cerebral H(2)O(2) production. RESULTS: Hyperoxia exposure (30 or 45 min) potentiated the locomotor-stimulating effects of ethanol (2.5 or 3.0 g/kg), whereas cocaine (4 mg/kg) or caffeine (15 mg/kg)-induced locomotion and blood ethanol levels were unaffected. Moreover, the results also confirmed brain H(2)O(2) overproduction in mice. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that an increase in brain H(2)O(2) production potentiates ethanol-induced locomotion. Therefore, this study provides further support for the notion that the brain catalase-H(2)O(2) system, and by implication centrally formed acetaldehyde, plays a key role in the mediation of ethanol's psychopharmacological effects.

Amitrole↗

PubMed2002

Consequences of monosodium glutamate or goldthioglucose arcuate nucleus lesions on ethanol-induced locomotion.

It has been suggested that the endogenous opioid system, especially beta-endorphins, may play an important role in the behavioral effects of ethanol. The main site of beta-endorphin synthesis in the brain is the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (ARC). In the present study, we used the neurotoxins monosodium glutamate (MSG) or goldthioglucose (GTG) to produce a selective ARC lesion and to assess its effects on the locomotion observed after ethanol administration. The results show that MSG or GTG pre-treatment produces a blockade of the increased locomotion produced by the injection of low and moderate doses of ethanol (0.5 and 1.5 g/kg, respectively). These effects were observed in the absence of any change in blood ethanol levels. On the other hand, MSG (but not GTG) pre-treatment enhanced the locomotor depression produced by higher doses of this alcohol (2.5 g/kg). Finally, caffeine (10 mg/kg)-induced locomotion was unaffected by the aforementioned neurotoxic agents. Thus, taken together, the present results suggest that MSG and GTG administration produce a blockade of the stimulating effects of ethanol on locomotion in mice and thus provides further support for a role of the ARC in the behavioral effects observed after ethanol administration.

Animals↗