Biomedical subjects

Catherine E Stewart

Publications and source records attributed to Catherine E Stewart.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Factors affecting the stability of visual function following cessation of occlusion therapy for amblyopia.

AIM: To identify factors that predict which children with amblyopia are at greatest risk of regression of visual acuity (VA) following the cessation of occlusion therapy. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed of 182 children (mean age at cessation of treatment; 5.9+/-1.6 years) who had undergone occlusion therapy for unilateral amblyopia, and had been followed up at least once within 15 months of cessation. Statistical analysis was used to identify whether change in VA following treatment cessation had any association with various factors, including the child's age, type of amblyopia, degree of anisometropia, initial severity of amblyopia, binocular vision status, length and dose of occlusion therapy, and VA response to treatment. RESULTS: At 1 year, follow-up from treatment cessation, children with "mixed" amblyopia (both anisometropia and strabismus) demonstrated significantly (p=0.03) greater deterioration in VA (0.11+/-0.11 log units) than children with only anisometropia (0.02+/-0.08 log units) or only strabismus (0.05+/-0.10 log units). However, none of the other factors investigated were found to be significant predictors. CONCLUSION: This study supports previous research that it is possible to identify those children most at risk of deterioration in VA following cessation of occlusion therapy. The presence of mixed amblyopia was the only risk factor identified in this study. Management of amblyopia should take this into account, with a more intensive follow-up recommended for those with both anisometropia and strabismus (mixed) amblyopia.

Amblyopia↗

PubMed2006

Intermediate spatial frequency letter contrast sensitivity: its relation to visual resolution before and during amblyopia treatment.

We examined the loss of letter contrast sensitivity (LCS) measured using the Pelli-Robson chart, and the extent to which any such loss was modulated by spectacle wear and occlusion therapy in children participating in an amblyopia treatment trial. Their initial mean interocular difference in logMAR acuity was approximately three times that of their LCS (0.45 vs 0.14 log units). Log LCS was weakly though significantly correlated with logMAR visual acuity (VA) for all VAs better than 0.90 (r = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.28 to -0.10) whereas for all VAs of 0.90 or poorer, log LCS was markedly and significantly correlated with VA (r = -0.72, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.53). LCS in those children with a > or =0.1 log unit interocular difference on this test improved commensurately with VA during treatment. We conjecture that the spatial visual loss in all but the most severe amblyopes occurs in an area of resolution and contrast space that lies beyond that sampled by the Pelli-Robson chart.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of logMAR ETDRS chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children.

The validity and repeatability of visual acuity measures are particularly important in the detection and monitoring of childhood visual anomalies such as amblyopia. The repeatability and sensitivity of a new computerised visual acuity test, 'Staircased Procedure' is compared with the now gold standard visual acuity test, the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS). Twenty-seven visually normal children (mean age: 6.7 +/- 1.1 years) and 27 children with amblyopia (mean age: 6.1 +/- 0.7 years) were tested with the ETDRS and Staircased Procedure. A retest was administered 4-5 weeks later and 30 min later for the visually normal and the amblyopic children, respectively. The staircased procedure produced significantly better visual acuity than the ETDRS for visually normal and amblyopic children. Repeatability was similar for both tests (ETDRS: 0.11 log units; staircased procedure: 0.13 log units). In conclusion, the Staircased Procedure was an acceptable test with high repeatability and validity.

Amblyopia↗

PubMed2005

Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: factors influencing visual outcome.

PURPOSE: To identify factors that influence the outcome of treatment for unilateral amblyopia, as a part of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). METHODS: This was an intervention study consisting of three nonoverlapping phases: "Baseline", "refractive adaptation" (18 weeks of full-time spectacle wear), and "occlusion" (6 hours of patching per day, objectively monitored). Condition factors: type of amblyopia, age of participant, initial severity of amblyopia, fixation, and binocular vision status; treatment factors: refractive adaptation and occlusion (total dose [hours] and dose rate [hours per day]) were assessed for their influence on visual outcome. Visual outcome was expressed in three ways: logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) change, residual amblyopia, and proportion of the deficit corrected. RESULTS: The study included 85 participants (mean age, 5.1 +/- 1.4 years) with amblyopia associated with strabismus (n = 32) or anisometropia (n = 20) or associated with both anisometropia and strabismus (n = 33). Treatment factors: cumulative occlusion dose exceeding 50 hours, and dose rates > or =1 hour per day resulted in (P < or = 0.01) lower residual amblyopia and a greater proportion of the deficit corrected. Condition factors associated with poor outcome (high residual amblyopia) were presence of eccentric fixation, severe initial amblyopia, and no binocular vision. CONCLUSIONS: Factors influencing outcome with treatment for amblyopia are occlusion dose (the rate of delivery and cumulative dose worn), the initial severity of the amblyopia, binocular vision status, fixation of the amblyopic eye, and the age of the subject at the start of treatment.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2004

Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).

PURPOSE: Amblyopia is the commonest visual disorder of childhood. Yet the contributions of the two principal treatments (spectacle wear and occlusion) to outcome are unknown. This study was undertaken to investigate the dose-response relationship of amblyopia therapy. METHODS: The study comprised three distinct phases: baseline, in which repeat measures of visual function were undertaken to confirm the initial visual deficit; refractive adaptation: an 18-week period of spectacle wear with six weekly measurements of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity; occlusion: in which participants were prescribed 6 hours of "patching" per day. In the latter phase, occlusion was objectively monitored and logMAR visual acuity recorded at 2-week intervals until any observed gains had ceased. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 94 participants (mean age, 5.1 +/- 1.4 years) with amblyopia associated with strabismus (n = 34), anisometropia (n = 23), and both anisometropia and strabismus (n = 37). Eighty-six underwent refractive adaptation. Average concordance with patching was 48%. The relationship between logMAR visual acuity gain and total occlusion dose was monotonic and linear. Increasing dose rate beyond 2 h/d hastened the response but did not improve outcome. More than 80% of the improvement during occlusion occurred within 6 weeks. Treatment outcome was significantly better for children younger than 4 years (n = 17) than in those older than 6 years (n = 24; P = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous objective monitoring of the amount of patching therapy received has provided insight into the dose-response relationship of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Patching is most effective within the first few weeks of treatment, even for those in receipt of a relatively small dose. Further studies are needed to elucidate the neural basis for the dose-response functions.

Adaptation, Physiological↗