PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Casey N Stoner

Publications and source records attributed to Casey N Stoner.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Contrast administration reduces interobserver variability in determination of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and good baseline endocardial border delineation.

Echocardiographic contrast agents improve endocardial border delineation in patients with technically difficult baseline studies. With medical and device therapy for heart failure increasingly based on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) partition values, the accurate and reproducible assessment of LV function is necessary. It was hypothesized that routine contrast enhancement would significantly reduce interobserver variability in the determination of LVEFs in a cohort of patients with LV dysfunction and good baseline endocardial delineation. All patients underwent baseline noncontrast studies followed by contrast-enhanced imaging using Definity. Two experienced echocardiographers, blinded to the clinical data, determined LVEFs using 4 different techniques: noncontrast estimated (NCE), noncontrast calculated (NCC), contrast estimated (CE), and contrast calculated (CC). Using a mixed-model procedure that allows for fixed and random events, the variance due to error and that due to the patient was obtained (interclass correlation). The proportion of variation due to the reader was calculated as 1--interclass correlation. Mean standardized percentage differences ([reader 1 EF--reader 2 EF]/mean EF) were also calculated for each method. The proportion of variation due to the reader was smallest in the CC group and largest in the NCC group (NCE = 0.21, NCC = 0.33, CE = 0.25, CC = 0.11). The results were similar when only patients with NCE EFs >or=20% and or=20% and or=20% and <or=50%.

Cohort Studies↗

Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting late mortality in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction.

We investigated whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) performed soon after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves risk stratification for late mortality. MCE after AMI identifies microvascular "no-reflow" and predicts early outcomes; however, the predictive value of MCE for late mortality is unknown. One hundred sixty-seven patients with anterior AMI and left ventricular dysfunction underwent MCE 2 days after admission, and a perfusion score index (PSI) was calculated. Long-term follow-up (mean 39 months) was available for all patients. Patients with normal and abnormal perfusion had similar baseline characteristics. Myocardial contrast echocardiographic PSI was a predictor of mortality as a continuous variable (odds ratio 3.2 for each 1.0 increase in PSI, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 9.7, p = 0.04). In a logistic regression model, age (odds ratio 2.6 per decade, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 4.4, p = 0.0002) and PSI (odds ratio 4.5 for each 1.0 increase in PSI, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 15.4, p = 0.02) were the only significant predictors of mortality. In a subanalysis comparing patients >70 years old with abnormal PSI with all other patients, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a marked difference in survival over a mean follow-up of 39 months (24% vs 4% mortality, p = 0.0002). In conclusion, MCE refines risk stratification soon after anterior AMI in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Patients at very high and very low risk of mortality can be identified, and myocardial contrast echocardiographic data are incrementally useful compared with existing clinical and angiographic variables.

Adult↗