PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Caroline Boggis

Publications and source records attributed to Caroline Boggis.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Breaking bad news: qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning opportunity.

This paper analyses the effects of bringing together a small group of nursing and medical students to learn the skills needed to break bad news to patients. It outlines the qualitative and quantitative methods used, to provide the reader with a comprehensive account of the teaching, learning and research strategies drawn on during the study. The paper examines the evaluation phase, as this aspect is of greatest import if such initiatives are to flourish. The facet of the study analysed in detail concerns the students' responses to the open-ended qualitative questionnaires. In coding the data, three researchers independently highlighted a series of themes associated with the benefits and hazards of nursing and medical students learning and working together. Finally, the paper closes by arguing that trust and mutual respect are vital ingredients if collaborative working is to become part of the medical and nursing curriculum.

Clinical Competence↗

Interprofessional education in a midwifery curriculum: the learning through the exploration of the professional task project (LEAPT).

OBJECTIVE: to develop interprofessional education for students of midwifery, nursing and medicine. To foster collaborative working and learning between students of midwifery, nursing and medicine. DESIGN: a quasi-experimental method to evaluate the outcomes of an intervention (a problem-based learning (PBL) scenario) with interprofessional students and facilitators. Data were collected using pre- and post-test questionnaires. SETTING: a University and National Health Service healthcare facilities in the North of England. PARTICIPANTS: 40 students of midwifery, nursing and medicine. FINDINGS: student midwives participating in the PBL scenario in this interprofessional format improved their attitudes to working in this environment. All students enjoyed the opportunity to learn in an interprofessional team, and they felt that the experience provided a safe environment to help prepare for their future roles. The learning opportunity enabled all students to reflect on each other's role and to discuss differing perspectives of care, although the student midwives had mixed feelings about the PBL experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: interprofessional learning using PBL is a useful environment for students to learn about each others' role, and to prepare for working together as qualified professionals in a collaborative manner. However, time and commitment is required to plan joint working in order to maximise the benefits.

Curriculum↗

Bayesian evaluation of breast cancer screening using data from two studies.

The mean sojourn time (the duration of the period during which a cancer is symptom free but potentially detectable by screening) and the screening sensitivity (the probability that a screen applied to a cancer in the preclinical screen detectable period will result in a positive diagnosis) are two important features of a cancer screening programme. Little data from any single study are available on the potential effectiveness of mammographic screening for breast cancer in women with a family history of the disease, despite this being an important public health issue. We develop a method of estimation, from two separate studies, of the two parameters, assuming that transition from no disease to preclinical screen detectable disease, and from preclinical disease to clinical disease, are Poisson processes. Estimation is performed by a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. The method is applied to the synthesis of two studies of mammographic screening in women with a family history of breast cancer, one in Manchester and one in Kopparberg, Sweden.

Adult↗

Learning together: clinical skills teaching for medical and nursing students.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of shared learning of clinical skills for medical and nursing students at the University of Manchester. DESIGN: Medical and nursing students learned clinical skills in either uniprofessional or multiprofessional groups. These groups rotated through skills stations taught by multiprofessional facilitators. The groups stayed together for a series of 3 sessions held at weekly intervals (an induction meeting followed by 2 3-hour teaching sessions). Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to evaluate the project. CONTEXT: A total of 113 Year 3 students registered on the Medical (n = 41), Bachelor of Nursing (Honours) (n = 43) or the Diploma for Professional Studies in Nursing (n = 29) courses participated in the project which was set in the clinical skills unit of a teaching hospital. RESULTS: Pre- and post self-evaluation of confidence levels for the taught skills revealed a statistically significant increase for all skills. The primary reason students gave for participation in the project was to learn or consolidate skills. An additional inducement for participation was the opportunity to share knowledge and observations between professional groups. Tutors also evaluated the experience favourably, particularly with regard to small group discussions. They indicated that the programme provided an opportunity to standardise clinical skills teaching. CONCLUSION: Collaborative learning opportunities for nursing and medical students are feasible and add value to the learning experience. Data indicate positive outcomes of learning in multiprofessional groups, comprising increased confidence levels, increased understanding of others' professional roles and personal development.

Clinical Competence↗

Learning together: use of simulated patients with nursing and medical students for breaking bad news.

This article reports a small research study on the use of simulated patients for teaching medical and nursing students how to break bad news. A total of 34 nursing and medical students undertook the activity in mixed groups. Data obtained from free response questionnaires and a focus group were analysed and independently coded to identify recurrent themes across the data and the two student groups. Students reported that simulated patients gave instant feedback about their performance which they found useful. Students felt that working in doctor-nurse pairs helped them formulate strategies for imparting the bad news and that this made them feel better prepared and less isolated. The article outlines why the use of simulated patients may be valuable and suggests that this form of teaching could be used in other types of communications training. The use of simulated patients appears to have the potential to enhance patient-practitioner and practitioner-practitioner interactions.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Costs and benefits of a one stop clinic compared with a dedicated breast clinic: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost to the NHS and the impact on anxiety of a one stop clinic for assessing women with suspected breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 35 or over referred with a breast lump. STUDY SETTING: Teaching hospital, north west England. INTERVENTIONS: Women were randomly allocated to attend a one stop clinic or a dedicated breast clinic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in mean anxiety from baseline at 24 hours after the first visit and at 3 weeks and 3 months after diagnosis; mean cost per patient. RESULTS: 670 women were randomised. Compared with women who attended the dedicated clinic, patients attending the one stop clinic were less anxious 24 hours after the visit (adjusted mean change in state anxiety _5.7 (95% confidence interval _8.4 to _3.0)) but not at 3 weeks or 3 months after diagnosis. The additional cost to the NHS of a one stop attendance was pound 32 per woman; this was largely explained by greater cytopathological and radiological staff costs. CONCLUSION: One stop clinics may not be justified in terms of a reduction in short term anxiety.

Adult↗