PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Catharie Nass

Publications and source records attributed to Catharie Nass.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Long-term variations in human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I and HTLV-II proviral loads and association with clinical data.

BACKGROUND: The human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I or -II proviral load (VL) may be linked to viral pathogenesis, but prospective data on VL and disease outcomes are lacking. METHODS: Using data from a prospective cohort study of HTLV disease outcomes, we examined baseline VLs with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 122 HTLV-I- and 319 HTLV-II-infected subjects and serial VLs over the course of 6 visits in a subset of 30 HTLV-I- and 30 HTLV-II-infected subjects. Cox and logistic-regression models were used to test baseline associations, and repeated-measures analysis was used to study variations in VL over time. RESULTS: Over the course of a median of 10.4 years, HTLV-I VLs decreased slightly (slope, -0.017 log(10) copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]/year; P=.042) and HTLV-II VLs did not change (slope, -0.019 log(10) copies/10(6) PBMCs/year; P=.165). Changes in VL over time were associated positively with alcohol use (P=.07) and negatively with black race (P=.03) for HTLV-I and positively with smoking (P=.08) for HTLV-II. In the larger group, there was no association between baseline VL and disease outcomes. In the smaller group with serial VL data, there was an association between increasing VL and bladder or kidney infections for both HTLV-I (P=.005) and HTLV-II (P=.022). CONCLUSIONS: HTLV VLs are stable over time, but alcohol and tobacco intake may affect the progression of VLs. The association between increasing VLs and bladder/kidney infection may be explained by early HTLV-related neuropathologic progression.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The donor notification process from the donor's perspective.

BACKGROUND: Despite large numbers of blood donors being notified of abnormal infectious disease screening results, there has been little scientific study of the effects of this process. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With a 28-item questionnaire, an anonymous mail survey was conducted of 4141 blood donors notified of 15 distinct categories of abnormal infectious disease screening and confirmatory test results. RESULTS: The survey had a 42 percent response rate, and 10 percent of the respondents did not recall being notified of their results. Of the 1556 respondents who recalled being notified, 27 percent contacted the blood center for further information, 60 percent discussed their results with a health care provider, and 73 percent of permanently or indefinitely deferred donors correctly understood their deferral status. Confusion and emotional upset were reported in 81 and 75 percent of notified donors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The notification process appears to achieve most of its aims in the majority of donors. Nevertheless, some donors did not understand that they were ineligible for future donation, and many donors were confused and upset. These data indicate that the adverse impact of notifying donors about abnormal test results needs to be considered when new blood donor screening tests and confirmatory algorithms are being licensed and implemented. Further studies of the effectiveness of newer revised donor notification materials are needed.

Adult↗