PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Carolyn D Runowicz

Publications and source records attributed to Carolyn D Runowicz.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

American cancer society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer.

An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer, based on recommendations from a formal review and recent workshop, is presented. The new screening recommendations address when to begin screening, when screening may be discontinued, whether to screen women who have had a hysterectomy, appropriate screening intervals, and new screening technologies, including liquid-based cytology and HPV DNA testing.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of cervix cancer: clinical experience with and without chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: In recent years, high-dose-rate brachytherapy has become popular in the management of carcinoma of the uterine cervix, because it eliminates many of the problems associated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. However, the optimum time-dose-fractionation remains controversial. Two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy are convenient for patients, but most radiation oncologists in the United States do not use them, because of fear that they could lead to excessive rectal or bladder toxicity. Here we present our experience, which suggests that a two-fraction regimen is indeed safe and effective. METHODS: We treated 49 patients with Stages I-III biopsy-proven carcinoma of the uterine cervix by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), plus two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 43 patients (88%) and nonsquamous in 6 (12%). The median size of the primary tumor was 6 cm (range: 3-10 cm). Each patient received EBRT to the pelvis to a median dose of 45 Gy (range: 41.4-50.4 Gy), followed by a parametrial boost when indicated. Thirty patients (61%) also received irradiation to the para-aortic lymph nodes to a dose of 45 Gy. After EBRT, each patient underwent two applications of high-dose-rate brachytherapy, 1 week apart. The dose delivered to point A was 9 Gy per application for 49 applications (50%) and 9.4 Gy for 43 applications (44%), and it varied from 7 to 11 Gy for the rest (6%). The total dose to the rectum from both high-dose-rate brachytherapy applications ranged from 4.7 to 11.7 Gy (median: 7.1 Gy), and the total dose to the bladder from 3.8 to 15.5 Gy (median: 10.5 Gy). Twenty-five of the 49 patients (51%) received concomitant chemotherapy (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days) during the first and fourth weeks of EBRT and once after the second high-dose-rate brachytherapy application. Chemotherapy was not assigned in a randomized fashion. The use of chemotherapy increased during the time period spanned by this study as increasing evidence supporting the use of chemotherapy began to appear. RESULTS: The observed survival rates after 2, 3, and 5 years were 83%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. The surviving patients have been followed up for a median of 3 years (range: 2-6 years). Eight of the 49 patients suffered local failures. Among patients treated without chemotherapy, the 3-year local control rate was 77%; it was 88% among those receiving chemotherapy. There have been no regional failures. Four patients developed distant metastases. At 3 years, 91% of the patients in each group were free of distant metastases. Ten of the 49 patients (20%) suffered Grade 3 acute toxicity; 11 (22%) had Grade 4. Among the 24 patients treated without chemotherapy, only 1 (4%) suffered Grade 3 toxicity. Among the 25 patients receiving chemotherapy, in contrast, 8 (32%) suffered Grade 3 and 12 (48%) Grade 4 acute toxicity. Only 2 patients suffered late toxicity: One suffered Grade 2 and the other Grade 3 late toxicity. The actuarial risk of Grade 2 or worse late toxicity was 5%, with or without chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy are safe and effective in the management of cervix cancer, even in conjunction with concomitant cisplatin. The fears that the use of two fractions would lead to excessive rectal or bladder toxicity proved unfounded. Guidelines for ensuring a low complication rate are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Phase I clinical trial of parenteral hydroxyurea in combination with pelvic and para-aortic external radiation and brachytherapy for patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix.

PURPOSE: Oral hydroxyurea (HU) is a potent radiation sensitizer, but in vitro studies have suggested that prolonged exposure to HU by way of continuous parenteral infusion would enhance clinical efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose and identify the toxicities of continuous infusion HU in combination with pelvic and para-aortic external beam radiotherapy (RT) and intrauterine brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS: This Phase I study of concomitant RT was designed with an escalating dose schedule of HU administered by continuous infusion. HU was administered parenterally as a continuous infusion, 5 d/wk, during the first 21 days of external radiation, during the final 5 days of external beam RT, followed by another 5-day infusion schedule bracketing the single fraction of brachytherapy. The maximal tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose level at which 3 of 3 or 5 of 6 patients could be treated without dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: At dose level 1 (0.25 mg/m(2)/min), 0 of 4 patients experienced Grade 4 toxicities and 2 patients experienced Grade 3 hematologic toxicities that were not considered dose-limiting. One of the first 4 patients at level 2 (0.375 mg/m(2)/min) had Grade 3 diarrhea, but the 3 subsequent patients tolerated the dose. At level 3 (0.5 mg/m(2)/min), 4 of 5 patients failed to complete therapy without a >7-day interruption in HU. CONCLUSIONS: The maximal tolerated dose of parenteral HU was 0.375 mg/m(2)/min when administered with concomitant RT. The most common toxicities were hematologic. A new trial, incorporating concurrent cisplatin, HU, and RT is planned.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Expression of COX-2, Ki-67, cyclin D1, and P21 in endometrial endometrioid carcinomas.

COX-2, the isoform of cyclooxygenase inducible by cytokines, mitogens, and growth factors, appears to play an important role in inflammation and carcinogenesis. In the colon, COX-2 overexpression results in cell cycle alterations, and NSAIDs have proven effective in cancer chemoprevention. HNPCC (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) is a clinically defined cancer susceptibility syndrome in which women are also at significantly increased risk for the development of endometrial carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate expression of COX-2 in benign and malignant endometrium in the context of other cell cycle and proliferation markers, including Ki-67, cyclin D1, and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21. Immunostains with COX-2, Ki-67, cyclin D1, and p21 antibodies were performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 40 cases: 10 benign (5 atrophic and 5 proliferative) endometria, 6 hyperplasias (complex without atypia), and 24 endometrioid carcinomas (9 well, 4 moderately, and 11 poorly differentiated). Ki-67 was positive in all proliferative and neoplastic endometria. Cyclin D1 and p21 were both overexpressed in endometrial hyperplasia and endometrioid carcinomas. COX-2 was negative in the nonneoplastic endometrium, stained minimally in the well-differentiated endometrioid carcinomas, and stained most strongly in the moderately and poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinomas. Because cyclin D1 may function as an oncogene, its effects may dominate the usual inhibitory effect of a rising p21. Alternatively, it has been shown that p21 can promote cell cycle function by stabilizing cell cycle complexes. The overexpression of COX-2 in poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinoma and lack of expression in hyperplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma suggests that in this form of cancer, COX-2 may play a role in tumor progression rather than tumor initiation.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2002

Utilization of the human genome sequence localizes human papillomavirus type 16 DNA integrated into the TNFAIP2 gene in a fatal cervical cancer from a 39-year-old woman.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to characterize a human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 DNA integration in the genome of a rapidly progressive, lethal cervical cancer in a 39-year-old woman. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: An HPV 16 integration site from cervical cancer tissue was cloned and analyzed using Southern blot hybridization, nucleotide sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for chromosomal localization and comparison with the draft human genome sequence. RESULTS: HPV 16 DNA (3826 bp) was integrated into the genome of the tumor sample and contained an intact upstream regulatory region and E6 and E7 open reading frames. Both 5' and 3' viral-cell junction regions contained direct repeat and palindrome sequences. The chromosomal location of the viral integration and cellular deletion was mapped to chromosome 14q32.3 using both a somatic cell hybrid panel and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Search of the draft human genome sequence confirmed the chromosomal location and revealed a disruption of the TNFAIP2 cytokine/retinoic acid-inducible gene. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the lack of sequence homology between the viral and cellular site of integration and the structure of the viral-cell junctions, it seems that HPV 16 DNA integrates into the host genome by a mechanism of nonhomologous recombination. We suggest that, taken together, maintenance of E6 and E7 expression, loss of the E2 gene and disruption of the TNFAIP2 gene through viral integration contributed to the rapid progression of cervical cancer in this patient. Availability of the human genome sequence will facilitate identification of cellular genes involved in cervical cancer by high-throughput analysis of viral integration sites.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Genetic counseling, testing, and screening for breast and ovarian cancer: practical and social considerations.

Breast and ovarian cancer are complex diseases that develop from multiple genetic alterations. In an era of genomics and advancing technologies, scientific knowledge regarding specific mechanisms of cancer development is evolving rapidly. In this context, identifying women with hereditary breast or ovarian cancer syndrome is becoming more complicated. Cancer genetic counselors must convey new scientific information, accurately assess cancer risk, and offer available options for genetic testing and medical interventions when there are still more questions than definitive answers.

Breast Neoplasms↗